mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-12-21 07:59:03 +00:00
722dab5286
# Background Golang template is not friendly for large projects, and Golang template team is quite slow, related: * `https://github.com/golang/go/issues/54450` Without upstream support, we can also have our solution to make HTML template functions support context. It helps a lot, the above Golang template issue `#54450` explains a lot: 1. It makes `{{Locale.Tr}}` could be used in any template, without passing unclear `(dict "root" . )` anymore. 2. More and more functions need `context`, like `avatar`, etc, we do not need to do `(dict "Context" $.Context)` anymore. 3. Many request-related functions could be shared by parent&children templates, like "user setting" / "system setting" See the test `TestScopedTemplateSetFuncMap`, one template set, two `Execute` calls with different `CtxFunc`. # The Solution Instead of waiting for upstream, this PR re-uses the escaped HTML template trees, use `AddParseTree` to add related templates/trees to a new template instance, then the new template instance can have its own FuncMap , the function calls in the template trees will always use the new template's FuncMap. `template.New` / `template.AddParseTree` / `adding-FuncMap` are all quite fast, so the performance is not affected. The details: 1. Make a new `html/template/Template` for `all` templates 2. Add template code to the `all` template 3. Freeze the `all` template, reset its exec func map, it shouldn't execute any template. 4. When a router wants to render a template by its `name` 1. Find the `name` in `all` 2. Find all its related sub templates 3. Escape all related templates (just like what the html template package does) 4. Add the escaped parse-trees of related templates into a new (scoped) `text/template/Template` 5. Add context-related func map into the new (scoped) text template 6. Execute the new (scoped) text template 7. To improve performance, the escaped templates are cached to `template sets` # FAQ ## There is a `unsafe` call, is this PR unsafe? This PR is safe. Golang has strict language definition, it's safe to do so: https://pkg.go.dev/unsafe#Pointer (1) Conversion of a *T1 to Pointer to *T2 ## What if Golang template supports such feature in the future? The public structs/interfaces/functions introduced by this PR is quite simple, the code of `HTMLRender` is not changed too much. It's very easy to switch to the official mechanism if there would be one. ## Does this PR change the template execution behavior? No, see the tests (welcome to design more tests if it's necessary) --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
133 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
133 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package test
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
scontext "context"
|
|
"io"
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
"net/http/httptest"
|
|
"net/url"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
|
|
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/templates"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/translation"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/web/middleware"
|
|
|
|
chi "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// MockContext mock context for unit tests
|
|
func MockContext(t *testing.T, path string) *context.Context {
|
|
resp := &mockResponseWriter{}
|
|
ctx := context.Context{
|
|
Render: &mockRender{},
|
|
Data: make(map[string]interface{}),
|
|
Flash: &middleware.Flash{
|
|
Values: make(url.Values),
|
|
},
|
|
Resp: context.NewResponse(resp),
|
|
Locale: &translation.MockLocale{},
|
|
}
|
|
defer ctx.Close()
|
|
|
|
requestURL, err := url.Parse(path)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
req := &http.Request{
|
|
URL: requestURL,
|
|
Form: url.Values{},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
chiCtx := chi.NewRouteContext()
|
|
req = req.WithContext(scontext.WithValue(req.Context(), chi.RouteCtxKey, chiCtx))
|
|
ctx.Req = context.WithContext(req, &ctx)
|
|
return &ctx
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LoadRepo load a repo into a test context.
|
|
func LoadRepo(t *testing.T, ctx *context.Context, repoID int64) {
|
|
ctx.Repo = &context.Repository{}
|
|
ctx.Repo.Repository = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: repoID})
|
|
var err error
|
|
ctx.Repo.Owner, err = user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ctx.Repo.RepoLink = ctx.Repo.Repository.Link()
|
|
ctx.Repo.Permission, err = access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, ctx.Doer)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LoadRepoCommit loads a repo's commit into a test context.
|
|
func LoadRepoCommit(t *testing.T, ctx *context.Context) {
|
|
gitRepo, err := git.OpenRepository(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.RepoPath())
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
defer gitRepo.Close()
|
|
branch, err := gitRepo.GetHEADBranch()
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, branch)
|
|
if branch != nil {
|
|
ctx.Repo.Commit, err = gitRepo.GetBranchCommit(branch.Name)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LoadUser load a user into a test context.
|
|
func LoadUser(t *testing.T, ctx *context.Context, userID int64) {
|
|
ctx.Doer = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: userID})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LoadGitRepo load a git repo into a test context. Requires that ctx.Repo has
|
|
// already been populated.
|
|
func LoadGitRepo(t *testing.T, ctx *context.Context) {
|
|
assert.NoError(t, ctx.Repo.Repository.LoadOwner(ctx))
|
|
var err error
|
|
ctx.Repo.GitRepo, err = git.OpenRepository(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.RepoPath())
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type mockResponseWriter struct {
|
|
httptest.ResponseRecorder
|
|
size int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (rw *mockResponseWriter) Write(b []byte) (int, error) {
|
|
rw.size += len(b)
|
|
return rw.ResponseRecorder.Write(b)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (rw *mockResponseWriter) Status() int {
|
|
return rw.ResponseRecorder.Code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (rw *mockResponseWriter) Written() bool {
|
|
return rw.ResponseRecorder.Code > 0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (rw *mockResponseWriter) Size() int {
|
|
return rw.size
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (rw *mockResponseWriter) Push(target string, opts *http.PushOptions) error {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type mockRender struct{}
|
|
|
|
func (tr *mockRender) TemplateLookup(tmpl string) (templates.TemplateExecutor, error) {
|
|
return nil, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (tr *mockRender) HTML(w io.Writer, status int, _ string, _ interface{}) error {
|
|
if resp, ok := w.(http.ResponseWriter); ok {
|
|
resp.WriteHeader(status)
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|