Commit graph

682 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Earl Warren dcee31e20b
[BRANDING] add X-Forgejo-* headers
(cherry picked from commit 0a3388f93f)
(cherry picked from commit 7eba0a440a)
(cherry picked from commit eb9646c7ef)
(cherry picked from commit f1972578f5)

Conflicts:
(cherry picked from commit 7f96222fb4)
(cherry picked from commit e3c7c9fe7b)
(cherry picked from commit 84fdead902)
(cherry picked from commit 85148e1196)
(cherry picked from commit c0086bd70d)
(cherry picked from commit d1e31ef318)
(cherry picked from commit 681d3ed5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 76a3001f5b)
(cherry picked from commit a55a9567d3)
(cherry picked from commit aa7adc167d)
(cherry picked from commit d5354cb52c)
(cherry picked from commit 472c489996)
(cherry picked from commit dc816d065b)
(cherry picked from commit 3e9799148f)
(cherry picked from commit 85ede01671)
(cherry picked from commit 9c288b5b30)
2023-07-03 12:06:16 +02:00
Giteabot b2b5c80cb2
Use correct response code in push mirror creation response in v1_json.tmpl (#25476) (#25571)
Backport #25476 by @GeorgDangl

In the process of doing a bit of automation via the API, we've
discovered a _small_ issue in the Swagger definition. We tried to create
a push mirror for a repository, but our generated client raised an
exception due to an unexpected status code.

When looking at this function:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L236-L240)

We see it defines `201 - Created` as response:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L260-L262)

But it actually returns `200 - OK`:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L373)

So I've just updated the Swagger definitions to match the code😀

Co-authored-by: Georg Dangl <10274404+GeorgDangl@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-06-28 19:00:56 -04:00
Giteabot 203fe2841d
Fix Permission in API returned repository struct (#25388) (#25441)
Backport #25388 by @wolfogre

The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.

Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)

---

Review tips:

The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101

And other changes are passive.

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-06-22 17:01:42 +02:00
Giteabot 21cd5c2f3d
Fix all possible setting error related storages and added some tests (#23911) (#25244)
Backport #23911 by @lunny

Follow up #22405

Fix #20703 

This PR rewrites storage configuration read sequences with some breaks
and tests. It becomes more strict than before and also fixed some
inherit problems.

- Move storage's MinioConfig struct into setting, so after the
configuration loading, the values will be stored into the struct but not
still on some section.
- All storages configurations should be stored on one section,
configuration items cannot be overrided by multiple sections. The
prioioty of configuration is `[attachment]` > `[storage.attachments]` |
`[storage.customized]` > `[storage]` > `default`
- For extra override configuration items, currently are `SERVE_DIRECT`,
`MINIO_BASE_PATH`, `MINIO_BUCKET`, which could be configured in another
section. The prioioty of the override configuration is `[attachment]` >
`[storage.attachments]` > `default`.
- Add more tests for storages configurations.
- Update the storage documentations.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-06-14 08:36:52 +02:00
Denys Konovalov eac1bddb8d
fix swagger documentation for multiple files API endpoint (#25110)
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:

1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
2023-06-07 23:49:58 +08:00
JakobDev 1b115296d3
Followup to pinned Issues (#24945)
This addressees some things from #24406 that came up after the PR was
merged. Mostly from @delvh.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-30 15:26:51 +00:00
Denys Konovalov 275d4b7e3f
API endpoint for changing/creating/deleting multiple files (#24887)
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).

To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.

Resolves #14619
2023-05-29 17:41:35 +08:00
JakobDev aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
yp05327 bebc3433c5
Add IsErrRepoFilesAlreadyExist check when fork repo (#24678)
Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/e9e3de75-eb6e-418e-9227-ef4e5f448a04)
After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/74b1cd6c-c5b1-4ee0-a1d8-6b3fb8d3a8e9)
2023-05-22 18:21:46 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 64f6a5d113
Use CommentList instead of []*Comment (#24828)
As title.
2023-05-21 20:48:28 +08:00
wxiaoguang 6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 38cf43d060
Some refactors for issues stats (#24793)
This PR

- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
2023-05-19 22:17:48 +08:00
Matthew Walowski 5930ab5fdf
Filter get single commit (#24613)
Pretty much the same thing as #24568 but for getting a single commit
instead of getting a list of commits
2023-05-10 09:34:07 +08:00
来自村里的小螃蟹 cd9a13ebb4
Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API (#22956)
#### Added
- API: Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API
- Added `old_ref_name` parameter to allow creating a new branch from a
specific commit, tag, or branch.
- Deprecated `old_branch_name` parameter in favor of the new
`old_ref_name` parameter.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-05-09 18:22:32 +08:00
wxiaoguang 023a048f52
Make repository response support HTTP range request (#24592)
Replace #20480
Replace #18448

Close #16414
2023-05-09 15:34:36 +08:00
Matthew Walowski 1dd83dbb91
Filters for GetAllCommits (#24568)
The `GetAllCommits` endpoint can be pretty slow, especially in repos
with a lot of commits. The issue is that it spends a lot of time
calculating information that may not be useful/needed by the user.

The `stat` param was previously added in #21337 to address this, by
allowing the user to disable the calculating stats for each commit. But
this has two issues:
1. The name `stat` is rather misleading, because disabling `stat`
disables the Stat **and** Files. This should be separated out into two
different params, because getting a list of affected files is much less
expensive than calculating the stats
2. There's still other costly information provided that the user may not
need, such as `Verification`

This PR, adds two parameters to the endpoint, `files` and `verification`
to allow the user to explicitly disable this information when listing
commits. The default behavior is true.
2023-05-09 09:06:05 +08:00
wxiaoguang def4956122
Improve Gitea's web context, decouple "issue template" code into service package (#24590)
1. Remove unused fields/methods in web context.
2. Make callers call target function directly instead of the light
wrapper like "IsUserRepoReaderSpecific"
3. The "issue template" code shouldn't be put in the "modules/context"
package, so move them to the service package.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-09 01:30:14 +02:00
wxiaoguang cb700aedd1
Split "modules/context.go" to separate files (#24569)
The "modules/context.go" is too large to maintain.

This PR splits it to separate files, eg: context_request.go,
context_response.go, context_serve.go

This PR will help:

1. The future refactoring for Gitea's web context (eg: simplify the context)
2. Introduce proper "range request" support
3. Introduce context function

This PR only moves code, doesn't change any logic.
2023-05-08 17:36:54 +08:00
Matthew Walowski ff5629268c
Pass 'not' to commit count (#24473)
Due to #24409 , we can now specify '--not' when getting all commits from
a repo to exclude commits from a different branch.

When I wrote that PR, I forgot to also update the code that counts the
number of commits in the repo. So now, if the --not option is used, it
may return too many commits, which can indicate that another page of
data is available when it is not.

This PR passes --not to the commands that count the number of commits in
a repo
2023-05-08 07:10:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao e5a8ebc0ed
Require at least one unit to be enabled (#24189)
Don't remember why the previous decision that `Code` and `Release` are
non-disable units globally. Since now every unit include `Code` could be
disabled, maybe we should have a new rule that the repo should have at
least one unit. So any unit could be disabled.

Fixes #20960
Fixes #7525

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
2023-05-06 17:39:06 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 377a0a20f0
Merge setting.InitXXX into one function with options (#24389)
This PR will merge 3 Init functions on setting packages as 1 and
introduce an options struct.
2023-05-04 11:55:35 +08:00
Otto Richter (fnetX) 3362620ee3
Fix api error message if fork exists (#24487)
On the @Forgejo instance of Codeberg, we discovered that forking a repo
which is already forked now returns a 500 Internal Server Error, which
is unexpected. This is an attempt at fixing this.

The error message in the log:
~~~
2023/05/02 08:36:30 .../api/v1/repo/fork.go:147:CreateFork() [E]
[6450cb8e-113] ForkRepository: repository is already forked by user
[uname: ...., repo path: .../..., fork path: .../...]
~~~

The service that is used for forking returns a custom error message
which is not checked against.

About the order of options:
The case that the fork already exists should be more common, followed by
the case that a repo with the same name already exists for other
reasons. The case that the global repo limit is hit is probably not the
likeliest.

Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-02 20:26:38 -04:00
Matthew Walowski f766b00293
Add ability to specify '--not' from GetAllCommits (#24409)
For my specific use case, I'd like to get all commits that are on one
branch but NOT on the other branch.

For instance, I'd like to get all the commits on `Branch1` that are not
also on `master` (I.e. all commits that were made after `Branch1` was
created).

This PR adds a `not` query param that gets passed down to the `git log`
command to allow the user to exclude items from `GetAllCommits`.

See [git
documentation](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log#Documentation/git-log.txt---not)

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-29 08:34:14 -04:00
wxiaoguang de2268ffab
Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)
Close #24195

Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)


The bug is:

1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview


This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-20 02:39:44 -04:00
wxiaoguang b39a5bbbd6
Make wiki title supports dashes and improve wiki name related features (#24143)
Close #7570


1. Clearly define the wiki path behaviors, see
`services/wiki/wiki_path.go` and tests
2. Keep compatibility with old contents
3. Allow to use dashes in titles, eg: "2000-01-02 Meeting record"
4. Add a "Pages" link in the dropdown, otherwise users can't go to the
Pages page easily.
5. Add a "View original git file" link in the Pages list, even if some
file names are broken, users still have a chance to edit or remove it,
without cloning the wiki repo to local.
6. Fix 500 error when the name contains prefix spaces.


This PR also introduces the ability to support sub-directories, but it
can't be done at the moment due to there are a lot of legacy wiki data,
which use "%2F" in file names.



![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232239004-3359d7b9-7bf3-4ff3-8446-bfb0e79645dd.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232239020-74b92c72-bf73-4377-a319-1c85609f82b1.png)

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-19 13:50:10 -04:00
wxiaoguang cfe3d6e9b5
Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.

There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
2023-04-14 14:18:28 -04:00
Lunny Xiao fd9d072af1
Fix protected branch for API (#24013)
Fix #23998
2023-04-09 22:52:16 -04:00
Yoan Blanc 9b416b2e36
Use graceful editorconfig loader to reduce errors when loading malformed editorconfigs (#21257)
The _graceful_ should fail less when the `.editorconfig` file isn't
properly written, e.g. boolean values from YAML or unparseable numbers
(when a number is expected). As is... information is lost as the
_warning_ (a go-multierror.Error) is ignored. If anybody knows how to
send them to the UI as warning; any help is appreciated.

Closes #20694

Signed-off-by: Yoan Blanc <yoan@dosimple.ch>
2023-04-06 16:01:20 -04:00
Zettat123 6b0df6d8da
Add activity feeds API (#23494)
Close #5666

Add APIs for getting activity feeds.
2023-04-04 21:35:31 +08:00
JakobDev f384b13f1c
Implement Issue Config (#20956)
Closes #20955

This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
2023-03-28 14:22:07 -04:00
qwerty287 3cab9c6b0c
Add API to manage issue dependencies (#17935)
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency

Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115

Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-03-28 13:23:25 -04:00
Andrew Tomaka 0206882e8a
Match api migration behavior to web behavior (#23552)
When attempting to migrate a repository via the API endpoint comments
are always included. This can create a problem if your source repository
has issues or pull requests but you do not want to import them into
Gitea that displays as something like:

> Error 500: We were unable to perform the request due to server-side
problems. 'comment references non existent IssueIndex 4

There are only two ways to resolve this:
1. Migrate using the web interface
2. Migrate using the API including at issues or pull requests.

This PR matches the behavior of the API migration router to the web
migration router.

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-19 02:29:14 -04:00
James Cleverley-Prance 574d8fe6d6
Add absent repounits to create/edit repo API (#23500)
Adds the ability to enable/disable Actions, Packages and Releases from
the API, via the Edit and Get Repository API endpoints.
2023-03-16 12:30:42 -05:00
Zettat123 8421b8264f
Handle missing README in create repos API (#23387)
Close #22934 

In `/user/repos` API (and other APIs related to creating repos), user
can specify a readme template for auto init. At present, if the
specified template does not exist, a `500` will be returned . This PR
improved the logic and will return a `400` instead of `500`.
2023-03-13 16:55:30 -05:00
Peter c6f5029708
Preserve file size when creating attachments (#23406)
When creating attachments (issue, release, repo) the file size (being
part of the multipart file header) is passed through the chain of
creating an attachment to ensure the MinIO client can stream the file
directly instead of having to read it to memory completely at first.

Fixes #23393

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-12 03:48:07 -04:00
KN4CK3R 2173f14708
Add user webhooks (#21563)
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/197391408-15dfdc23-b476-4d0c-82f7-9bc9b065988f.png)
2023-03-10 08:28:32 -06:00
Zettat123 15a1c2d7ef
Fix panic when getting notes by ref (#23372)
Fix #23357 .

Now the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/notes/{sha}` API supports getting
notes by a ref or sha
(https://try.gitea.io/api/swagger#/repository/repoGetNote). But the
`GetNote` func can only accept commit ID.

a12f575737/modules/git/notes_nogogit.go (L18)

So we need to convert the query parameter to commit ID before calling
`GetNote`.
2023-03-08 20:21:23 +08:00
wxiaoguang 188c8c12c2
Make Ctrl+Enter submit a pending comment (starting review) instead of submitting a single comment (#23245)
Close #23241

Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.

After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.


The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-04 02:13:37 -05:00
Lauris BH 58b4143803
Add loading yaml label template files (#22976)
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates

* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
2023-03-02 01:44:23 +02:00
Jason Song 04347eb810
Use context parameter in services/repository (#23186)
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.

And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.

Fix #23160
2023-02-28 16:17:51 -06:00
Brecht Van Lommel 10cdcb9ea8
Add "Reviewed by you" filter for pull requests (#22927)
This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or
commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the
filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or
prodding the author or reviewers.

Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful
to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention,
without having to sift through the complete list.
2023-02-24 21:55:50 -05:00
Jason Song c8c2a31818
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010)
Fix #23000.
2023-02-21 08:42:07 -06:00
sillyguodong 36d1d5fb78
Fix panic when call api (/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files) (#22921)
Close: #22910 

---
I'm confused about that why does the api (`GET
/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files`) require caller to pass the
parameters `limit` and `page`.
In my case, the caller only needs to pass a `skip-to` to paging. This is
consistent with the api `GET /{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files`
So, I deleted the code related to `listOptions`

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 22:22:34 +08:00
Lunny Xiao c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel 6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
yp05327 bd66fa586a
Rename repo.GetOwner to repo.LoadOwner (#22967)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-02-18 20:11:03 +08:00
Lunny Xiao bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel 49919c636e
Pull Requests: setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, tweak UI (#22862)
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.

This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.

Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-13 14:09:52 +08:00
KN4CK3R e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams (#21441)
Fixes #19555

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
JakobDev 4d072a4c4e
Add API endpoint to get latest release (#21267)
This PR adds a new API endpoint to get the latest stable release of a
repo, similar to [GitHub
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/releases/releases#get-the-latest-release).
2023-01-26 10:33:47 -06:00