Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lunny Xiao 97c8dbf332
Fix bug hidden on CI and make ci failed if tests failure (#29254)
The tests on migration tests failed but CI reports successfully

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/actions/runs/7364373807/job/20044685969#step:8:141

This PR will fix the bug on migration v283 and also the CI hidden
behaviour.

The reason is on the Makefile

`GITEA_ROOT="$(CURDIR)" GITEA_CONF=tests/mysql.ini $(GO) test
$(GOTESTFLAGS) -tags='$(TEST_TAGS)' $(MIGRATE_TEST_PACKAGES)` will
return the error exit code.

But

`for pkg in $(shell $(GO) list
code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/...); do \
GITEA_ROOT="$(CURDIR)" GITEA_CONF=tests/mysql.ini $(GO) test
$(GOTESTFLAGS) -tags '$(TEST_TAGS)' $$pkg; \
	done`

will not work.

This also fix #29602

(cherry picked from commit 45277486c2c6213b7766b1da708a991cdb1f3565)

Conflicts:
	.github/workflows/pull-db-tests.yml
	Makefile
	models/migrations/v1_22/v283.go
	models/migrations/v1_22/v286_test.go
	models/migrations/v1_22/v287_test.go
	already in Forgejo for the Makefile & CI logic but Gitea changes
	otherwise rule
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
techknowlogick 82b7de1360
Add admin API route for managing user's badges (#23106) (database migration ony)
Fix #22785

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit cb52b17f92e2d2293f7c003649743464492bca48)

Conflicts:
	discard everything except the database migration
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
Gusted e8c1bfc2e5
[CI] Fix false positive in database migration
- This also means that if one of the test fails, it will actually
propagate to make and subsequently fail the test.
- Remove the 'delete duplicates issue users' code, I checked this
against my local development database (which contains quite bizarre
cases, even some that Forgejo does not like), my local instance database
and against Codeberg production and they all yielded no results to this
query, so I'm removing it thus resolving the error that the delete code
was not compatible with Mysql.
- Sync all tables that are requires by the migration in the test.
- Resolves #2206

(cherry picked from commit 8e02be7e89)
(cherry picked from commit 006f064416)
2024-02-05 13:33:59 +01:00
Adam Majer d68a613ba8
Add support for sha256 repositories (#23894)
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.

Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138

<img width="776" alt="图片" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-01-19 17:05:02 +01:00
yp05327 07ba4d9f87
Fix incorrect action duration time when rerun the job before executed once (#28364)
Fix #28323
Reason was mentioned here:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28323#issuecomment-1841867298

### Changes: (maybe breaking)
We can rerun jobs in Gitea, so there will be some problems in
calculating duration time.
In this PR, I use the exist `Started` and `Stopped` column to record the
last run time instead of the total time,
and add a new `PreviousDuration` column to record the previous duration
time.
You can also check the cost time of last run:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/2ca39145-2c92-401a-b78b-43164f7ae061)
2024-01-19 14:05:49 +00:00
Jimmy Praet 5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao cb10f2767c
Fix migration test (#28659) 2023-12-30 21:54:48 +08:00
sebastian-sauer e08f1a9cbd
Add combined index for issue_user.uid and issue_id (#28080)
fixes #27877

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-14 09:26:59 +00:00
JakobDev c8602a8dfa
Add Index to pull_auto_merge.doer_id (#27811)
Reported at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1677

This column is used by
[deleteUser](f089be91da/services/user/delete.go (L90)).

Note: This PR contains a Migration, so we can't backport it to 1.21.
2023-10-30 08:39:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R c6c829fe3f
Enhanced auth token / remember me (#27606)
Closes #27455

> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
> 
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.

The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
2023-10-14 00:56:41 +00:00
silverwind 023e937141
Rename the default themes to gitea-light, gitea-dark, gitea-auto (#27419)
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27097:

- `gitea` theme is renamed to `gitea-light`
- `arc-green` theme is renamed to `gitea-dark`
- `auto` theme is renamed to `gitea-auto`

I put both themes in separate CSS files, removing all colors from the
base CSS. Existing users will be migrated to the new theme names. The
dark theme recolor will follow in a separate PR.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

1. If there are existing custom themes with the names `gitea-light` or
`gitea-dark`, rename them before this upgrade and update the `theme`
column in the `user` table for each affected user.
2. The theme in `<html>` has moved from `class="theme-name"` to
`data-theme="name"`, existing customizations that depend on should be
updated.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-10-06 09:46:36 +02:00