Commit graph

843 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jason Song 47b912cd52
Avoid panic caused by broken payload when creating commit status (#23216)
When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.

Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166

Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.

In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-03-04 02:12:37 -05:00
Jason Song 7b9e23cc1d
Fill head commit to in payload when notifying push commits for mirroring (#23215)
Just like what has been done when pushing manually:

7a5af25592/services/repository/push.go (L225-L226)

Before:

<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100123-cd4839d1-2d4d-45f7-b7a0-0cbc73162b44.png">

After:

<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100225-f3c5bb65-7ab9-41e2-8e39-9d84c23c352d.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 23:45:53 -05:00
sillyguodong 2f49b55c19
Fix cannot reopen after pushing commits to a closed PR (#23189)
Close: #22784

1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.

2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)

3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call  function `CreatePushPullComment()`.

067b0c2664/services/pull/pull.go (L260-L282)
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)

4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`.  PR is closed now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 21:16:58 +08:00
Lauris BH 58b4143803
Add loading yaml label template files (#22976)
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates

* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
2023-03-02 01:44:23 +02:00
Brecht Van Lommel 0268ee5c37
Do not create commit graph for temporary repos (#23219)
When fetching remotes for conflict checking, skip unnecessary and
potentially slow writing of commit graphs.

In a test with the Blender repository, this reduces conflict checking
time for one pull request from about 2s to 0.1s.
2023-03-01 14:19:04 -05:00
Jason Song 04347eb810
Use context parameter in services/repository (#23186)
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.

And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.

Fix #23160
2023-02-28 16:17:51 -06:00
Jason Song edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request (#22803)
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.

So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).

Current strategy:

- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov

GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.

<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00
sillyguodong 1f09051f2b
Fix SyncOnCommit always return false in API of push_mirrors (#23088)
Fix: #22990

---
Before, the return value of the api is always false,regrardless of
whether the entry of `sync_on_commit` is true or false.
I have confirmed that the value of `sync_on_commit` dropped into the
database is correct.
So, I think it is enough to make some small changes.
2023-02-23 15:50:33 -06:00
zeripath 1319ba6742
Use minio/sha256-simd for accelerated SHA256 (#23052)
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.

It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-22 14:21:46 -05:00
Zettat123 4de5cd9f36
Return empty url for submodule tree entries (#23043)
Close #22614.

Refer to [Github's
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/git/trees?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-tree),
if a tree entry is a submodule, its url will be an empty string.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-21 12:31:17 -05:00
Jason Song c8c2a31818
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010)
Fix #23000.
2023-02-21 08:42:07 -06:00
wxiaoguang dc9cebdf45
Use --message=%s for git commit message (#23028)
Close  #23027

`git commit` message option _only_ supports 4 formats (well, only ....):
* `"commit", "-m", msg`
* `"commit", "-m{msg}"`  (no space)
* `"commit", "--message", msg`
* `"commit", "--message={msg}"`

The long format with `=` is the best choice, and it's documented in `man
git-commit`:

`-m <msg>, --message=<msg> ...`

ps: I would suggest always use long format option for git command, as
much as possible.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-21 14:12:57 +08:00
zeripath 35d2fa744a
Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019)
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-20 19:15:49 -05:00
Zettat123 9a83aa28a3
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule (#22932)
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)

---

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)

The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 19:30:41 +08:00
Lunny Xiao c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00
yp05327 7eaf192967
Rename GetUnits to LoadUnits (#22970)
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-19 16:31:39 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel 6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
yp05327 bd66fa586a
Rename repo.GetOwner to repo.LoadOwner (#22967)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-02-18 20:11:03 +08:00
Lunny Xiao bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel 49919c636e
Pull Requests: setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, tweak UI (#22862)
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.

This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.

Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-13 14:09:52 +08:00
Lunny Xiao f2772b5920
Move delete user to service (#22478)
Move delete user to service

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-13 13:11:41 +08:00
sillyguodong 51ab495198
escape filename when assemble URL (#22850)
Fixes: #22843 

### Cause:

affdd40296/services/repository/files/content.go (L161)

Previously, we did not escape the **"%"** that might be in "treePath"
when call "url.parse()".


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/218066318-5a909e50-2a17-46e6-b32f-684b2aa4b91f.png)

This function will check whether "%" is the beginning of an escape
character. Obviously, the "%" in the example (hello%mother.txt) is not
that. So, the function will return a error.

### Solution:
We can escape "treePath" by call "url.PathEscape()" function firstly.

### Screenshot:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/218069781-1a030f8b-18d0-4804-b0f8-73997849ef43.png)

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-02-12 09:31:14 +08:00
Nathaniel Sabanski fb1a2a13f0
Preview images for Issue cards in Project Board view (#22112)
Original Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22102

This addition would be a big benefit for design and art teams using the
issue tracking.

The preview will be the latest "image type" attachments on an issue-
simple, and allows for automatic updates of the cover image as issue
progress is made!

This would make Gitea competitive with Trello... wouldn't it be amazing
to say goodbye to Atlassian products? Ha.

First image is the most recent, the SQL will fetch up to 5 latest images
(URL string).

All images supported by browsers plus upcoming formats: *.avif *.bmp
*.gif *.jpg *.jpeg *.jxl *.png *.svg *.webp

The CSS will try to center-align images until it cannot, then it will
left align with overflow hidden. Single images get to be slightly
larger!

Tested so far on: Chrome, Firefox, Android Chrome, Android Firefox.

Current revision with light and dark themes:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066878-58e6bf73-0c93-4caa-8d40-38f4432b3578.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066555-293f65c3-e706-4888-8516-de8ec632d638.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-11 16:12:41 +08:00
wxiaoguang e9288c2477
Fix improper HTMLURL usages in Go code (#22839)
In Go code, HTMLURL should be only used for external systems, like
API/webhook/mail/notification, etc.

If a URL is used by `Redirect` or rendered in a template, it should be a
relative URL (aka `Link()` in Gitea)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-11 14:34:11 +08:00
Gusted 1cb8d14bf7
Use proxy for pull mirror (#22771)
- Use the proxy (if one is specified) for pull mirrors syncs.
- Pulled the code from
c2774d9e80/modules/git/repo.go (L164-L170)

Downstream issue: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/302

---------

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-11 08:39:50 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel bdd2c9d2ef
Fix update by rebase being wrongly disabled by protected base branch (#22825)
The branch this is force pushing to is the head branch in the head repo,
so it should be checking if that is protected, not the base.
2023-02-09 12:08:42 -05:00
John Olheiser 4dd7d61ac8
Load issue before accessing index in merge message (#22822)
Fixes #22821

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-09 10:47:52 +08:00
KN4CK3R e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams (#21441)
Fixes #19555

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
KN4CK3R f8c1e14a13
Use import of OCI structs (#22765)
Fixes #22758

Otherwise we would need to rewrite the structs in `oci.go`.
2023-02-06 10:07:09 +00:00
KN4CK3R d987ac6bf1
Add Chef package registry (#22554)
This PR implements a [Chef registry](https://chef.io/) to manage
cookbooks. This package type was a bit complicated because Chef uses RSA
signed requests as authentication with the registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213747995-46819fd8-c3d6-45a2-afd4-a4c3c8505a4a.png)


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213748145-d01c9e81-d4dd-41e3-a3cc-8241862c3166.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-06 09:49:21 +08:00
Jason Song c18a62279a
Fix time to NotifyPullRequestSynchronized (#22650)
Should call `PushToBaseRepo` before
`notification.NotifyPullRequestSynchronized`.

Or the notifier will get an old commit when reading branch
`pull/xxx/head`.

Found by ~#21937~ #22679.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 19:57:38 +08:00
KN4CK3R df789d962b
Add Cargo package registry (#21888)
This PR implements a [Cargo registry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/)
to manage Rust packages. This package type was a little bit more
complicated because Cargo needs an additional Git repository to store
its package index.

Screenshots:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102004-08d812ac-c066-4969-9bda-2fed818554eb.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102141-d9970f14-dca6-4174-b17a-50ba1bd79087.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102244-dc05743b-78b6-4d97-998e-ef76341a978f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 18:12:31 +08:00
techknowlogick 2741546bed
Repositories: by default disable all units except code and pulls on forks (#22541)
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.

A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.

Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.

code by: @brechtvl

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ 

When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.

Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
2023-02-04 14:48:38 +08:00
wxiaoguang 6bc3079c00
Refactor git command package to improve security and maintainability (#22678)
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)

## Review without space diff

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1

## Purpose of this PR

1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command

## The main idea of this PR

* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
    * Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
    * After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
    * -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`

## FAQ

### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?

#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.

Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.


### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`

According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.

### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?

Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.

And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.

### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?

Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.

### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?

At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.


### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?

Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-04 10:30:43 +08:00
zeripath 3c5655ce18
Improve trace logging for pulls and processes (#22633)
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.

This PR:

* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.

Ref #22578

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-03 18:11:48 -05:00
Pavel Ezhov 98770d3db8
Fix group filter for ldap source sync (#22506)
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.

- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic

Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-02 15:45:00 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 4e946e5a7d
Small refactor for loading PRs (#22652) 2023-02-01 21:49:28 -06:00
KN4CK3R 6ba9ff7b48
Add Conda package registry (#22262)
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
2023-02-01 12:30:39 -06:00
Lunny Xiao 2871ea0809
Add more events details supports for actions (#22680)
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-01 13:32:46 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel faa96553d1
Add repository setting to enable/disable releases unit (#22671)
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
2023-02-01 01:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song 707ecec715
Fix ref to trigger Actions (#22679)
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.

And improve UI:

<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png">


Related to #21937.
2023-01-31 22:45:25 +00:00
Jason Song 4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
KN4CK3R d283a31f03
Check quota limits for container uploads (#22450)
The test coverage has revealed that container packages were not checked
against the quota limits.
2023-01-29 11:34:29 -06:00
zeripath 78e6b21c1a
Improve checkIfPRContentChanged (#22611)
The code for checking if a commit has caused a change in a PR is
extremely inefficient and affects the head repository instead of using a
temporary repository.

This PR therefore makes several significant improvements:

* A temporary repo like that used in merging.
* The diff code is then significant improved to use a three-way diff
instead of comparing diffs (possibly binary) line-by-line - in memory...

Ref #22578

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-28 15:54:40 +00:00
a1012112796 48f5d51908
fix permission check for creating comment while mail (#22524)
only creating comment on locked issue request write permission,
for others, read permission is enough.

related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22056

/cc @KN4CK3R

---------

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-28 17:28:55 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
Sybren 25f4b7d7cd
Prevent duplicate labels when importing more than 99 (#22591)
Importing labels (via `gitea restore-repo`) did not split them up into
batches properly. The first "batch" would create all labels, the second
"batch" would create all labels except those in the first "batch", etc.
This meant that when importing more than 99 labels (the batch size)
there would always be duplicate ones.

This is solved by actually passing `labels[:lbBatchSize]` to the
`CreateLabels()` function, instead of the entire list `labels`.
2023-01-24 19:44:55 +00:00
KN4CK3R 21dd4a252a
Prevent multiple To recipients (#22566)
Change the mailer interface to prevent leaking of possible hidden email
addresses when sending to multiple recipients.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
2023-01-22 08:23:52 -06:00
Lunny Xiao 6fe3c8b398
Support org/user level projects (#22235)
Fix #13405

<img width="1151" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png">

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-01-20 19:42:33 +08:00
zeripath 4199d28053
When updating by rebase we need to set the environment for head repo (#22535)
The update by rebase code reuses the merge code but shortcircuits and
pushes back up to the head. However, it doesn't set the correct pushing
environment - and just uses the same environment as the base repo. This
leads to the push update failing and thence the PR becomes out-of-sync
with the head.

This PR fixes this and adjusts the trace logging elsewhere to help make
this clearer.

Fix #18802

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-19 17:31:44 -05:00
Sybren b383652e02
Fix assignment to cm.AssigneeID when importing comments (#22528)
This is a fix for https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22510

The code assumed that the `AssigneeID` from the comment YAML was an
`int64`, but it is actually an `int`, causing a panic. It also had no
check on whether the type cast was actually valid, so badly formatted
YAML could also cause a panic.

Both these issues have been fixed.
2023-01-19 13:24:40 -05:00
Sybren 151b1a9508
Support importing comment types (#22510)
This commit adds support for specifying comment types when importing
with `gitea restore-repo`. It makes it possible to import issue changes,
such as "title changed" or "assigned user changed".

An earlier version of this pull request was made by Matti Ranta, in
https://future.projects.blender.org/blender-migration/gitea-bf/pulls/3

There are two changes with regard to Matti's original code:

1. The comment type was an `int64` in Matti's code, and is now using a
string. This makes it possible to use `comment_type: title`, which is
more reliable and future-proof than an index into an internal list in
the Gitea Go code.

2. Matti's code also had support for including labels, but in a way that
would require knowing the database ID of the labels before the import
even starts, which is impossible. This can be solved by using label
names instead of IDs; for simplicity I I left that out of this PR.
2023-01-18 21:14:56 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel cdf53fa4a7
Fix issue not auto-closing when it includes a reference to a branch (#22514)
Ensure branch prefix is stripped away for both when comparing the branch
name.
2023-01-18 19:24:38 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel aa87b36900
Fix 500 error viewing pull request when fork has pull requests disabled (#22512)
Swallow error just like in #20839, for the case where there is no
protected branch.

Fixes #20826 for me, though I can't tell if this now covers all cases.
2023-01-18 13:54:57 -06:00
Lunny Xiao f59ce77772
Display unreferenced packages total size in package admin panel (#22498) 2023-01-18 09:52:04 -06:00
Chongyi Zheng de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes #4300
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Lunny Xiao db2286bbb6
some refactor about code comments (#20821) 2023-01-17 15:03:44 -06:00
Yarden Shoham e763fab685
Fix pull request API field closed_at always being null (#22482)
Fix #22480
2023-01-17 11:42:32 +00:00
Haruo Kinoshita 9edf80f472
Fix migration from gitbucket (repost) (#22477)
Reposting pull request for #22465 

> Migration from GitBucket does not work due to a access for "Reviews"
API on GitBucket that makes 404 response. This PR has following changes.
> 1. Made to stop access for Reviews API while migrating from GitBucket.
> 2. Added support for custom URL (e.g.
`http://example.com/gitbucket/owner/repository`)
> 3. Made to accept for git checkout URL
(`http://example.com/git/owner/repository.git`)

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-17 15:22:00 +08:00
KN4CK3R 8117e41dfa
Add reply hint to mail text (#22459)
Addition to #22056

This PR adds a hint to mail text if replies are supported.
I can't tell if the text structure is supported in every language. Maybe
we need to put the whole line in the translation file and use
parameters.
2023-01-16 14:58:01 -06:00
zeripath 2cc3a6381c
Add cron method to gc LFS MetaObjects (#22385)
This PR adds a task to the cron service to allow garbage collection of
LFS meta objects. As repositories may have a large number of
LFSMetaObjects, an updated column is added to this table and it is used
to perform a generational GC to attempt to reduce the amount of work.
(There may need to be a bit more work here but this is probably enough
for the moment.)

Fix #7045

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 13:50:53 -06:00
Felipe Leopoldo Sologuren Gutiérrez 04c97aa364
Change use of Walk to WalkDir to improve disk performance (#22462)
As suggest by Go developers, use `filepath.WalkDir` instead of
`filepath.Walk` because [*Walk is less efficient than WalkDir,
introduced in Go 1.16, which avoids calling `os.Lstat` on every file or
directory visited](https://pkg.go.dev/path/filepath#Walk).

This proposition address that, in a similar way as
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22392 did.


Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-16 16:21:44 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
KN4CK3R fc037b4b82
Add support for incoming emails (#22056)
closes #13585
fixes #9067
fixes #2386
ref #6226
ref #6219
fixes #745

This PR adds support to process incoming emails to perform actions.
Currently I added handling of replies and unsubscribing from
issues/pulls. In contrast to #13585 the IMAP IDLE command is used
instead of polling which results (in my opinion 😉) in cleaner code.

Procedure:
- When sending an issue/pull reply email, a token is generated which is
present in the Reply-To and References header.
- IMAP IDLE waits until a new email arrives
- The token tells which action should be performed

A possible signature and/or reply gets stripped from the content.

I added a new service to the drone pipeline to test the receiving of
incoming mails. If we keep this in, we may test our outgoing emails too
in future.

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-14 23:57:10 +08:00
zeripath 99cf0d394e
Continue GCing other repos on error in one repo (#22422)
The current code propagates all errors up to the iteration step meaning
that a single malformed repo will prevent GC of other repos.

This PR simply stops that propagation.

Fix #21605

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-13 09:48:48 +08:00
John Olheiser 1ee1147baa
fix: don't replace err variable in nested check (#22416)
We can use `:=` to make `err` local to the if-scope instead of
overwriting the `err` in outer scope.

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-12 14:57:12 -06:00
techknowlogick b36854df37
Update golang deps (#22410)
Note, hashicorp's LRU has been updated to v2 which supports generics but
this was left out as it is a more involved upgrade.
2023-01-12 09:21:16 +01:00
Jason Song 477a1cc40e
Improve utils of slices (#22379)
- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.
2023-01-11 13:31:16 +08:00
John Olheiser e7f1d45eb5
fix: omit avatar_url in discord payload when empty (#22393)
Fixes #22391

This field is optional for Discord, however when it exists in the
payload it is now validated.
Omitting it entirely just makes Discord use the default for that
webhook, which is set on the Discord side.

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-10 14:01:52 -05:00
Jason Song 7adc2de464
Use context parameter in models/git (#22367)
After #22362, we can feel free to use transactions without
`db.DefaultContext`.

And there are still lots of models using `db.DefaultContext`, I think we
should refactor them carefully and one by one.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-09 11:50:54 +08:00
Jason Song 6135359a04
Always reuse transaction (#22362) 2023-01-08 09:34:58 +08:00
Gusted 96797fed31
Unify hashing for avatar (#22289)
- Unify the hashing code for repository and user avatars into a
function.
- Use a sane hash function instead of MD5.
- Only require hashing once instead of twice(w.r.t. hashing for user
avatar).
- Improve the comment for the hashing code of why it works.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-01-02 22:46:39 +01:00
delvh 0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
Jason Song 47efba78ec
Support template for merge message description (#22248)
Fix #21435.

Use the first line of the template as the git commit message title, and
the rest as the description.

## Snapshots

<img width="806" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644083-5d85179c-cf58-404f-bc98-c662398a2411.png">
<img width="860" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644392-22573090-e2c1-458b-ba44-855b79735632.png">
<img width="1154" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644457-a1b2711a-6787-45b4-b52c-a88d7fc132d7.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-29 14:40:20 +02:00
KN4CK3R a35749893b
Move convert package to services (#22264)
Addition to #22256

The `convert` package relies heavily on different models which is
[disallowed by our definition of
modules](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#design-guideline).
This helps to prevent possible import cycles.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-29 10:57:15 +08:00
Lunny Xiao ca67c5a8a7
refactor auth interface to return error when verify failure (#22119)
This PR changed the Auth interface signature from 
`Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) *user_model.User`
to 
`Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) (*user_model.User, error)`.

There is a new return argument `error` which means the verification
condition matched but verify process failed, we should stop the auth
process.

Before this PR, when return a `nil` user, we don't know the reason why
it returned `nil`. If the match condition is not satisfied or it
verified failure? For these two different results, we should have
different handler. If the match condition is not satisfied, we should
try next auth method and if there is no more auth method, it's an
anonymous user. If the condition matched but verify failed, the auth
process should be stop and return immediately.

This will fix #20563

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2022-12-28 13:53:28 +08:00
Xinyu Zhou 7cc7db73b9
Add option to prohibit fork if user reached maximum limit of repositories (#21848)
If user has reached the maximum limit of repositories:

- Before
  - disallow create
  - allow fork without limit
- This patch:
  - disallow create
  - disallow fork
- Add option `ALLOW_FORK_WITHOUT_MAXIMUM_LIMIT` (Default **true**) :
enable this allow user fork repositories without maximum number limit

fixed https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21847

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
2022-12-27 15:21:14 -06:00
Jason Song 6cf09ccab4
Use complete SHA to create and query commit status (#22244)
Fix #13485.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-27 21:12:49 +08:00
Jason Song 71ca3067bc
Check primary keys for all tables and drop ForeignReference (#21721)
Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see
- #16802
- #21086

We can add a test to keep it from being broken again.

Edit:

~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the
`ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086.

More context can be found in comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-23 19:35:43 +08:00
Jason Song 659055138b
Secrets storage with SecretKey encrypted (#22142)
Fork of #14483, but [gave up
MasterKey](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14483#issuecomment-1350728557),
and fixed some problems.

Close #12065.
Needed by #13539.

Featrues:
- Secrets for repo and org, not user yet.
- Use SecretKey to encrypte/encrypt secrets.
- Trim spaces of secret value.
- Add a new locale ini block, to make it easy to support secrets for
user.

Snapshots:

Repo level secrets:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823319-b8a4903f-38ca-4af7-9d05-336a5af906f3.png)

Rrg level secrets

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823371-8bd02e93-1928-40d1-8c76-f48b255ace36.png)

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-20 17:07:13 +08:00
zeripath d6b96627c1
Add setting to disable the git apply step in test patch (#22130)
For a long time Gitea has tested PR patches using a git apply --check
method, and in fact prior to the introduction of a read-tree assisted
three-way merge in #18004, this was the only way of checking patches.

Since #18004, the git apply --check method has been a fallback method,
only used when the read-tree three-way merge method has detected a
conflict. The read-tree assisted three-way merge method is much faster
and less resource intensive method of detecting conflicts. #18004 kept
the git apply method around because it was thought possible that this
fallback might be able to rectify conflicts that the read-tree three-way
merge detected. I am not certain if this could ever be the case.

Given the uncertainty here and the now relative stability of the
read-tree method - this PR makes using this fallback optional and
disables it by default. The hope is that users will not notice any
significant difference in conflict detection and we will be able to
remove the git apply fallback in future, and/or improve the read-tree
three-way merge method to catch any conflicts that git apply method
might have been able to fix.

An additional benefit is that patch checking should be significantly
less resource intensive and much quicker.

(See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22083\#issuecomment-1347961737)

Ref #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-19 19:37:15 +08:00
Christian Ullrich 84285a1169
Do not list active repositories as unadopted (#22034)
This fixes a bug where, when searching unadopted repositories, active
repositories will be listed as well. This is because the size of the
array of repository names to check is larger by one than the
`IterateBufferSize`.

For an `IterateBufferSize` of 50, the original code will pass 51
repository names but set the query to `LIMIT 50`. If all repositories in
the query are active (i.e. not unadopted) one of them will be omitted
from the result. Due to the `ORDER BY` clause it will be the oldest (or
least recently modified) one.

Bug found in 1.17.3.

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-16 16:58:56 +08:00
zeripath 651fe4bb7d
Add doctor command for full GC of LFS (#21978)
The recent PR adding orphaned checks to the LFS storage is not
sufficient to completely GC LFS, as it is possible for LFSMetaObjects to
remain associated with repos but still need to be garbage collected.

Imagine a situation where a branch is uploaded containing LFS files but
that branch is later completely deleted. The LFSMetaObjects will remain
associated with the Repository but the Repository will no longer contain
any pointers to the object.

This PR adds a second doctor command to perform a full GC.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-15 20:44:16 +00:00
zeripath cdc43454a4
Correctly handle moved files in apply patch (#22118)
Moved files in a patch will result in git apply returning:

```
error: {filename}: No such file or directory
```

This wasn't handled by the git apply patch code. This PR adds handling
for this.

Fix #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2022-12-14 21:45:33 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 003b4e209c
Allow disable code tab (#20805)
I know some users created a repository in an organization but just use
issues and projects to handle the whole organizations issues. So that
`Code` could be disabled per repository.

<img width="1148" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792075-346cb508-b620-4adb-bc9a-cba76fdcb294.png">

It could also become a wiki repository.

<img width="1173" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792324-e15c6f68-35c0-4105-ab77-83585ce53672.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-12 13:29:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 68704532c2
Rename almost all Ctx functions (#22071) 2022-12-10 10:46:31 +08:00
KN4CK3R 3c59d31bc6
Add API management for issue/pull and comment attachments (#21783)
Close #14601
Fix #3690

Revive of #14601.
Updated to current code, cleanup and added more read/write checks.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andre Bruch <ab@andrebruch.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-09 14:35:56 +08:00
Jason Song 74874d065f
Fix issue/PR numbers (#22037)
When deleting a closed issue, we should update both `NumIssues`and
`NumClosedIssues`, or `NumOpenIssues`(`= NumIssues -NumClosedIssues`)
will be wrong. It's the same for pull requests.

Releated to #21557.

Alse fixed two harmless problems:

- The SQL to check issue/PR total numbers is wrong, that means it will
update the numbers even if they are correct.
- Replace legacy `num_issues = num_issues + 1` operations with
`UpdateRepoIssueNumbers`.
2022-12-06 15:53:09 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 0a7d3ff786
refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2022-12-03 10:48:26 +08:00
Jason Song f59a74852b
Update gitea-vet to check FSFE REUSE (#22004)
Related to:
- #21840
- https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-vet/pulls/21

What it looks like when it's working:
https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/64040/1/5

All available SPDX license identifiers: [SPDX License
List](https://spdx.org/licenses/).

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-02 22:14:57 +08:00
Jason Song 9607750b5e
Replace fmt.Sprintf with hex.EncodeToString (#21960)
`hex.EncodeToString` has better performance than `fmt.Sprintf("%x",
[]byte)`, we should use it as much as possible.

I'm not an extreme fan of performance, so I think there are some
exceptions:

- `fmt.Sprintf("%x", func(...)[N]byte())`
- We can't slice the function return value directly, and it's not worth
adding lines.
    ```diff
    func A()[20]byte { ... }
    - a := fmt.Sprintf("%x", A())
    - a := hex.EncodeToString(A()[:]) // invalid
    + tmp := A()
    + a := hex.EncodeToString(tmp[:])
    ```
- `fmt.Sprintf("%X", []byte)`
- `strings.ToUpper(hex.EncodeToString(bytes))` has even worse
performance.
2022-11-28 11:19:18 +00:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
zeripath f6fd501841
Correct the fallbacks for mailer configuration (#21945)
Unfortunately the fallback configuration code for [mailer] that were
added in #18982 are incorrect. When you read a value from an ini section
that key is added. This leads to a failure of the fallback mechanism.
Further there is also a spelling mistake in the startTLS configuration.

This PR restructures the mailer code to first map the deprecated
settings on to the new ones - and then use ini.MapTo to map those on to
the struct with additional validation as necessary.

Ref #21744

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-27 10:08:40 +00:00
zeripath 787f6c3227
Ensure that Webhook tasks are not double delivered (#21558)
When re-retrieving hook tasks from the DB double check if they have not
been delivered in the meantime. Further ensure that tasks are marked as
delivered when they are being delivered.

In addition:
* Improve the error reporting and make sure that the webhook task
population script runs in a separate goroutine.
* Only get hook task IDs out of the DB instead of the whole task when
repopulating the queue
* When repopulating the queue make the DB request paged

Ref #17940 

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-23 22:10:04 +08:00
Xinyu Zhou 68e934ab5d
Add option to enable CAPTCHA validation for login (#21638)
Enable this to require captcha validation for user login. You also must
enable `ENABLE_CAPTCHA`.

Summary:
- Consolidate CAPTCHA template
- add CAPTCHA handle and context
- add `REQUIRE_CAPTCHA_FOR_LOGIN` config and docs
- Consolidate CAPTCHA set-up and verification code 

Partially resolved #6049 

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-22 21:13:18 +00:00
zeripath e77b76425e
Prepend refs/heads/ to issue template refs (#20461)
Fix #20456

At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue
branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in
our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be
addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one)

We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible.
That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add
`refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and
merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just
wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the
prefix at the time of
presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and
permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` /
`SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix,
and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way
of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must
not store a potentially
ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` -
there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same
short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this
will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a
`tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.)

To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check
the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know
or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the
`BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer
to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is
particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish`
be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.)

Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The
links here are created with `git.RefURL`

Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided
`ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external
escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place -
unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong
thing.)

Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore
potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that
is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This
will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases
where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`.

But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make
it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a
`branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you
are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and
`tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing
problems like this.

Fix #20456

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 20:58:49 +08:00
Jason Song e4eaa68a2b
Replace yaml.v2 with yaml.v3 (#21832)
I don't see why we have to use two versions of yaml. The difference
between the two versions has nothing to do with our usage.
2022-11-21 16:36:59 +08:00
KN4CK3R 32db62515f
Add package registry cleanup rules (#21658)
Fixes #20514
Fixes #20766
Fixes #20631

This PR adds Cleanup Rules for the package registry. This allows to
delete unneeded packages automatically. Cleanup rules can be set up from
the user or org settings.
Please have a look at the documentation because I'm not a native english
speaker.

Rule Form

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330792-c13918a6-e196-4e71-9f53-18554515edca.png)

Rule List

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199331261-5f6878e8-a80c-4985-800d-ebb3524b1a8d.png)

Rule Preview

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330917-c95e4017-cf64-4142-a3e4-af18c4f127c3.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-20 16:08:38 +02:00
Jim Kirisame c8f3eb6acb
Fix wechatwork webhook sends empty content in PR review (#21762)
Wechatwork webhook is sending the following string for pull request reviews:

``` markdown
# 
>
```

This commit fixes this problem.
2022-11-19 15:19:14 +00:00
silverwind eec1c71880
Show syntax lexer name in file view/blame (#21814)
Show which Chroma Lexer is used to highlight the file in the file
header. It's useful for development to see what was detected, and I
think it's not bad info to have for the user:

<img width="233" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 31 16"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770854-44933dfc-70a4-487c-8457-1bb3cc43ea62.png">
<img width="226" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 36 06"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770856-9260ce6f-6c0f-442c-92b5-201e5b113188.png">
<img width="194" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 36 26"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770857-6f56591b-80ea-42cc-8ea5-21b9156c018b.png">

Also, I improved the way this header overflows on small screens:

<img width="354" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 44 36"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201774828-2ddbcde1-da15-403f-bf7a-6248449fa2c5.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 13:08:06 +02:00