Commit graph

749 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted 22cff41585
[GITEA] Document correct status code for creating Tag
- When there's a succesful POST operation, it should return a 201 status
code (which is the status code for succesful created) and additionally
the created object.
- Currently for the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/tags` endpoint an 200
status code was documented in the OpenAPI specification, while an 201
status code was actually being returned. In this case the code is
correct and the documented status code needs to be adjusted.
- Resolves #2200

(cherry picked from commit a2939116f5)
2024-01-22 18:13:43 +00:00
Gusted 3f74bcb14d
[GITEA] Fix API inconsistencies
- Document the correct content types for Git archives. Add code that
actually sets the correct application type for `.zip` and `.tar.gz`.
- When an action (POST/PUT/DELETE method) was successful, an 204 status
code should be returned instead of status code 200.
- Add and adjust integration testing.
- Resolves #2180
- Resolves #2181

(cherry picked from commit 6c8c4512b5)
2024-01-22 18:13:43 +00:00
Earl Warren 28ecd6f5a6
[GITEA] DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments/{comment}
* reuse deleteIssueComment by adding the commentType parameter
* ensure tests start with a PR with no random reviews from fixtures

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 5b90ab77f6)
2024-01-22 18:13:43 +00:00
Earl Warren 119d10d9e2
[GITEA] GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments/{comment}
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 69fcf26dee)
(cherry picked from commit 1296f4d115)
2024-01-22 18:13:43 +00:00
Earl Warren f44830c3cb
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs
Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment
is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware
function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the
comment is verified to be related to the repository.

There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated
comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the
commentAssignment() function logic.

* TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions
* TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction
* TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction
* TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment
* TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment
* TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment

The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of
potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they
no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have
integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on
does not introduce a regression.

* TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment
* TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments
* TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment
* TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment
* TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment

(cherry picked from commit d414376d74)
(cherry picked from commit 09db07aeae)
2024-01-22 18:13:42 +00:00
Earl Warren b173a0ccee
[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review

If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.

The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.

Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.

The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.

(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
2024-01-22 18:13:42 +00:00
Gergely Nagy 95d9fe19cf
[FEAT] API support for repository flags
Expose the repository flags feature over the API, so the flags can be
managed by a site administrator without using the web API.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit bac9f0225d)
(cherry picked from commit e7f5c1ba14)
2024-01-22 18:13:42 +00:00
Earl Warren bd47ee33c2
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param

See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a

(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
2024-01-22 13:41:21 +00:00
Adam Majer d68a613ba8
Add support for sha256 repositories (#23894)
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.

Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138

<img width="776" alt="图片" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-01-19 17:05:02 +01:00
Viktor Kuzmin 49eb168677
Retarget depending pulls when the parent branch is deleted (#28686)
Sometimes you need to work on a feature which depends on another (unmerged) feature.
In this case, you may create a PR based on that feature instead of the main branch.
Currently, such PRs will be closed without the possibility to reopen in case the parent feature is merged and its branch is deleted.
Automatic target branch change make life a lot easier in such cases.
Github and Bitbucket behave in such way.

Example:
$PR_1$: main <- feature1
$PR_2$: feature1 <- feature2

Currently, merging $PR_1$ and deleting its branch leads to $PR_2$ being closed without the possibility to reopen.
This is both annoying and loses the review history when you open a new PR.

With this change, $PR_2$ will change its target branch to main ($PR_2$: main <- feature2) after $PR_1$ has been merged and its branch has been deleted.

This behavior is enabled by default but can be disabled.
For security reasons, this target branch change will not be executed when merging PRs targeting another repo. 

Fixes #27062
Fixes #18408

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-17 01:44:56 +01:00
KN4CK3R 3793ec4d14
Fix GetCommitStatuses (#28787)
Fixes #28764.
2024-01-15 14:07:32 +00:00
Jimmy Praet 5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 70c4aad8e1
Move more functions to db.Find (#28419)
Following #28220

This PR move more functions to use `db.Find`.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 02:19:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 97292da960
Fix schedule tasks bugs (#28691)
Fix #28157 

This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.

## The Changes

- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
2024-01-12 21:50:38 +00:00
Nanguan Lin 9b59af37e7
Fix issue dependencies (#27736)
Fix #27722 
Fix #27357
Fix #25837 
1. Fix the typo `BlockingByDependenciesNotPermitted`, which causes the
`not permitted message` not to show. The correct one is `Blocking` or
`BlockedBy`
2. Rewrite the perm check. The perm check uses a very tricky way to
avoid duplicate checks for a slice of issues, which is confusing. In
fact, it's also the reason causing the bug. It uses `lastRepoID` and
`lastPerm` to avoid duplicate checks, but forgets to assign the
`lastPerm` at the end of the code block. So I rewrote this to avoid this
trick.
![I U1AT{GNFY3
1HZ`6L{(2L](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/79acd02a-a567-4316-ae0d-11c6461becf1)
3. It also reuses the `blocks` slice, which is even more confusing. So I
rewrote this too.

![UARFPXRGGZQFB7J$2`R}5_R](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/f21cff0f-d9ac-4ce4-ae4d-adffc98ecd99)
2024-01-12 16:49:02 +00:00
Lunny Xiao baf0d402d9
Add get actions runner registration token for API routes, repo, org, user and global level (#27144)
Replace #23761

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-12-27 07:57:54 +00:00
delvh 778ad795fd
Refactor deletion (#28610)
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`

So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.

Replacement of #28450

Closes #28450

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-25 21:25:29 +01:00
Lunny Xiao 408a484224
Adjust object format interface (#28469)
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
2023-12-17 11:56:08 +00:00
Adam Majer cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 537fa69962
Second part of refactor db.Find (#28194)
Continue of #27798 and move more functions to `db.Find` and `db.Count`.
2023-12-11 16:56:48 +08:00
Lunny Xiao aeb383025f
Also sync DB branches on push if necessary (#28361)
Fix #28056 

This PR will check whether the repo has zero branch when pushing a
branch. If that, it means this repository hasn't been synced.

The reason caused that is after user upgrade from v1.20 -> v1.21, he
just push branches without visit the repository user interface. Because
all repositories routers will check whether a branches sync is necessary
but push has not such check.

For every repository, it has two states, synced or not synced. If there
is zero branch for a repository, then it will be assumed as non-sync
state. Otherwise, it's synced state. So if we think it's synced, we just
need to update branch/insert new branch. Otherwise do a full sync. So
that, for every push, there will be almost no extra load added. It's
high performance than yours.

For the implementation, we in fact will try to update the branch first,
if updated success with affect records > 0, then all are done. Because
that means the branch has been in the database. If no record is
affected, that means the branch does not exist in database. So there are
two possibilities. One is this is a new branch, then we just need to
insert the record. Another is the branches haven't been synced, then we
need to sync all the branches into database.
2023-12-09 13:30:56 +00:00
Nanguan Lin 0aab2d38a7
Remove deprecated query condition in ListReleases (#28339)
close #24057 
call stack: 

25faee3c5f/routers/api/v1/repo/release.go (L154)

ec1feedbf5/routers/api/v1/utils/page.go (L13-L18)

ec1feedbf5/services/convert/utils.go (L15-L22)

## ⚠️ Breaking   ⚠️ (though it's not caused by this PR)
Do not use `per_page` to specify pagination; use `limit` instead
2023-12-05 07:30:43 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 882e502327
Fix comment permissions (#28213)
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
2023-11-25 17:21:21 +00:00
Lunny Xiao df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084)
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
silverwind ce83609ff6
Upgrade to golangci-lint@v1.55.0 (#27756)
https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2023-10-24 02:54:59 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 9852c92e9a
Remove unnecessary parameter (#27671) 2023-10-18 15:03:10 +00:00
JakobDev 76a85a4ce9
Final round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27587)
Last part of #27065
2023-10-14 08:37:24 +00:00
JakobDev ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
Michael Santos 5283ce9650
api: GetPullRequestCommits: return file list (#27483)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27481

----

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-10-09 11:22:12 +00:00
JakobDev f2b2608a86
Don't let API add 2 exclusive labels from same scope (#27433)
Fixes #27380
2023-10-05 03:37:36 +00:00
JakobDev cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
JakobDev cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
JakobDev 7047df36d4
Another round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27103)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 13:17:37 +00:00
JakobDev 28f9b313ba
Updates to the API for archived repos (#27149) 2023-09-21 23:43:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R c766140dad
Add RemoteAddress to mirrors (#26952)
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
2023-09-16 16:03:02 +00:00
JakobDev f91dbbba98
Next round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27089)
Part of #27065
2023-09-16 14:39:12 +00:00
JakobDev c548dde205
More refactoring of db.DefaultContext (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
JakobDev 76659b1114
Reduce usage of db.DefaultContext (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
JakobDev aaeec2a392
Add missing 404 response to Swagger (#27038)
Most middleware throw a 404 in case something is not found e.g. a Repo
that is not existing. But most API endpoints don't include the 404
response in their documentation. This PR changes this.
2023-09-13 10:37:54 +08:00
Lunny Xiao e3ed67859a
Move some functions to service layer (#26969) 2023-09-08 21:09:23 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
CaiCandong a78c2eae24
Replace util.SliceXxx with slices.Xxx (#26958) 2023-09-07 09:37:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao b9df9fa2e2
Move createrepository from module to service layer (#26927)
Repository creation depends on many models, so moving it to service
layer is better.
2023-09-06 12:08:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 540bf9fa6d
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
KN4CK3R a99b96cbcd
Refactor secrets modification logic (#26873)
- Share code between web and api
- Add some tests
2023-09-05 15:21:02 +00:00
Zettat123 04771b5ff7
Allow users with write permissions for issues to add attachments with API (#26837)
Fixes #24944

Since a user with write permissions for issues can add attachments to an
issue via the the web interface, the user should also be able to add
attachments via the API
2023-09-01 15:35:38 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu 9eb4a9e601
feat(API): add secret deletion functionality for repository (#26808)
- Modify the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function in `api.go` to include a
`Delete` operation for the secret
- Modify the `DeleteOrgSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the organization
- Modify the `DeleteSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the repository
- Modify the `v1_json.tmpl` template file to update the `operationId`
and `summary` for the `deleteSecret` operation in both the organization
and repository sections

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:02:49 +00:00
wxiaoguang e8aae43f56
Move web/api context related testing function into a separate package (#26859)
Just like `models/unittest`, the testing helper functions should be in a
separate package: `contexttest`

And complete the TODO:

> // TODO: move this function to other packages, because it depends on
"models" package
2023-09-01 11:26:07 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu b91057b172
feat(API): add route and implementation for creating/updating repository secret (#26766)
spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-a-repository-secret

- Add a new route for creating or updating a secret value in a
repository
- Create a new file `routers/api/v1/repo/action.go` with the
implementation of the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function
- Update the Swagger documentation for the `updateRepoSecret` operation
in the `v1_json.tmpl` template file

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-29 20:54:49 +00:00