Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/mastodon/modal.scss`:
For some reason we changed the file loading path in glitch-soc,
but now upstream has completely changed how the logo is loaded.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/public_feed.rb`:
Upstream refactored a bit, glitch-soc had specific code for local-only
statuses.
Updated glitch-soc's specific code accordingly.
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/configuration.js`:
Upstream updated the `js-yaml` dependency, which changed how to call it.
Those changes conflicted because that code is pretty different in glitch-soc
which has to deal with its more complex theming system.
Proceeded to the same compatibility changes in glitch-soc's code.
- `package.json` and `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, just glitch-soc-specific dependencies textually too
close to some dependencies updated upstream.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream removed RTL classes. Did the same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
Conflicts:
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Conflict caused by us having a distinc Direct timeline.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Conflict between glitch-soc's variable character limit and upstream
refactoring that part of the code.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
If someone tries logging in to an account and is prompted for a 2FA
code or sign-in token, even if the account's password or e-mail is
updated in the meantime, the session will show the prompt and allow
the login process to complete with a valid 2FA code or sign-in token
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, we deleted it to not be flooded by Depandabot.
Kept deleted.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Puma updated on both sides, went for the most recent version.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/mutes_controller.rb`:
Upstream updated the serializer to support timed mutes, while
glitch-soc added a custom API ages ago to get information that
is already available elsewhere.
Dropped the glitch-soc-specific API, went with upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/models/mute.rb`:
🤷
- `app/models/user.rb`:
New user setting added upstream while we have glitch-soc-specific
user settings. Added upstream's user setting.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added a new user setting close to a user setting we had
changed the defaults for. Added the new upstream setting.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated “too close” to a glitch-soc-specific
dependency. No real conflict. Updated the dependency.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
- `app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/base_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc not preventing moved accounts from logging
in.
Ported upstream changes while keeping the ability for moved accounts to log
in.
- `app/policies/status_policy.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's ability to hide followers count.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/process_mentions_service.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
* Add bell button
Fix#4890
* Remove duplicate type from post-deployment migration
* Fix legacy class type mappings
* Improve query performance with better index
* Fix validation
* Remove redundant index from notifications
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/api/v1/timelines/public_controller.rb
- app/lib/feed_manager.rb
- app/models/status.rb
- app/services/precompute_feed_service.rb
- app/workers/feed_insert_worker.rb
- spec/models/status_spec.rb
All conflicts are due to upstream refactoring feed management and us having
local-only toots on top of that. Rewrote local-only toots management for
upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict caused because we have additional code to make sure pinned
local-only toots don't get rendered on the ActivityPub endpoints.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Upstream has changed how Tesseract.js gets included and dropped a dependency.
The conflict is caused by glitch-soc having different code due to its
theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream refactor/code style change in a place we replaced upstream's
repo URL with ours.
Ported upstram changes, keeping our repo URL.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dropped dependencies, one of which was textually too close to
a glitch-soc-specific dependency. Not a real conflict.
* Add database support for list show-reply preferences
* Add backend support to read and update list-specific show_replies settings
* Add basic UI to set list replies setting
* Add specs for list replies policy
* Switch "cycling" reply policy link to a set of radio inputs
* Capitalize replies_policy strings
* Change radio button design to be consistent with that of the directory explorer
* Make Array-creation behavior of Paginable more predictable
Paginable.paginate_by_id usually returns ActiveRecord::Relation, but it
returns an Array if min_id option is present. The behavior caused problems
fixed with the following commits:
- 552e886b64
- b63ede5005
- 64ef37b89d
To prevent from recurring similar problems, this commit introduces two
changes:
- The scope now always returns an Array whether min_id option is present
or not.
- The scope is renamed to to_a_paginated_by_id to clarify it returns an
Array.
* Transform Paginable.to_a_paginated_by_id from a scope to a class method
https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Scoping/Named/ClassMethods.html#method-i-scope
> The method is intended to return an ActiveRecord::Relation object, which
> is composable with other scopes.
Paginable.to_a_paginated_by_id returns an Array and is not appropriate
as a scope.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
* Replace incorrect use of distinct with group
Some uses of ActiveRecord::QueryMethods#distinct pass field names but they
are incorrect for the current version of Rails.
ActiveRecord::QueryMethods#group provides the expected behavior and
benefits performance. See commit 6da24aad4c.
* Introduce ApplicationController#cache_collection_paginated_by_id
ApplicationController#cache_collection_paginated_by_id fuses
ApplicationController#cache_collection and Paginable.paginate_by_id.
An advantage of this method is that it prevents from modifying scope which
Paginable.paginate_by_id may provide.
ApplicationController#cache_collection always return an array and there
is no possibility of the scope modification. It is also clear for a
programmer, considering the implication of "cache".
This method can also emit more efficient queries by using
Cacheable.cache_ids before calling Paginable.paginate_by_id.
Some uses of ActiveRecord::QueryMethods#distinct pass field names but they
are incorrect for the current version of Rails.
ActiveRecord::QueryMethods#group provides the expected behavior and
benefits performance. See commit 6da24aad4c.
The old implementation had two queries:
1. The query constructed in Api::V1::FavouritesController#results
2. The query constructed in #cached_favourites, which is merged with 1.
Both of them are issued againt PostgreSQL. The combination of the two
queries caused the following problems:
- The small window between the two queries involves race conditions.
- Minor performance inefficiency.
Moreover, the construction of query 2, which involves merging with query
1 has a bug. Query 1 is finalized with paginate_by_id, but paginate_by_id
returns an array when min_id parameter is specified. The behavior prevents
from merging the query, and in the real world, ActiveRecord simply ignores
the merge (!), which results in querying the entire scan of statuses and
favourites table.
This change fixes these issues by simply letting query 1 get all the works
done.
DISTINCT clause removes duplicated records according to all the selected
attributes. In reality, it can remove duplicated records only looking at
statuses.id, but the clause confuses the query planner and yields
insufficient performance.
The behavior is also problematic if the scope produced by HashQueryService
is used to query columns without id (using pluck method, for example). The
scope is expected to contain unique statuses, but the uniquness will be
evaluated with some arbitrary columns other than id.
GROUP BY clause resolves those problem by explicitly specifying the
column to take into account for the record distinction.
A workaround for the problem of DISTINCT clause in
Api::V1::Timelines::TagController is no longer necessary and removed.
