- Check if someone is (accidentally) trying to create a pull request via
AGit with changes already in the target branch and fail if that is the
case.
- Added integration test.
- The ambiguous character detection is an important security feature to
combat against sourcebase attacks (https://trojansource.codes/).
- However there are a few problems with the feature as it stands
today (i) it's apparantly an big performance hitter, it's twice as slow
as syntax highlighting (ii) it contains false positives, because it's
reporting valid problems but not valid within the context of a
programming language (ambiguous charachters in code comments being a
prime example) that can lead to security issues (iii) charachters from
certain languages always being marked as ambiguous. It's a lot of effort
to fix the aforementioned issues.
- Therefore, make it configurable in which context the ambiguous
character detection should be run, this avoids running detection in all
contexts such as file views, but still enable it in commits and pull
requests diffs where it matters the most. Ideally this also becomes an
per-repository setting, but the code architecture doesn't allow for a
clean implementation of that.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration tests to ensure that the contexts and instance-wide
is respected (and that ambigious charachter detection actually work in
different places).
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2395#issuecomment-1575547
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/564
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27172#discussion_r1493735466
When cleanup artifacts, it removes storage first. If storage is not
exist (maybe delete manually), it gets error and continue loop. It makes
a dead loop if there are a lot pending but non-existing artifacts.
Now it updates db record at first to avoid keep a lot of pending status
artifacts.
Fix#29166
Add support for the following activity types of `pull_request`
- assigned
- unassigned
- review_requested
- review_request_removed
- milestoned
- demilestoned
(cherry picked from commit 1a6e1cbada27db1e3327b0d7d331492c95e24759)
Port of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29205
Use a clearly defined "signing secret" for token signing.
(cherry picked from commit 8be198cdef0a486f417663b1fd6878458d7e5d92)
TLDR: Less code, better maintainability and more comments.
- Add code comments to explain what the code does, it's quite a big
function so it definitely deserved some of that.
- Simplify some logic.
- Load the `pusher` in a single place.
- Update the error messages to be more correct, not capitlized, include
more debug info and remove 'Error:' As it's no need to indicate that,
errors are concenated with `:` seperators.
- Improve the message that a change was rejected, because a force push
was detected and the `force-push` option wasn't set.
- Avoid a second time loading `gitRepo.GetObjectFormat` and handle the
error gracefully for the other occurence.
- Adds integration test for force push detection.
There is a missing newline when generating the debian apt repo InRelease
file, which results in output like:
```
[...]
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:03:01 UTC
Acquire-By-Hash: yesMD5Sum:
51a518dbddcd569ac3e0cebf330c800a 3018 main-dev/binary-amd64/Packages
[...]
```
It appears this would probably result in apt ignoring the
Acquire-By-Hash setting and not using the by-hash functionality,
although I'm not sure how to confirm it.
(cherry picked from commit 33400a02d4eb35a0656fd6d20fc56801de09b959)
Continuation of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25439. Fixes#847
Before:
<img width="1296" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/32161460/24571ac8-b254-43c9-b178-97340f0dc8a9">
----
After:
<img width="1296" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/32161460/c60b2459-9d10-4d42-8d83-d5ef0f45bf94">
---
#### Overview
This is the implementation of a requested feature: Contributors graph
(#847)
It makes Activity page a multi-tab page and adds a new tab called
Contributors. Contributors tab shows the contribution graphs over time
since the repository existed. It also shows per user contribution graphs
for top 100 contributors. Top 100 is calculated based on the selected
contribution type (commits, additions or deletions).
---
#### Demo
(The demo is a bit old but still a good example to show off the main
features)
<video src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/32161460/9f68103f-8145-4cc2-94bc-5546daae7014" controls width="320" height="240">
<a href="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/32161460/9f68103f-8145-4cc2-94bc-5546daae7014">Download</a>
</video>
#### Features:
- Select contribution type (commits, additions or deletions)
- See overall and per user contribution graphs for the selected
contribution type
- Zoom and pan on graphs to see them in detail
- See top 100 contributors based on the selected contribution type and
selected time range
- Go directly to users' profile by clicking their name if they are
registered gitea users
- Cache the results so that when the same repository is visited again
fetching data will be faster
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: hiifong <i@hiif.ong>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 21331be30cb8f6c2d8b9dd99f1061623900632b9)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)
Conflicts:
modules/web/middleware/binding.go
routers/web/feed/convert.go
tests/integration/branches_test.go
tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
trivial context conflicts
`KeyID` is never set.
(cherry picked from commit 155269fa586c41a268530c3bb56349e68e6761d7)
Conflicts:
models/user/email_address.go
trivial context conflict
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)
One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).
To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
If no `-o description=` is provided, fill it in automatically from the
first commit, just like title. Also allow filling in either, and
specifying them independently.
This means that `git push origin HEAD:refs/for/main/my-local-branch`
will fill in the PR title, *and* the description, without having to
specify additional parameters.
The description is the first commit's message without the first two
lines (the title and a newline, as customary).
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.
Closes#24906
This splits out the repository unit settings (formerly "Advanced
settings" under the repository settings page) into their own, separate
page.
The primary reason for this is that the settings page became long and
complicated, with a structure that not always made sense. A secondary
reason is that toggling units on and off should not necessarily be an
"advanced" setting. We want to make doing that easier, and having the
units on their own page helps with that.
This is basically a refactor, there is no new functionality introduced,
just an extra pair of routes for the new page, and the supporting code.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Skip a HookEventPullRequestSync event if it has the same CommitSHA as an existing HookEventPullRequest event in the ActionRun table. A HookEventPullRequestSync event must only create an ActionRun if the CommitSHA is different from what it was when the PR was open.
This guards against a race that can happen when the following is done in parallel:
* A commit C is pushed to a repo on branch B
* A pull request with head on branch B
it is then possible that the pull request is created first, successfully. The commit that was just pushed is not known yet but the PR only references the repository and the B branch so it is fine.
A HookEventPullRequest event is sent to the notification queue but not processed immediately.
The commit C is pushed and processed successfully. Since the PR already exists and has a head that matches the branch, the head of the PR is updated with the commit C and a HookEventPullRequestSync event is sent to the notification queue.
The HookEventPullRequest event is processed and since the head of the PR was updated to be commit C, an ActionRun with CommitSHA C is created.
The HookEventPullRequestSync event is then processed and also has a CommitSHA equal to C.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2314
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Outgoing new release e-mail notifications were missing links to the
actual release. An example from Codeberg.org e-mail:
<a href=3D"">View it on Codeberg.org</a>.<br/>
This PR adds `"Link"` context property pointing to the release on the
web interface.
The change was tested using `[mailer] PROTOCOL=dummy`.
Signed-off-by: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
(cherry picked from commit 37191dcfbdbd007266a4d15a3c85cdf94cec1a7a)
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* Before scheduling the task, AddTestPullRequestTask stores the max
index of the repository
* When the task runs, it does not take into account pull requests that
have an index higher than the recorded max index
When AddTestPullRequestTask is called with isSync == true, it is the
direct consequence of a new commit being pushed. Forgejo knows nothing
of this new commit yet. If a PR is created later and its head
references the new commit, it will have an index that is higher and
must not be taken into account. It would be acting and triggering a
notification for a PR based on an event that happened before it
existed.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2236
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
(cherry picked from commit b3be895a30)
Previously, the repo wiki was hardcoded to use `master` as its branch,
this change makes it possible to use `main` (or something else, governed
by `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`, a setting that already exists and
defaults to `main`).
The way it is done is that a new column is added to the `repository`
table: `wiki_branch`. The migration will make existing repositories
default to `master`, for compatibility's sake, even if they don't have a
Wiki (because it's easier to do that). Newly created repositories will
default to `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH` instead.
The Wiki service was updated to use the branch name stored in the
database, and fall back to the default if it is empty.
Old repositories with Wikis using the older `master` branch will have
the option to do a one-time transition to `main`, available via the
repository settings in the "Danger Zone". This option will only be
available for repositories that have the internal wiki enabled, it is
not empty, and the wiki branch is not `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`.
When migrating a repository with a Wiki, Forgejo will use the same
branch name for the wiki as the source repository did. If that's not the
same as the default, the option to normalize it will be available after
the migration's done.
Additionally, the `/api/v1/{owner}/{repo}` endpoint was updated: it will
now include the wiki branch name in `GET` requests, and allow changing
the wiki branch via `PATCH`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d87c526d2a)
So the caller can check log events at the desired level instead of
being limited to the default level log.INFO
(cherry picked from commit 2fbf5f9555)
(cherry picked from commit e2137a3147)
handleSchedules() is called every time an event is received and will
check the content of the main branch to (re)create scheduled events.
There is no reason why intput.Event will be relevant when the schedule
workflow runs.
(cherry picked from commit 9a712bb276)
(cherry picked from commit 41af36da81)
(cherry picked from commit bb83604fa2)
(cherry picked from commit 65e4503a7a)
(cherry picked from commit e562b6f7a0)
(cherry picked from commit aca2ae2390)
(cherry picked from commit bf2b5ea507)
This function is now being used elsewhere and cannot be reverted. Only
the part that was modified in addition to being moved is deleted.
(cherry picked from commit 72954836a4)
(cherry picked from commit 86f4d1871e)
(cherry picked from commit 8089076ee2)
- Unset the http proxies environments for the `TestWebhookProxy`.
- Resolves#2132
(cherry picked from commit 244b9786fc)
(cherry picked from commit 8602dfa6a2)
(cherry picked from commit 8621449209)
(cherry picked from commit aefa77f917)
services: in loadOneBranch, return if CountDivergingCommits fail
If we can't count the number of diverging commits for one reason or
another (such as the branch being in the database, but missing from
disk), rather than logging an error and continuing into a crash (because
`divergence` will be nil), return an error instead.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 8266105f24)
services: Gracefully handle missing branches
When loading branches, if loading one fails, log an error, and ignore
the branch, rather than returning and causing an internal server error.
Ideally, we would only ignore the error if it was caused by a missing
branch, and do it silently, like the respective API endpoint does.
However, veryfing that at this place is not very practical, so for the
time being, ignore any and all branch loading errors.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit e552a8fd62)
tests: Add a testcase for missing branches
This tests the scenario reported in Codeberg/Community#1408: a branch
that is recorded in the database, but missing on disk was causing
internal server errors. With recent changes, that is no longer the case,
the error is logged and then ignored.
This test case tests this behaviour, that the repo's branches page on
the web UI functions even if the git branch is missing.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit e20eb7b385)
tests: More testing in TestDatabaseMissingABranch
In the `TestDatabaseMissingABranch` testcase, make sure that the
branches are in sync between the db and git before deleting a branch via
git, then compare the branch count from the web UI, making sure that it
returns an out-of-sync value first, and the correct one after another
sync.
This is currently tested by scraping the UI, and relies on the fact that
the branch counter is out of date before syncing. If that issue gets
resolved, we'll have to adjust the test to verify the sync another way.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 8c2ccfcece)
(cherry picked from commit 439fadf563)
(cherry picked from commit 44dd80552c)
(cherry picked from commit 37b91fe6f2)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)
[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review
If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.
The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.
Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.
The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.
(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
(cherry picked from commit b173a0ccee)
(cherry picked from commit 838ab9740a)
- Add condition to ensure doer isn't nil when using it.
- Added unit test.
- Resolves#2055
(cherry picked from commit 8f1a74fb29)
(cherry picked from commit 60ac881776)
(cherry picked from commit 5fdc461ac5)
(cherry picked from commit 70623e8da1)
(cherry picked from commit 1d5153aaf6)
(cherry picked from commit 3927f0c8b2)
