This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 57e597bf7e)
(cherry picked from commit 643a2b0e81)
(cherry picked from commit f10faffb4f)
(cherry picked from commit b440c5767e)
[TESTS] verify facts for the admin storage documentation (squash)
(cherry picked from commit d83d8ce57b)
(cherry picked from commit d8855ef27c)
(cherry picked from commit 11230466ec)
(cherry picked from commit b2cdd9d971)
(cherry picked from commit a0a5e78524)
(cherry picked from commit 846413110f)
(cherry picked from commit 72b92d5a78)
Follow-up to d58c542579 for Forgejo.
By default, Gitea does not select any map service that can be used
to introduce a 'Show this place on a map' button in the location
field of a user profile. Before I tried upstreaming this change to
Gitea, this was the case in Forgejo. This patch essentially recovers
this functionality, which is nice for public-facing instances and
communities.
Links to original PRs:
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1076
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26214
(cherry picked from commit bb187d5f61)
(cherry picked from commit ce02ef9078)
(cherry picked from commit 6b75c40e25)
(cherry picked from commit 6bc8e9f573)
(cherry picked from commit 063f8afdf7)
(cherry picked from commit c5cc736b72)
(cherry picked from commit 7b1bb4bedc)
(cherry picked from commit 2a022dceb4)
(cherry picked from commit a946c142d2)
(cherry picked from commit 8a4ea0c7ab)
(cherry picked from commit 37bfb05b34)
(cherry picked from commit f9d75d4705)
(cherry picked from commit 64f76f4ab2)
(cherry picked from commit 5d02454155)
[CI] Forgejo Actions workflows
(cherry picked from commit 3ff59b5379)
(cherry picked from commit 8af826a6f7)
(cherry picked from commit d7c09d9cc8)
[CI] use the docker label instead of ubuntu-latest
(cherry picked from commit b6a6470db6)
[CI] all tests need compliance before proceeding
(cherry picked from commit b35c496f2c)
(cherry picked from commit 36a4148a8e)
(cherry picked from commit 7ffcffa653)
(cherry picked from commit 8a246d296e)
(cherry picked from commit dd0b6e1826)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) MySQL optimization
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/976
(cherry picked from commit b4b8c489e6)
(cherry picked from commit 1e861db4af)
(cherry picked from commit a6c0e00330)
(cherry picked from commit f97b336465)
(cherry picked from commit 6d65d5f0d6f798556a8f9e547896be03a5ee2f87)
(cherry picked from commit 79bfbadbed)
(cherry picked from commit e86c40a34a)
(cherry picked from commit da0c454adb)
(cherry picked from commit b49d892cda)
[CI] enable minio tests
(cherry picked from commit 4d8f438031)
(cherry picked from commit c4eeb0a61e)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based CI for PR & branches (squash) cleanup
(cherry picked from commit 80eb20e842)
(cherry picked from commit d2ff589858)
(cherry picked from commit f6eedecb67)
(cherry picked from commit cf458091e2)
(cherry picked from commit ddd322cb2d)
(cherry picked from commit f0f5729b64)
Conflicts:
.github/workflows/pull-db-tests.yml
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1573
(cherry picked from commit bb347aedd4)
(cherry picked from commit 8b11cab677)
(cherry picked from commit be59270696)
(cherry picked from commit e068f8b191)
(cherry picked from commit 7855bb0c60)
(cherry picked from commit 45c4c8f443)
(cherry picked from commit 89520d67ff)
(cherry picked from commit 15eeb417a4)
(cherry picked from commit 6db53a2643)
(cherry picked from commit 2f689b321f)
(cherry picked from commit 04dc478314c3b4927cca78c354ca46ee217f035a)
(cherry picked from commit a554624f40)
(cherry picked from commit abca05f0d1)
(cherry picked from commit dc13e7eb22)
(cherry picked from commit a161c5740e)
(cherry picked from commit 06d33e2773)
(cherry picked from commit f536275161)
(cherry picked from commit 84ac6f314a)
(cherry picked from commit 1e8126edfc)
(cherry picked from commit 0287ac3416)
(cherry picked from commit 3e5fca2aae)
(cherry picked from commit a1381d9146fba42cb97d72d38525fa3e721bfb03)
(cherry picked from commit 74714e0246)
(cherry picked from commit 7749dbfe66)
(cherry picked from commit 4379249711)
(cherry picked from commit a69f55bebf)
(cherry picked from commit 24dd5fbfdb)
(cherry picked from commit dda856d6b8)
(cherry picked from commit bc14f4fa97)
(cherry picked from commit 78fef4f137)
(cherry picked from commit 69e013cc51)
(cherry picked from commit f173c6a273)
(cherry picked from commit e1bbfa3619)
(cherry picked from commit 91245ca917)
(cherry picked from commit 705d0558be)
(cherry picked from commit 9247594970)
(cherry picked from commit 9db1158a48)
(cherry picked from commit 3b36b77d87)
(cherry picked from commit 162fa1d8ae)
(cherry picked from commit d03d0afbb5)
(cherry picked from commit 7b8f92f787)
(cherry picked from commit 035abca969)
(cherry picked from commit a8fbf6bb56)
(cherry picked from commit 3be681d037b07880236cae1aa70245e5eb4d1497)
(cherry picked from commit 7e5d471c83)
(cherry picked from commit 323801d935)
(cherry picked from commit 3fdfe4bfea)
(cherry picked from commit 58a07421a4)
(cherry picked from commit dbb71a4c85)
(cherry picked from commit d442113520)
(cherry picked from commit d3329f01f8)
(cherry picked from commit 069a1d68b8)
(cherry picked from commit 14919e609a)
(cherry picked from commit 49b76be106)
Closes#27455
> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
>
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.
The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
assert.Fail() will continue to execute the code while assert.FailNow()
not. I thought those uses of assert.Fail() should exit immediately.
PS: perhaps it's a good idea to use
[require](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/require)
somewhere because the assert package's default behavior does not exit
when an error occurs, which makes it difficult to find the root error
reason.
Fix #27541
The INI package has a quirk: by default, the keys are inherited.
When maintaining the keys, the newly added sub key should not be
affected by the parent key.
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27097:
- `gitea` theme is renamed to `gitea-light`
- `arc-green` theme is renamed to `gitea-dark`
- `auto` theme is renamed to `gitea-auto`
I put both themes in separate CSS files, removing all colors from the
base CSS. Existing users will be migrated to the new theme names. The
dark theme recolor will follow in a separate PR.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
1. If there are existing custom themes with the names `gitea-light` or
`gitea-dark`, rename them before this upgrade and update the `theme`
column in the `user` table for each affected user.
2. The theme in `<html>` has moved from `class="theme-name"` to
`data-theme="name"`, existing customizations that depend on should be
updated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This pull request is a minor code cleanup.
From the Go specification (https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range):
> "1. For a nil slice, the number of iterations is 0."
> "3. If the map is nil, the number of iterations is 0."
`len` returns 0 if the slice or map is nil
(https://pkg.go.dev/builtin#len). Therefore, checking `len(v) > 0`
before a loop is unnecessary.
---
At the time of writing this pull request, there wasn't a lint rule that
catches these issues. The closest I could find is
https://staticcheck.dev/docs/checks/#S103
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
This PR reduces the complexity of the system setting system.
It only needs one line to introduce a new option, and the option can be
used anywhere out-of-box.
It is still high-performant (and more performant) because the config
values are cached in the config system.
With this PR we added the possibility to configure the Actions timeouts
values for killing tasks/jobs.
Particularly this enhancement is closely related to the `act_runner`
configuration reported below:
```
# The timeout for a job to be finished.
# Please note that the Gitea instance also has a timeout (3h by default) for the job.
# So the job could be stopped by the Gitea instance if it's timeout is shorter than this.
timeout: 3h
```
---
Setting the corresponding key in the INI configuration file, it is
possible to let jobs run for more than 3 hours.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Antognazza <francesco.antognazza@gmail.com>
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
Follow #23465 and #25624
This PR introduces the following improvements:
- We do not need to call `GetTags` to get tags because tags have been
loaded by `RepoAssignment`
ef90fdbd1d/modules/context/repo.go (L663-L668)
- Similarly, the number of tags and releases also have been loaded by
`RepoAssignment`, so the related code has been removed from the
handlers. The query condition of `GetReleaseCountByRepoID` in
`RepoAssignment` has been changed to include draft releases.
ef90fdbd1d/modules/context/repo.go (L538-L551)
- `releasesOrTags` function has been removed. The code for rendering
releases list and tags list moved to `Releases` and `TagList`
respectively.
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
I noticed, that the push mirrors endpoint, is the only endpoint which
returns the times in long format rather than as time.Time().
I think the behavior should be consistent across the project.
----
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
This PR changes the time format used in API responses for all
push_mirror endpoints which return a push mirror.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Refactor lfs request code
- The original code uses `performRequest` function to create the
request, uses a callback to modify the request, and then send the
request.
- Now it's replaced with `createRequest` that only creates request and
`performRequest` that only sends the request.
- Reuse `createRequest` and `performRequest` in `http_client.go` and
`transferadapter.go`
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Closes#26329
This PR adds the ability to ignore revisions specified in the
`.git-blame-ignore-revs` file in the root of the repository.
The banner is displayed in this case. I intentionally did not add a UI
way to bypass the ignore file (same behaviour as Github) but you can add
`?bypass-blame-ignore=true` to the url manually.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
As described in the title.
Some points:
1. Why need those tests?
Because `buildIssueOverview` is not well tested, there are several
continuous bugs in the issue overview webpage.
2. Why in indexer_test.go?
It's hard to put those tests in `./modules/indexer/issue/db/db_test.go`
because those tests need 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures instead of
random data in `./modules/indexer/issue/internal/tests`. When using
'real' data(`unittest.PrepareTestDatabase`), `InitIssueIndexer` and the
package `init()` function of `indexer` are required to init indexer.
3. Why only db?
The other three indexer engines are well tested by random data and it's
okay to also test them with 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures. Any
follow-up PR is welcome.
4. Those tests are really basic, any more complicated tests are welcome.
5. I think it's also necessary to add tests in `TestAPISearchIssues`
in`api_test_issue.go` and `TestIssues` in `home_test.go`
