As described in the title.
Some points:
1. Why need those tests?
Because `buildIssueOverview` is not well tested, there are several
continuous bugs in the issue overview webpage.
2. Why in indexer_test.go?
It's hard to put those tests in `./modules/indexer/issue/db/db_test.go`
because those tests need 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures instead of
random data in `./modules/indexer/issue/internal/tests`. When using
'real' data(`unittest.PrepareTestDatabase`), `InitIssueIndexer` and the
package `init()` function of `indexer` are required to init indexer.
3. Why only db?
The other three indexer engines are well tested by random data and it's
okay to also test them with 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures. Any
follow-up PR is welcome.
4. Those tests are really basic, any more complicated tests are welcome.
5. I think it's also necessary to add tests in `TestAPISearchIssues`
in`api_test_issue.go` and `TestIssues` in `home_test.go`
Part of #27065
This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.
Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Since the issue indexer has been refactored, the issue overview webpage
is built by the `buildIssueOverview` function and underlying
`indexer.Search` function and `GetIssueStats` instead of
`GetUserIssueStats`. So the function is no longer used.
I moved the relevant tests to `indexer_test.go` and since the search
option changed from `IssueOptions` to `SearchOptions`, most of the tests
are useless now.
We need more tests about the db indexer because those tests are highly
connected with the issue overview webpage and now this page has several
bugs.
Any advice about those test cases is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
- In org mode you can specify an description for media via the following
syntax `[[description][media link]]`. The description is then used as
title or alt.
- This patch fixes the rendering of the description by seperating the
description and non-description cases and using `org.String()`.
- Added unit tests.
- Inspired by
6eb20dbda9/org/html_writer.go (L406-L427)
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/848
(cherry picked from commit 8b8aab8311)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Fix#26723
Add `ChangeDefaultBranch` to the `notifier` interface and implement it
in `indexerNotifier`. So when changing the default branch,
`indexerNotifier` sends a message to the `indexer queue` to update the
index.
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Hello,
The current package guide for cargo gives you only the git index, with
the HTTP Index stabilized being used as default for crates.io and being
better for most use-cases.
However, it's not documented that gitea supports the sparse spec, and it
does not require the _crates-index git repo for the sparse api.
I personally think we should push users to use the sparse instead of the
git repository. (Even let users disable crates-index repos if they only
want to use sparse)
Most middleware throw a 404 in case something is not found e.g. a Repo
that is not existing. But most API endpoints don't include the 404
response in their documentation. This PR changes this.
* Rootless/ful docker images build separately
* Vendor go modules outside docker to speed up the build
Thanks to Alex Ellis for these suggestions (and actuated runner build
time)
Should BucketExists (HeadBucket) fail because of an error related to
the connection rather than the existence of the bucket, no information
is available and the admin is left guessing.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_HeadBucket.html
> This action is useful to determine if a bucket exists and you have
> permission to access it. The action returns a 200 OK if the bucket
> exists and you have permission to access it.
>
> If the bucket does not exist or you do not have permission to access
> it, the HEAD request returns a generic 400 Bad Request, 403
> Forbidden or 404 Not Found code. A message body is not included, so
> you cannot determine the exception beyond these error codes.
GetBucketVersioning is used instead and exclusively dedicated to
asserting if using the connection does not return a BadRequest.
If it does the NewMinioStorage logs an error and returns. Otherwise
it keeps going knowing that BucketExists is not going to fail for
reasons unrelated to the existence of the bucket and the permissions
to access it.
(cherry picked from commit d1df4b3bc62e5e61893a923f1c4b58f084eb03af)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1338
Unfortunately, when a system setting hasn't been stored in the database,
it cannot be cached.
Meanwhile, this PR also uses context cache for push email avatar display
which should avoid to read user table via email address again and again.
According to my local test, this should reduce dashboard elapsed time
from 150ms -> 80ms .
If the AppURL(ROOT_URL) is an HTTPS URL, then the COOKIE_SECURE's
default value should be true.
And, if a user visits an "http" site with "https" AppURL, they won't be
able to login, and they should have been warned. The only problem is
that the "language" can't be set either in such case, while I think it
is not a serious problem, and it could be fixed easily if needed.
1. Introduce lightweight `fetch` wrapper functions that automatically
sets csfr token, content-type and use it in `RepoActionView.vue`.
2. Fix a specific issue on `RepoActionView.vue` where a fetch network
error is shortly visible during page reload sometimes. It can be
reproduced by F5-in in quick succession on the actions view page and was
also producing a red error box on the page.
Once approved, we can replace all current `fetch` uses in UI with this
in another PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
