- The Conan and Container packages use a different type of
authentication. It first authenticates via the regular way (api tokens
or user:password, handled via `auth.Basic`) and then generates a JWT
token that is used by the package software (such as Docker) to do the
action they wanted to do. This JWT token didn't properly propagate the
API scopes that the token was generated for, and thus could lead to a
'scope escalation' within the Conan and Container packages, read
access to write access.
- Store the API scope in the JWT token, so it can be propagated on
subsequent calls that uses that JWT token.
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#5128
- Moves to a fork of gitea.com/go-chi/session that removed support for
couchbase (and ledis, but that was never made available in Forgejo)
along with other code improvements.
f8ce677595..main
- The rationale for removing Couchbase is quite simple. Its not licensed
under FOSS
license (https://www.couchbase.com/blog/couchbase-adopts-bsl-license/)
and therefore cannot be tested by Forgejo and shouldn't be supported.
This is a similair vein to the removal of MSSQL
support (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/122)
- A additional benefit is that this reduces the Forgejo binary by ~600Kb.
- Continuation of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18835 (by
@Gusted, so it's fine to change copyright holder to Forgejo).
- Add the option to use SSH for push mirrors, this would allow for the
deploy keys feature to be used and not require tokens to be used which
cannot be limited to a specific repository. The private key is stored
encrypted (via the `keying` module) on the database and NEVER given to
the user, to avoid accidental exposure and misuse.
- CAVEAT: This does require the `ssh` binary to be present, which may
not be available in containerized environments, this could be solved by
adding a SSH client into forgejo itself and use the forgejo binary as
SSH command, but should be done in another PR.
- CAVEAT: Mirroring of LFS content is not supported, this would require
the previous stated problem to be solved due to LFS authentication (an
attempt was made at forgejo/forgejo#2544).
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#4416
- When a comment was updated or deleted and was part of an
pending/ongoing review, it would have triggered a notification, such as
a webhook.
- This patch checks if the comment is part of a pending review and then
does not fire a notification and, in the case of updating a comment,
does not save the content history because this is not necessary if it is
still a "draft" comment given it is a pending comment (there is no need
to see my embarrassing typos).
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4368
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/164 for the
rationale and discussion of this change.
Everything related to the `go-git` dependency is dropped (Only a single
instance is left in a test file to test for an XSS, it requires crafting
an commit that Git itself refuses to craft). `_gogit` files have
been removed entirely, `go:build: !gogit` is removed, `XXX_nogogit.go` files
either have been renamed or had their code being merged into the
`XXX.go` file.
Now that my colleague just posted a wonderful blog post https://blog.datalad.org/posts/forgejo-runner-podman-deployment/ on forgejo runner, some time I will try to add that damn codespell action to work on CI here ;) meanwhile some typos managed to sneak in and this PR should address them (one change might be functional in a test -- not sure if would cause a fail or not)
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4857
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
These are the three conflicted changes from #4716:
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31632
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31688
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31706
cc @earl-warren; as per discussion on https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31632 this involves a small compatibility break (OIDC introspection requests now require a valid client ID and secret, instead of a valid OIDC token)
## Checklist
The [developer guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/developer/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Draft release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Breaking features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4724): <!--number 4724 --><!--line 0 --><!--description T0lEQyBpbnRlZ3JhdGlvbnMgdGhhdCBQT1NUIHRvIGAvbG9naW4vb2F1dGgvaW50cm9zcGVjdGAgd2l0aG91dCBzZW5kaW5nIEhUVFAgYmFzaWMgYXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gd2lsbCBub3cgZmFpbCB3aXRoIGEgNDAxIEhUVFAgVW5hdXRob3JpemVkIGVycm9yLiBUbyBmaXggdGhlIGVycm9yLCB0aGUgY2xpZW50IG11c3QgYmVnaW4gc2VuZGluZyBIVFRQIGJhc2ljIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIHdpdGggYSB2YWxpZCBjbGllbnQgSUQgYW5kIHNlY3JldC4gVGhpcyBlbmRwb2ludCB3YXMgcHJldmlvdXNseSBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGVkIHZpYSB0aGUgaW50cm9zcGVjdGlvbiB0b2tlbiBpdHNlbGYsIHdoaWNoIGlzIGxlc3Mgc2VjdXJlLg==-->OIDC integrations that POST to `/login/oauth/introspect` without sending HTTP basic authentication will now fail with a 401 HTTP Unauthorized error. To fix the error, the client must begin sending HTTP basic authentication with a valid client ID and secret. This endpoint was previously authenticated via the introspection token itself, which is less secure.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4724
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shivaram Lingamneni <slingamn@cs.stanford.edu>
Co-committed-by: Shivaram Lingamneni <slingamn@cs.stanford.edu>
- Currently if the password, primary mail, TOTP or security keys are
changed, no notification is made of that and makes compromising an
account a bit easier as it's essentially undetectable until the original
person tries to log in. Although other changes should be made as
well (re-authing before allowing a password change), this should go a
long way of improving the account security in Forgejo.
- Adds a mail notification for password and primary mail changes. For
the primary mail change, a mail notification is sent to the old primary
mail.
- Add a mail notification when TOTP or a security keys is removed, if no
other 2FA method is configured the mail will also contain that 2FA is
no longer needed to log into their account.
- `MakeEmailAddressPrimary` is refactored to the user service package,
as it now involves calling the mailer service.
- Unit tests added.
- Integration tests added.
This adds a release note file for features cherry picked during the
2024-30 weekly gitea->forgejo cherry pick.
Thanks @earl-warren for the notes themselves!
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Currently if you want to update the milestone of an issue or pull
request, your whole page will be reloaded to reflect the newly set
milestone. This is quite unecessary, as only the milestone text is
updated and a new timeline event is added.
- This patch converts the milestone section in the issue/pull request
sidebar to use HTMX, so it becomes a progressive element and avoids
reloading the whole page to update the milestone.
- The update of the milestone section itself is quite straightforward
and nothing special is happening. To support adding new timeline events,
a new element `#insert-timeline` is conviently placed after the last
timeline event, which can be used with
[`hx-swap-oob`](https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-swap-oob/) to position
new timeline events before that element.
- Adds E2E test.
- We were previously using `github.com/keybase/go-crypto`, because the
package for openpgp by Go itself is deprecated and no longer
maintained. This library provided a maintained version of the openpgp
package. However, it hasn't seen any activity for the last five years,
and I would therefore consider this also unmaintained.
- This patch switches the package to `github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto`
which provides a maintained version of the openpgp package and was
already being used in the tests.
- Adds unit tests, I've carefully checked the callstacks to ensure the
OpenPGP-related code was covered under either a unit test or integration
tests to avoid regression, as this can easily turn into security
vulnerabilities if a regression happens here.
- Small behavior update, revocations are now checked correctly instead
of checking if they merely exist and the expiry time of a subkey is used
if one is provided (this is just cosmetic and doesn't impact security).
- One more dependency eliminated :D
It is not for the developer to keep them sorted in a hierarchy when
the release they belong to can be deduced from the tag of the release
into which they were merged. The release notes assistant does that
work instead.
Some files appeared in more than one directory (feat and fix for
instance) when the PR contains multiple unrelated commits which is
what happens on a regular basis with the weekly cherry-pick of
Gitea. Those files were merged into one and each line changed to start
with a conventional commit prefix (feat: fix:).
Each line in a file will be a separate line in the release notes, they
are not groupped together even when they relate to the same PR. The
determination of the category in which they should be displayed will
be based on regular expressions using either the PR title or the line
to add to the release notes itself.
Unify the content of each file to either be a bullet list of
independent pull requests or be folded into a single line if it is
multiline. Multiline content belongs to the documentation.
Refs: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/release-notes-assistant
Refs: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4417 by adding a conditional branch to the `head_opengraph` template to match wiki pages. I tried to be consistent with the other types:
- `og:title` is the wiki page title
- `og:url` is built via `{{AppUrl}}{{.Link}}` like it is done for commit and file views. This has the caveat of doubling the slash (see test below). Should we `{{trimSuffix "/" AppUrl}}` to remove this, if sprig is available?
- `og:description` is the repository description to match GH behaviour. Also, the first sentences of the page might not be descriptive enough. Should we prefix the repo description with the repo name?
- `og:type` and `og:image` are common
Added a `TestOpenGraphProperties` integration test using existing fixtures. Coverage is not 100% but can be improved later.
## Output on a test repo
```html
<meta property="og:title" content="Project architecture">
<meta property="og:url" content="http://localhost:3000//xvello/wiki-test/wiki/Project-architecture">
<meta property="og:description" content="description for a test project">
<meta property="og:type" content="object">
<meta property="og:image" content="http://localhost:3000/avatars/3dd4d1e4eef065d1b4ad4bdb081ab6e7">
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4427
Co-authored-by: Xavier Vello <xavier.vello@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Xavier Vello <xavier.vello@gmail.com>
- It was noticed [in the Forgejo matrix channel](https://matrix.to/#/!qjPHwFPdxhpLkXMkyP:matrix.org/$vk78UR0eFCwQMDMTZ7-DWjMVB_LIAwHW6SkjhEcGkQQ?via=matrix.org) that the generation of the Forgejo project contributor stats was taking quite a while on codeberg.org. This was continued with the fact that a few moments later it was once again generating them again; it seemed like they weren't being cached while they were.
- The problem was that the cache TTL is hardcoded to ten minutes and not to the configured TTL. This patch changes that by using the configured TLL for the contributor cache, as this is a computationally heavy operation and should be cached for as long as possible for a good user experience. This doesn't impact the accuracy of this feature because the commit ID of the default branch is used as a cache key.
- Also changed in this patch, is that errors aren't cached and are instead being logged, this is more helpful to the administrator. For the user essentially nothing changed on this side, the contributor stats just looks like it's loading indefinitely.
- Realistically, testing this isn't possible, as the cache library Forgejo currently uses doesn't expose the TTL or expiration time of a key. Manually testing this behavior is quite lengthy, as one of the steps would need to be "wait for ten minutes" and describe how you can notice the data was cached or was just generated, and because you could use different types of cache, it will be quite hard to write down how you could check the TTL of a key for a particular cache (I'm not even sure it's even possible for some).
If a repository has
git config --add push.pushOption submit=".sourcehut/*.yml"
it failed when pushed because of the unknown submit push
option. It will be ignored instead.
Filtering out the push options is done in an earlier stage, when the
hook command runs, before it submits the options map to the private
endpoint.
* move all the push options logic to modules/git/pushoptions
* add 100% test coverage for modules/git/pushoptions
Test coverage for the code paths from which code was moved to the
modules/git/pushoptions package:
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPreReceive
* routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go:validatePushOptions
tests/integration/git_push_test.go:TestOptionsGitPush runs through
both. The test verifying the option is rejected was removed and, if
added again, will fail because the option is now ignored instead of
being rejected.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookProcReceive
* services/agit/agit.go:ProcReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go: doCreateAgitFlowPull runs through
both. It uses variations of AGit related push options.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPostReceive
* routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:HookPostReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go:doPushCreate called by TestGit/HTTP/sha1/PushCreate
runs through both.
Note that although it provides coverage for this code path it does not use push options.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3651
We haven't decided much (to my knowledge), and I've been using the main branch in production (as one does) and found out even I myself rely on Tab sometimes working to move focus and have been caught off guard by it indenting lines instead.
So this removes Tab handling and instead adds two new buttons to the toolbar. The indentation logic is unchanged (other than now focusing the textarea during button handling, to ensure execCommand works, and thus undo history is preserved).
I'm not sure which terminology to use in tooltips. Could also add keyboard shortcuts for the whole toolbar eventually, but as is this is hopefully an better solution to the problems I previously created than un-merging the whole thing :)
<img width="414" alt="Screenshot with two new buttons" src="/attachments/b7af3aa4-a195-48d1-be0a-1559f25dce8e">
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4263
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Danko Aleksejevs <danko@very.lv>
Co-committed-by: Danko Aleksejevs <danko@very.lv>
