mirror of
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy.git
synced 2024-11-10 10:08:58 +00:00
Replaced table
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e9164584b
commit
7f1ab6a5cd
|
@ -7,11 +7,19 @@ An expected feature in link aggregators is a kind of "Trending" sort which shows
|
|||
- After a day or so, the time factor should go away.
|
||||
- Use a log scale, since votes tend to snowball, and so the first 10 votes are just as important as the next hundred.
|
||||
|
||||
| Reddit | Hacker News | Lemmy |
|
||||
|-|-|-|
|
||||
| Does not take the lifetime of the thread into account, [giving early comments an overwhelming advantage over later ones,](https://minimaxir.com/2016/11/first-comment/) with the effect being even worse in small communities. New comments pool at the bottom of the thread, effectively killing off discussion and making each thread a race to comment early. This lowers the quality of conversation and rewards comments that are repetitive and spammy. | While far superior to Reddit's implementation for its decay of scores over time, [Hacker News' ranking algorithm](https://medium.com/hacking-and-gonzo/how-hacker-news-ranking-algorithm-works-1d9b0cf2c08d) does not use a logarithmic scale for scores. | Counterbalances the snowballing effect of votes over time with a logarithmic scale. Negates the inherent advantage of early comments while still ensuring that votes still matter in the long-term, not nuking older popular comments. |
|
||||
## Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
### Reddit
|
||||
Does not take the lifetime of the thread into account, [giving early comments an overwhelming advantage over later ones,](https://minimaxir.com/2016/11/first-comment/) with the effect being even worse in small communities. New comments pool at the bottom of the thread, effectively killing off discussion and making each thread a race to comment early. This lowers the quality of conversation and rewards comments that are repetitive and spammy.
|
||||
|
||||
### Hacker News
|
||||
|
||||
While far superior to Reddit's implementation for its decay of scores over time, [Hacker News' ranking algorithm](https://medium.com/hacking-and-gonzo/how-hacker-news-ranking-algorithm-works-1d9b0cf2c08d) does not use a logarithmic scale for scores.
|
||||
|
||||
### Lemmy
|
||||
|
||||
Counterbalances the snowballing effect of votes over time with a logarithmic scale. Negates the inherent advantage of early comments while still ensuring that votes still matter in the long-term, not nuking older popular comments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Additional Details
|
||||
```
|
||||
Rank = ScaleFactor * log(Max(1, 3 + Score)) / (Time + 2)^Gravity
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue