mastodon/app/models/user.rb

533 lines
16 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
# == Schema Information
#
# Table name: users
#
# id :bigint(8) not null, primary key
# email :string default(""), not null
# created_at :datetime not null
# updated_at :datetime not null
# encrypted_password :string default(""), not null
# reset_password_token :string
# reset_password_sent_at :datetime
# sign_in_count :integer default(0), not null
# current_sign_in_at :datetime
# last_sign_in_at :datetime
# confirmation_token :string
# confirmed_at :datetime
# confirmation_sent_at :datetime
# unconfirmed_email :string
# locale :string
# encrypted_otp_secret :string
# encrypted_otp_secret_iv :string
# encrypted_otp_secret_salt :string
# consumed_timestep :integer
# otp_required_for_login :boolean default(FALSE), not null
# last_emailed_at :datetime
# otp_backup_codes :string is an Array
# account_id :bigint(8) not null
# disabled :boolean default(FALSE), not null
# invite_id :bigint(8)
# chosen_languages :string is an Array
# created_by_application_id :bigint(8)
# approved :boolean default(TRUE), not null
# sign_in_token :string
# sign_in_token_sent_at :datetime
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466) * feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from there they'll be able to add or remove any of them. Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings page, you'll be asked to set it up. This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for login when enabled. If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be present. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA' in order to remove second factor auth. The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way, users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe even lost them. * We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another authenticator app. So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is finished. This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to log in again using TOTP. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * refactor: fix eslint errors The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors. This commit attempts to fix them. * refactor: normalize i18n translations The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not normalized. This commits fixes that. * refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version * refactor: use symbols for routes without '/' * refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify that WebAuthn was disabled. As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can remove it and send just one email to users. * refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config * refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
# webauthn_id :string
2020-10-12 14:33:49 +00:00
# sign_up_ip :inet
# role_id :bigint(8)
# settings :text
2023-06-10 01:29:37 +00:00
# time_zone :string
# otp_secret :string
#
2016-08-17 15:56:23 +00:00
class User < ApplicationRecord
self.ignored_columns += %w(
remember_created_at
remember_token
current_sign_in_ip
last_sign_in_ip
skip_sign_in_token
filtered_languages
admin
moderator
)
include LanguagesHelper
include Redisable
include User::HasSettings
include User::LdapAuthenticable
include User::Omniauthable
include User::PamAuthenticable
# The home and list feeds will be stored in Redis for this amount
# of time, and status fan-out to followers will include only people
# within this time frame. Lowering the duration may improve performance
# if lots of people sign up, but not a lot of them check their feed
# every day. Raising the duration reduces the amount of expensive
# RegenerationWorker jobs that need to be run when those people come
# to check their feed
ACTIVE_DURATION = ENV.fetch('USER_ACTIVE_DAYS', 7).to_i.days.freeze
devise :two_factor_authenticatable,
otp_secret_encryption_key: Rails.configuration.x.otp_secret
include LegacyOtpSecret # Must be after the above `devise` line in order to override the legacy method
devise :two_factor_backupable,
otp_number_of_backup_codes: 10
2016-03-05 12:12:24 +00:00
devise :registerable, :recoverable, :validatable,
:confirmable
belongs_to :account, inverse_of: :user
belongs_to :invite, counter_cache: :uses, optional: true
belongs_to :created_by_application, class_name: 'Doorkeeper::Application', optional: true
belongs_to :role, class_name: 'UserRole', optional: true
accepts_nested_attributes_for :account
2016-03-05 12:12:24 +00:00
has_many :applications, class_name: 'Doorkeeper::Application', as: :owner, dependent: nil
has_many :backups, inverse_of: :user, dependent: nil
has_many :invites, inverse_of: :user, dependent: nil
has_many :markers, inverse_of: :user, dependent: :destroy
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466) * feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from there they'll be able to add or remove any of them. Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings page, you'll be asked to set it up. This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for login when enabled. If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be present. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA' in order to remove second factor auth. The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way, users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe even lost them. * We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another authenticator app. So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is finished. This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to log in again using TOTP. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * refactor: fix eslint errors The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors. This commit attempts to fix them. * refactor: normalize i18n translations The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not normalized. This commits fixes that. * refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version * refactor: use symbols for routes without '/' * refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify that WebAuthn was disabled. As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can remove it and send just one email to users. * refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config * refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
has_many :webauthn_credentials, dependent: :destroy
has_many :ips, class_name: 'UserIp', inverse_of: :user, dependent: nil
has_one :invite_request, class_name: 'UserInviteRequest', inverse_of: :user, dependent: :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :invite_request, reject_if: ->(attributes) { attributes['text'].blank? && !Setting.require_invite_text }
validates :invite_request, presence: true, on: :create, if: :invite_text_required?
validates :email, presence: true, email_address: true
validates_with UserEmailValidator, if: -> { ENV['EMAIL_DOMAIN_LISTS_APPLY_AFTER_CONFIRMATION'] == 'true' || !confirmed? }
validates_with EmailMxValidator, if: :validate_email_dns?
validates :agreement, acceptance: { allow_nil: false, accept: [true, 'true', '1'] }, on: :create
2016-03-14 16:49:13 +00:00
# Honeypot/anti-spam fields
attr_accessor :registration_form_time, :website, :confirm_password
validates_with RegistrationFormTimeValidator, on: :create
validates :website, absence: true, on: :create
validates :confirm_password, absence: true, on: :create
validate :validate_role_elevation
scope :account_not_suspended, -> { joins(:account).merge(Account.without_suspended) }
scope :recent, -> { order(id: :desc) }
scope :pending, -> { where(approved: false) }
scope :approved, -> { where(approved: true) }
2017-03-03 22:45:48 +00:00
scope :confirmed, -> { where.not(confirmed_at: nil) }
scope :unconfirmed, -> { where(confirmed_at: nil) }
scope :enabled, -> { where(disabled: false) }
scope :disabled, -> { where(disabled: true) }
scope :active, -> { confirmed.signed_in_recently.account_not_suspended }
scope :signed_in_recently, -> { where(current_sign_in_at: ACTIVE_DURATION.ago..) }
scope :not_signed_in_recently, -> { where(current_sign_in_at: ...ACTIVE_DURATION.ago) }
scope :matches_email, ->(value) { where(arel_table[:email].matches("#{value}%")) }
scope :matches_ip, ->(value) { left_joins(:ips).where('user_ips.ip <<= ?', value).group('users.id') }
before_validation :sanitize_role
before_create :set_approved
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
after_commit :send_pending_devise_notifications
after_create_commit :trigger_webhooks
normalizes :locale, with: ->(locale) { I18n.available_locales.exclude?(locale.to_sym) ? nil : locale }
normalizes :time_zone, with: ->(time_zone) { ActiveSupport::TimeZone[time_zone].nil? ? nil : time_zone }
normalizes :chosen_languages, with: ->(chosen_languages) { chosen_languages.compact_blank.presence }
has_many :session_activations, dependent: :destroy
delegate :can?, to: :role
attr_reader :invite_code
attr_writer :external, :bypass_invite_request_check, :current_account
def self.those_who_can(*any_of_privileges)
matching_role_ids = UserRole.that_can(*any_of_privileges).map(&:id)
if matching_role_ids.empty?
none
else
where(role_id: matching_role_ids)
end
end
def self.skip_mx_check?
Rails.env.local?
end
def role
if role_id.nil?
UserRole.everyone
else
super
end
end
def confirmed?
confirmed_at.present?
end
def invited?
invite_id.present?
end
def valid_invitation?
invite_id.present? && invite.valid_for_use?
end
def disable!
update!(disabled: true)
end
def enable!
update!(disabled: false)
end
def to_log_human_identifier
account.acct
end
def to_log_route_param
account_id
end
def confirm
wrap_email_confirmation do
super
end
end
# Mark current email as confirmed, bypassing Devise
def mark_email_as_confirmed!
wrap_email_confirmation do
skip_confirmation!
save!
end
end
def update_sign_in!(new_sign_in: false)
old_current = current_sign_in_at
new_current = Time.now.utc
self.last_sign_in_at = old_current || new_current
self.current_sign_in_at = new_current
if new_sign_in
self.sign_in_count ||= 0
self.sign_in_count += 1
end
save(validate: false) unless new_record?
prepare_returning_user!
end
def pending?
!approved?
end
def active_for_authentication?
!account.memorial?
end
def functional?
functional_or_moved? && account.moved_to_account_id.nil?
end
def functional_or_moved?
confirmed? && approved? && !disabled? && !account.unavailable? && !account.memorial?
end
def unconfirmed?
!confirmed?
end
def unconfirmed_or_pending?
unconfirmed? || pending?
end
def approve!
return if approved?
update!(approved: true)
# Avoid extremely unlikely race condition when approving and confirming
# the user at the same time
reload unless confirmed?
prepare_new_user! if confirmed?
end
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466) * feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from there they'll be able to add or remove any of them. Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings page, you'll be asked to set it up. This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for login when enabled. If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be present. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA' in order to remove second factor auth. The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way, users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe even lost them. * We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another authenticator app. So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is finished. This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to log in again using TOTP. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * refactor: fix eslint errors The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors. This commit attempts to fix them. * refactor: normalize i18n translations The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not normalized. This commits fixes that. * refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version * refactor: use symbols for routes without '/' * refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify that WebAuthn was disabled. As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can remove it and send just one email to users. * refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config * refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
def otp_enabled?
otp_required_for_login
end
def webauthn_enabled?
webauthn_credentials.any?
end
def two_factor_enabled?
otp_required_for_login? || webauthn_credentials.any?
end
def disable_two_factor!
self.otp_required_for_login = false
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466) * feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from there they'll be able to add or remove any of them. Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings page, you'll be asked to set it up. This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for login when enabled. If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be present. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA' in order to remove second factor auth. The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way, users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe even lost them. * We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another authenticator app. So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is finished. This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to log in again using TOTP. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * refactor: fix eslint errors The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors. This commit attempts to fix them. * refactor: normalize i18n translations The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not normalized. This commits fixes that. * refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version * refactor: use symbols for routes without '/' * refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify that WebAuthn was disabled. As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can remove it and send just one email to users. * refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config * refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
self.otp_secret = nil
otp_backup_codes&.clear
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466) * feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from there they'll be able to add or remove any of them. Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings page, you'll be asked to set it up. This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for login when enabled. If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be present. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA' in order to remove second factor auth. The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way, users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe even lost them. * We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another authenticator app. So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is finished. This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to log in again using TOTP. Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com> * refactor: fix eslint errors The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors. This commit attempts to fix them. * refactor: normalize i18n translations The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not normalized. This commits fixes that. * refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version * refactor: use symbols for routes without '/' * refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify that WebAuthn was disabled. As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can remove it and send just one email to users. * refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config * refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
webauthn_credentials.destroy_all if webauthn_enabled?
save!
end
def token_for_app(app)
return nil if app.nil? || app.owner != self
Doorkeeper::AccessToken.find_or_create_by(application_id: app.id, resource_owner_id: id) do |t|
t.scopes = app.scopes
t.expires_in = Doorkeeper.configuration.access_token_expires_in
t.use_refresh_token = Doorkeeper.configuration.refresh_token_enabled?
end
end
def activate_session(request)
session_activations.activate(
session_id: SecureRandom.hex,
user_agent: request.user_agent,
ip: request.remote_ip
).session_id
end
def clear_other_sessions(id)
session_activations.exclusive(id)
end
Web Push Notifications (#3243) * feat: Register push subscription * feat: Notify when mentioned * feat: Boost, favourite, reply, follow, follow request * feat: Notification interaction * feat: Handle change of public key * feat: Unsubscribe if things go wrong * feat: Do not send normal notifications if push is enabled * feat: Focus client if open * refactor: Move push logic to WebPushSubscription * feat: Better title and body * feat: Localize messages * chore: Fix lint errors * feat: Settings * refactor: Lazy load * fix: Check if push settings exist * feat: Device-based preferences * refactor: Simplify logic * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Create /api/web/push_subscriptions endpoint * feat: Spec PushSubscriptionController * refactor: WebPushSubscription => Web::PushSubscription * feat: Spec Web::PushSubscription * feat: Display first media attachment * feat: Support direction * fix: Stuff broken while rebasing * refactor: Integration with session activations * refactor: Cleanup * refactor: Simplify implementation * feat: Set VAPID keys via environment * chore: Comments * fix: Crash when no alerts * fix: Set VAPID keys in testing environment * fix: Follow link * feat: Notification actions * fix: Delete previous subscription * chore: Temporary logs * refactor: Move migration to a later date * fix: Fetch the correct session activation and misc bugs * refactor: Move migration to a later date * fix: Remove follow request (no notifications) * feat: Send administrator contact to push service * feat: Set time-to-live * fix: Do not show sensitive images * fix: Reducer crash in error handling * feat: Add badge * chore: Fix lint error * fix: Checkbox label overlap * fix: Check for payload support * fix: Rename action "type" (crash in latest Chrome) * feat: Action to expand notification * fix: Lint errors * fix: Unescape notification body * fix: Do not allow boosting if the status is hidden * feat: Add VAPID keys to the production sample environment * fix: Strip HTML tags from status * refactor: Better error messages * refactor: Handle browser not implementing the VAPID protocol (Samsung Internet) * fix: Error when target_status is nil * fix: Handle lack of image * fix: Delete reference to invalid subscriptions * feat: Better error handling * fix: Unescape HTML characters after tags are striped * refactor: Simpify code * fix: Modify to work with #4091 * Sort strings alphabetically * i18n: Updated Polish translation it annoys me that it's not fully localized :P * refactor: Use current_session in PushSubscriptionController * fix: Rebase mistake * fix: Set cacheName to mastodon * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Remove logging statements * chore(yarn): Fix conflicts with master * chore(yarn): Copy latest from master * chore(yarn): Readd offline-plugin * refactor: Use save! and update! * refactor: Send notifications async * fix: Allow retry when push fails * fix: Save track for failed pushes * fix: Minify sw.js * fix: Remove account_id from fabricator
2017-07-13 20:15:32 +00:00
def web_push_subscription(session)
session.web_push_subscription.nil? ? nil : session.web_push_subscription
Web Push Notifications (#3243) * feat: Register push subscription * feat: Notify when mentioned * feat: Boost, favourite, reply, follow, follow request * feat: Notification interaction * feat: Handle change of public key * feat: Unsubscribe if things go wrong * feat: Do not send normal notifications if push is enabled * feat: Focus client if open * refactor: Move push logic to WebPushSubscription * feat: Better title and body * feat: Localize messages * chore: Fix lint errors * feat: Settings * refactor: Lazy load * fix: Check if push settings exist * feat: Device-based preferences * refactor: Simplify logic * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Create /api/web/push_subscriptions endpoint * feat: Spec PushSubscriptionController * refactor: WebPushSubscription => Web::PushSubscription * feat: Spec Web::PushSubscription * feat: Display first media attachment * feat: Support direction * fix: Stuff broken while rebasing * refactor: Integration with session activations * refactor: Cleanup * refactor: Simplify implementation * feat: Set VAPID keys via environment * chore: Comments * fix: Crash when no alerts * fix: Set VAPID keys in testing environment * fix: Follow link * feat: Notification actions * fix: Delete previous subscription * chore: Temporary logs * refactor: Move migration to a later date * fix: Fetch the correct session activation and misc bugs * refactor: Move migration to a later date * fix: Remove follow request (no notifications) * feat: Send administrator contact to push service * feat: Set time-to-live * fix: Do not show sensitive images * fix: Reducer crash in error handling * feat: Add badge * chore: Fix lint error * fix: Checkbox label overlap * fix: Check for payload support * fix: Rename action "type" (crash in latest Chrome) * feat: Action to expand notification * fix: Lint errors * fix: Unescape notification body * fix: Do not allow boosting if the status is hidden * feat: Add VAPID keys to the production sample environment * fix: Strip HTML tags from status * refactor: Better error messages * refactor: Handle browser not implementing the VAPID protocol (Samsung Internet) * fix: Error when target_status is nil * fix: Handle lack of image * fix: Delete reference to invalid subscriptions * feat: Better error handling * fix: Unescape HTML characters after tags are striped * refactor: Simpify code * fix: Modify to work with #4091 * Sort strings alphabetically * i18n: Updated Polish translation it annoys me that it's not fully localized :P * refactor: Use current_session in PushSubscriptionController * fix: Rebase mistake * fix: Set cacheName to mastodon * refactor: Pull request feedback * refactor: Remove logging statements * chore(yarn): Fix conflicts with master * chore(yarn): Copy latest from master * chore(yarn): Readd offline-plugin * refactor: Use save! and update! * refactor: Send notifications async * fix: Allow retry when push fails * fix: Save track for failed pushes * fix: Minify sw.js * fix: Remove account_id from fabricator
2017-07-13 20:15:32 +00:00
end
def invite_code=(code)
self.invite = Invite.find_by(code: code) if code.present?
@invite_code = code
end
def password_required?
return false if external?
super
end
def external_or_valid_password?(compare_password)
# If encrypted_password is blank, we got the user from LDAP or PAM,
# so credentials are already valid
encrypted_password.blank? || valid_password?(compare_password)
end
def send_reset_password_instructions
return false if encrypted_password.blank?
super
end
def reset_password(new_password, new_password_confirmation)
return false if encrypted_password.blank?
super
end
def revoke_access!
Doorkeeper::AccessGrant.by_resource_owner(self).update_all(revoked_at: Time.now.utc)
Doorkeeper::AccessToken.by_resource_owner(self).in_batches do |batch|
batch.update_all(revoked_at: Time.now.utc)
Web::PushSubscription.where(access_token_id: batch).delete_all
# Revoke each access token for the Streaming API, since `update_all``
# doesn't trigger ActiveRecord Callbacks:
# TODO: #28793 Combine into a single topic
payload = Oj.dump(event: :kill)
redis.pipelined do |pipeline|
batch.ids.each do |id|
pipeline.publish("timeline:access_token:#{id}", payload)
end
end
end
end
def reset_password!
# First, change password to something random and deactivate all sessions
transaction do
update(password: SecureRandom.hex)
session_activations.destroy_all
end
# Then, remove all authorized applications and connected push subscriptions
revoke_access!
# Finally, send a reset password prompt to the user
send_reset_password_instructions
end
protected
def send_devise_notification(notification, *args, **kwargs)
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
# This method can be called in `after_update` and `after_commit` hooks,
# but we must make sure the mailer is actually called *after* commit,
# otherwise it may work on stale data. To do this, figure out if we are
# within a transaction.
# It seems like devise sends keyword arguments as a hash in the last
# positional argument
kwargs = args.pop if args.last.is_a?(Hash) && kwargs.empty?
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
if ActiveRecord::Base.connection.current_transaction.try(:records)&.include?(self)
pending_devise_notifications << [notification, args, kwargs]
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
else
render_and_send_devise_message(notification, *args, **kwargs)
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
end
end
private
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
def send_pending_devise_notifications
pending_devise_notifications.each do |notification, args, kwargs|
render_and_send_devise_message(notification, *args, **kwargs)
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
end
# Empty the pending notifications array because the
# after_commit hook can be called multiple times which
# could cause multiple emails to be sent.
pending_devise_notifications.clear
end
def pending_devise_notifications
@pending_devise_notifications ||= []
end
def render_and_send_devise_message(notification, *args, **kwargs)
devise_mailer.send(notification, self, *args, **kwargs).deliver_later
Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail (#13475) * Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail Fixes #6778 The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to pick previous values if running too early. Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however, I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order: - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification. In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so if we use the former, we have the same issue. - the `after_commit` hook is called - `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions` notification. In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true, so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after* executing the after_commit hook). This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or `after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification. The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook. [1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification [2]: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/blob/406915cb781e38255a30ad2a0609e33952b9ec50/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb#L133-L194 * Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model * Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
2020-04-15 14:13:44 +00:00
end
def set_approved
2020-10-12 14:33:49 +00:00
self.approved = begin
if sign_up_from_ip_requires_approval? || sign_up_email_requires_approval?
2020-10-12 14:33:49 +00:00
false
else
open_registrations? || valid_invitation? || external?
end
end
end
def grant_approval_on_confirmation?
# Re-check approval on confirmation if the server has switched to open registrations
open_registrations? && !sign_up_from_ip_requires_approval? && !sign_up_email_requires_approval?
end
def wrap_email_confirmation
new_user = !confirmed?
self.approved = true if grant_approval_on_confirmation?
yield
if new_user
# Avoid extremely unlikely race condition when approving and confirming
# the user at the same time
reload unless approved?
if approved?
prepare_new_user!
else
notify_staff_about_pending_account!
end
end
end
2020-10-12 14:33:49 +00:00
def sign_up_from_ip_requires_approval?
sign_up_ip.present? && IpBlock.severity_sign_up_requires_approval.exists?(['ip >>= ?', sign_up_ip.to_s])
end
def sign_up_email_requires_approval?
return false if email.blank?
_, domain = email.split('@', 2)
return false if domain.blank?
records = []
# Doing this conditionally is not very satisfying, but this is consistent
# with the MX records validations we do and keeps the specs tractable.
unless self.class.skip_mx_check?
Resolv::DNS.open do |dns|
dns.timeouts = 5
records = dns.getresources(domain, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::MX).to_a.map { |e| e.exchange.to_s }.compact_blank
end
end
EmailDomainBlock.requires_approval?(records + [domain], attempt_ip: sign_up_ip)
end
def open_registrations?
Setting.registrations_mode == 'open'
end
def external?
!!@external
end
def bypass_invite_request_check?
@bypass_invite_request_check
end
def sanitize_role
self.role = nil if role.present? && role.everyone?
end
def prepare_new_user!
BootstrapTimelineWorker.perform_async(account_id)
ActivityTracker.increment('activity:accounts:local')
ActivityTracker.record('activity:logins', id)
UserMailer.welcome(self).deliver_later(wait: 1.hour)
TriggerWebhookWorker.perform_async('account.approved', 'Account', account_id)
end
def prepare_returning_user!
return unless confirmed?
ActivityTracker.record('activity:logins', id)
regenerate_feed! if needs_feed_update?
end
def notify_staff_about_pending_account!
User.those_who_can(:manage_users).includes(:account).find_each do |u|
next unless u.allows_pending_account_emails?
2023-07-08 18:03:38 +00:00
AdminMailer.with(recipient: u.account).new_pending_account(self).deliver_later
end
end
def regenerate_feed!
RegenerationWorker.perform_async(account_id) if redis.set("account:#{account_id}:regeneration", true, nx: true, ex: 1.day.seconds)
end
def needs_feed_update?
last_sign_in_at < ACTIVE_DURATION.ago
end
def validate_email_dns?
email_changed? && !external? && !self.class.skip_mx_check?
end
def validate_role_elevation
errors.add(:role_id, :elevated) if defined?(@current_account) && role&.overrides?(@current_account&.user_role)
end
def invite_text_required?
Setting.require_invite_text && !open_registrations? && !invited? && !external? && !bypass_invite_request_check?
end
def trigger_webhooks
TriggerWebhookWorker.perform_async('account.created', 'Account', account_id)
end
2016-02-22 15:00:20 +00:00
end