(cherry picked from commit c2a7aaeee8)
(cherry picked from commit 6b6007fbce)
(cherry picked from commit 63608a221e)
(cherry picked from commit 5cfe60baa7)
(cherry picked from commit 2af4c73d12)
(cherry picked from commit 1985959bfe)
(cherry picked from commit 880424c77e)
(cherry picked from commit c78a861d1b)
(cherry picked from commit 25c1227011)
(cherry picked from commit 7195e894ee)
(cherry picked from commit cf15153873)
(cherry picked from commit 9bee773c95)
(cherry picked from commit 581c3060da)
(cherry picked from commit bf550f9b2c)
(cherry picked from commit b570eca0b9)
[CI] implementation: Woodpecker based CI (squash)
Upgrade xgo to Go v1.20 for building binaries
(cherry picked from commit 6308c776b6)
[CI] v1.20: switch PR check from Woodpecker CI to Forgejo Actions
The PR checks for v1.19 still rely on Woodpecker CI. Keeping
.woodpecker in v1.20 while both Woodpecker CI & Forgejo Actions are
enabled would dupicate the checks.
The release process in releases remains Woodpecker CI.
(cherry picked from commit 93e42f3f53)
(cherry picked from commit 599c5162ad)
(cherry picked from commit 6f8b723a55)
(cherry picked from commit e238d7d72f)
(cherry picked from commit 2258fb575b)
(cherry picked from commit 52195d9456)
(cherry picked from commit 2f95143000)
(cherry picked from commit 42f2f8731e)
[CLI] implement forgejo-cli actions register (squash) no private
Do not go through the private API, directly modify the database
(cherry picked from commit 1ba7c0d39d)
Use a real button and add an aria-label.
Additionally, show the button whenever it is focused.
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/998 for explanation.
Our handling of this button is now equal to that of GitHub.
Nothing has changed visually.
Before:
emmm, don't know how to write a good title to describe this issue.
If you have a good idea, I can change the title.
The fix code is copied from L122. Not sure it is right or not.
@lunny
Maybe `DefaultBranchBranch` is also typo?
Two `Branch` in variable name .
Issue filters are being used on repo list page and on milestone issues
page, and the code is mostly duplicated.
This PR does the following changes:
- move issue filters into a shared template
- allow filtering milestone issues by project, so no need to hide this
filter on milestone issues page
- remove some dead code (e. g. issue actions in milestone issues
template)
- fix label filter dropdown width
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
The `FileBlame` function looks strange, it has `revision` as argument
but doesn't use it.
Since the function never be used, I think we could just remove it.
If anyone thinks it should be kept, please help fix `revision`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Before:
After:
This issue comes from the change in #25468.
`LoadProject` will always return at least one record, so we use
`ProjectID` to check whether an issue is linked to a project in the old
code.
As other `issue.LoadXXX` functions, we need to check the return value
from `xorm.Session.Get`.
In recent unit tests, we only test `issueList.LoadAttributes()` but
don't test `issue.LoadAttributes()`. So I added a new test for
`issue.LoadAttributes()` in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Related issue: #18368
It doesn't seem right to "guess" the file encoding/BOM when using API to
upload files.
The API should save the uploaded content as-is.
we refactored `userIDFromToken` for the token parsing part into a new
function `parseToken`. `parseToken` returns the string `token` from
request, and a boolean `ok` representing whether the token exists or
not. So we can distinguish between token non-existence and token
inconsistency in the `verfity` function, thus solving the problem of no
proper error message when the token is inconsistent.
close#24439
related #22119
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fix#25726#17846 chose an incorrect WORK_DIR path for docker root image.
Gitea's work-path was already used as the base path for various paths
(like AppDataPath), so, the work-path should be mounted to a volume in a
docker image.
Now, for docker root image, it's unavoidable to mix the
WorkPath/CustomPath/AppDataPath in the same directory ("/data/gitea"),
because some of them have already been mixed.
Some directories in the screenshot are for "CustomPath" , while others
are for "AppDataPath", due to the technical debts in old code:
```
CUSTOM_PATH="/data/gitea"
APP_DATA_PATH = /data/gitea
```
<details>
</details>
This PR is breaking but this is the only way at the moment to avoid
users losing their data accidently
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Replace #25580Fix#19453
The problem was: when users set "GITEA__XXX__YYY" , the "install page"
doesn't respect it.
So, to make the result consistent and avoid surprising end users, now
the "install page" also writes the environment variables to the config
file.
And, to make things clear, there are enough messages on the UI to tell
users what will happen.
There are some necessary/related changes to `environment-to-ini.go`:
* The "--clear" flag is removed and it was incorrectly written there.
The "clear" operation should be done if INSTALL_LOCK=true
* The "--prefix" flag is removed because it's never used, never
documented and it only causes inconsistent behavior.
Fix#25627
1. `ctx.Data["Link"]` should use relative URL but not AppURL
2. The `data-params` is incorrect because it doesn't contain "page". JS
can simply use "window.location.search" to construct the AJAX URL
3. The `data-xxx` and `id` in notification_subscriptions.tmpl were
copied&pasted, they don't have affect.
Fixes (?) #25538
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972
Regression #23879#23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a
user is not a member of an organization.
That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the
team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think
this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private
orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an
unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member.
This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an
owner, they can read packages".
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
