(cherry picked from commit 5c1b550e00e9460078e00c41a32d206b260ef482)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/git_push_test.go
trivial context conflict because of
2ac3dcbd43 test: hook post-receive for sha256 repos
(cherry picked from commit 62448bfb93)
(cherry picked from commit e8c776c79384c1c0a4d707ce5084b27347703848)
The right to force merge is uses the wrong predicate and
applies to instance admins:
ctx.user.IsAdmin
It must apply to repository admins and use the following predicate:
ctx.userPerm.IsAdmin()
This regression is from the ApplyToAdmins implementation in
79b7089360.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3780
(cherry picked from commit 09f3518069)
When performing migrations, and need to remap external users to local
ones, when no local mapping is possible, map the external user to Ghost,
rather than the user who initiated the migration.
Mapping the external user to the migration initiator has the potential
of breaking assumptions elsewhere, like only having one review per pull
request per user. Mapping these migrated, locally unavailable users to
Ghost makes sure these - often hidden - assumptions do not break.
Fixes#3860.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit ade7304eea)
Merging PR may fail because of various problems. The pull request may
have a dirty state because there is no transaction when merging a pull
request. ref
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25741#issuecomment-2074126393
This PR moves all database update operations to post-receive handler for
merging a pull request and having a database transaction. That means if
database operations fail, then the git merging will fail, the git client
will get a fail result.
There are already many tests for pull request merging, so we don't need
to add a new one.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ebf0c969403d91ed80745ff5bd7dfbdb08174fc7)
Conflicts:
modules/private/hook.go
routers/private/hook_post_receive.go
trivial conflicts because
263a716cb5 * Performance optimization for git push (#30104)
was not cherry-picked and because of
998a431747 Do not update PRs based on events that happened before they existed
(cherry picked from commit eb792d9f8a)
(cherry picked from commit ec3f5f9992d7ff8250c044a4467524d53bd50210)
replace reply with forgejos forked version
If plain text is selected as the message format in e.g. Apple Mail, the inline attachments are no longer at the end of the mail, but instead directly where they are in the mail. When parsing the mail, these inline attachments are replaced by "--". The new reply version no longer cuts the text at the first "--".
Tests for this are present in reply (7dc5750c6d).
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3496#issuecomment-1798416
---
Additionally, I reduced the allocations for the inline attachments.
Also add a test for GogsDownloaderFactory.New() to make sure
that the URL of the source repository is parsed correctly.
When the source gogs instance is hosted at a subpath like `https://git.example.com/gogs/<username>/<reponame>` the migration fails.
This PR fixes that.
Co-authored-by: hecker <tomas.hecker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3572
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
Co-committed-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4a2959b3ec)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3504
If incoming email is configured and an email is sent, inline attachments are currently not added to the comment if it has the `Content-Disposition: inline` instead of `Content-Disposition: attachment` as e.g. with Apple Mail.
This adds inline attachments (`Content-Disposition: inline`) that *have a filename* as attachment to the comment. Other elements with `Content-Disposition: inline` are not attached as attachment to the comment.
In addition, a check has been added to prevent mails from being processed twice.
Fixes#3496
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3566
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
If `commitstatus_service.FindReposLastestCommitStatuses` receives no
repos in its params, short-circuit, and return early, without performing
any potentially expensive work.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 33cd8446d3)
When converting a `repo_model.Repository` to `api.Repository`, copy the
`ObjectFormatName` field too.
Fixes#3458.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 2385f3c9db)
Follow https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30357
When user push to default branch, the schedule trigger user will be the
user.
When disable then enable action units in settings, the schedule trigger
user will be action user.
When repo is a mirror, the schedule trigger user will be action user. (
before it will return error, fixed by #30357)
As scheduled job is a cron, the trigger user should be action user from
Gitea, not a real user.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit cb6814adad4dc81a683b50826a211ce7bce731d7)
Conflicts:
- services/actions/notifier_helper.go
Conflict resolved by keeping Forgejo's version of the line.
(cherry picked from commit 829c3c6838)
Backport #30291 by @edwardzhanged
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694
Co-authored-by: Edward Zhang <45360012+edwardzhanged@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
(cherry picked from commit d88958bb99eabc07dead6965e396755e7b6d947f)
Backport #30375 by @jtran
Cookies may exist on "/subpath" and "/subpath/" for some legacy reasons
(eg: changed CookiePath behavior in code). The legacy cookie should be
removed correctly.
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e64926c5193e9ccc30b34f187d96c74d104179ae)
When sending notification emails about a release, use a properly
formatted, RFC-compliant message id, rather than the release's HTML URL
wrapped in angle brackets (which would not be compliant).
Fixes#3105.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit b0c0167c54)
This is a continuation of #2728, with a test case added.
Fixes#2633.
I kept @zareck 's commit as is, because I believe it is correct. We can't move the check to `owner.CanForkRepo()`, because `owner` is the future owner of the forked repo, and may be an organization. We need to check the admin permission of the `doer`, like in the case of repository creation.
I verified that the test fails without the `ForkRepository` change, and passes with it.
Co-authored-by: Cassio Zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3277
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-committed-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit ea4071ca9f)
Fix#30378
(cherry picked from commit 0fe9f93eb4c94d55e43b18b9c3cc6d513a34c0b5)
Conflicts:
- models/organization/org.go
- services/repository/delete.go
- services/user/delete.go
In all three cases, conflicts were resolved by manually adding
the lines added by the Gitea patch, keeping the Forgejo code
surrounding them.
- `RemoveFilesFromIndex` used an hardcoded empty commit ID for the SHA1
object format, this would result in an error if the repository was
initialized to use the sha256 object format. Get the object format of
the Git repository and use that to get the empty commit id.
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves#3184
(cherry picked from commit eeaef556c2)
Backport #30392 by @jam7
This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.
The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and
ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to
migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may
not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has
this problem.
This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket
as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are
several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for
Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds
difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked
out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.
Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30316.
In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write
here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server
and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write
such test cases here. Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa <jam@pobox.com>
(cherry picked from commit b941d7485b53e5dd093a1cce3c9ff47c91d4fc58)
