Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jason Song 0c40cff9a4
Clear up old Actions logs (#31735)
Part of #24256.

Clear up old action logs to free up storage space.

Users will see a message indicating that the log has been cleared if
they view old tasks.

<img width="1361" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f0f3a3a-bc5a-402f-90ca-49282d196c22">

Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/40

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 687c1182482ad9443a5911c068b317a91c91d586)

Conflicts:
	custom/conf/app.example.ini
	routers/web/repo/actions/view.go
  trivial context conflict
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Denys Konovalov 5734499778
add skip secondary authorization option for public oauth2 clients (#31454) (migration v301)
(cherry picked from commit a8d0c879c38e21a8e78db627119bf622d919ee75)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Henry Goodman ee8f3e09f8
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) (migration v300)
Fixes #22722

Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).

The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.

Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.

It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.

This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)

This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`

<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">

branch `test` being a protected branch:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc)
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 12cb1d2998f2a307713ce979f8d585711e92061c)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Gusted 138942c09e
[CHORE] Move test related function to own package
- Go's deadcode eliminator is quite simple, if you put a public function
in a package `aa/bb` that is used only by tests, it would still be built
if package `aa/bb` was imported. This means that if such functions use
libraries relevant only to tests that those libraries would still be
be built and increase the binary size of a Go binary.
- This is also the case with Forgejo, `models/migrations/base/tests.go`
contained functions exclusively used by tests which (skipping some steps
here) imports https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go, which is
2MiB. The `code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/base` package is
imported by `cmd/doctor` and thus the code of the clickhouse library is
also built and included in the Forgejo binary, although entirely unused
and not reachable.
- This patch moves the test-related functions to their own package, so
Go's deadcode eliminator knows not to build the test-related functions
and thus reduces the size of the Forgejo binary.
- It is not possible to move this to a `_test.go` file because Go does
not allow importing functions from such files, so any test helper
function must be in a non-test package and file.
- Reduction of size (built with `TAGS="sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify" make
build`):
  - Before: 95912040 bytes (92M)
  - After: 92306888 bytes (89M)
2024-07-14 17:00:49 +02:00
metiftikci ca0921a95a
Prevent simultaneous editing of comments and issues (#31053)
fixes #22907

Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist

![issue-content-edit](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/29250154/a0828889-fb96-4bc4-8600-da92e3205812)

(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)

Conflicts:
	models/issues/comment.go
	 c7a389f2b2 [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments

	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	 trivial context conflicts

	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	services/issue/comments.go
	services/issue/content.go
         user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo

	routers/web/repo/issue.go
	 trivial difference from 6a0750177f Allow to save empty comment
         user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo

	templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
	 templates changed a lot in Forgejo but the change is
	 trivially ported

	tests/integration/issue_test.go
	 other tests were added in the same region

	web_src/js/features/repo-issue-edit.js
	 the code is still web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
	 trivially ported
2024-06-02 16:26:54 +02:00
wxiaoguang 2d2c18f0bd
Rename migration package name for 1.22-rc1 (#30730)
Ref: Propose to restart 1.22 release #30501
(cherry picked from commit 6d2a307ad8af7d686f1c3a3706ff0f2df895658a)

Conflicts:
	models/migrations/migrations.go
	models/migrations/v1_22/v297.go
	trivial conflict because a migration does not exist in Forgejo
2024-04-28 15:39:01 +02:00
Lunny Xiao 4f73382e95
Fix wrong table name (#30557)
The table name should be `oauth2_application` but `o_auth2_application`

Caused by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21316/files#diff-9610efbc608a41f1f2eaff5790423f0a187906f6ff0beb23a5e8d18366cc2ccfR38

(cherry picked from commit e94864e86c43f435af7e1fc3c4831a4cc0a3e981)

Conflicts:
	models/migrations/migrations.go
	trivial context conflict because
	Allow everyone to read or write a wiki by a repo unit setting (#30495)
        was skipped.
2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
Lunny Xiao c0d22d55c9
Fix commitstatus summary (#30431)
The target_url is necessary for the UI, but missed in
commit_status_summary table. This PR fix it.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-16 12:01:27 +02:00
Lunny Xiao 6495741238
Add commit status summary table to reduce query from commit status table (#30223)
This PR adds a new table named commit status summary to reduce queries
from the commit status table. After this change, commit status summary
table will be used for the final result, commit status table will be for
details.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2024-04-16 12:01:20 +02:00
Lunny Xiao f0004760f6
[PORT] gitea#30190: Add unique index for project_issue to prevent duplicate data
Fix #27639

---

Remove MSSQL specific code per https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/122

(cherry picked from commit b4825670596fe745cebdcc63a8ead4388602d42c)
2024-04-07 14:51:50 +02:00