Commit graph

25 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted 63736e8301
[FEAT] Add support for webauthn credential level 3
- For WebAuthn Credential level 3, the `backup_eligible` and
`backup_state` flags are checked if they are consistent with the values
given on login. Forgejo never stored this data, so add a database
migration that makes all webauthn credentials 'legacy' and on the next
first use capture the values of `backup_eligible` and `backup_state`.
As suggested in https://github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn/discussions/219#discussioncomment-10429662
- Adds unit tests.
- Add E2E test.
2024-08-29 10:05:03 +02:00
Philip Peterson 03508b33a8
[FEAT] Allow pushmirror to use publickey authentication
- Continuation of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18835 (by
@Gusted, so it's fine to change copyright holder to Forgejo).
- Add the option to use SSH for push mirrors, this would allow for the
deploy keys feature to be used and not require tokens to be used which
cannot be limited to a specific repository. The private key is stored
encrypted (via the `keying` module) on the database and NEVER given to
the user, to avoid accidental exposure and misuse.
- CAVEAT: This does require the `ssh` binary to be present, which may
not be available in containerized environments, this could be solved by
adding a SSH client into forgejo itself and use the forgejo binary as
SSH command, but should be done in another PR.
- CAVEAT: Mirroring of LFS content is not supported, this would require
the previous stated problem to be solved due to LFS authentication (an
attempt was made at forgejo/forgejo#2544).
- Integration test added.
- Resolves #4416
2024-08-22 17:05:07 +02:00
Gergely Nagy e1fe3bbdc0
feat(quota): Humble beginnings of a quota engine
This is an implementation of a quota engine, and the API routes to
manage its settings. This does *not* contain any enforcement code: this
is just the bedrock, the engine itself.

The goal of the engine is to be flexible and future proof: to be nimble
enough to build on it further, without having to rewrite large parts of
it.

It might feel a little more complicated than necessary, because the goal
was to be able to support scenarios only very few Forgejo instances
need, scenarios the vast majority of mostly smaller instances simply do
not care about. The goal is to support both big and small, and for that,
we need a solid, flexible foundation.

There are thee big parts to the engine: counting quota use, setting
limits, and evaluating whether the usage is within the limits. Sounds
simple on paper, less so in practice!

Quota counting
==============

Quota is counted based on repo ownership, whenever possible, because
repo owners are in ultimate control over the resources they use: they
can delete repos, attachments, everything, even if they don't *own*
those themselves. They can clean up, and will always have the permission
and access required to do so. Would we count quota based on the owning
user, that could lead to situations where a user is unable to free up
space, because they uploaded a big attachment to a repo that has been
taken private since. It's both more fair, and much safer to count quota
against repo owners.

This means that if user A uploads an attachment to an issue opened
against organization O, that will count towards the quota of
organization O, rather than user A.

One's quota usage stats can be queried using the `/user/quota` API
endpoint. To figure out what's eating into it, the
`/user/repos?order_by=size`, `/user/quota/attachments`,
`/user/quota/artifacts`, and `/user/quota/packages` endpoints should be
consulted. There's also `/user/quota/check?subject=<...>` to check
whether the signed-in user is within a particular quota limit.

Quotas are counted based on sizes stored in the database.

Setting quota limits
====================

There are different "subjects" one can limit usage for. At this time,
only size-based limits are implemented, which are:

- `size:all`: As the name would imply, the total size of everything
  Forgejo tracks.
- `size:repos:all`: The total size of all repositories (not including
  LFS).
- `size:repos:public`: The total size of all public repositories (not
  including LFS).
- `size:repos:private`: The total size of all private repositories (not
  including LFS).
- `size:git:all`: The total size of all git data (including all
  repositories, and LFS).
- `size:git:lfs`: The size of all git LFS data (either in private or
  public repos).
- `size:assets:all`: The size of all assets tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:all`: The size of all kinds of attachments
  tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:issues`: Size of all attachments attached to
  issues, including issue comments.
- `size:assets:attachments:releases`: Size of all attachments attached
  to releases. This does *not* include automatically generated archives.
- `size:assets:artifacts`: Size of all Action artifacts.
- `size:assets:packages:all`: Size of all Packages.
- `size:wiki`: Wiki size

Wiki size is currently not tracked, and the engine will always deem it
within quota.

These subjects are built into Rules, which set a limit on *all* subjects
within a rule. Thus, we can create a rule that says: "1Gb limit on all
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, combined". For a rule to
stand, the total sum of all subjects must be below the rule's limit.

Rules are in turn collected into groups. A group is just a name, and a
list of rules. For a group to stand, all of its rules must stand. Thus,
if we have a group with two rules, one that sets a combined 1Gb limit on
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, and another rule that sets a
256Mb limit on packages, if the user has 512Mb of packages, the group
will not stand, because the second rule deems it over quota. Similarly,
if the user has only 128Mb of packages, but 900Mb of release assets, the
group will not stand, because the combined size of packages and release
assets is over the 1Gb limit of the first rule.

Groups themselves are collected into Group Lists. A group list stands
when *any* of the groups within stand. This allows an administrator to
set conservative defaults, but then place select users into additional
groups that increase some aspect of their limits.

To top it off, it is possible to set the default quota groups a user
belongs to in `app.ini`. If there's no explicit assignment, the engine
will use the default groups. This makes it possible to avoid having to
assign each and every user a list of quota groups, and only those need
to be explicitly assigned who need a different set of groups than the
defaults.

If a user has any quota groups assigned to them, the default list will
not be considered for them.

The management APIs
===================

This commit contains the engine itself, its unit tests, and the quota
management APIs. It does not contain any enforcement.

The APIs are documented in-code, and in the swagger docs, and the
integration tests can serve as an example on how to use them.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-08-02 11:10:34 +02:00
Malte Jürgens a61e7c7a39
Implement external assets 2024-07-29 20:35:55 +02:00
Michael Jerger 2f7f1aab8a fix review 2024-05-29 18:31:06 +02:00
Michael Jerger b2c3eb1644 add migration & enhance int-test 2024-05-16 18:25:16 +02:00
Michael Jerger fc38e56373 enhance test & fix reviews 2024-05-14 08:24:31 +02:00
Gergely Nagy 2bc226eb57
Drop Gitea-specific columns from two tables
Gitea and Forgejo chose to implement wiki branch naming differently, but
Forgejo picked the Gitea migration anyway, resulting in an unused column
in the database, which wasn't part of the `Repository` struct either -
something warned about during startup, too.

Similarly, Forgejo chose not to implement User badges at all - but kept
the existing code for it -, and the `badge` table ended up with an
unused `slug` column due to a Gitea migration, and resulted in another
warning at startup.

To keep the database consistent with the code, and to get rid of these
warnings, lets introduce a new migration, which simply drops these
Gitea-specific columns from the database.

Fixes #3463.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-04-26 10:34:06 +02:00
JakobDev 1bce2dc5c5 [FEAT]Add Option to hide Release Archive links (#3139)
This adds a new options to releases to hide the links to the automatically generated archives. This is useful, when the automatically generated Archives are broken e.g. because of Submodules.

![grafik](/attachments/5686edf6-f318-4175-8459-89c33973b181)
![grafik](/attachments/74a8bf92-2abb-47a0-876d-d41024770d0b)

Note:
This juts hides the Archives from the UI. Users can still download 5the Archive if they know t correct URL.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3139
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-committed-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
2024-04-24 15:15:55 +00:00
Earl Warren 998a431747
Do not update PRs based on events that happened before they existed
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* A Created field is added to the Issue table
* The Created field is set to the time (with nano resolution) on creation
* Record the nano time repo_module.PushUpdateOptions is created by the hook
* The decision to update a pull request created before a commit was
  pushed is based on the time (with nano resolution) the git hook
  was run and the Created field

It ensures the following happens:

* commit C is pushed
* the git hook queues AddTestPullRequestTask for processing and returns with success
* TestPullRequest is not called yet
* a pull request P with commit C as the head is created
* TestPullRequest runs and ignores P because it was created after the commit was received

When the "created" column is NULL, no verification is done, pull
requests that were created before the column was created in the
database cannot be newer than the latest call to a git hook.

Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
2024-04-11 11:16:23 +02:00
Earl Warren f1c1a1e877
models: reserve v11 for backporting release blocker 2024-04-11 11:13:28 +02:00
JakobDev a610e93cc9 Add fix and migration 2024-04-08 12:54:43 +02:00
hazycora 204dd9e300
Add migration for pronouns 2024-04-03 15:15:53 -05:00
Gusted 79b7089360
[FEAT] Configure if protected branch rule should apply to admins
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves #65
2024-03-29 00:21:49 +01:00
Earl Warren ba458530aa
[COSMETIC] unify the wording of the Forgejo migration comments 2024-03-28 12:08:43 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 8fdffc94ca Add a migration to remove SSH signatures from release notes
Because the `git` module did not recognize SSH signed tags, those
signatures ended up in the `notes` column of the `release` table. While
future signatures will not end up there, Forgejo should clean up the old
ones.

This migration does just that: finds all releases that have an SSH
signature, and removes those signatures, preserving the rest of the
note (if any).

While this may seem like an expensive operation, it's only done once,
and even on the largest known Forgejo instance as of this
writing (Codeberg), the number of affected rows are just over a hundred,
a tiny amount all things considered.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-03-26 08:09:36 +00:00
Gergely Nagy 36147f580c
Allow users to hide all "Add more units..." hints
Repositories displaying an "Add more..." tab on the header is a neat way
to let people discover they can enable more units. However, displaying
it all the time for repository owners, even when they deliberately do
not want to enable more units gets noisy very fast.

As such, this patch introduces a new setting which lets people disable
this hint under the appearance settings.

Fixes #2378.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-03-21 08:15:51 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 2ca4862f8b
[GITEA] Allow changing the repo Wiki branch to main
Previously, the repo wiki was hardcoded to use `master` as its branch,
this change makes it possible to use `main` (or something else, governed
by `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`, a setting that already exists and
defaults to `main`).

The way it is done is that a new column is added to the `repository`
table: `wiki_branch`. The migration will make existing repositories
default to `master`, for compatibility's sake, even if they don't have a
Wiki (because it's easier to do that). Newly created repositories will
default to `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH` instead.

The Wiki service was updated to use the branch name stored in the
database, and fall back to the default if it is empty.

Old repositories with Wikis using the older `master` branch will have
the option to do a one-time transition to `main`, available via the
repository settings in the "Danger Zone". This option will only be
available for repositories that have the internal wiki enabled, it is
not empty, and the wiki branch is not `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`.

When migrating a repository with a Wiki, Forgejo will use the same
branch name for the wiki as the source repository did. If that's not the
same as the default, the option to normalize it will be available after
the migration's done.

Additionally, the `/api/v1/{owner}/{repo}` endpoint was updated: it will
now include the wiki branch name in `GET` requests, and allow changing
the wiki branch via `PATCH`.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d87c526d2a)
2024-02-05 16:57:47 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 36f7c162e2
[FEAT] Repository flags
This implements "repository flags", a way for instance administrators to
assign custom flags to repositories. The idea is that custom templates
can look at these flags, and display banners based on them, Forgejo does
not provide anything built on top of it, just the foundation. The
feature is optional, and disabled by default. To enable it, set
`[repository].ENABLE_FLAGS = true`.

On the UI side, instance administrators will see a new "Manage flags"
tab on repositories, and a list of enabled tags (if any) on the
repository home page. The "Manage flags" page allows them to remove
existing flags, or add any new ones that are listed in
`[repository].SETTABLE_FLAGS`.

The model does not enforce that only the `SETTABLE_FLAGS` are present.
If the setting is changed, old flags may remain present in the database,
and anything that uses them, will still work. The repository flag
management page will allow an instance administrator to remove them, but
not set them, once removed.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit ba735ce222)
(cherry picked from commit f09f6e029b)
(cherry picked from commit 2f8b041489)
(cherry picked from commit d3186ee5f4)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 5eeccecafc
[GITEA] Optionally allow anyone to edit Wikis
This is largely based on gitea#6312 by @ashimokawa, with updates and
fixes by myself, and incorporates the review feedback given in that pull
request, and more.

What this patch does is add a new "default_permissions" column to the
`repo_units` table (defaulting to read permission), adjusts the
permission checking code to take this into consideration, and then
exposes a setting that lets a repo administrator enable any user on a
Forgejo instance to edit the repo's wiki (effectively giving the wiki
unit of the repo "write" permissions by default).

By default, wikis will remain restricted to collaborators, but with the
new setting exposed, they can be turned into globally editable wikis.

Fixes Codeberg/Community#28.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 4b74439922)
(cherry picked from commit 337cf62c10)
(cherry picked from commit b6786fdb32)
(cherry picked from commit a5d2829a10)

[GITEA] Optionally allow anyone to edit Wikis (squash) AddTokenAuth

(cherry picked from commit fed50cf72e)
(cherry picked from commit 42c55e494e)
(cherry picked from commit e3463bda47)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
Gusted c6a53c3172
[SECURITY] Rework long-term authentication
- This is a 'front-port' of the already existing patch on v1.21 and
v1.20, but applied on top of what Gitea has done to rework the LTA
mechanism. Forgejo will stick with the reworked mechanism by the Forgejo
Security team for the time being. The removal of legacy code (AES-GCM) has been
left out.
- The current architecture is inherently insecure, because you can
construct the 'secret' cookie value with values that are available in
the database. Thus provides zero protection when a database is
dumped/leaked.
- This patch implements a new architecture that's inspired from: [Paragonie Initiative](https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies).
- Integration testing is added to ensure the new mechanism works.
- Removes a setting, because it's not used anymore.

(cherry picked from commit e3d6622a63)
(cherry picked from commit fef1a6dac5)
(cherry picked from commit b0c5165145)
(cherry picked from commit 7ad51b9f8d)
(cherry picked from commit 64f053f383)
(cherry picked from commit f5e78e4c20)

Conflicts:
	services/auth/auth_token_test.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2069
(cherry picked from commit f69fc23d4b)
(cherry picked from commit d955ab3ab0)
(cherry picked from commit 9220088f90)
(cherry picked from commit c73ac63696)
(cherry picked from commit 747a176048)

Conflicts:
	models/user/user.go
	routers/web/user/setting/account.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2295
2024-02-05 15:06:15 +01:00
Earl Warren 081a155cc1
[SEMVER] store SemVer in ForgejoSemVer after a database upgrade
(cherry picked from commit b7fe7cf401)
(cherry picked from commit cf339eed4f)
(cherry picked from commit 4f3a16168b)
(cherry picked from commit 6f5bbc53fc)
(cherry picked from commit aca42b422e)
(cherry picked from commit 5a7f7580e5)
(cherry picked from commit 06c383c807)
(cherry picked from commit fe831dcb53)
(cherry picked from commit cd12cd0dbc)
(cherry picked from commit cc79163703)
(cherry picked from commit 0102a5715e)
(cherry picked from commit 403f7520b3)
(cherry picked from commit a3b61510a2)
(cherry picked from commit f83f0f9feb)
(cherry picked from commit fd1c3a6d09)
(cherry picked from commit f7cdc3d6f1)
(cherry picked from commit 060121b644)
(cherry picked from commit 62c847ff02)
(cherry picked from commit 4d051b51c2)
(cherry picked from commit 86e6981a93)
(cherry picked from commit c1fc9e441b)
(cherry picked from commit 8bb2f0871a)
(cherry picked from commit 0cd9fe5251)
(cherry picked from commit b0b44778b4)
(cherry picked from commit 7c2f4f749f)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Gusted 76c7df9630
[DB] forgejo migration v1: add blocked user migration
(cherry picked from commit 66afddd511)
(cherry picked from commit 19da0dee9d)
(cherry picked from commit 0b725af693)
(cherry picked from commit 64d4de2b66)
(cherry picked from commit 05bc9d3b7f)
(cherry picked from commit 5958553066)
(cherry picked from commit c4f77e26c9)
(cherry picked from commit 3034832c66)
(cherry picked from commit d48931ec5b)
(cherry picked from commit b1e0d53c28)
(cherry picked from commit e3de35fe15)
(cherry picked from commit 3b2712c3d6)
(cherry picked from commit 00c6940851)
(cherry picked from commit ac56c7a202)
(cherry picked from commit d957fb66de)
(cherry picked from commit 01e9125f1b)
(cherry picked from commit 71675caecb)
(cherry picked from commit 0313d02e50)
(cherry picked from commit d2952769c1)
(cherry picked from commit 63d080cdcf)
(cherry picked from commit 43ced29b28)
(cherry picked from commit e556074abd)
(cherry picked from commit 165409d8ff)
(cherry picked from commit 0a3f370162)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Earl Warren 40b99a5f89
[DB] forgejo migration v2: create the forgejo_sem_ver table
(cherry picked from commit 86b26436af)
(cherry picked from commit 479cba59ac)
(cherry picked from commit 4765f9a889)
(cherry picked from commit af771410bf)
(cherry picked from commit d1ea9305d8)
(cherry picked from commit f77e1bb7ab)
(cherry picked from commit 0b95f8fe89)
(cherry picked from commit 4f8fb2390a)
(cherry picked from commit 8ea0e22ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 43ac19ac59)
(cherry picked from commit 0d2f63df4f)
(cherry picked from commit d02a8036fd)
(cherry picked from commit 1fe4c7db94)
(cherry picked from commit d641cdeaf0)
(cherry picked from commit 10e8a4f8b8)
(cherry picked from commit 8097bc40b3)
(cherry picked from commit ee5cb37d7e)
(cherry picked from commit 26d93b8e49)
(cherry picked from commit bc73195e59)
(cherry picked from commit a763fa5de2)
(cherry picked from commit 4b000cb435)
(cherry picked from commit 9f6d20e73f)
(cherry picked from commit b5001edeea)
(cherry picked from commit 7632171832)
(cherry picked from commit 816c5b0c4e)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Gusted 8bb5e8b2b4
[DB] Forgejo database migrations
- Implements https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/32#issuecomment-918737
- Allows to add Forgejo-specific migrations that don't interfere with Gitea's migration logic. Please do note that we cannot liberally add migrations for Gitea tables, as they might do their own migrations in a future version on that table, and that could undo our migrations. Luckily,  we don't have a scenario where that's needed and thus not taken into account.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/795
(cherry picked from commit 8ee32978c0)
(cherry picked from commit c240b34f59)
(cherry picked from commit 03936c6492)
(cherry picked from commit a20ed852f8)
(cherry picked from commit 1dfa82676f)
(cherry picked from commit c39ae0bf8a)
(cherry picked from commit cfaff08996)
(cherry picked from commit 94a458835a)
(cherry picked from commit 61a3cf77df)
(cherry picked from commit abb350fde8)
(cherry picked from commit 5194829d6b)
(cherry picked from commit 89239a60f2)
(cherry picked from commit 683cfd86ef)
(cherry picked from commit f4546cfed9)
(cherry picked from commit 86614d5826)
(cherry picked from commit e4b9c32187)
(cherry picked from commit 8c253719af)
(cherry picked from commit 857365d6c1)
(cherry picked from commit a488b3952f)
(cherry picked from commit 98313c4910)
(cherry picked from commit 430d95e824)
(cherry picked from commit 08bf9d918f)
(cherry picked from commit f8a170e2d0)
(cherry picked from commit d20e325378)
(cherry picked from commit 6c0aa7dd4f)
(cherry picked from commit 46c08c26c7)
(cherry picked from commit 9ee22153c4)

[DB] Ensure forgejo migration up to date (squash)

- Hook Forgejo's `EnsureUpToDate` to Gitea's `EnsureUpToDate`, such that
the Forgejo migrations are also being checked to be up to date.
- I'm not sure how I missed this and if this has caused any problems,
but due to the lack of any open issue about it it seems to not be a big
problem.

(cherry picked from commit 6c65b6dcf6)
(cherry picked from commit 6d45c37d84)

[DB] Add test for TestEnsureUpToDate (squash)

- Add a test for the behavior of `EnsureUpToDate`, to ensure it will
error when needed and succeed when the forgejo version is up to date.
- Add forgejo_migrations package to GO_TEST_PACKAGES, to avoid running
it with `test-unit` and instead test it with `test-*-migration`.

(cherry picked from commit b172a50691)
(cherry picked from commit d8af308820)
(cherry picked from commit e69e64a32c)
(cherry picked from commit 4e8363fad4)
(cherry picked from commit fc9ecd6c53)
(cherry picked from commit e5c446e3dc)
(cherry picked from commit 7066a15655)
(cherry picked from commit 9183cdc835)
(cherry picked from commit 5f93039e0d)

Conflicts:
	Makefile
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2245
(cherry picked from commit a039b3b0c9)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00