Backport #27610 by @evantobin
Fixes#27598
In #27080, the logic for the tokens endpoints were updated to allow
admins to create and view tokens in other accounts. However, the same
functionality was not added to the DELETE endpoint. This PR makes the
DELETE endpoint function the same as the other token endpoints and adds
unit tests
Co-authored-by: Evan Tobin <me@evantob.in>
Backport #28072
To avoid unnecessary database access, the `cacheTime` should always be
set if the revision has been checked.
Fix#28057
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport changelog for v1.21.0 as Giteabot doesn't seem to be in the
mood for it
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #28014 by @earl-warren
System users (Ghost, ActionsUser, etc) have a negative id and may be the
author of a comment, either because it was created by a now deleted user
or via an action using a transient token.
The GetPossibleUserByID function has special cases related to system
users and will not fail if given a negative id.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1425
(cherry picked from commit 6a2d2fa243)
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28019 by @anudeepreddy
Hi,
This PR fixes#27988. The use of `path.join`(which uses `/` as the file
separator) to construct paths and comparing them with paths constructed
using `filepath.join`(which uses platform specific file separator) is
the root cause of this issue.
The desired behavior is to ignore attachments when dumping data
directory. Due to the what's mentioned above, the function
`addRecursiveExclude` is not actually ignoring the attachments directory
and is being written to the archive. The attachment directory is again
added to the archive (with different file separator as mentioned in the
issue) causing a duplicate entry on windows.
The solution is to use `filepath.join` in `addResursiveExclude` to
construct `currentAbsPath`.
Co-authored-by: Anudeep Reddy <anudeepc85@gmail.com>
Backport #27946 by @lng2020
As title. Some attachments and file sizes can easily be larger than
these limits
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <70063547+lng2020@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #27994 by @wxiaoguang
To improve maintainability, this PR:
1. Rename `web_src/js/modules/aria` to `web_src/js/modules/fomantic`
(the code there are all for aria of fomantic)
2. Move api/transition related code to
`web_src/js/modules/fomantic/api.js` and
`web_src/js/modules/fomantic/transition.js`
No logic is changed.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27927 by @invliD
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/42910/7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Brückner <code@nik.dev>
Backport #27915 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#27819
We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #27930 by @lng2020
The bug has been fixed for several months in the
`docker/build-push-action`
The fix commit is
[d8823bfaed](d8823bfaed)
as the Gitea Actions Doc mentioned too.
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <70063547+lng2020@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #27912 by @delvh
This should be the easiest fix.
While other solutions might be possible that exterminate the root cause,
they will not be as trivial.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Backport #27902 by @earl-warren
- On user deletion, delete action runners that the user has created.
- Add a database consistency check to remove action runners that have
nonexistent belonging owner.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1720
(cherry picked from commit 009ca7223d)
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Backport #27892 by @earl-warren
- Remove the set tabindex and instead let the browser figure out the
correct tab order.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1626
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27887 by @Zettat123
We should not use `asset.ID` in DownloadFunc because DownloadFunc is a
closure.
1bf5527eac/services/migrations/gitea_downloader.go (L284-L295)
A similar bug when migrating from GitHub has been fixed in #14703. This
PR fixes the bug when migrating from Gitea and GitLab.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #27723 by @mpldr
This patchset changes the connection string builder to use net.URL and
the host/port parser to use the stdlib function for splitting host from
port. It also adds a footnote about a potentially required portnumber
for postgres UNIX sockets.
Fixes: #24552
Co-authored-by: Moritz Poldrack <33086936+mpldr@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #27844 by @nodiscc
This documents running `act-runner` as a systemd service under a
dedicated user account.
Co-authored-by: nodiscc <nodiscc@gmail.com>
Backport #27856
The only conflict is `ThemeName` in `500.tmpl`, it has been resolved
manually by keeping using old
`{{.SignedUser.Theme}}{{else}}{{DefaultTheme}}`
Backport #27832 by @jbgomond
Adds the missing user secrets API integration tests so #27829 does not
happen again
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Gomond <dev@jbgomond.com>
Backport #27829 by @jbgomond
Fixed a little mistake when you deleting user secrets via the API. Found
it when working on #27725.
It should be backported to 1.21 I think.
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Gomond <dev@jbgomond.com>
