mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-12-30 04:15:21 +00:00
bb25f85ce8
This was intended to be a small followup for https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23712, but...here we are. 1. Our docs currently use `slug` as the entire URL, which makes refactoring tricky (see https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23712). Instead, this PR attempts to make future refactoring easier by using slugs as an extension of the section. (Hugo terminology) - What the above boils down to is this PR attempts to use directory organization as URL management. e.g. `usage/comparison.en-us.md` -> `en-us/usage/comparison/`, `usage/packages/overview.en-us.md` -> `en-us/usage/packages/overview/` - Technically we could even remove `slug`, as Hugo defaults to using filename, however at least with this PR it means `slug` only needs to be the name for the **current file** rather than an entire URL 2. This PR adds appropriate aliases (redirects) for pages, so anything on the internet that links to our docs should hopefully not break. 3. A minor nit I've had for a while, renaming `seek-help` to `support`. It's a minor thing, but `seek-help` has a strange connotation to it. 4. The commits are split such that you can review the first which is the "actual" change, and the second is added redirects so that the first doesn't break links elsewhere. --------- Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
19 KiB
19 KiB
date | title | slug | weight | toc | draft | aliases | menu | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-05-07T13:00:00+02:00 | 比較 Gitea 和其它自託管 Git 服務 | comparison | 5 | false | false |
|
|
比較 Gitea 和其它自託管 Git 服務
目錄
{{< toc >}}
為了幫助您判斷 Gitea 是否適合您的需求,這裡列出了它和其它自託管 Git 服務的比較。
請注意我們不會經常檢查其它產品的功能異動,所以這份清單可能過期,如果您在下方表格中找到需要更新的資料,請在 GitHub 的 Issue 回報。
表格中使用的符號:
-
✓ - 支援
-
⁄ - 有限度的支援
-
✘ - 不支援
-
⚙️ - 由第三方服務或外掛程式支援
一般功能
功能 | Gitea | Gogs | GitHub EE | GitLab CE | GitLab EE | BitBucket | RhodeCode CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
免費及開放原始碼 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ |
低資源使用 (RAM/CPU) | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
支援多種資料庫 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ⁄ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ |
支援多種作業系統 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ |
簡單的升級程序 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
支援 Markdown | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
支援 Orgmode | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ? |
支援 CSV | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ? |
支援第三方渲染工具 | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ? |
Git 驅動的靜態頁面 | ⚙️, ⚙️ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
Git 驅動的整合 wiki | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
部署 Token | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
有寫入權限的儲存庫 Token | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
內建 Container Registry | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
對外部 Git 鏡像 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
FIDO (2FA) | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
內建 CI/CD | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
子群組: 群組中的群組 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
程式碼管理
功能 | Gitea | Gogs | GitHub EE | GitLab CE | GitLab EE | BitBucket | RhodeCode CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
儲存庫主題描述 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
儲存庫程式碼搜尋 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
全域程式碼搜尋 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Git LFS 2.0 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ⁄ | ✓ |
群組里程碑 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
精細的使用者權限(程式碼, 問題, Wiki 等) | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
驗證提交者 | ⁄ | ✘ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
GPG 簽署提交 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
拒絕未經簽署的提交 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
儲存庫動態頁 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
分支管理 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
建立新分支 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
網頁程式碼編輯器 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
提交線圖 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
儲存庫範本 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
問題追蹤器
功能 | Gitea | Gogs | GitHub EE | GitLab CE | GitLab EE | BitBucket | RhodeCode CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
問題追蹤器 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
問題範本 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
標籤 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
時間追蹤 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
指派問題給多個成員 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
相關問題 | ✘ | ✘ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
機密問題 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
對留言的反應 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
鎖定對話 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
批次處理問題 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
問題看板(看板方法) | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
從問題建立新分支 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
問題搜尋 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
全域問題搜尋 | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
問題相依 | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
從電子郵件建立問題 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
服務台 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
拉取/合併請求
功能 | Gitea | Gogs | GitHub EE | GitLab CE | GitLab EE | BitBucket | RhodeCode CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拉取/合併請求 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Squash 合併 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Rebase 合併 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ⁄ | ✘ | ✓ |
拉取/合併請求的行內留言 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
拉取/合併請求的核可 | ✓ | ✘ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
解決合併衝突 | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
限制某些使用者的推送及合併 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
還原指定的提交或合併請求 | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
拉取/合併請求範本 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
Cherry-picking 變更 | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
下載 Patch | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | / | ✘ |
第三方整合
功能 | Gitea | Gogs | GitHub EE | GitLab CE | GitLab EE | BitBucket | RhodeCode CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
支援 Webhook | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
自訂 Git Hook | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
整合 AD / LDAP | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
支援多重 LDAP / AD 伺服器 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
同步 LDAP 使用者 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
SAML 2.0 service provider | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
支援 OpenId Connect | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✘ |
整合 OAuth 2.0 (外部驗證) | ✓ | ✘ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
成為 OAuth 2.0 提供者 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
兩步驟驗證 (2FA) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
整合 Mattermost/Slack | ✓ | ✓ | ⁄ | ✓ | ✓ | ⁄ | ✓ |
整合 Discord | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
整合 Microsoft Teams | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ |
顯示外部 CI/CD 狀態 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |