Although it would be possible to modify these files, it would create
conflicts when rebasing. Instead, this commit removes them entirely
and another commit can start from scratch, borrowing content from the
original files.
The drawback of this approach is that some content updates from Gitea
that also need updating in Forgejo will have to be copy/pasted
instead of being merged.
(cherry picked from commit eb85782115)
(cherry picked from commit 34401f2004)
Backport #23054
Partially fix#23050
After #22294 merged, it always has a warning log like `cannot get
context cache` when starting up. This should not affect any real life
but it's annoying. This PR will fix the problem. That means when
starting up, getting the system settings will not try from the cache but
will read from the database directly.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Backport #23014
As the title. Label/assignee share the same code.
* Close#22607
* Close#20727
Also:
* partially fix for #21742, now the comment reaction and menu work with
keyboard.
* partially fix for #17705, in most cases the comment won't be lost.
* partially fix for #21539
* partially fix for #20347
* partially fix for #7329
### The `Enter` support
Before, if user presses Enter, the dropdown just disappears and nothing
happens or the window reloads.
After, Enter can be used to select/deselect labels, and press Esc to
hide the dropdown to update the labels (still no way to cancel ....
maybe you can do a Cmd+R or F5 to refresh the window to discard the
changes .....)
This is only a quick patch, the UX is still not perfect, but it's much
better than before.
### The `confirm` before reloading
And more fixes for the `reload` problem, the new behaviors:
* If nothing changes (just show/hide the dropdown), then the page won't
be reloaded.
* If there are draft comments, show a confirm dialog before reloading,
to avoid losing comments.
That's the best effect can be done at the moment, unless completely
refactor these dropdown related code.
Screenshot of the confirm dialog:
<details>
</details>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #23088Fix: #22990
---
Before, the return value of the api is always false,regrardless of
whether the entry of `sync_on_commit` is true or false.
I have confirmed that the value of `sync_on_commit` dropped into the
database is correct.
So, I think it is enough to make some small changes.
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <33891828+sillyguodong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #23059
This PR is trying to add accessibility to the menu as mentioned in
#23053 so the menu can be accessed using keyboard (A quick demo is added
below), with a reference to
[PR2612](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22612). The goal is to
make the menu accessible merely using keyboard like shown below. And
this PR might need confirmation from developers using screen readers.
Backport #23087
Whitespace was missing from refactoring docs metadata.
backport label applied so it is included in versioned docs.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Backport #22612
### Preamble
Gitea is an extremely great and smart solution perfectly suitable for
smaller systems and self-hosted Git-powered setups. However, there is a
group of people who have indredible difficulties in using Gitea,
rendering it useless in many cases. Those people are blind developers
using [screen readers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_reader).
Unfortunately, the frontend framework is super convoluted, and Go
templates don’t allow accessibility improvements in a straightforward
way. As a blind developer myself, I'm trying to start fixing smaller
accessibility quirks with intention to go deeper and eventually, alone
or not, make Gitea at least mostly accessible for screen reader users.
### What This Fix Does
My blind fellows and me navigate webpages not very similarly to how a
sighted person does it. For instance, we love semantic HTML markup like
headings, lists, tables etc. because our screen readers allow us to jump
by those landmarks with a single keypress.
Currently in Gitea issue comments are not marked up with headings. I'm
trying to fix this by adding an appropriate
[ARIA](https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/aria/) role for
comment header and also by enclosing the comment itself in a semantical
article element.
Co-authored-by: Andre Polykanine <ap@oire.me>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Backport #23079
Should fix the following:
> failed to render template: Evaluation error: Helper 'unless' called
with wrong number of arguments, needed 2 but got 3
https://go.dev/play/p/h7bt7MWKTcv
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
- Upgrade stylelint and plugin
- Change ruleset to a explicit one, with all deprecated rules removed
- Fix new issues detected by value validation
For `overflow: overlay` see
https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/issues/6667
Close #23027
`git commit` message option _only_ supports 4 formats (well, only ....):
* `"commit", "-m", msg`
* `"commit", "-m{msg}"` (no space)
* `"commit", "--message", msg`
* `"commit", "--message={msg}"`
The long format with `=` is the best choice, and it's documented in `man
git-commit`:
`-m <msg>, --message=<msg> ...`
ps: I would suggest always use long format option for git command, as
much as possible.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
`.gt-relative` is also `position: relative !important;`
There are `gt-pr-?` styles below (line 140) for `padding-right`, which
makes `.gt-pr` ambiguous
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Update `pull_request_template.md` because:
- It's a kind idea to hide the tips. However, it's easier to include
them in the commit message by mistake when you cannot see them. Check
`git log | grep 'Please check the following:'`. So don't hide it, expose
it and help fix it.
- "for backports" is much clearer than "for bug fixes". I saw someone
post a PR to a release branch because they believed it was the right way
for a bugfix.
- "Allow edits by maintainers", or we have to ask the contributor to
update the branch and they could be confused.
- Remind the contributor that the words could be included in the commit
message, to avoid some words like "Hello", "Sorry". If they really need
them, they can separate them with a line, like:
```markdown
Close #xxxx
Because ... Then ... Finally ...
---
Hello, this is my first time opening a pull request. Sorry for any mistakes.
```
And the merger should be careful, check and delete the extra content
before merging.
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
The API to create tokens is missing the ability to set the required
scopes for tokens, and to show them on the API and on the UI.
This PR adds this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
