fedi/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-01 13:01:15 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
forgejo/web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json

8764 lines
323 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
{
"name": "fomantic",
"lockfileVersion": 3,
"requires": true,
"packages": {
"": {
"dependencies": {
"fomantic-ui": "2.8.7"
}
},
"node_modules/@choojs/findup": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@choojs/findup/-/findup-0.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YstAqNb0MCN8PjdLCDfRsBcGVRN41f3vgLvaI0IrIcBp4AqILRSS0DeWNGkicC+f/zRIPJLc+9RURVSepwvfBw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"commander": "^2.15.1"
},
"bin": {
"findup": "bin/findup.js"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/@choojs/findup/node_modules/commander": {
"version": "2.20.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/commander/-/commander-2.20.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-GpVkmM8vF2vQUkj2LvZmD35JxeJOLCwJ9cUkugyk2nuhbv3+mJvpLYYt+0+USMxE+oj+ey/lJEnhZw75x/OMcQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui": {
"version": "8.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@isaacs/cliui/-/cliui-8.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-O8jcjabXaleOG9DQ0+ARXWZBTfnP4WNAqzuiJK7ll44AmxGKv/J2M4TPjxjY3znBCfvBXFzucm1twdyFybFqEA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"string-width": "^5.1.2",
"string-width-cjs": "npm:string-width@^4.2.0",
"strip-ansi": "^7.0.1",
"strip-ansi-cjs": "npm:strip-ansi@^6.0.1",
"wrap-ansi": "^8.1.0",
"wrap-ansi-cjs": "npm:wrap-ansi@^7.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
}
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-6.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-n5M855fKb2SsfMIiFFoVrABHJC8QtHwVx+mHWP3QcEqBHYienj5dHSgjbxtC0WEZXYt4wcD6zrQElDPhFuZgfA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/ansi-regex?sponsor=1"
}
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "6.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-6.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bN798gFfQX+viw3R7yrGWRqnrN2oRkEkUjjl4JNn4E8GxxbjtG3FbrEIIY3l8/hrwUwIeCZvi4QuOTP4MErVug==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/ansi-styles?sponsor=1"
}
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/emoji-regex": {
"version": "9.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/emoji-regex/-/emoji-regex-9.2.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-L18DaJsXSUk2+42pv8mLs5jJT2hqFkFE4j21wOmgbUqsZ2hL72NsUU785g9RXgo3s0ZNgVl42TiHp3ZtOv/Vyg==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "5.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-5.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HnLOCR3vjcY8beoNLtcjZ5/nxn2afmME6lhrDrebokqMap+XbeW8n9TXpPDOqdGK5qcI3oT0GKTW6wC7EMiVqA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"eastasianwidth": "^0.2.0",
"emoji-regex": "^9.2.2",
"strip-ansi": "^7.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
}
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "7.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-7.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iq6eVVI64nQQTRYq2KtEg2d2uU7LElhTJwsH4YzIHZshxlgZms/wIc4VoDQTlG/IvVIrBKG06CrZnp0qv7hkcQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^6.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/strip-ansi?sponsor=1"
}
},
"node_modules/@isaacs/cliui/node_modules/wrap-ansi": {
"version": "8.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wrap-ansi/-/wrap-ansi-8.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-si7QWI6zUMq56bESFvagtmzMdGOtoxfR+Sez11Mobfc7tm+VkUckk9bW2UeffTGVUbOksxmSw0AA2gs8g71NCQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^6.1.0",
"string-width": "^5.0.1",
"strip-ansi": "^7.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=12"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/wrap-ansi?sponsor=1"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/@octokit/auth-token": {
"version": "2.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/auth-token/-/auth-token-2.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-r5FVUJCOLl19AxiuZD2VRZ/ORjp/4IN98Of6YJoJOkY75CIBuYfmiNHGrDwXr+aLGG55igl9QrxX3hbiXlLb+g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^6.0.3"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "6.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/core/-/core-6.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hEb7Ma4cGJGEUNOAVmyfdB/3WirWMg5hDuNFVejGEDFqupeOysLc2sG6HJxY2etBp5YQu5Wtxwi020jS9xlUwg==",
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"@octokit/auth-token": "^5.0.0",
"@octokit/graphql": "^8.0.0",
"@octokit/request": "^9.0.0",
"@octokit/request-error": "^6.0.1",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"before-after-hook": "^3.0.2",
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/auth-token": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "5.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/auth-token/-/auth-token-5.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rh3G3wDO8J9wSjfI436JUKzHIxq8NaiL0tVeB2aXmG6p/9859aUOAjA9pmSPNGGZxfwmaJ9ozOJImuNVJdpvbA==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/endpoint": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "10.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/endpoint/-/endpoint-10.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JYjh5rMOwXMJyUpj028cu0Gbp7qe/ihxfJMLc8VZBMMqSwLgOxDI1911gV4Enl1QSavAQNJcwmwBF9M0VvLh6Q==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/openapi-types": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "22.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/openapi-types/-/openapi-types-22.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QBhVjcUa9W7Wwhm6DBFu6ZZ+1/t/oYxqc2tp81Pi41YNuJinbFRx8B133qVOrAaBbF7D/m0Et6f9/pZt9Rc+tg==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/request": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "9.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request/-/request-9.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-pyAguc0p+f+GbQho0uNetNQMmLG1e80WjkIaqqgUkihqUp0boRU6nKItXO4VWnr+nbZiLGEyy4TeKRwqaLvYgw==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/endpoint": "^10.0.0",
"@octokit/request-error": "^6.0.1",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.1.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/request-error": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "6.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request-error/-/request-error-6.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1mw1gqT3fR/WFvnoVpY/zUM2o/XkMs/2AszUUG9I69xn0JFLv6PGkPhNk5lbfvROs79wiS0bqiJNxfCZcRJJdg==",
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/@octokit/types": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "13.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-13.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HdqWTf5Z3qwDVlzCrP8UJquMwunpDiMPt5er+QjGzL4hqr/vBVY/MauQgS1xWxCDT1oMx1EULyqxncdCY/NVSQ==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/openapi-types": "^22.2.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/before-after-hook": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/before-after-hook/-/before-after-hook-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Nik3Sc0ncrMK4UUdXQmAnRtzmNQTAAXmXIopizwZ1W1t8QmfJj+zL4OA2I7XPTPW5z5TDqv4hRo/JzouDJnX3A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/@octokit/core/node_modules/universal-user-agent": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "7.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/universal-user-agent/-/universal-user-agent-7.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0JCqzSKnStlRRQfCdowvqy3cy0Dvtlb8xecj/H8JFZuCze4rwjPZQOgvFvn0Ws/usCHQFGpyr+pB9adaGwXn4Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peer": true
},
"node_modules/@octokit/endpoint": {
"version": "6.0.12",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/endpoint/-/endpoint-6.0.12.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lF3puPwkQWGfkMClXb4k/eUT/nZKQfxinRWJrdZaJO85Dqwo/G0yOC434Jr2ojwafWJMYqFGFa5ms4jJUgujdA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^6.0.3",
"is-plain-object": "^5.0.0",
"universal-user-agent": "^6.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/endpoint/node_modules/universal-user-agent": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/universal-user-agent/-/universal-user-agent-6.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-yCzhz6FN2wU1NiiQRogkTQszlQSlpWaw8SvVegAc+bDxbzHgh1vX8uIe8OYyMH6DwH+sdTJsgMl36+mSMdRJIQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "8.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/graphql/-/graphql-8.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ukiRmuHTi6ebQx/HFRCXKbDlOh/7xEV6QUXaE7MJEKGNAncGI/STSbOkl12qVXZrfZdpXctx5O9X1AIaebiDBg==",
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"@octokit/request": "^9.0.0",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/@octokit/endpoint": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "10.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/endpoint/-/endpoint-10.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JYjh5rMOwXMJyUpj028cu0Gbp7qe/ihxfJMLc8VZBMMqSwLgOxDI1911gV4Enl1QSavAQNJcwmwBF9M0VvLh6Q==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/@octokit/openapi-types": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "22.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/openapi-types/-/openapi-types-22.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QBhVjcUa9W7Wwhm6DBFu6ZZ+1/t/oYxqc2tp81Pi41YNuJinbFRx8B133qVOrAaBbF7D/m0Et6f9/pZt9Rc+tg==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/@octokit/request": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "9.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request/-/request-9.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-pyAguc0p+f+GbQho0uNetNQMmLG1e80WjkIaqqgUkihqUp0boRU6nKItXO4VWnr+nbZiLGEyy4TeKRwqaLvYgw==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/endpoint": "^10.0.0",
"@octokit/request-error": "^6.0.1",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.1.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"universal-user-agent": "^7.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/@octokit/request-error": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "6.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request-error/-/request-error-6.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1mw1gqT3fR/WFvnoVpY/zUM2o/XkMs/2AszUUG9I69xn0JFLv6PGkPhNk5lbfvROs79wiS0bqiJNxfCZcRJJdg==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/types": "^13.0.0"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 18"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/@octokit/types": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "13.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-13.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HdqWTf5Z3qwDVlzCrP8UJquMwunpDiMPt5er+QjGzL4hqr/vBVY/MauQgS1xWxCDT1oMx1EULyqxncdCY/NVSQ==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"peer": true,
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"@octokit/openapi-types": "^22.2.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/graphql/node_modules/universal-user-agent": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "7.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/universal-user-agent/-/universal-user-agent-7.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0JCqzSKnStlRRQfCdowvqy3cy0Dvtlb8xecj/H8JFZuCze4rwjPZQOgvFvn0Ws/usCHQFGpyr+pB9adaGwXn4Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peer": true
},
"node_modules/@octokit/openapi-types": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "12.11.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/openapi-types/-/openapi-types-12.11.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-VsXyi8peyRq9PqIz/tpqiL2w3w80OgVMwBHltTml3LmVvXiphgeqmY9mvBw9Wu7e0QWk/fqD37ux8yP5uVekyQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest": {
"version": "1.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest/-/plugin-paginate-rest-1.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jbsSoi5Q1pj63sC16XIUboklNw+8tL9VOnJsWycWYR78TKss5PVpIPb1TUUcMQ+bBh7cY579cVAWmf5qG+dw+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^2.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest/node_modules/@octokit/types": {
"version": "2.16.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-2.16.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-O75k56TYvJ8WpAakWwYRN8Bgu60KrmX0z1KqFp1kNiFNkgW+JW+9EBKZ+S33PU6SLvbihqd+3drvPxKK68Ee8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@types/node": ">= 8"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/plugin-request-log": {
"version": "1.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/plugin-request-log/-/plugin-request-log-1.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mLUsMkgP7K/cnFEw07kWqXGF5LKrOkD+lhCrKvPHXWDywAwuDUeDwWBpc69XK3pNX0uKiVt8g5z96PJ6z9xCFA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"peerDependencies": {
"@octokit/core": ">=3"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods": {
"version": "2.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/-/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods-2.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-EZi/AWhtkdfAYi01obpX0DF7U6b1VRr30QNQ5xSFPITMdLSfhcBqjamE3F+sKcxPbD7eZuMHu3Qkk2V+JGxBDQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^2.0.1",
"deprecation": "^2.3.1"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/node_modules/@octokit/types": {
"version": "2.16.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-2.16.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-O75k56TYvJ8WpAakWwYRN8Bgu60KrmX0z1KqFp1kNiFNkgW+JW+9EBKZ+S33PU6SLvbihqd+3drvPxKK68Ee8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@types/node": ">= 8"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/request": {
"version": "5.6.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request/-/request-5.6.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bFJl0I1KVc9jYTe9tdGGpAMPy32dLBXXo1dS/YwSCTL/2nd9XeHsY616RE3HPXDVk+a+dBuzyz5YdlXwcDTr2A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/endpoint": "^6.0.1",
"@octokit/request-error": "^2.1.0",
"@octokit/types": "^6.16.1",
"is-plain-object": "^5.0.0",
"node-fetch": "^2.6.7",
"universal-user-agent": "^6.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/request-error": {
"version": "1.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request-error/-/request-error-1.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+6yDyk1EES6WK+l3viRDElw96MvwfJxCt45GvmjDUKWjYIb3PJZQkq3i46TwGwoPD4h8NmTrENmtyA1FwbmhRA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^2.0.0",
"deprecation": "^2.0.0",
"once": "^1.4.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/request-error/node_modules/@octokit/types": {
"version": "2.16.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-2.16.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-O75k56TYvJ8WpAakWwYRN8Bgu60KrmX0z1KqFp1kNiFNkgW+JW+9EBKZ+S33PU6SLvbihqd+3drvPxKK68Ee8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@types/node": ">= 8"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/request/node_modules/@octokit/request-error": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/request-error/-/request-error-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1VIvgXxs9WHSjicsRwq8PlR2LR2x6DwsJAaFgzdi0JfJoGSO8mYI/cHJQ+9FbN21aa+DrgNLnwObmyeSC8Rmpg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/types": "^6.0.3",
"deprecation": "^2.0.0",
"once": "^1.4.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/request/node_modules/universal-user-agent": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/universal-user-agent/-/universal-user-agent-6.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-yCzhz6FN2wU1NiiQRogkTQszlQSlpWaw8SvVegAc+bDxbzHgh1vX8uIe8OYyMH6DwH+sdTJsgMl36+mSMdRJIQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@octokit/rest": {
"version": "16.43.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/rest/-/rest-16.43.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ngDBevLbBTFfrHZeiS7SAMAZ6ssuVmXuya+F/7RaVvlysgGa1JKJkKWY+jV6TCJYcW0OALfJ7nTIGXcBXzycfQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/auth-token": "^2.4.0",
"@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest": "^1.1.1",
"@octokit/plugin-request-log": "^1.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods": "2.4.0",
"@octokit/request": "^5.2.0",
"@octokit/request-error": "^1.0.2",
"atob-lite": "^2.0.0",
"before-after-hook": "^2.0.0",
"btoa-lite": "^1.0.0",
"deprecation": "^2.0.0",
"lodash.get": "^4.4.2",
"lodash.set": "^4.3.2",
"lodash.uniq": "^4.5.0",
"octokit-pagination-methods": "^1.1.0",
"once": "^1.4.0",
"universal-user-agent": "^4.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@octokit/types": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "6.41.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@octokit/types/-/types-6.41.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eJ2jbzjdijiL3B4PrSQaSjuF2sPEQPVCPzBvTHJD9Nz+9dw2SGH4K4xeQJ77YfTq5bRQ+bD8wT11JbeDPmxmGg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"@octokit/openapi-types": "^12.11.0"
}
},
"node_modules/@one-ini/wasm": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@one-ini/wasm/-/wasm-0.1.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-XuySG1E38YScSJoMlqovLru4KTUNSjgVTIjyh7qMX6aNN5HY5Ct5LhRJdxO79JtTzKfzV/bnWpz+zquYrISsvw==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@pkgjs/parseargs": {
"version": "0.11.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@pkgjs/parseargs/-/parseargs-0.11.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+1VkjdD0QBLPodGrJUeqarH8VAIvQODIbwh9XpP5Syisf7YoQgsJKPNFoqqLQlu+VQ/tVSshMR6loPMn8U+dPg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/@types/expect": {
"version": "1.20.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/expect/-/expect-1.20.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Q5Vn3yjTDyCMV50TB6VRIbQNxSE4OmZR86VSbGaNpfUolm0iePBB4KdEEHmxoY5sT2+2DIvXW0rvMDP2nHZ4Mg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@types/node": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "20.14.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/node/-/node-20.14.9.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-06OCtnTXtWOZBJlRApleWndH4JsRVs1pDCc8dLSQp+7PpUpX3ePdHyeNSFTeSe7FtKyQkrlPvHwJOW3SLd8Oyg==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"undici-types": "~5.26.4"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/@types/vinyl": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "2.0.12",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/vinyl/-/vinyl-2.0.12.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Sr2fYMBUVGYq8kj3UthXFAu5UN6ZW+rYr4NACjZQJvHvj+c8lYv0CahmZ2P/r7iUkN44gGUBwqxZkrKXYPb7cw==",
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@types/expect": "^1.20.4",
"@types/node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/abbrev": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/abbrev/-/abbrev-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-6/mh1E2u2YgEsCHdY0Yx5oW+61gZU+1vXaoiHHrpKeuRNNgFvS+/jrwHiQhB5apAf5oB7UB7E19ol2R2LKH8hQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": "^14.17.0 || ^16.13.0 || >=18.0.0"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/accord": {
"version": "0.29.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/accord/-/accord-0.29.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3OOR92FTc2p5/EcOzPcXp+Cbo+3C15nV9RXHlOUBCBpHhcB+0frbSNR9ehED/o7sTcyGVtqGJpguToEdlXhD0w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"convert-source-map": "^1.5.0",
"glob": "^7.0.5",
"indx": "^0.2.3",
"lodash.clone": "^4.3.2",
"lodash.defaults": "^4.0.1",
"lodash.flatten": "^4.2.0",
"lodash.merge": "^4.4.0",
"lodash.partialright": "^4.1.4",
"lodash.pick": "^4.2.1",
"lodash.uniq": "^4.3.0",
"resolve": "^1.5.0",
"semver": "^5.3.0",
"uglify-js": "^2.8.22",
"when": "^3.7.8"
}
},
"node_modules/accord/node_modules/lodash.defaults": {
"version": "4.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.defaults/-/lodash.defaults-4.2.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-qjxPLHd3r5DnsdGacqOMU6pb/avJzdh9tFX2ymgoZE27BmjXrNy/y4LoaiTeAb+O3gL8AfpJGtqfX/ae2leYYQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/align-text": {
"version": "0.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/align-text/-/align-text-0.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GrTZLRpmp6wIC2ztrWW9MjjTgSKccffgFagbNDOX95/dcjEcYZibYTeaOntySQLcdw1ztBoFkviiUvTMbb9MYg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^3.0.2",
"longest": "^1.0.1",
"repeat-string": "^1.5.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/align-text/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-3.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NOW9QQXMoZGg/oqnVNoNTTIFEIid1627WCffUBJEdMxYApq7mNE7CpzucIPc+ZQg25Phej7IJSmX3hO+oblOtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-colors": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-colors/-/ansi-colors-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SFKX67auSNoVR38N3L+nvsPjOE0bybKTYbkf5tRvushrAPQ9V75huw0ZxBkKVeRU9kqH3d6HA4xTckbwZ4ixmA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-wrap": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-cyan": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-cyan/-/ansi-cyan-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eCjan3AVo/SxZ0/MyIYRtkpxIu/H3xZN7URr1vXVrISxeyz8fUFz0FJziamK4sS8I+t35y4rHg1b2PklyBe/7A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-wrap": "0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-escapes": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-escapes/-/ansi-escapes-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cBhpre4ma+U0T1oM5fXg7Dy1Jw7zzwv7lt/GoCpr+hDQJoYnKVPLL4dCvSEFMmQurOQvSrwT7SL/DAlhBI97RQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-gray": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-gray/-/ansi-gray-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HrgGIZUl8h2EHuZaU9hTR/cU5nhKxpVE1V6kdGsQ8e4zirElJ5fvtfc8N7Q1oq1aatO275i8pUFUCpNWCAnVWw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-wrap": "0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-red": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-red/-/ansi-red-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ewaIr5y+9CUTGFwZfpECUbFlGcC0GCw1oqR9RI6h1gQCd9Aj2GxSckCnPsVJnmfMZbwFYE+leZGASgkWl06Jow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-wrap": "0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-TIGnTpdo+E3+pCyAluZvtED5p5wCqLdezCyhPZzKPcxvFplEt4i+W7OONCKgeZFT3+y5NZZfOOS/Bdcanm1MYA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "2.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-2.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kmCevFghRiWM7HB5zTPULl4r9bVFSWjz62MhqizDGUrq2NWuNMQyuv4tHHoKJHs69M/MF64lEcHdYIocrdWQYA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ansi-wrap": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-wrap/-/ansi-wrap-0.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZyznvL8k/FZeQHr2T6LzcJ/+vBApDnMNZvfVFy3At0knswWd6rJ3/0Hhmpu8oqa6C92npmozs890sX9Dl6q+Qw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/any-shell-escape": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/any-shell-escape/-/any-shell-escape-0.1.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-36j4l5HVkboyRhIWgtMh1I9i8LTdFqVwDEHy1cp+QioJyKgAUG40X0W8s7jakWRta/Sjvm8mUG1fU6Tj8mWagQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/anymatch": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/anymatch/-/anymatch-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5teOsQWABXHHBFP9y3skS5P3d/WfWXpv3FUpy+LorMrNYaT9pI4oLMQX7jzQ2KklNpGpWHzdCXTDT2Y3XGlZBw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"micromatch": "^3.1.4",
"normalize-path": "^2.1.1"
}
},
"node_modules/anymatch/node_modules/normalize-path": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-path/-/normalize-path-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3pKJwH184Xo/lnH6oyP1q2pMd7HcypqqmRs91/6/i2CGtWwIKGCkOOMTm/zXbgTEWHw1uNpNi/igc3ePOYHb6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"remove-trailing-separator": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/append-buffer": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/append-buffer/-/append-buffer-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WLbYiXzD3y/ATLZFufV/rZvWdZOs+Z/+5v1rBZ463Jn398pa6kcde27cvozYnBoxXblGZTFfoPpsaEw0orU5BA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"buffer-equal": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/archy": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/archy/-/archy-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Xg+9RwCg/0p32teKdGMPTPnVXKD0w3DfHnFTficozsAgsvq2XenPJq/MYpzzQ/v8zrOyJn6Ds39VA4JIDwFfqw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/argparse": {
"version": "1.0.10",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/argparse/-/argparse-1.0.10.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-o5Roy6tNG4SL/FOkCAN6RzjiakZS25RLYFrcMttJqbdd8BWrnA+fGz57iN5Pb06pvBGvl5gQ0B48dJlslXvoTg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"sprintf-js": "~1.0.2"
}
},
"node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YVIQ82gZPGBebQV/a8dar4AitzCQs0jjXwMPZllpXMaGjXPYVUawSxQrRsjhjupyVxEvbHgUmIhKVlND+j02kA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/arr-filter": {
"version": "1.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-filter/-/arr-filter-1.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-A2BETWCqhsecSvCkWAeVBFLH6sXEUGASuzkpjL3GR1SlL/PWL6M3J8EAAld2Uubmh39tvkJTqC9LeLHCUKmFXA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"make-iterator": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/arr-flatten": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-flatten/-/arr-flatten-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L3hKV5R/p5o81R7O02IGnwpDmkp6E982XhtbuwSe3O4qOtMMMtodicASA1Cny2U+aCXcNpml+m4dPsvsJ3jatg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/arr-map": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-map/-/arr-map-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tVqVTHt+Q5Xb09qRkbu+DidW1yYzz5izWS2Xm2yFm7qJnmUfz4HPzNxbHkdRJbz2lrqI7S+z17xNYdFcBBO8Hw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"make-iterator": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-sKpyeERZ02v1FeCZT8lrfJq5u6goHCtpTAzPwJYe7c8SPFOboNjNg1vz2L4VTn9T4PQxEx13TbXLmYUcS6Ug7Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-differ": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-differ/-/array-differ-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LeZY+DZDRnvP7eMuQ6LHfCzUGxAAIViUBliK24P3hWXL6y4SortgR6Nim6xrkfSLlmH0+k+9NYNwVC2s53ZrYQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-each": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-each/-/array-each-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zHjL5SZa68hkKHBFBK6DJCTtr9sfTCPCaph/L7tMSLcTFgy+zX7E+6q5UArbtOtMBCtxdICpfTCspRse+ywyXA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-initial": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-initial/-/array-initial-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BC4Yl89vneCYfpLrs5JU2aAu9/a+xWbeKhvISg9PT7eWFB9UlRvI+rKEtk6mgxWr3dSkk9gQ8hCrdqt06NXPdw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-slice": "^1.0.0",
"is-number": "^4.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-initial/node_modules/is-number": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-number/-/is-number-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rSklcAIlf1OmFdyAqbnWTLVelsQ58uvZ66S/ZyawjWqIviTWCjg2PzVGw8WUA+nNuPTqb4wgA+NszrJ+08LlgQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-last": {
"version": "1.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-last/-/array-last-1.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eOCut5rXlI6aCOS7Z7kCplKRKyiFQ6dHFBem4PwlwKeNFk2/XxTrhRh5T9PyaEWGy/NHTZWbY+nsZlNFJu9rYg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-number": "^4.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-last/node_modules/is-number": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-number/-/is-number-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rSklcAIlf1OmFdyAqbnWTLVelsQ58uvZ66S/ZyawjWqIviTWCjg2PzVGw8WUA+nNuPTqb4wgA+NszrJ+08LlgQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-B1qMD3RBP7O8o0H2KbrXDyB0IccejMF15+87Lvlor12ONPRHP6gTjXMNkt/d3ZuOGbAe66hFmaCfECI24Ufp6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-sort": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-sort/-/array-sort-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ihLeJkonmdiAsD7vpgN3CRcx2J2S0TiYW+IS/5zHBI7mKUq3ySvBdzzBfD236ubDBQFiiyG3SWCPc+msQ9KoYg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"default-compare": "^1.0.0",
"get-value": "^2.0.6",
"kind-of": "^5.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-union": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-union/-/array-union-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Dxr6QJj/RdU/hCaBjOfxW+q6lyuVE6JFWIrAUpuOOhoJJoQ99cUn3igRaHVB5P9WrgFVN0FfArM3x0cueOU8ng==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-uniq": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-uniq": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-uniq/-/array-uniq-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-MNha4BWQ6JbwhFhj03YK552f7cb3AzoE8SzeljgChvL1dl3IcvggXVz1DilzySZkCja+CXuZbdW7yATchWn8/Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/array-unique": {
"version": "0.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-unique/-/array-unique-0.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SleRWjh9JUud2wH1hPs9rZBZ33H6T9HOiL0uwGnGx9FpE6wKGyfWugmbkEOIs6qWrZhg0LWeLziLrEwQJhs5mQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/assign-symbols": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/assign-symbols/-/assign-symbols-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Q+JC7Whu8HhmTdBph/Tq59IoRtoy6KAm5zzPv00WdujX82lbAL8K7WVjne7vdCsAmbF4AYaDOPyO3k0kl8qIrw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/async": {
"version": "1.5.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/async/-/async-1.5.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-nSVgobk4rv61R9PUSDtYt7mPVB2olxNR5RWJcAsH676/ef11bUZwvu7+RGYrYauVdDPcO519v68wRhXQtxsV9w==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/async-done": {
"version": "1.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/async-done/-/async-done-1.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uYkTP8dw2og1tu1nmza1n1CMW0qb8gWWlwqMmLb7MhBVs4BXrFziT6HXUd+/RlRA/i4H9AkofYloUbs1fwMqlw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"end-of-stream": "^1.1.0",
"once": "^1.3.2",
"process-nextick-args": "^2.0.0",
"stream-exhaust": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/async-each": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/async-each/-/async-each-1.0.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-c646jH1avxr+aVpndVMeAfYw7wAa6idufrlN3LPA4PmKS0QEGp6PIC9nwz0WQkkvBGAMEki3pFdtxaF39J9vvg==",
"funding": [
{
"type": "individual",
"url": "https://paulmillr.com/funding/"
}
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
],
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/async-settle": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/async-settle/-/async-settle-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VPXfB4Vk49z1LHHodrEQ6Xf7W4gg1w0dAPROHngx7qgDjqmIQ+fXmwgGXTW/ITLai0YLSvWepJOP9EVpMnEAcw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"async-done": "^1.2.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/atob": {
"version": "2.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/atob/-/atob-2.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Wm6ukoaOGJi/73p/cl2GvLjTI5JM1k/O14isD73YML8StrH/7/lRFgmg8nICZgD3bZZvjwCGxtMOD3wWNAu8cg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "(MIT OR Apache-2.0)",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"bin": {
"atob": "bin/atob.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 4.5.0"
}
},
"node_modules/atob-lite": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/atob-lite/-/atob-lite-2.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-LEeSAWeh2Gfa2FtlQE1shxQ8zi5F9GHarrGKz08TMdODD5T4eH6BMsvtnhbWZ+XQn+Gb6om/917ucvRu7l7ukw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/autoprefixer": {
"version": "9.8.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/autoprefixer/-/autoprefixer-9.8.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eM9d/swFopRt5gdJ7jrpCwgvEMIayITpojhkkSMRsFHYuH5bkSQ4p/9qTEHtmNudUZh22Tehu7I6CxAW0IXTKA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"browserslist": "^4.12.0",
"caniuse-lite": "^1.0.30001109",
"normalize-range": "^0.1.2",
"num2fraction": "^1.2.2",
"picocolors": "^0.2.1",
"postcss": "^7.0.32",
"postcss-value-parser": "^4.1.0"
},
"bin": {
"autoprefixer": "bin/autoprefixer"
},
"funding": {
"type": "tidelift",
"url": "https://tidelift.com/funding/github/npm/autoprefixer"
}
},
"node_modules/bach": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/bach/-/bach-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bZOOfCb3gXBXbTFXq3OZtGR88LwGeJvzu6szttaIzymOTS4ZttBNOWSv7aLZja2EMycKtRYV0Oa8SNKH/zkxvg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-filter": "^1.1.1",
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"arr-map": "^2.0.0",
"array-each": "^1.0.0",
"array-initial": "^1.0.0",
"array-last": "^1.1.1",
"async-done": "^1.2.2",
"async-settle": "^1.0.0",
"now-and-later": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/balanced-match": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/balanced-match/-/balanced-match-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-3oSeUO0TMV67hN1AmbXsK4yaqU7tjiHlbxRDZOpH0KW9+CeX4bRAaX0Anxt0tx2MrpRpWwQaPwIlISEJhYU5Pw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/base": {
"version": "0.11.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/base/-/base-0.11.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5T6P4xPgpp0YDFvSWwEZ4NoE3aM4QBQXDzmVbraCkFj8zHM+mba8SyqB5DbZWyR7mYHo6Y7BdQo3MoA4m0TeQg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"cache-base": "^1.0.1",
"class-utils": "^0.3.5",
"component-emitter": "^1.2.1",
"define-property": "^1.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.1",
"mixin-deep": "^1.2.0",
"pascalcase": "^0.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/base/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cZTYKFWspt9jZsMscWo8sc/5lbPC9Q0N5nBLgb+Yd915iL3udB1uFgS3B8YCx66UVHq018DAVFoee7x+gxggeA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/beeper": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/beeper/-/beeper-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3vqtKL1N45I5dV0RdssXZG7X6pCqQrWPNOlBPZPrd+QkE2HEhR57Z04m0KtpbsZH73j+a3F8UD1TQnn+ExTvIA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/before-after-hook": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/before-after-hook/-/before-after-hook-2.2.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-NzUnlZexiaH/46WDhANlyR2bXRopNg4F/zuSA3OpZnllCUgRaOF2znDioDWrmbNVsuZk6l9pMquQB38cfBZwkQ==",
"license": "Apache-2.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/better-console": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/better-console/-/better-console-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-M/azU25cj3ZHbMSoXEroDfzcolfUvM03PZw5EEBk9T3tqdIYfMXrIkEKb9q8OZMC8Hic8Q9l8jk6TZq9cyRrcw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"chalk": "^1.1.3",
"cli-table": "~0.3.1"
}
},
"node_modules/binary-extensions": {
"version": "1.13.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/binary-extensions/-/binary-extensions-1.13.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Un7MIEDdUC5gNpcGDV97op1Ywk748MpHcFTHoYs6qnj1Z3j7I53VG3nwZhKzoBZmbdRNnb6WRdFlwl7tSDuZGw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/binaryextensions": {
"version": "2.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/binaryextensions/-/binaryextensions-2.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-nAihlQsYGyc5Bwq6+EsubvANYGExeJKHDO3RjnvwU042fawQTQfM3Kxn7IHUXQOz4bzfwsGYYHGSvXyW4zOGLg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://bevry.me/fund"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/bindings": {
"version": "1.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/bindings/-/bindings-1.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-p2q/t/mhvuOj/UeLlV6566GD/guowlr0hHxClI0W9m7MWYkL1F0hLo+0Aexs9HSPCtR1SXQ0TD3MMKrXZajbiQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"dependencies": {
"file-uri-to-path": "1.0.0"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/brace-expansion": {
"version": "1.1.11",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/brace-expansion/-/brace-expansion-1.1.11.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iCuPHDFgrHX7H2vEI/5xpz07zSHB00TpugqhmYtVmMO6518mCuRMoOYFldEBl0g187ufozdaHgWKcYFb61qGiA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"balanced-match": "^1.0.0",
"concat-map": "0.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/braces": {
"version": "2.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/braces/-/braces-2.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aNdbnj9P8PjdXU4ybaWLK2IF3jc/EoDYbC7AazW6to3TRsfXxscC9UXOB5iDiEQrkyIbWp2SLQda4+QAa7nc3w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.1.0",
"array-unique": "^0.3.2",
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"fill-range": "^4.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.1",
"repeat-element": "^1.1.2",
"snapdragon": "^0.8.1",
"snapdragon-node": "^2.0.1",
"split-string": "^3.0.2",
"to-regex": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/browserslist": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "4.23.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/browserslist/-/browserslist-4.23.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-TUfofFo/KsK/bWZ9TWQ5O26tsWW4Uhmt8IYklbnUa70udB6P2wA7w7o4PY4muaEPBQaAX+CEnmmIA41NVHtPVw==",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"funding": [
{
"type": "opencollective",
"url": "https://opencollective.com/browserslist"
},
{
"type": "tidelift",
"url": "https://tidelift.com/funding/github/npm/browserslist"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
{
"type": "github",
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ai"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
],
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"caniuse-lite": "^1.0.30001629",
"electron-to-chromium": "^1.4.796",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node-releases": "^2.0.14",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"update-browserslist-db": "^1.0.16"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"browserslist": "cli.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": "^6 || ^7 || ^8 || ^9 || ^10 || ^11 || ^12 || >=13.7"
}
},
"node_modules/btoa-lite": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/btoa-lite/-/btoa-lite-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-gvW7InbIyF8AicrqWoptdW08pUxuhq8BEgowNajy9RhiE86fmGAGl+bLKo6oB8QP0CkqHLowfN0oJdKC/J6LbA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/buffer-equal": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/buffer-equal/-/buffer-equal-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QoV3ptgEaQpvVwbXdSO39iqPQTCxSF7A5U99AxbHYqUdCizL/lH2Z0A2y6nbZucxMEOtNyZfG2s6gsVugGpKkg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">=0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/buffer-from": {
"version": "1.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/buffer-from/-/buffer-from-1.1.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-E+XQCRwSbaaiChtv6k6Dwgc+bx+Bs6vuKJHHl5kox/BaKbhiXzqQOwK4cO22yElGp2OCmjwVhT3HmxgyPGnJfQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/cache-base": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cache-base/-/cache-base-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-AKcdTnFSWATd5/GCPRxr2ChwIJ85CeyrEyjRHlKxQ56d4XJMGym0uAiKn0xbLOGOl3+yRpOTi484dVCEc5AUzQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"collection-visit": "^1.0.0",
"component-emitter": "^1.2.1",
"get-value": "^2.0.6",
"has-value": "^1.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.1",
"set-value": "^2.0.0",
"to-object-path": "^0.3.0",
"union-value": "^1.0.0",
"unset-value": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/call-bind": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/call-bind/-/call-bind-1.0.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GHTSNSYICQ7scH7sZ+M2rFopRoLh8t2bLSW6BbgrtLsahOIB5iyAVJf9GjWK3cYTDaMj4XdBpM1cA6pIS0Kv2w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es-define-property": "^1.0.0",
"es-errors": "^1.3.0",
"function-bind": "^1.1.2",
"get-intrinsic": "^1.2.4",
"set-function-length": "^1.2.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/camelcase": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/camelcase/-/camelcase-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4nhGqUkc4BqbBBB4Q6zLuD7lzzrHYrjKGeYaEji/3tFR5VdJu9v+LilhGIVe8wxEJPPOeWo7eg8dwY13TZ1BNg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/caniuse-lite": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-05 10:42:17 +00:00
"version": "1.0.30001640",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/caniuse-lite/-/caniuse-lite-1.0.30001640.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lA4VMpW0PSUrFnkmVuEKBUovSWKhj7puyCg8StBChgu298N1AtuF1sKWEvfDuimSEDbhlb/KqPKC3fs1HbuQUA==",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"funding": [
{
"type": "opencollective",
"url": "https://opencollective.com/browserslist"
},
{
"type": "tidelift",
"url": "https://tidelift.com/funding/github/npm/caniuse-lite"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
{
"type": "github",
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ai"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
],
"license": "CC-BY-4.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/center-align": {
"version": "0.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/center-align/-/center-align-0.1.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Baz3aNe2gd2LP2qk5U+sDk/m4oSuwSDcBfayTCTBoWpfIGO5XFxPmjILQII4NGiZjD6DoDI6kf7gKaxkf7s3VQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"align-text": "^0.1.3",
"lazy-cache": "^1.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/chalk": {
"version": "1.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chalk/-/chalk-1.1.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-U3lRVLMSlsCfjqYPbLyVv11M9CPW4I728d6TCKMAOJueEeB9/8o+eSsMnxPJD+Q+K909sdESg7C+tIkoH6on1A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^2.2.1",
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.2",
"has-ansi": "^2.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.0",
"supports-color": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/chardet": {
"version": "0.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chardet/-/chardet-0.7.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-mT8iDcrh03qDGRRmoA2hmBJnxpllMR+0/0qlzjqZES6NdiWDcZkCNAk4rPFZ9Q85r27unkiNNg8ZOiwZXBHwcA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/chokidar": {
"version": "2.1.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chokidar/-/chokidar-2.1.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZmZUazfOzf0Nve7duiCKD23PFSCs4JPoYyccjUFF3aQkQadqBhfzhjkwBH2mNOG9cTBwhamM37EIsIkZw3nRgg==",
"deprecated": "Chokidar 2 does not receive security updates since 2019. Upgrade to chokidar 3 with 15x fewer dependencies",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"anymatch": "^2.0.0",
"async-each": "^1.0.1",
"braces": "^2.3.2",
"glob-parent": "^3.1.0",
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"is-binary-path": "^1.0.0",
"is-glob": "^4.0.0",
"normalize-path": "^3.0.0",
"path-is-absolute": "^1.0.0",
"readdirp": "^2.2.1",
"upath": "^1.1.1"
},
"optionalDependencies": {
"fsevents": "^1.2.7"
}
},
"node_modules/class-utils": {
"version": "0.3.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/class-utils/-/class-utils-0.3.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qOhPa/Fj7s6TY8H8esGu5QNpMMQxz79h+urzrNYN6mn+9BnxlDGf5QZ+XeCDsxSjPqsSR56XOZOJmpeurnLMeg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-union": "^3.1.0",
"define-property": "^0.2.5",
"isobject": "^3.0.0",
"static-extend": "^0.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/class-utils/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "0.2.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-0.2.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Rr7ADjQZenceVOAKop6ALkkRAmH1A4Gx9hV/7ZujPUN2rkATqFO0JZLZInbAjpZYoJ1gUx8MRMQVkYemcbMSTA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/class-utils/node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.1.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-0.1.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3grZTvObeN1xud4cRWl366OMXZTj0+HGyk4hvfpx4ZHt1Pb60ANSXqCK7pdOTeUQpRzECBSTphqvD7U+l22Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/clean-css": {
"version": "4.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clean-css/-/clean-css-4.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4ZxI6dy4lrY6FHzfiy1aEOXgu4LIsW2MhwG0VBKdcoGoH/XLFgaHSdLTGr4O8Be6A8r3MOphEiI8Gc1n0ecf3g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"source-map": "~0.6.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 4.0"
}
},
"node_modules/cli-cursor": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cli-cursor/-/cli-cursor-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8lgKz8LmCRYZZQDpRyT2m5rKJ08TnU4tR9FFFW2rxpxR1FzWi4PQ/NfyODchAatHaUgnSPVcx/R5w6NuTBzFiw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"restore-cursor": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/cli-table": {
"version": "0.3.11",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cli-table/-/cli-table-0.3.11.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-IqLQi4lO0nIB4tcdTpN4LCB9FI3uqrJZK7RC515EnhZ6qBaglkIgICb1wjeAqpdoOabm1+SuQtkXIPdYC93jhQ==",
"dependencies": {
"colors": "1.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.2.0"
}
},
"node_modules/cli-width": {
"version": "2.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cli-width/-/cli-width-2.2.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-GRMWDxpOB6Dgk2E5Uo+3eEBvtOOlimMmpbFiKuLFnQzYDavtLFY3K5ona41jgN/WdRZtG7utuVSVTL4HbZHGkw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/cliui": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cliui/-/cliui-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0yayqDxWQbqk3ojkYqUKqaAQ6AfNKeKWRNA8kR0WXzAsdHpP4BIaOmMAG87JGuO6qcobyW4GjxHd9PmhEd+T9w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"string-width": "^1.0.1",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.1",
"wrap-ansi": "^2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/cliui/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1pqUqRjkhPJ9miNq9SwMfdvi6lBJcd6eFxvfaivQhaH3SgisfiuudvFntdKOmxuee/77l+FPjKrQjWvmPjWrRw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"number-is-nan": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/cliui/node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0XsVpQLnVCXHJfyEs8tC0zpTVIr5PKKsQtkT29IwupnPTjtPmQ3xT/4yCREF9hYkV/3M3kzcUTSAZT6a6h81tw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"code-point-at": "^1.0.0",
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^1.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/clone": {
"version": "2.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clone/-/clone-2.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3Pe/CF1Nn94hyhIYpjtiLhdCoEoz0DqQ+988E9gmeEdQZlojxnOb74wctFyuwWQHzqyf9X7C7MG8juUpqBJT8w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8"
}
},
"node_modules/clone-buffer": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clone-buffer/-/clone-buffer-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-KLLTJWrvwIP+OPfMn0x2PheDEP20RPUcGXj/ERegTgdmPEZylALQldygiqrPPu8P45uNuPs7ckmReLY6v/iA5g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/clone-stats": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clone-stats/-/clone-stats-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-au6ydSpg6nsrigcZ4m8Bc9hxjeW+GJ8xh5G3BJCMt4WXe1H10UNaVOamqQTmrx1kjVuxAHIQSNU6hY4Nsn9/ag==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/cloneable-readable": {
"version": "1.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cloneable-readable/-/cloneable-readable-1.1.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2EF8zTQOxYq70Y4XKtorQupqF0m49MBz2/yf5Bj+MHjvpG3Hy7sImifnqD6UA+TKYxeSV+u6qqQPawN5UvnpKQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inherits": "^2.0.1",
"process-nextick-args": "^2.0.0",
"readable-stream": "^2.3.5"
}
},
"node_modules/code-point-at": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/code-point-at/-/code-point-at-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-RpAVKQA5T63xEj6/giIbUEtZwJ4UFIc3ZtvEkiaUERylqe8xb5IvqcgOurZLahv93CLKfxcw5YI+DZcUBRyLXA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/collection-map": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/collection-map/-/collection-map-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5D2XXSpkOnleOI21TG7p3T0bGAsZ/XknZpKBmGYyluO8pw4zA3K8ZlrBIbC4FXg3m6z/RNFiUFfT2sQK01+UHA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-map": "^2.0.2",
"for-own": "^1.0.0",
"make-iterator": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/collection-visit": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/collection-visit/-/collection-visit-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lNkKvzEeMBBjUGHZ+q6z9pSJla0KWAQPvtzhEV9+iGyQYG+pBpl7xKDhxoNSOZH2hhv0v5k0y2yAM4o4SjoSkw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"map-visit": "^1.0.0",
"object-visit": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/color-convert": {
"version": "1.9.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/color-convert/-/color-convert-1.9.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QfAUtd+vFdAtFQcC8CCyYt1fYWxSqAiK2cSD6zDB8N3cpsEBAvRxp9zOGg6G/SHHJYAT88/az/IuDGALsNVbGg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-name": "1.1.3"
}
},
"node_modules/color-name": {
"version": "1.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/color-name/-/color-name-1.1.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-72fSenhMw2HZMTVHeCA9KCmpEIbzWiQsjN+BHcBbS9vr1mtt+vJjPdksIBNUmKAW8TFUDPJK5SUU3QhE9NEXDw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/color-support": {
"version": "1.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/color-support/-/color-support-1.1.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qiBjkpbMLO/HL68y+lh4q0/O1MZFj2RX6X/KmMa3+gJD3z+WwI1ZzDHysvqHGS3mP6mznPckpXmw1nI9cJjyRg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"bin": {
"color-support": "bin.js"
}
},
"node_modules/colors": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/colors/-/colors-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-pFGrxThWcWQ2MsAz6RtgeWe4NK2kUE1WfsrvvlctdII745EW9I0yflqhe7++M5LEc7bV2c/9/5zc8sFcpL0Drw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.1.90"
}
},
"node_modules/commander": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "10.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/commander/-/commander-10.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-y4Mg2tXshplEbSGzx7amzPwKKOCGuoSRP/CjEdwwk0FOGlUbq6lKuoyDZTNZkmxHdJtp54hdfY/JUrdL7Xfdug==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/component-emitter": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/component-emitter/-/component-emitter-1.3.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-T0+barUSQRTUQASh8bx02dl+DhF54GtIDY13Y3m9oWTklKbb3Wv974meRpeZ3lp1JpLVECWWNHC4vaG2XHXouQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/concat-map": {
"version": "0.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/concat-map/-/concat-map-0.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-/Srv4dswyQNBfohGpz9o6Yb3Gz3SrUDqBH5rTuhGR7ahtlbYKnVxw2bCFMRljaA7EXHaXZ8wsHdodFvbkhKmqg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/concat-stream": {
"version": "1.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/concat-stream/-/concat-stream-1.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-27HBghJxjiZtIk3Ycvn/4kbJk/1uZuJFfuPEns6LaEvpvG1f0hTea8lilrouyo9mVc2GWdcEZ8OLoGmSADlrCw==",
"engines": [
"node >= 0.8"
],
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"buffer-from": "^1.0.0",
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"readable-stream": "^2.2.2",
"typedarray": "^0.0.6"
}
},
"node_modules/concat-with-sourcemaps": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/concat-with-sourcemaps/-/concat-with-sourcemaps-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4gEjHJFT9e+2W/77h/DS5SGUgwDaOwprX8L/gl5+3ixnzkVJJsZWDSelmN3Oilw3LNDZjZV0yqH1hLG3k6nghg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"source-map": "^0.6.1"
}
},
"node_modules/config-chain": {
"version": "1.1.13",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/config-chain/-/config-chain-1.1.13.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qj+f8APARXHrM0hraqXYb2/bOVSV4PvJQlNZ/DVj0QrmNM2q2euizkeuVckQ57J+W0mRH6Hvi+k50M4Jul2VRQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ini": "^1.3.4",
"proto-list": "~1.2.1"
}
},
"node_modules/convert-source-map": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.9.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/convert-source-map/-/convert-source-map-1.9.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ASFBup0Mz1uyiIjANan1jzLQami9z1PoYSZCiiYW2FczPbenXc45FZdBZLzOT+r6+iciuEModtmCti+hjaAk0A==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/copy-anything": {
"version": "2.0.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/copy-anything/-/copy-anything-2.0.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1j20GZTsvKNkc4BY3NpMOM8tt///wY3FpIzozTOFO2ffuZcV61nojHXVKIy3WM+7ADCy5FVhdZYHYDdgTU0yJw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-what": "^3.14.1"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/mesqueeb"
}
},
"node_modules/copy-descriptor": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/copy-descriptor/-/copy-descriptor-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-XgZ0pFcakEUlbwQEVNg3+QAis1FyTL3Qel9FYy8pSkQqoG3PNoT0bOCQtOXcOkur21r2Eq2kI+IE+gsmAEVlYw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/copy-props": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/copy-props/-/copy-props-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-XBlx8HSqrT0ObQwmSzM7WE5k8FxTV75h1DX1Z3n6NhQ/UYYAvInWYmG06vFt7hQZArE2fuO62aihiWIVQwh1sw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"each-props": "^1.3.2",
"is-plain-object": "^5.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/core-util-is": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/core-util-is/-/core-util-is-1.0.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ZQBvi1DcpJ4GDqanjucZ2Hj3wEO5pZDS89BWbkcrvdxksJorwUDDZamX9ldFkp9aw2lmBDLgkObEA4DWNJ9FYQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/cross-spawn": {
"version": "6.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-6.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eTVLrBSt7fjbDygz805pMnstIs2VTBNkRm0qxZd+M7A5XDdxVRWO5MxGBXZhjY4cqLYLdtrGqRf8mBPmzwSpWQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"nice-try": "^1.0.4",
"path-key": "^2.0.1",
"semver": "^5.5.0",
"shebang-command": "^1.2.0",
"which": "^1.2.9"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4.8"
}
},
"node_modules/css": {
"version": "2.2.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/css/-/css-2.2.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-oUnjmWpy0niI3x/mPL8dVEI1l7MnG3+HHyRPHf+YFSbK+svOhXpmSOcDURUh2aOCgl2grzrOPt1nHLuCVFULLw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"source-map": "^0.6.1",
"source-map-resolve": "^0.5.2",
"urix": "^0.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/d": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d/-/d-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-MOqHvMWF9/9MX6nza0KgvFH4HpMU0EF5uUDXqX/BtxtU8NfB0QzRtJ8Oe/6SuS4kbhyzVJwjd97EA4PKrzJ8bw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es5-ext": "^0.10.64",
"type": "^2.7.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.12"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/dateformat": {
"version": "2.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dateformat/-/dateformat-2.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GODcnWq3YGoTnygPfi02ygEiRxqUxpJwuRHjdhJYuxpcZmDq4rjBiXYmbCCzStxo176ixfLT6i4NPwQooRySnw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/debug": {
"version": "2.6.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/debug/-/debug-2.6.9.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bC7ElrdJaJnPbAP+1EotYvqZsb3ecl5wi6Bfi6BJTUcNowp6cvspg0jXznRTKDjm/E7AdgFBVeAPVMNcKGsHMA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ms": "2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/decamelize": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/decamelize/-/decamelize-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-z2S+W9X73hAUUki+N+9Za2lBlun89zigOyGrsax+KUQ6wKW4ZoWpEYBkGhQjwAjjDCkWxhY0VKEhk8wzY7F5cA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/decode-uri-component": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/decode-uri-component/-/decode-uri-component-0.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FqUYQ+8o158GyGTrMFJms9qh3CqTKvAqgqsTnkLI8sKu0028orqBhxNMFkFen0zGyg6epACD32pjVk58ngIErQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/deep-assign": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/deep-assign/-/deep-assign-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iAL1PDjxqhANx86VhUjK0HSb4bozMfJUK64rxdrlWPCgMv7rBvP6AFySY69e+k8JAtPHNWoTsQT5OJvE+Jgpjg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-obj": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/deepmerge": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "4.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/deepmerge/-/deepmerge-4.3.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3sUqbMEc77XqpdNO7FRyRog+eW3ph+GYCbj+rK+uYyRMuwsVy0rMiVtPn+QJlKFvWP/1PYpapqYn0Me2knFn+A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/default-compare": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/default-compare/-/default-compare-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QWfXlM0EkAbqOCbD/6HjdwT19j7WCkMyiRhWilc4H9/5h/RzTF9gv5LYh1+CmDV5d1rki6KAWLtQale0xt20eQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^5.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/default-resolution": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/default-resolution/-/default-resolution-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2xaP6GiwVwOEbXCGoJ4ufgC76m8cj805jrghScewJC2ZDsb9U0b4BIrba+xt/Uytyd0HvQ6+WymSRTfnYj59GQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/define-data-property": {
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"version": "1.1.4",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-data-property/-/define-data-property-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rBMvIzlpA8v6E+SJZoo++HAYqsLrkg7MSfIinMPFhmkorw7X+dOXVJQs+QT69zGkzMyfDnIMN2Wid1+NbL3T+A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es-define-property": "^1.0.0",
"es-errors": "^1.3.0",
"gopd": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/define-properties": {
"version": "1.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-properties/-/define-properties-1.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8QmQKqEASLd5nx0U1B1okLElbUuuttJ/AnYmRXbbbGDWh6uS208EjD4Xqq/I9wK7u0v6O08XhTWnt5XtEbR6Dg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"define-data-property": "^1.0.1",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"has-property-descriptors": "^1.0.0",
"object-keys": "^1.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jwK2UV4cnPpbcG7+VRARKTZPUWowwXA8bzH5NP6ud0oeAxyYPuGZUAC7hMugpCdz4BeSZl2Dl9k66CHJ/46ZYQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^1.0.2",
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/del": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/del/-/del-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7yjqSoVSlJzA4t/VUwazuEagGeANEKB3f/aNI//06pfKgwoCb7f6Q1gETN1sZzYaj6chTQ0AhIwDiPdfOjko4A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"globby": "^6.1.0",
"is-path-cwd": "^1.0.0",
"is-path-in-cwd": "^1.0.0",
"p-map": "^1.1.1",
"pify": "^3.0.0",
"rimraf": "^2.2.8"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/deprecation": {
"version": "2.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/deprecation/-/deprecation-2.3.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-xmHIy4F3scKVwMsQ4WnVaS8bHOx0DmVwRywosKhaILI0ywMDWPtBSku2HNxRvF7jtwDRsoEwYQSfbxj8b7RlJQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/detect-file": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/detect-file/-/detect-file-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DtCOLG98P007x7wiiOmfI0fi3eIKyWiLTGJ2MDnVi/E04lWGbf+JzrRHMm0rgIIZJGtHpKpbVgLWHrv8xXpc3Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/detect-indent": {
"version": "6.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/detect-indent/-/detect-indent-6.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-reYkTUJAZb9gUuZ2RvVCNhVHdg62RHnJ7WJl8ftMi4diZ6NWlciOzQN88pUhSELEwflJht4oQDv0F0BMlwaYtA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/diff": {
"version": "1.0.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/diff/-/diff-1.0.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1zEb73vemXFpUmfh3fsta4YHz3lwebxXvaWmPbFv9apujQBWDnkrPDLXLQs1gZo4RCWMDsT89r0Pf/z8/02TGA==",
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.3.1"
}
},
"node_modules/duplexer2": {
"version": "0.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/duplexer2/-/duplexer2-0.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+AWBwjGadtksxjOQSFDhPNQbed7icNXApT4+2BNpsXzcCBiInq2H9XW0O8sfHFaPmnQRs7cg/P0fAr2IWQSW0g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~1.1.9"
}
},
"node_modules/duplexer2/node_modules/isarray": {
"version": "0.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isarray/-/isarray-0.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-D2S+3GLxWH+uhrNEcoh/fnmYeP8E8/zHl644d/jdA0g2uyXvy3sb0qxotE+ne0LtccHknQzWwZEzhak7oJ0COQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/duplexer2/node_modules/readable-stream": {
"version": "1.1.14",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/readable-stream/-/readable-stream-1.1.14.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+MeVjFf4L44XUkhM1eYbD8fyEsxcV81pqMSR5gblfcLCHfZvbrqy4/qYHE+/R5HoBUT11WV5O08Cr1n3YXkWVQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"core-util-is": "~1.0.0",
"inherits": "~2.0.1",
"isarray": "0.0.1",
"string_decoder": "~0.10.x"
}
},
"node_modules/duplexer2/node_modules/string_decoder": {
"version": "0.10.31",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string_decoder/-/string_decoder-0.10.31.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ev2QzSzWPYmy9GuqfIVildA4OdcGLeFZQrq5ys6RtiuF+RQQiZWr8TZNyAcuVXyQRYfEO+MsoB/1BuQVhOJuoQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/duplexify": {
"version": "3.7.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/duplexify/-/duplexify-3.7.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-07z8uv2wMyS51kKhD1KsdXJg5WQ6t93RneqRxUHnskXVtlYYkLqM0gqStQZ3pj073g687jPCHrqNfCzawLYh5g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"end-of-stream": "^1.0.0",
"inherits": "^2.0.1",
"readable-stream": "^2.0.0",
"stream-shift": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/each-props": {
"version": "1.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/each-props/-/each-props-1.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-vV0Hem3zAGkJAyU7JSjixeU66rwdynTAa1vofCrSA5fEln+m67Az9CcnkVD776/fsN/UjIWmBDoNRS6t6G9RfA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.1",
"object.defaults": "^1.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/each-props/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/eastasianwidth": {
"version": "0.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/eastasianwidth/-/eastasianwidth-0.2.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-I88TYZWc9XiYHRQ4/3c5rjjfgkjhLyW2luGIheGERbNQ6OY7yTybanSpDXZa8y7VUP9YmDcYa+eyq4ca7iLqWA==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/editorconfig": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/editorconfig/-/editorconfig-1.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L9Qe08KWTlqYMVvMcTIvMAdl1cDUubzRNYL+WfA4bLDMHe4nemKkpmYzkznE1FwLKu0EEmy6obgQKzMJrg4x9Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"@one-ini/wasm": "0.1.1",
"commander": "^10.0.0",
"minimatch": "9.0.1",
"semver": "^7.5.3"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"editorconfig": "bin/editorconfig"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
}
},
"node_modules/editorconfig/node_modules/brace-expansion": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/brace-expansion/-/brace-expansion-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-XnAIvQ8eM+kC6aULx6wuQiwVsnzsi9d3WxzV3FpWTGA19F621kwdbsAcFKXgKUHZWsy+mY6iL1sHTxWEFCytDA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"balanced-match": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/editorconfig/node_modules/minimatch": {
"version": "9.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimatch/-/minimatch-9.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0jWhJpD/MdhPXwPuiRkCbfYfSKp2qnn2eOc279qI7f+osl/l+prKSrvhg157zSYvx/1nmgn2NqdT6k2Z7zSH9w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"brace-expansion": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.17"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/editorconfig/node_modules/semver": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "7.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/semver/-/semver-7.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FNAIBWCx9qcRhoHcgcJ0gvU7SN1lYU2ZXuSfl04bSC5OpvDHFyJCjdNHomPXxjQlCBU67YW64PzY7/VIEH7F2w==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"bin": {
"semver": "bin/semver.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=10"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/electron-to-chromium": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-05 10:42:17 +00:00
"version": "1.4.816",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/electron-to-chromium/-/electron-to-chromium-1.4.816.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-EKH5X5oqC6hLmiS7/vYtZHZFTNdhsYG5NVPRN6Yn0kQHNBlT59+xSM8HBy66P5fxWpKgZbPqb+diC64ng295Jw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"node_modules/emoji-regex": {
"version": "8.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/emoji-regex/-/emoji-regex-8.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-MSjYzcWNOA0ewAHpz0MxpYFvwg6yjy1NG3xteoqz644VCo/RPgnr1/GGt+ic3iJTzQ8Eu3TdM14SawnVUmGE6A==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/end-of-stream": {
"version": "1.4.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/end-of-stream/-/end-of-stream-1.4.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+uw1inIHVPQoaVuHzRyXd21icM+cnt4CzD5rW+NC1wjOUSTOs+Te7FOv7AhN7vS9x/oIyhLP5PR1H+phQAHu5Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"once": "^1.4.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/errno": {
"version": "0.1.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/errno/-/errno-0.1.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dJ6oBr5SQ1VSd9qkk7ByRgb/1SH4JZjCHSW/mr63/QcXO9zLVxvJ6Oy13nio03rxpSnVDDjFor75SjVeZWPW/A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"dependencies": {
"prr": "~1.0.1"
},
"bin": {
"errno": "cli.js"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/error-ex": {
"version": "1.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/error-ex/-/error-ex-1.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7dFHNmqeFSEt2ZBsCriorKnn3Z2pj+fd9kmI6QoWw4//DL+icEBfc0U7qJCisqrTsKTjw4fNFy2pW9OqStD84g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-arrayish": "^0.2.1"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/es-define-property": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es-define-property/-/es-define-property-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jxayLKShrEqqzJ0eumQbVhTYQM27CfT1T35+gCgDFoL82JLsXqTJ76zv6A0YLOgEnLUMvLzsDsGIrl8NFpT2gQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-intrinsic": "^1.2.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
"node_modules/es-errors": {
"version": "1.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es-errors/-/es-errors-1.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Zf5H2Kxt2xjTvbJvP2ZWLEICxA6j+hAmMzIlypy4xcBg1vKVnx89Wy0GbS+kf5cwCVFFzdCFh2XSCFNULS6csw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/es5-ext": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.10.64",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es5-ext/-/es5-ext-0.10.64.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-p2snDhiLaXe6dahss1LddxqEm+SkuDvV8dnIQG0MWjyHpcMNfXKPE+/Cc0y+PhxJX3A4xGNeFCj5oc0BUh6deg==",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"hasInstallScript": true,
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"es6-iterator": "^2.0.3",
"es6-symbol": "^3.1.3",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"esniff": "^2.0.1",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"next-tick": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/es6-iterator": {
"version": "2.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es6-iterator/-/es6-iterator-2.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zw4SRzoUkd+cl+ZoE15A9o1oQd920Bb0iOJMQkQhl3jNc03YqVjAhG7scf9C5KWRU/R13Orf588uCC6525o02g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"d": "1",
"es5-ext": "^0.10.35",
"es6-symbol": "^3.1.1"
}
},
"node_modules/es6-symbol": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "3.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es6-symbol/-/es6-symbol-3.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-U9bFFjX8tFiATgtkJ1zg25+KviIXpgRvRHS8sau3GfhVzThRQrOeksPeT0BWW2MNZs1OEWJ1DPXOQMn0KKRkvg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"d": "^1.0.2",
"ext": "^1.7.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.12"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/es6-weak-map": {
"version": "2.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/es6-weak-map/-/es6-weak-map-2.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-p5um32HOTO1kP+w7PRnB+5lQ43Z6muuMuIMffvDN8ZB4GcnjLBV6zGStpbASIMk4DCAvEaamhe2zhyCb/QXXsA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"d": "1",
"es5-ext": "^0.10.46",
"es6-iterator": "^2.0.3",
"es6-symbol": "^3.1.1"
}
},
"node_modules/escalade": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "3.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/escalade/-/escalade-3.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ErCHMCae19vR8vQGe50xIsVomy19rg6gFu3+r3jkEO46suLMWBksvVyoGgQV+jOfl84ZSOSlmv6Gxa89PmTGmA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/escape-string-regexp": {
"version": "1.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/escape-string-regexp/-/escape-string-regexp-1.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-vbRorB5FUQWvla16U8R/qgaFIya2qGzwDrNmCZuYKrbdSUMG6I1ZCGQRefkRVhuOkIGVne7BQ35DSfo1qvJqFg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/esniff": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/esniff/-/esniff-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kTUIGKQ/mDPFoJ0oVfcmyJn4iBDRptjNVIzwIFR7tqWXdVI9xfA2RMwY/gbSpJG3lkdWNEjLap/NqVHZiJsdfg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"d": "^1.0.1",
"es5-ext": "^0.10.62",
"event-emitter": "^0.3.5",
"type": "^2.7.2"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">=0.10"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/event-emitter": {
"version": "0.3.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/event-emitter/-/event-emitter-0.3.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-D9rRn9y7kLPnJ+hMq7S/nhvoKwwvVJahBi2BPmx3bvbsEdK3W9ii8cBSGjP+72/LnM4n6fo3+dkCX5FeTQruXA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"d": "1",
"es5-ext": "~0.10.14"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/execa": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/execa/-/execa-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-adbxcyWV46qiHyvSp50TKt05tB4tK3HcmF7/nxfAdhnox83seTDbwnaqKO4sXRy7roHAIFqJP/Rw/AuEbX61LA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"cross-spawn": "^6.0.0",
"get-stream": "^4.0.0",
"is-stream": "^1.1.0",
"npm-run-path": "^2.0.0",
"p-finally": "^1.0.0",
"signal-exit": "^3.0.0",
"strip-eof": "^1.0.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">=6"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/expand-brackets": {
"version": "2.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/expand-brackets/-/expand-brackets-2.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-w/ozOKR9Obk3qoWeY/WDi6MFta9AoMR+zud60mdnbniMcBxRuFJyDt2LdX/14A1UABeqk+Uk+LDfUpvoGKppZA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"debug": "^2.3.3",
"define-property": "^0.2.5",
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"posix-character-classes": "^0.1.0",
"regex-not": "^1.0.0",
"snapdragon": "^0.8.1",
"to-regex": "^3.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/expand-brackets/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "0.2.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-0.2.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Rr7ADjQZenceVOAKop6ALkkRAmH1A4Gx9hV/7ZujPUN2rkATqFO0JZLZInbAjpZYoJ1gUx8MRMQVkYemcbMSTA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-descriptor": "^0.1.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/expand-brackets/node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.1.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-0.1.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3grZTvObeN1xud4cRWl366OMXZTj0+HGyk4hvfpx4ZHt1Pb60ANSXqCK7pdOTeUQpRzECBSTphqvD7U+l22Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/expand-tilde": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/expand-tilde/-/expand-tilde-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-A5EmesHW6rfnZ9ysHQjPdJRni0SRar0tjtG5MNtm9n5TUvsYU8oozprtRD4AqHxcZWWlVuAmQo2nWKfN9oyjTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"homedir-polyfill": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ext": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ext/-/ext-1.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-6hxeJYaL110a9b5TEJSj0gojyHQAmA2ch5Os+ySCiA1QGdS697XWY1pzsrSjqA9LDEEgdB/KypIlR59RcLuHYw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"type": "^2.7.2"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/extend": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend/-/extend-3.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-fjquC59cD7CyW6urNXK0FBufkZcoiGG80wTuPujX590cB5Ttln20E2UB4S/WARVqhXffZl2LNgS+gQdPIIim/g==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zCnTtlxNoAiDc3gqY2aYAWFx7XWWiasuF2K8Me5WbN8otHKTUKBwjPtNpRs/rbUZm7KxWAaNj7P1a/p52GbVug==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-extendable": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/external-editor": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/external-editor/-/external-editor-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hMQ4CX1p1izmuLYyZqLMO/qGNw10wSv9QDCPfzXfyFrOaCSSoRfqE1Kf1s5an66J5JZC62NewG+mK49jOCtQew==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"chardet": "^0.7.0",
"iconv-lite": "^0.4.24",
"tmp": "^0.0.33"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/extglob": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extglob/-/extglob-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Nmb6QXkELsuBr24CJSkilo6UHHgbekK5UiZgfE6UHD3Eb27YC6oD+bhcT+tJ6cl8dmsgdQxnWlcry8ksBIBLpw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-unique": "^0.3.2",
"define-property": "^1.0.0",
"expand-brackets": "^2.1.4",
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"fragment-cache": "^0.2.1",
"regex-not": "^1.0.0",
"snapdragon": "^0.8.1",
"to-regex": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/extglob/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cZTYKFWspt9jZsMscWo8sc/5lbPC9Q0N5nBLgb+Yd915iL3udB1uFgS3B8YCx66UVHq018DAVFoee7x+gxggeA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/fancy-log": {
"version": "1.3.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fancy-log/-/fancy-log-1.3.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-k9oEhlyc0FrVh25qYuSELjr8oxsCoc4/LEZfg2iJJrfEk/tZL9bCoJE47gqAvI2m/AUjluCS4+3I0eTx8n3AEw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-gray": "^0.1.1",
"color-support": "^1.1.3",
"parse-node-version": "^1.0.0",
"time-stamp": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/fast-levenshtein": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fast-levenshtein/-/fast-levenshtein-1.1.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Ia0sQNrMPXXkqVFt6w6M1n1oKo3NfKs+mvaV811Jwir7vAk9a6PVV9VPYf6X3BU97QiLEmuW3uXH9u87zDFfdw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/figures": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/figures/-/figures-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Oa2M9atig69ZkfwiApY8F2Yy+tzMbazyvqv21R0NsSC8floSOC09BbT1ITWAdoMGQvJ/aZnR1KMwdx9tvHnTNA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/file-uri-to-path": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/file-uri-to-path/-/file-uri-to-path-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0Zt+s3L7Vf1biwWZ29aARiVYLx7iMGnEUl9x33fbB/j3jR81u/O2LbqK+Bm1CDSNDKVtJ/YjwY7TUd5SkeLQLw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/fill-range": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fill-range/-/fill-range-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VcpLTWqWDiTerugjj8e3+esbg+skS3M9e54UuR3iCeIDMXCLTsAH8hTSzDQU/X6/6t3eYkOKoZSef2PlU6U1XQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"is-number": "^3.0.0",
"repeat-string": "^1.6.1",
"to-regex-range": "^2.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/find-up": {
"version": "1.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/find-up/-/find-up-1.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jvElSjyuo4EMQGoTwo1uJU5pQMwTW5lS1x05zzfJuTIyLR3zwO27LYrxNg+dlvKpGOuGy/MzBdXh80g0ve5+HA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"path-exists": "^2.0.0",
"pinkie-promise": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/findup-sync": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/findup-sync/-/findup-sync-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YbffarhcicEhOrm4CtrwdKBdCuz576RLdhJDsIfvNtxUuhdRet1qZcsMjqbePtAseKdAnDyM/IyXbu7PRPRLYg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"detect-file": "^1.0.0",
"is-glob": "^4.0.0",
"micromatch": "^3.0.4",
"resolve-dir": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/fined": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fined/-/fined-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZYDqPLGxDkDhDZBjZBb+oD1+j0rA4E0pXY50eplAAOPg2N/gUBSSk5IM1/QhPfyVo19lJ+CvXpqfvk+b2p/8Ng==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"expand-tilde": "^2.0.2",
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.3",
"object.defaults": "^1.1.0",
"object.pick": "^1.2.0",
"parse-filepath": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/fined/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/first-chunk-stream": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/first-chunk-stream/-/first-chunk-stream-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-X8Z+b/0L4lToKYq+lwnKqi9X/Zek0NibLpsJgVsSxpoYq7JtiCtRb5HqKVEjEw/qAb/4AKKRLOwwKHlWNpm2Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "^2.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/flagged-respawn": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/flagged-respawn/-/flagged-respawn-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lNaHNVymajmk0OJMBn8fVUAU1BtDeKIqKoVhk4xAALB57aALg6b4W0MfJ/cUE0g9YBXy5XhSlPIpYIJ7HaY/3Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/flush-write-stream": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/flush-write-stream/-/flush-write-stream-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3Z4XhFZ3992uIq0XOqb9AreonueSYphE6oYbpt5+3u06JWklbsPkNv3ZKkP9Bz/r+1MWCaMoSQ28P85+1Yc77w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"readable-stream": "^2.3.6"
}
},
"node_modules/fomantic-ui": {
"version": "2.8.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fomantic-ui/-/fomantic-ui-2.8.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-u22d28Z+U8mduTIM50MYzBGRz7CXYjGs2fUY6KO8N3enE8OAatDOXV4Mb/Xvj/ck5aNE6er6XJNK1fFWXt/u/w==",
"hasInstallScript": true,
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@octokit/rest": "^16.16.0",
"better-console": "1.0.1",
"del": "^3.0.0",
"extend": "^3.0.2",
"gulp": "^4.0.0",
"gulp-autoprefixer": "^6.0.0",
"gulp-chmod": "^2.0.0",
"gulp-clean-css": "^3.10.0",
"gulp-clone": "^2.0.1",
"gulp-concat": "^2.6.1",
"gulp-concat-css": "^3.1.0",
"gulp-concat-filenames": "^1.2.0",
"gulp-copy": "^4.0.0",
"gulp-debug": "^4.0.0",
"gulp-dedupe": "0.0.2",
"gulp-flatten": "^0.4.0",
"gulp-git": "^2.9.0",
"gulp-header": "^2.0.5",
"gulp-if": "^2.0.2",
"gulp-json-editor": "^2.4.3",
"gulp-less": "^4.0.1",
"gulp-notify": "^3.0.0",
"gulp-plumber": "^1.1.0",
"gulp-print": "^5.0.0",
"gulp-rename": "^1.4.0",
"gulp-replace": "^1.0.0",
"gulp-rtlcss": "^1.3.0",
"gulp-tap": "^1.0.1",
"gulp-uglify": "^3.0.1",
"inquirer": "^6.2.1",
"jquery": "^3.4.0",
"less": "^3.7.0",
"map-stream": "^0.1.0",
"merge-stream": "^2.0.0",
"mkdirp": "^0.5.1",
"normalize-path": "^3.0.0",
"replace-ext": "^1.0.0",
"require-dot-file": "^0.4.0",
"wrench-sui": "^0.0.3",
"yamljs": "^0.3.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=10.15.3",
"npm": ">=6.4.1"
}
},
"node_modules/for-in": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/for-in/-/for-in-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7EwmXrOjyL+ChxMhmG5lnW9MPt1aIeZEwKhQzoBUdTV0N3zuwWDZYVJatDvZ2OyzPUvdIAZDsCetk3coyMfcnQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/for-own": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/for-own/-/for-own-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0OABksIGrxKK8K4kynWkQ7y1zounQxP+CWnyclVwj81KW3vlLlGUx57DKGcP/LH216GzqnstnPocF16Nxs0Ycg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"for-in": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/foreground-child": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "3.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/foreground-child/-/foreground-child-3.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-PXUUyLqrR2XCWICfv6ukppP96sdFwWbNEnfEMt7jNsISjMsvaLNinAHNDYyvkyU+SZG2BTSbT5NjG+vZslfGTA==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"cross-spawn": "^7.0.0",
"signal-exit": "^4.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/cross-spawn": {
"version": "7.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iRDPJKUPVEND7dHPO8rkbOnPpyDygcDFtWjpeWNCgy8WP2rXcxXL8TskReQl6OrB2G7+UJrags1q15Fudc7G6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"path-key": "^3.1.0",
"shebang-command": "^2.0.0",
"which": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 8"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/path-key": {
"version": "3.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-key/-/path-key-3.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ojmeN0qd+y0jszEtoY48r0Peq5dwMEkIlCOu6Q5f41lfkswXuKtYrhgoTpLnyIcHm24Uhqx+5Tqm2InSwLhE6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/shebang-command": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shebang-command/-/shebang-command-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kHxr2zZpYtdmrN1qDjrrX/Z1rR1kG8Dx+gkpK1G4eXmvXswmcE1hTWBWYUzlraYw1/yZp6YuDY77YtvbN0dmDA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"shebang-regex": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/shebang-regex": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shebang-regex/-/shebang-regex-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7++dFhtcx3353uBaq8DDR4NuxBetBzC7ZQOhmTQInHEd6bSrXdiEyzCvG07Z44UYdLShWUyXt5M/yhz8ekcb1A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/signal-exit": {
"version": "4.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/signal-exit/-/signal-exit-4.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bzyZ1e88w9O1iNJbKnOlvYTrWPDl46O1bG0D3XInv+9tkPrxrN8jUUTiFlDkkmKWgn1M6CfIA13SuGqOa9Korw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/foreground-child/node_modules/which": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/which/-/which-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BLI3Tl1TW3Pvl70l3yq3Y64i+awpwXqsGBYWkkqMtnbXgrMD+yj7rhW0kuEDxzJaYXGjEW5ogapKNMEKNMjibA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isexe": "^2.0.0"
},
"bin": {
"node-which": "bin/node-which"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 8"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/fork-stream": {
"version": "0.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fork-stream/-/fork-stream-0.0.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Pqq5NnT78ehvUnAk/We/Jr22vSvanRlFTpAmQ88xBY/M1TlHe+P0ILuEyXS595ysdGfaj22634LBkGMA2GTcpA==",
"license": "BSD"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/fragment-cache": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fragment-cache/-/fragment-cache-0.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GMBAbW9antB8iZRHLoGw0b3HANt57diZYFO/HL1JGIC1MjKrdmhxvrJbupnVvpys0zsz7yBApXdQyfepKly2kA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"map-cache": "^0.2.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/fs-mkdirp-stream": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fs-mkdirp-stream/-/fs-mkdirp-stream-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+vSd9frUnapVC2RZYfL3FCB2p3g4TBhaUmrsWlSudsGdnxIuUvBB2QM1VZeBtc49QFwrp+wQLrDs3+xxDgI5gQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.11",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/fs-mkdirp-stream/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/fs.realpath": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fs.realpath/-/fs.realpath-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-OO0pH2lK6a0hZnAdau5ItzHPI6pUlvI7jMVnxUQRtw4owF2wk8lOSabtGDCTP4Ggrg2MbGnWO9X8K1t4+fGMDw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/fsevents": {
"version": "1.2.13",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fsevents/-/fsevents-1.2.13.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-oWb1Z6mkHIskLzEJ/XWX0srkpkTQ7vaopMQkyaEIoq0fmtFVxOthb8cCxeT+p3ynTdkk/RZwbgG4brR5BeWECw==",
"deprecated": "The v1 package contains DANGEROUS / INSECURE binaries. Upgrade to safe fsevents v2",
"hasInstallScript": true,
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"os": [
"darwin"
],
"dependencies": {
"bindings": "^1.5.0",
"nan": "^2.12.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 4.0"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/function-bind": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/function-bind/-/function-bind-1.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7XHNxH7qX9xG5mIwxkhumTox/MIRNcOgDrxWsMt2pAr23WHp6MrRlN7FBSFpCpr+oVO0F744iUgR82nJMfG2SA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/get-caller-file": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-caller-file/-/get-caller-file-1.0.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-3t6rVToeoZfYSGd8YoLFR2DJkiQrIiUrGcjvFX2mDw3bn6k2OtwHN0TNCLbBO+w8qTvimhDkv+LSscbJY1vE6w==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/get-imports": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-imports/-/get-imports-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-9FjKG2Os+o/EuOIh3B/LNMbU2FWPGHVy/gs9TJpytK95IPl7lLqiu+VAU7JX6VZimqdmpLemgsGMdQWdKvqYGQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-uniq": "^1.0.1",
"import-regex": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/get-intrinsic": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.2.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-intrinsic/-/get-intrinsic-1.2.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5uYhsJH8VJBTv7oslg4BznJYhDoRI6waYCxMmCdnTrcCrHA/fCFKoTFz2JKKE0HdDFUF7/oQuhzumXJK7paBRQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es-errors": "^1.3.0",
"function-bind": "^1.1.2",
"has-proto": "^1.0.1",
"has-symbols": "^1.0.3",
"hasown": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/get-own-enumerable-property-symbols": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-own-enumerable-property-symbols/-/get-own-enumerable-property-symbols-3.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-I0UBV/XOz1XkIJHEUDMZAbzCThU/H8DxmSfmdGcKPnVhu2VfFqr34jr9777IyaTYvxjedWhqVIilEDsCdP5G6g==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/get-stream": {
"version": "4.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-stream/-/get-stream-4.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GMat4EJ5161kIy2HevLlr4luNjBgvmj413KaQA7jt4V8B4RDsfpHk7WQ9GVqfYyyx8OS/L66Kox+rJRNklLK7w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"pump": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/get-stream/node_modules/pump": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pump/-/pump-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LwZy+p3SFs1Pytd/jYct4wpv49HiYCqd9Rlc5ZVdk0V+8Yzv6jR5Blk3TRmPL1ft69TxP0IMZGJ+WPFU2BFhww==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"end-of-stream": "^1.1.0",
"once": "^1.3.1"
}
},
"node_modules/get-value": {
"version": "2.0.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/get-value/-/get-value-2.0.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Ln0UQDlxH1BapMu3GPtf7CuYNwRZf2gwCuPqbyG6pB8WfmFpzqcy4xtAaAMUhnNqjMKTiCPZG2oMT3YSx8U2NA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/glob": {
"version": "7.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob/-/glob-7.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-nFR0zLpU2YCaRxwoCJvL6UvCH2JFyFVIvwTLsIf21AuHlMskA1hhTdk+LlYJtOlYt9v6dvszD2BGRqBL+iQK9Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "Glob versions prior to v9 are no longer supported",
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"fs.realpath": "^1.0.0",
"inflight": "^1.0.4",
"inherits": "2",
"minimatch": "^3.1.1",
"once": "^1.3.0",
"path-is-absolute": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": "*"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/glob-parent": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob-parent/-/glob-parent-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-E8Ak/2+dZY6fnzlR7+ueWvhsH1SjHr4jjss4YS/h4py44jY9MhK/VFdaZJAWDz6BbL21KeteKxFSFpq8OS5gVA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-glob": "^3.1.0",
"path-dirname": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/glob-parent/node_modules/is-glob": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-glob/-/is-glob-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-UFpDDrPgM6qpnFNI+rh/p3bUaq9hKLZN8bMUWzxmcnZVS3omf4IPK+BrewlnWjO1WmUsMYuSjKh4UJuV4+Lqmw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-extglob": "^2.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/glob-stream": {
"version": "6.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob-stream/-/glob-stream-6.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uMbLGAP3S2aDOHUDfdoYcdIePUCfysbAd0IAoWVZbeGU/oNQ8asHVSshLDJUPWxfzj8zsCG7/XeHPHTtow0nsw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend": "^3.0.0",
"glob": "^7.1.1",
"glob-parent": "^3.1.0",
"is-negated-glob": "^1.0.0",
"ordered-read-streams": "^1.0.0",
"pumpify": "^1.3.5",
"readable-stream": "^2.1.5",
"remove-trailing-separator": "^1.0.1",
"to-absolute-glob": "^2.0.0",
"unique-stream": "^2.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/glob-watcher": {
"version": "5.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob-watcher/-/glob-watcher-5.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zOZgGGEHPklZNjZQaZ9f41i7F2YwE+tS5ZHrDhbBCk3stwahn5vQxnFmBJZHoYdusR6R1bLSXeGUy/BhctwKzw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"anymatch": "^2.0.0",
"async-done": "^1.2.0",
"chokidar": "^2.0.0",
"is-negated-glob": "^1.0.0",
"just-debounce": "^1.0.0",
"normalize-path": "^3.0.0",
"object.defaults": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/global-modules": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/global-modules/-/global-modules-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-sKzpEkf11GpOFuw0Zzjzmt4B4UZwjOcG757PPvrfhxcLFbq0wpsgpOqxpxtxFiCG4DtG93M6XRVbF2oGdev7bg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"global-prefix": "^1.0.1",
"is-windows": "^1.0.1",
"resolve-dir": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/global-prefix": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/global-prefix/-/global-prefix-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5lsx1NUDHtSjfg0eHlmYvZKv8/nVqX4ckFbM+FrGcQ+04KWcWFo9P5MxPZYSzUvyzmdTbI7Eix8Q4IbELDqzKg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"expand-tilde": "^2.0.2",
"homedir-polyfill": "^1.0.1",
"ini": "^1.3.4",
"is-windows": "^1.0.1",
"which": "^1.2.14"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/globby": {
"version": "6.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/globby/-/globby-6.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-KVbFv2TQtbzCoxAnfD6JcHZTYCzyliEaaeM/gH8qQdkKr5s0OP9scEgvdcngyk7AVdY6YVW/TJHd+lQ/Df3Daw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-union": "^1.0.1",
"glob": "^7.0.3",
"object-assign": "^4.0.1",
"pify": "^2.0.0",
"pinkie-promise": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/globby/node_modules/pify": {
"version": "2.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pify/-/pify-2.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-udgsAY+fTnvv7kI7aaxbqwWNb0AHiB0qBO89PZKPkoTmGOgdbrHDKD+0B2X4uTfJ/FT1R09r9gTsjUjNJotuog==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/glogg": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glogg/-/glogg-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5mwUoSuBk44Y4EshyiqcH95ZntbDdTQqA3QYSrxmzj28Ai0vXBGMH1ApSANH14j2sIRtqCEyg6PfsuP7ElOEDA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"sparkles": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/gopd": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gopd/-/gopd-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-d65bNlIadxvpb/A2abVdlqKqV563juRnZ1Wtk6s1sIR8uNsXR70xqIzVqxVf1eTqDunwT2MkczEeaezCKTZhwA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-intrinsic": "^1.1.3"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/graceful-fs": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "4.2.11",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/graceful-fs/-/graceful-fs-4.2.11.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-RbJ5/jmFcNNCcDV5o9eTnBLJ/HszWV0P73bc+Ff4nS/rJj+YaS6IGyiOL0VoBYX+l1Wrl3k63h/KrH+nhJ0XvQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/growly": {
"version": "1.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/growly/-/growly-1.3.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-+xGQY0YyAWCnqy7Cd++hc2JqMYzlm0dG30Jd0beaA64sROr8C4nt8Yc9V5Ro3avlSUDTN0ulqP/VBKi1/lLygw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp": {
"version": "4.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp/-/gulp-4.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dvEs27SCZt2ibF29xYgmnwwCYZxdxhQ/+LFWlbAW8y7jt68L/65402Lz3+CKy0Ov4rOs+NERmDq7YlZaDqUIfA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"glob-watcher": "^5.0.3",
"gulp-cli": "^2.2.0",
"undertaker": "^1.2.1",
"vinyl-fs": "^3.0.0"
},
"bin": {
"gulp": "bin/gulp.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-autoprefixer": {
"version": "6.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-autoprefixer/-/gulp-autoprefixer-6.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Ti/BUFe+ekhbDJfspZIMiOsOvw51KhI9EncsDfK7NaxjqRm+v4xS9v99kPxEoiDavpWqQWvG8Y6xT1mMlB3aXA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"autoprefixer": "^9.5.1",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"plugin-error": "^1.0.1",
"postcss": "^7.0.2",
"through2": "^3.0.1",
"vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": "^0.2.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-chmod": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-chmod/-/gulp-chmod-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ttOK11mugzcy6D5CQD8rXqS7M4Ecoo64bDNhRXT9Yok9ztAcOeIK8hsv7LlV1eFS4iSQKZETvEZC5Kt/sH74sw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"deep-assign": "^1.0.0",
"stat-mode": "^0.2.0",
"through2": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-chmod/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clean-css": {
"version": "3.10.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-clean-css/-/gulp-clean-css-3.10.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7Isf9Y690o/Q5MVjEylH1H7L8WeZ89woW7DnhD5unTintOdZb67KdOayRgp9trUFo+f9UyJtuatV42e/+kghPg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"clean-css": "4.2.1",
"plugin-error": "1.0.1",
"through2": "2.0.3",
"vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": "0.2.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clean-css/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tmNYYHFqXmaKSSlOU4ZbQ82cxmFQa5LRWKFtWCNkGIiZ3/VHmOffCeWfBRZZRyXAhNP9itVMR+cuvomBOPlm8g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "^2.1.5",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-cli": {
"version": "2.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-cli/-/gulp-cli-2.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zzGBl5fHo0EKSXsHzjspp3y5CONegCm8ErO5Qh0UzFzk2y4tMvzLWhoDokADbarfZRL2pGpRp7yt6gfJX4ph7A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-colors": "^1.0.1",
"archy": "^1.0.0",
"array-sort": "^1.0.0",
"color-support": "^1.1.3",
"concat-stream": "^1.6.0",
"copy-props": "^2.0.1",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"gulplog": "^1.0.0",
"interpret": "^1.4.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.1",
"liftoff": "^3.1.0",
"matchdep": "^2.0.0",
"mute-stdout": "^1.0.0",
"pretty-hrtime": "^1.0.0",
"replace-homedir": "^1.0.0",
"semver-greatest-satisfied-range": "^1.1.0",
"v8flags": "^3.2.0",
"yargs": "^7.1.0"
},
"bin": {
"gulp": "bin/gulp.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-clone/-/gulp-clone-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SLg/KsHBbinR/pCX3PF5l1YlR28hLp0X+bcpf77PtMJ6zvAQ5kRjtCPV5Wt1wHXsXWZN0eTUZ15R8ZYpi/CdCA==",
"dependencies": {
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-clone/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat": {
"version": "2.6.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-concat/-/gulp-concat-2.6.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-a2scActrQrDBpBbR3WUZGyGS1JEPLg5PZJdIa7/Bi3GuKAmPYDK6SFhy/NZq5R8KsKKFvtfR0fakbUCcKGCCjg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"concat-with-sourcemaps": "^1.0.0",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"vinyl": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-concat-css/-/gulp-concat-css-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iLTBPS+cutlgLyK3bp9DMts+WuS8n2mQpjzQ7p/ZVQc8FO5fvpN+ntg9U6jsuNvPeuii82aKm8XeOzF0nUK+TA==",
"dependencies": {
"lodash.defaults": "^3.0.0",
"parse-import": "^2.0.0",
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"rework": "~1.0.0",
"rework-import": "^2.0.0",
"rework-plugin-url": "^1.0.1",
"through2": "~1.1.1",
"vinyl": "^2.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/isarray": {
"version": "0.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isarray/-/isarray-0.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-D2S+3GLxWH+uhrNEcoh/fnmYeP8E8/zHl644d/jdA0g2uyXvy3sb0qxotE+ne0LtccHknQzWwZEzhak7oJ0COQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/readable-stream": {
"version": "1.1.14",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/readable-stream/-/readable-stream-1.1.14.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+MeVjFf4L44XUkhM1eYbD8fyEsxcV81pqMSR5gblfcLCHfZvbrqy4/qYHE+/R5HoBUT11WV5O08Cr1n3YXkWVQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"core-util-is": "~1.0.0",
"inherits": "~2.0.1",
"isarray": "0.0.1",
"string_decoder": "~0.10.x"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/string_decoder": {
"version": "0.10.31",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string_decoder/-/string_decoder-0.10.31.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ev2QzSzWPYmy9GuqfIVildA4OdcGLeFZQrq5ys6RtiuF+RQQiZWr8TZNyAcuVXyQRYfEO+MsoB/1BuQVhOJuoQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-css/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zEbpaeSMHxczpTzO1KkMHjBC1enTA68ojeaZGG4toqdASpb9t4xUZaYFBq2/9OHo5nTGFVSYd4c910OR+6wxbQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": ">=1.1.13-1 <1.2.0-0",
"xtend": ">=4.0.0 <4.1.0-0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat-filenames": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-concat-filenames/-/gulp-concat-filenames-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2wHcntxftYa2kiv5QOaniSNQuRf1axHGqkyXhRoCBXAVvwzrUp++qW9GNSAdvb3h+7m8yC8Fu25guuaDU+1WaA==",
"dependencies": {
"gulp-util": "3.x.x",
"through": "2.x.x"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-concat/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy": {
"version": "4.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-copy/-/gulp-copy-4.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-UbdAwmEiVNNv55KAiUYWOP6Za7h8JPHNNyekNx8Gyc5XRlpUzTrlEclps939nOeiDPsd6jUtT2LmfavJirbZQg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"gulp": "^4.0.0",
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-copy/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-debug": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-debug/-/gulp-debug-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cn/GhMD2nVZCVxAl5vWao4/dcoZ8wUJ8w3oqTvQaGDmC1vT7swNOEbhQTWJp+/otKePT64aENcqAQXDcdj5H1g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"chalk": "^2.3.0",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"plur": "^3.0.0",
"stringify-object": "^3.0.0",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"tildify": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"gulp": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-debug/node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "3.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-3.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VT0ZI6kZRdTh8YyJw3SMbYm/u+NqfsAxEpWO0Pf9sq8/e94WxxOpPKx9FR1FlyCtOVDNOQ+8ntlqFxiRc+r5qA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-convert": "^1.9.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-debug/node_modules/chalk": {
"version": "2.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chalk/-/chalk-2.4.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Mti+f9lpJNcwF4tWV8/OrTTtF1gZi+f8FqlyAdouralcFWFQWF2+NgCHShjkCb+IFBLq9buZwE1xckQU4peSuQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^3.2.1",
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.5",
"supports-color": "^5.3.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-debug/node_modules/supports-color": {
"version": "5.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-color/-/supports-color-5.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QjVjwdXIt408MIiAqCX4oUKsgU2EqAGzs2Ppkm4aQYbjm+ZEWEcW4SfFNTr4uMNZma0ey4f5lgLrkB0aX0QMow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"has-flag": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-debug/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-dedupe": {
"version": "0.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-dedupe/-/gulp-dedupe-0.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y+FZmAVHUYDgJiGneLXY2sCErvcY89sskjGQILhh5YvNGZq5M+pKsY54K0MyquZGxj2g10ZDVM5vQnEP7yUrVA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"colors": "~1.0.2",
"diff": "~1.0.8",
"gulp-util": "~3.0.1",
"lodash.defaults": "~2.4.1",
"through": "~2.3.6"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-dedupe/node_modules/lodash.defaults": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.defaults/-/lodash.defaults-2.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5wTIPWwGGr07JFysAZB8+7JB2NjJKXDIwogSaRX5zED85zyUAQwtOqUk8AsJkkigUcL3akbHYXd5+BPtTGQPZw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._objecttypes": "~2.4.1",
"lodash.keys": "~2.4.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-dedupe/node_modules/lodash.keys": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.keys/-/lodash.keys-2.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZpJhwvUXHSNL5wYd1RM6CUa2ZuqorG9ngoJ9Ix5Cce+uX7I5O/E06FCJdhSZ33b5dVyeQDnIlWH7B2s5uByZ7g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._isnative": "~2.4.1",
"lodash._shimkeys": "~2.4.1",
"lodash.isobject": "~2.4.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten": {
"version": "0.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-flatten/-/gulp-flatten-0.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eg4spVTAiv1xXmugyaCxWne1oPtNG0UHEtABx5W8ScLiqAYceyYm6GYA36x0Qh8KOIXmAZV97L2aYGnKREG3Sg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-flatten/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-git": {
"version": "2.10.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-git/-/gulp-git-2.10.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qiXYYDXchMZU/AWAgtphi4zbJb/0gXgfPw7TlZwu/7qPS3Bdcc3zbVe1B0xY9S8on6RQTmWoi+KaTGACIXQeNg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"any-shell-escape": "^0.1.1",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"lodash.template": "^4.4.0",
"plugin-error": "^1.0.1",
"require-dir": "^1.0.0",
"strip-bom-stream": "^3.0.0",
"through2": "^2.0.3",
"vinyl": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.9.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-git/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-header": {
"version": "2.0.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-header/-/gulp-header-2.0.9.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LMGiBx+qH8giwrOuuZXSGvswcIUh0OiioNkUpLhNyvaC6/Ga8X6cfAeme2L5PqsbXMhL8o8b/OmVqIQdxprhcQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"concat-with-sourcemaps": "^1.1.0",
"lodash.template": "^4.5.0",
"map-stream": "0.0.7",
"through2": "^2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-header/node_modules/map-stream": {
"version": "0.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/map-stream/-/map-stream-0.0.7.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-C0X0KQmGm3N2ftbTGBhSyuydQ+vV1LC3f3zPvT3RXHXNZrvfPZcoXp/N5DOa8vedX/rTMm2CjTtivFg2STJMRQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp-header/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-if": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-if/-/gulp-if-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tV0UfXkZodpFq6CYxEqH8tqLQgN6yR9qOhpEEN3O6N5Hfqk3fFLcbAavSex5EqnmoQjyaZ/zvgwclvlTI1KGfw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"gulp-match": "^1.0.3",
"ternary-stream": "^2.0.1",
"through2": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-if/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-json-editor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.6.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-json-editor/-/gulp-json-editor-2.6.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Ni0ZUpNrhesHiTlHQth/Nv1rXCn0LUicEvzA5XuGy186C4PVeNoRjfuAIQrbmt3scKv8dgGbCs0hd77ScTw7hA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"deepmerge": "^4.3.1",
"detect-indent": "^6.1.0",
"js-beautify": "^1.14.11",
"plugin-error": "^2.0.1",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"through2": "^4.0.2"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/gulp-json-editor/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zMakqvIDyY40xHOvzXka0kUvf40nYIuwRE8dWhti2WtjQZ31xAgBZBhxsK7vK3QbRXS1Xms/LO7B5cuAsfB2Gg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-colors": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=10.13.0"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/gulp-json-editor/node_modules/readable-stream": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "3.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/readable-stream/-/readable-stream-3.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-9u/sniCrY3D5WdsERHzHE4G2YCXqoG5FTHUiCC4SIbr6XcLZBY05ya9EKjYek9O5xOAwjGq+1JdGBAS7Q9ScoA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"string_decoder": "^1.1.1",
"util-deprecate": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 6"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-json-editor/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "4.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-4.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iOqSav00cVxEEICeD7TjLB1sueEL+81Wpzp2bY17uZjZN0pWZPuo4suZ/61VujxmqSGFfgOcNuTZ85QJwNZQpw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "3"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less": {
"version": "4.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-less/-/gulp-less-4.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hmM2k0FfQp7Ptm3ZaqO2CkMX3hqpiIOn4OHtuSsCeFym63F7oWlEua5v6u1cIjVUKYsVIs9zPg9vbqTEb/udpA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"accord": "^0.29.0",
"less": "2.6.x || ^3.7.1",
"object-assign": "^4.0.1",
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"replace-ext": "^1.0.0",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": "^0.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-less/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-match": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-match/-/gulp-match-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DlyVxa1Gj24DitY2OjEsS+X6tDpretuxD6wTfhXE/Rw2hweqc1f6D/XtsJmoiCwLWfXgR87W9ozEityPCVzGtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"minimatch": "^3.0.3"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-notify/-/gulp-notify-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qEocs1UVoDKKUjfsxJNMNwkRla0PbsyJwsqNNXpzYWsLQ29LhxRMY3wnTGZcc4hMHtalnvah/Dwlwb4NijH/0A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-colors": "^1.0.1",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"lodash.template": "^4.4.0",
"node-notifier": "^5.2.1",
"node.extend": "^2.0.0",
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8.0",
"npm": ">=1.2.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-notify/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber": {
"version": "1.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-plumber/-/gulp-plumber-1.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mctAi9msEAG7XzW5ytDVZ9PxWMzzi1pS2rBH7lA095DhMa6KEXjm+St0GOCc567pJKJ/oCvosVAZEpAey0q2eQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"chalk": "^1.1.3",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.2",
"plugin-error": "^0.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10",
"npm": ">=1.2.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/arr-diff": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-diff/-/arr-diff-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OQwDZUqYaQwyyhDJHThmzId8daf4/RFNLaeh3AevmSeZ5Y7ug4Ga/yKc6l6kTZOBW781rCj103ZuTh8GAsB3+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^0.2.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/arr-union": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/arr-union/-/arr-union-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t5db90jq+qdgk8aFnxEkjqta0B/GHrM1pxzuuZz2zWsOXc5nKu3t+76s/PQBA8FTcM/ipspIH9jWG4OxCBc2eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/array-slice": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/array-slice/-/array-slice-0.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rlVfZW/1Ph2SNySXwR9QYkChp8EkOEiTMO5Vwx60usw04i4nWemkm9RXmQqgkQFaLHsqLuADvjp6IfgL9l2M8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L7AGmkO6jhDkEBBGWlLtftA80Xq8DipnrRPr0pyi7GQLXkaq9JYA4xF4z6qnadIC6euiTDKco0cGSU9muw+WTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aUH6ElPnMGon2/YkxRIigV32MOpTVcoXQ1Oo8aYn40s+sJ3j+0gFZsT8HKDcxNy7Fi9zuquWtGaGAahOdv5p/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WzZHcm4+GO34sjFMxQMqZbsz3xiNEgonCskQ9v+IroMmYgk/tas8dG+Hr2D6IbRPybZ12oWpzE/w3cGJ6FJzOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-cyan": "^0.1.1",
"ansi-red": "^0.1.1",
"arr-diff": "^1.0.1",
"arr-union": "^2.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-plumber/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-print": {
"version": "5.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-print/-/gulp-print-5.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-iIpHMzC/b3gFvVXOfP9Jk94SWGIsDLVNUrxULRleQev+08ug07mh84b1AOlW6QDQdmInQiqDFqJN1UvhU2nXdg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-colors": "^3.2.4",
"fancy-log": "^1.3.3",
"map-stream": "0.0.7",
"vinyl": "^2.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-print/node_modules/ansi-colors": {
"version": "3.2.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-colors/-/ansi-colors-3.2.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hHUXGagefjN2iRrID63xckIvotOXOojhQKWIPUZ4mNUZ9nLZW+7FMNoE1lOkEhNWYsx/7ysGIuJYCiMAA9FnrA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-print/node_modules/map-stream": {
"version": "0.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/map-stream/-/map-stream-0.0.7.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-C0X0KQmGm3N2ftbTGBhSyuydQ+vV1LC3f3zPvT3RXHXNZrvfPZcoXp/N5DOa8vedX/rTMm2CjTtivFg2STJMRQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp-rename": {
"version": "1.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-rename/-/gulp-rename-1.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-swzbIGb/arEoFK89tPY58vg3Ok1bw+d35PfUNwWqdo7KM4jkmuGA78JiDNqR+JeZFaeeHnRg9N7aihX3YPmsyg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-replace": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-replace/-/gulp-replace-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SVSF7ikuWKhpAW4l4wapAqPPSToJoiNKsbDoUnRrSgwZHH7lH8pbPeQj1aOVYQrbZKhfSVBxVW+Py7vtulRktw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"@types/node": "*",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"@types/vinyl": "^2.0.4",
"istextorbinary": "^3.0.0",
"replacestream": "^4.0.3",
"yargs-parser": ">=5.0.0-security.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-rtlcss": {
"version": "1.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-rtlcss/-/gulp-rtlcss-1.4.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wd807z/xq4XKtSwgrEetbx/aPoI5gV0yWV2rNqEBRwe2cJvNKLDsYR9A968c3gZtaKRMGAue5g3pHn40R+GWSA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"plugin-error": "^1.0.1",
"rtlcss": "^2.4.0",
"through2": "^2.0.5",
"vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": "^0.2.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-rtlcss/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-tap": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-tap/-/gulp-tap-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VpCARRSyr+WP16JGnoIg98/AcmyQjOwCpQgYoE35CWTdEMSbpgtAIK2fndqv2yY7aXstW27v3ZNBs0Ltb0Zkbg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"through2": "^2.0.3"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-tap/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-uglify/-/gulp-uglify-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-gk1dhB74AkV2kzqPMQBLA3jPoIAPd/nlNzP2XMDSG8XZrqnlCiDGAqC+rZOumzFvB5zOphlFh6yr3lgcAb/OOg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-each": "^1.0.1",
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2",
"gulplog": "^1.0.0",
"has-gulplog": "^0.1.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.1",
"make-error-cause": "^1.1.1",
"safe-buffer": "^5.1.2",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"uglify-js": "^3.0.5",
"vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": "^0.2.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-uglify/node_modules/uglify-js": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "3.18.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/uglify-js/-/uglify-js-3.18.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SyVVbcNBCk0dzr9XL/R/ySrmYf0s372K6/hFklzgcp2lBFyXtw4I7BOdDjlLhE1aVqaI/SHWXWmYdlZxuyF38A==",
"license": "BSD-2-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"bin": {
"uglifyjs": "bin/uglifyjs"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util": {
"version": "3.0.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-util/-/gulp-util-3.0.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-q5oWPc12lwSFS9h/4VIjG+1NuNDlJ48ywV2JKItY4Ycc/n1fXJeYPVQsfu5ZrhQi7FGSDBalwUCLar/GyHXKGw==",
"deprecated": "gulp-util is deprecated - replace it, following the guidelines at https://medium.com/gulpjs/gulp-util-ca3b1f9f9ac5",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-differ": "^1.0.0",
"array-uniq": "^1.0.2",
"beeper": "^1.0.0",
"chalk": "^1.0.0",
"dateformat": "^2.0.0",
"fancy-log": "^1.1.0",
"gulplog": "^1.0.0",
"has-gulplog": "^0.1.0",
"lodash._reescape": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._reevaluate": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._reinterpolate": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.template": "^3.0.0",
"minimist": "^1.1.0",
"multipipe": "^0.1.2",
"object-assign": "^3.0.0",
"replace-ext": "0.0.1",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"vinyl": "^0.5.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/clone": {
"version": "1.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clone/-/clone-1.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JQHZ2QMW6l3aH/j6xCqQThY/9OH4D/9ls34cgkUBiEeocRTU04tHfKPBsUK1PqZCUQM7GiA0IIXJSuXHI64Kbg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/clone-stats": {
"version": "0.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/clone-stats/-/clone-stats-0.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-dhUqc57gSMCo6TX85FLfe51eC/s+Im2MLkAgJwfaRRexR2tA4dd3eLEW4L6efzHc2iNorrRRXITifnDLlRrhaA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/lodash.template": {
"version": "3.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.template/-/lodash.template-3.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0B4Y53I0OgHUJkt+7RmlDFWKjVAI/YUpWNiL9GQz5ORDr4ttgfQGo+phBWKFLJbBdtOwgMuUkdOHOnPg45jKmQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._basecopy": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._basetostring": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._basevalues": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._isiterateecall": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._reinterpolate": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.escape": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.keys": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.restparam": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.templatesettings": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/lodash.templatesettings": {
"version": "3.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.templatesettings/-/lodash.templatesettings-3.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-TcrlEr31tDYnWkHFWDCV3dHYroKEXpJZ2YJYvJdhN+y4AkWMDZ5I4I8XDtUKqSAyG81N7w+I1mFEJtcED+tGqQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._reinterpolate": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.escape": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/object-assign": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-assign/-/object-assign-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jHP15vXVGeVh1HuaA2wY6lxk+whK/x4KBG88VXeRma7CCun7iGD5qPc4eYykQ9sdQvg8jkwFKsSxHln2ybW3xQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/replace-ext": {
"version": "0.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/replace-ext/-/replace-ext-0.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-AFBWBy9EVRTa/LhEcG8QDP3FvpwZqmvN2QFDuJswFeaVhWnZMp8q3E6Zd90SR04PlIwfGdyVjNyLPyen/ek5CQ==",
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/gulp-util/node_modules/vinyl": {
"version": "0.5.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vinyl/-/vinyl-0.5.3.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-P5zdf3WB9uzr7IFoVQ2wZTmUwHL8cMZWJGzLBNCHNZ3NB6HTMsYABtt7z8tAGIINLXyAob9B9a1yzVGMFOYKEA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"clone": "^1.0.0",
"clone-stats": "^0.0.1",
"replace-ext": "0.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.9"
}
},
"node_modules/gulplog": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/gulplog/-/gulplog-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hm6N8nrm3Y08jXie48jsC55eCZz9mnb4OirAStEk2deqeyhXU3C1otDVh+ccttMuc1sBi6RX6ZJ720hs9RCvgw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"glogg": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/has-ansi": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-ansi/-/has-ansi-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C8vBJ8DwUCx19vhm7urhTuUsr4/IyP6l4VzNQDv+ryHQObW3TTTp9yB68WpYgRe2bbaGuZ/se74IqFeVnMnLZg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/has-flag": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-flag/-/has-flag-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-sKJf1+ceQBr4SMkvQnBDNDtf4TXpVhVGateu0t918bl30FnbE2m4vNLX+VWe/dpjlb+HugGYzW7uQXH98HPEYw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/has-gulplog": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-gulplog/-/has-gulplog-0.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+F4GzLjwHNNDEAJW2DC1xXfEoPkRDmUdJ7CBYw4MpqtDwOnqdImJl7GWlpqx+Wko6//J8uKTnIe4wZSv7yCqmw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"sparkles": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/has-property-descriptors": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-property-descriptors/-/has-property-descriptors-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-55JNKuIW+vq4Ke1BjOTjM2YctQIvCT7GFzHwmfZPGo5wnrgkid0YQtnAleFSqumZm4az3n2BS+erby5ipJdgrg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es-define-property": "^1.0.0"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/has-proto": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-proto/-/has-proto-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SJ1amZAJUiZS+PhsVLf5tGydlaVB8EdFpaSO4gmiUKUOxk8qzn5AIy4ZeJUmh22znIdk/uMAUT2pl3FxzVUH+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/has-symbols": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-symbols/-/has-symbols-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-l3LCuF6MgDNwTDKkdYGEihYjt5pRPbEg46rtlmnSPlUbgmB8LOIrKJbYYFBSbnPaJexMKtiPO8hmeRjRz2Td+A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/has-value": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-value/-/has-value-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-IBXk4GTsLYdQ7Rvt+GRBrFSVEkmuOUy4re0Xjd9kJSUQpnTrWR4/y9RpfexN9vkAPMFuQoeWKwqzPozRTlasGw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-value": "^2.0.6",
"has-values": "^1.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/has-values": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-values/-/has-values-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ODYZC64uqzmtfGMEAX/FvZiRyWLpAC3vYnNunURUnkGVTS+mI0smVsWaPydRBsE3g+ok7h960jChO8mFcWlHaQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-number": "^3.0.0",
"kind-of": "^4.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/has-values/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-24XsCxmEbRwEDbz/qz3stgin8TTzZ1ESR56OMCN0ujYg+vRutNSiOj9bHH9u85DKgXguraugV5sFuvbD4FW/hw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/hasown": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/hasown/-/hasown-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0hJU9SCPvmMzIBdZFqNPXWa6dqh7WdH0cII9y+CyS8rG3nL48Bclra9HmKhVVUHyPWNH5Y7xDwAB7bfgSjkUMQ==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"function-bind": "^1.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/homedir-polyfill": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/homedir-polyfill/-/homedir-polyfill-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eSmmWE5bZTK2Nou4g0AI3zZ9rswp7GRKoKXS1BLUkvPviOqs4YTN1djQIqrXy9k5gEtdLPy86JjRwsNM9tnDcA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"parse-passwd": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/hosted-git-info": {
"version": "2.8.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/hosted-git-info/-/hosted-git-info-2.8.9.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-mxIDAb9Lsm6DoOJ7xH+5+X4y1LU/4Hi50L9C5sIswK3JzULS4bwk1FvjdBgvYR4bzT4tuUQiC15FE2f5HbLvYw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/iconv-lite": {
"version": "0.4.24",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/iconv-lite/-/iconv-lite-0.4.24.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-v3MXnZAcvnywkTUEZomIActle7RXXeedOR31wwl7VlyoXO4Qi9arvSenNQWne1TcRwhCL1HwLI21bEqdpj8/rA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"safer-buffer": ">= 2.1.2 < 3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/image-size": {
"version": "0.5.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/image-size/-/image-size-0.5.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-6TDAlDPZxUFCv+fuOkIoXT/V/f3Qbq8e37p+YOiYrUv3v9cc3/6x78VdfPgFVaB9dZYeLUfKgHRebpkm/oP2VQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"bin": {
"image-size": "bin/image-size.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/import-regex": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/import-regex/-/import-regex-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-EblpleIyIdATUKj8ovFojUHyToxgjeKXQgTHZBGZ4cEkbtV21BlO1PSrzZQ6Fei2fgk7uhDeEx656yvPhlRGeA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/indx": {
"version": "0.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/indx/-/indx-0.2.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-SEM+Px+Ghr3fZ+i9BNvUIZJ4UhojFuf+sT7x3cl2/ElL7NXne1A/m29VYzWTTypdOgDnWfoKNewIuPA6y+NMyQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/inflight": {
"version": "1.0.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/inflight/-/inflight-1.0.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-k92I/b08q4wvFscXCLvqfsHCrjrF7yiXsQuIVvVE7N82W3+aqpzuUdBbfhWcy/FZR3/4IgflMgKLOsvPDrGCJA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "This module is not supported, and leaks memory. Do not use it. Check out lru-cache if you want a good and tested way to coalesce async requests by a key value, which is much more comprehensive and powerful.",
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"once": "^1.3.0",
"wrappy": "1"
}
},
"node_modules/inherits": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/inherits/-/inherits-2.0.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-k/vGaX4/Yla3WzyMCvTQOXYeIHvqOKtnqBduzTHpzpQZzAskKMhZ2K+EnBiSM9zGSoIFeMpXKxa4dYeZIQqewQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/ini": {
"version": "1.3.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ini/-/ini-1.3.8.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-JV/yugV2uzW5iMRSiZAyDtQd+nxtUnjeLt0acNdw98kKLrvuRVyB80tsREOE7yvGVgalhZ6RNXCmEHkUKBKxew==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/inquirer": {
"version": "6.5.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/inquirer/-/inquirer-6.5.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cntlB5ghuB0iuO65Ovoi8ogLHiWGs/5yNrtUcKjFhSSiVeAIVpD7koaSU9RM8mpXw5YDi9RdYXGQMaOURB7ycQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-escapes": "^3.2.0",
"chalk": "^2.4.2",
"cli-cursor": "^2.1.0",
"cli-width": "^2.0.0",
"external-editor": "^3.0.3",
"figures": "^2.0.0",
"lodash": "^4.17.12",
"mute-stream": "0.0.7",
"run-async": "^2.2.0",
"rxjs": "^6.4.0",
"string-width": "^2.1.0",
"strip-ansi": "^5.1.0",
"through": "^2.3.6"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/inquirer/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "4.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-4.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ILlv4k/3f6vfQ4OoP2AGvirOktlQ98ZEL1k9FaQjxa3L1abBgbuTDAdPOpvbGncC0BTVQrl+OM8xZGK6tWXt7g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/inquirer/node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "3.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-3.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VT0ZI6kZRdTh8YyJw3SMbYm/u+NqfsAxEpWO0Pf9sq8/e94WxxOpPKx9FR1FlyCtOVDNOQ+8ntlqFxiRc+r5qA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-convert": "^1.9.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/inquirer/node_modules/chalk": {
"version": "2.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chalk/-/chalk-2.4.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Mti+f9lpJNcwF4tWV8/OrTTtF1gZi+f8FqlyAdouralcFWFQWF2+NgCHShjkCb+IFBLq9buZwE1xckQU4peSuQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^3.2.1",
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.5",
"supports-color": "^5.3.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/inquirer/node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "5.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-5.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DuRs1gKbBqsMKIZlrffwlug8MHkcnpjs5VPmL1PAh+mA30U0DTotfDZ0d2UUsXpPmPmMMJ6W773MaA3J+lbiWA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^4.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/inquirer/node_modules/supports-color": {
"version": "5.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-color/-/supports-color-5.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QjVjwdXIt408MIiAqCX4oUKsgU2EqAGzs2Ppkm4aQYbjm+ZEWEcW4SfFNTr4uMNZma0ey4f5lgLrkB0aX0QMow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"has-flag": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/interpret": {
"version": "1.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/interpret/-/interpret-1.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-agE4QfB2Lkp9uICn7BAqoscw4SZP9kTE2hxiFI3jBPmXJfdqiahTbUuKGsMoN2GtqL9AxhYioAcVvgsb1HvRbA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/invert-kv": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/invert-kv/-/invert-kv-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-xgs2NH9AE66ucSq4cNG1nhSFghr5l6tdL15Pk+jl46bmmBapgoaY/AacXyaDznAqmGL99TiLSQgO/XazFSKYeQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ip-regex": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ip-regex/-/ip-regex-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HjpCHTuxbR/6jWJroc/VN+npo5j0T4Vv2TAI5qdEHQx7hsL767MeccGFSsLtF694EiZKTSEqgoeU6DtGFCcuqQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/irregular-plurals": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/irregular-plurals/-/irregular-plurals-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y75zBYLkh0lJ9qxeHlMjQ7bSbyiSqNW/UOPWDmzC7cXskL1hekSITh1Oc6JV0XCWWZ9DE8VYSB71xocLk3gmGw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/is": {
"version": "3.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is/-/is-3.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-nW24QBoPcFGGHJGUwnfpI7Yc5CdqWNdsyHQszVE/z2pKHXzh7FZ5GWhJqSyaQ9wMkQnsTx+kAI8bHlCX4tKdbg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/is-absolute": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-absolute/-/is-absolute-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dOWoqflvcydARa360Gvv18DZ/gRuHKi2NU/wU5X1ZFzdYfH29nkiNZsF3mp4OJ3H4yo9Mx8A/uAGNzpzPN3yBA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-relative": "^1.0.0",
"is-windows": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-accessor-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-accessor-descriptor/-/is-accessor-descriptor-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YBUanLI8Yoihw923YeFUS5fs0fF2f5TSFTNiYAAzhhDscDa3lEqYuz1pDOEP5KvX94I9ey3vsqjJcLVFVU+3QA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"hasown": "^2.0.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.10"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/is-arrayish": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-arrayish/-/is-arrayish-0.2.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-zz06S8t0ozoDXMG+ube26zeCTNXcKIPJZJi8hBrF4idCLms4CG9QtK7qBl1boi5ODzFpjswb5JPmHCbMpjaYzg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/is-binary-path": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-binary-path/-/is-binary-path-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-9fRVlXc0uCxEDj1nQzaWONSpbTfx0FmJfzHF7pwlI8DkWGoHBBea4Pg5Ky0ojwwxQmnSifgbKkI06Qv0Ljgj+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"binary-extensions": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-buffer": {
"version": "1.1.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-buffer/-/is-buffer-1.1.6.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-NcdALwpXkTm5Zvvbk7owOUSvVvBKDgKP5/ewfXEznmQFfs4ZRmanOeKBTjRVjka3QFoN6XJ+9F3USqfHqTaU5w==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/is-core-module": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "2.14.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-core-module/-/is-core-module-2.14.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-a5dFJih5ZLYlRtDc0dZWP7RiKr6xIKzmn/oAYCDvdLThadVgyJwlaoQPmRtMSpz+rk0OGAgIu+TcM9HUF0fk1A==",
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"hasown": "^2.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/is-data-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-data-descriptor/-/is-data-descriptor-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bc4NlCDiCr28U4aEsQ3Qs2491gVq4V8G7MQyws968ImqjKuYtTJXrl7Vq7jsN7Ly/C3xj5KWFrY7sHNeDkAzXw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"hasown": "^2.0.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JCNNGbwWZEVaSPtS45mdtrneRWJFp07LLmykxeFV5F6oBvNF8vHSfJuJgoT472pSfk+Mf8VnlrspaFBHWM8JAw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-5BMULNob1vgFX6EjQw5izWDxrecWK9AM72rugNr0TFldMOi0fj6Jk+zeKIt0xGj4cEfQIJth4w3OKWOJ4f+AFw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-extglob": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extglob/-/is-extglob-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SbKbANkN603Vi4jEZv49LeVJMn4yGwsbzZworEoyEiutsN3nJYdbO36zfhGJ6QEDpOZIFkDtnq5JRxmvl3jsoQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VHskAKYM8RfSFXwee5t5cbN5PZeq1Wrh6qd5bkyiXIf6UQcN6w/A0eXM9r6t8d+GYOh+o6ZhiEnb88LN/Y8m2w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/is-glob": {
"version": "4.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-glob/-/is-glob-4.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-xelSayHH36ZgE7ZWhli7pW34hNbNl8Ojv5KVmkJD4hBdD3th8Tfk9vYasLM+mXWOZhFkgZfxhLSnrwRr4elSSg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-extglob": "^2.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-negated-glob": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-negated-glob/-/is-negated-glob-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-czXVVn/QEmgvej1f50BZ648vUI+em0xqMq2Sn+QncCLN4zj1UAxlT+kw/6ggQTOaZPd1HqKQGEqbpQVtJucWug==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-number": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-number/-/is-number-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4cboCqIpliH+mAvFNegjZQ4kgKc3ZUhQVr3HvWbSh5q3WH2v82ct+T2Y1hdU5Gdtorx/cLifQjqCbL7bpznLTg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^3.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-number/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-3.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NOW9QQXMoZGg/oqnVNoNTTIFEIid1627WCffUBJEdMxYApq7mNE7CpzucIPc+ZQg25Phej7IJSmX3hO+oblOtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-obj": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-obj/-/is-obj-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-l4RyHgRqGN4Y3+9JHVrNqO+tN0rV5My76uW5/nuO4K1b6vw5G8d/cmFjP9tRfEsdhZNt0IFdZuK/c2Vr4Nb+Qg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-path-cwd": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-path-cwd/-/is-path-cwd-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cnS56eR9SPAscL77ik76ATVqoPARTqPIVkMDVxRaWH06zT+6+CzIroYRJ0VVvm0Z1zfAvxvz9i/D3Ppjaqt5Nw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-path-in-cwd": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-path-in-cwd/-/is-path-in-cwd-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FjV1RTW48E7CWM7eE/J2NJvAEEVektecDBVBE5Hh3nM1Jd0kvhHtX68Pr3xsDf857xt3Y4AkwVULK1Vku62aaQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-path-inside": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-path-inside": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-path-inside/-/is-path-inside-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qhsCR/Esx4U4hg/9I19OVUAJkGWtjRYHMRgUMZE2TDdj+Ag+kttZanLupfddNyglzz50cUlmWzUaI37GDfNx/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"path-is-inside": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "5.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-5.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VRSzKkbMm5jMDoKLbltAkFQ5Qr7VDiTFGXxYFXXowVj387GeGNOCsOH6Msy00SGZ3Fp84b1Naa1psqgcCIEP5Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-regexp": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-regexp/-/is-regexp-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7zjFAPO4/gwyQAAgRRmqeEeyIICSdmCqa3tsVHMdBzaXXRiqopZL4Cyghg/XulGWrtABTpbnYYzzIRffLkP4oA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-relative": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-relative/-/is-relative-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Kw/ReK0iqwKeu0MITLFuj0jbPAmEiOsIwyIXvvbfa6QfmN9pkD1M+8pdk7Rl/dTKbH34/XBFMbgD4iMJhLQbGA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-unc-path": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-stream": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-stream/-/is-stream-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uQPm8kcs47jx38atAcWTVxyltQYoPT68y9aWYdV6yWXSyW8mzSat0TL6CiWdZeCdF3KrAvpVtnHbTv4RN+rqdQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-unc-path": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-unc-path/-/is-unc-path-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mrGpVd0fs7WWLfVsStvgF6iEJnbjDFZh9/emhRDcGWTduTfNHd9CHeUwH3gYIjdbwo4On6hunkztwOaAw0yllQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"unc-path-regex": "^0.1.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-utf8": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-utf8/-/is-utf8-0.2.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-rMYPYvCzsXywIsldgLaSoPlw5PfoB/ssr7hY4pLfcodrA5M/eArza1a9VmTiNIBNMjOGr1Ow9mTyU2o69U6U9Q==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/is-valid-glob": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-valid-glob/-/is-valid-glob-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-AhiROmoEFDSsjx8hW+5sGwgKVIORcXnrlAx/R0ZSeaPw70Vw0CqkGBBhHGL58Uox2eXnU1AnvXJl1XlyedO5bA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-what": {
"version": "3.14.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-what/-/is-what-3.14.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-sNxgpk9793nzSs7bA6JQJGeIuRBQhAaNGG77kzYQgMkrID+lS6SlK07K5LaptscDlSaIgH+GPFzf+d75FVxozA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/is-windows": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-windows/-/is-windows-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eXK1UInq2bPmjyX6e3VHIzMLobc4J94i4AWn+Hpq3OU5KkrRC96OAcR3PRJ/pGu6m8TRnBHP9dkXQVsT/COVIA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/is-wsl": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-wsl/-/is-wsl-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-gfygJYZ2gLTDlmbWMI0CE2MwnFzSN/2SZfkMlItC4K/JBlsWVDB0bO6XhqcY13YXE7iMcAJnzTCJjPiTeJJ0Mw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/isarray": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isarray/-/isarray-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-VLghIWNM6ELQzo7zwmcg0NmTVyWKYjvIeM83yjp0wRDTmUnrM678fQbcKBo6n2CJEF0szoG//ytg+TKla89ALQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/isexe": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isexe/-/isexe-2.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-RHxMLp9lnKHGHRng9QFhRCMbYAcVpn69smSGcq3f36xjgVVWThj4qqLbTLlq7Ssj8B+fIQ1EuCEGI2lKsyQeIw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/isobject": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isobject/-/isobject-3.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WhB9zCku7EGTj/HQQRz5aUQEUeoQZH2bWcltRErOpymJ4boYE6wL9Tbr23krRPSZ+C5zqNSrSw+Cc7sZZ4b7vg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/istextorbinary": {
"version": "3.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/istextorbinary/-/istextorbinary-3.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Tvq1W6NAcZeJ8op+Hq7tdZ434rqnMx4CCZ7H0ff83uEloDvVbqAwaMTZcafKGJT0VHkYzuXUiCY4hlXQg6WfoQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"binaryextensions": "^2.2.0",
"textextensions": "^3.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://bevry.me/fund"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/jackspeak": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "3.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/jackspeak/-/jackspeak-3.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JVYhQnN59LVPFCEcVa2C3CrEKYacvjRfqIQl+h8oi91aLYQVWRYbxjPcv1bUiUy/kLmQaANrYfNMCO3kuEDHfw==",
"license": "BlueOak-1.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@isaacs/cliui": "^8.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
},
"optionalDependencies": {
"@pkgjs/parseargs": "^0.11.0"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/jquery": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "3.7.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/jquery/-/jquery-3.7.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-m4avr8yL8kmFN8psrbFFFmB/If14iN5o9nw/NgnnM+kybDJpRsAynV2BsfpTYrTRysYUdADVD7CkUUizgkpLfg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/js-beautify": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.15.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/js-beautify/-/js-beautify-1.15.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ESjNzSlt/sWE8sciZH8kBF8BPlwXPwhR6pWKAw8bw4Bwj+iZcnKW6ONWUutJ7eObuBZQpiIb8S7OYspWrKt7rA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"config-chain": "^1.1.13",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"editorconfig": "^1.0.4",
"glob": "^10.3.3",
"js-cookie": "^3.0.5",
"nopt": "^7.2.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"css-beautify": "js/bin/css-beautify.js",
"html-beautify": "js/bin/html-beautify.js",
"js-beautify": "js/bin/js-beautify.js"
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">=14"
}
},
"node_modules/js-beautify/node_modules/brace-expansion": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/brace-expansion/-/brace-expansion-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-XnAIvQ8eM+kC6aULx6wuQiwVsnzsi9d3WxzV3FpWTGA19F621kwdbsAcFKXgKUHZWsy+mY6iL1sHTxWEFCytDA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"balanced-match": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/js-beautify/node_modules/glob": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "10.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob/-/glob-10.4.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GwMlUF6PkPo3Gk21UxkCohOv0PLcIXVtKyLlpEI28R/cO/4eNOdmLk3CMW1wROV/WR/EsZOWAfBbBOqYvs88/w==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"foreground-child": "^3.1.0",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"jackspeak": "^3.1.2",
"minimatch": "^9.0.4",
"minipass": "^7.1.2",
"package-json-from-dist": "^1.0.0",
"path-scurry": "^1.11.1"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"glob": "dist/esm/bin.mjs"
},
"engines": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.18"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/js-beautify/node_modules/minimatch": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "9.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimatch/-/minimatch-9.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-G6T0ZX48xgozx7587koeX9Ys2NYy6Gmv//P89sEte9V9whIapMNF4idKxnW2QtCcLiTWlb/wfCabAtAFWhhBow==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"brace-expansion": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.17"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
"node_modules/js-cookie": {
"version": "3.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/js-cookie/-/js-cookie-3.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cEiJEAEoIbWfCZYKWhVwFuvPX1gETRYPw6LlaTKoxD3s2AkXzkCjnp6h0V77ozyqj0jakteJ4YqDJT830+lVGw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=14"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify/-/json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify-1.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Bdboy+l7tA3OGW6FjyFHWkP5LuByj1Tk33Ljyq0axyzdk9//JSi2u3fP1QSmd1KNwq6VOKYGlAu87CisVir6Pw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/just-debounce": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/just-debounce/-/just-debounce-1.1.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-qpcRocdkUmf+UTNBYx5w6dexX5J31AKK1OmPwH630a83DdVVUIngk55RSAiIGpQyoH0dlr872VHfPjnQnK1qDQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "5.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-5.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NGEErnH6F2vUuXDh+OlbcKW7/wOcfdRHaZ7VWtqCztfHri/++YKmP51OdWeGPuqCOba6kk2OTe5d02VmTB80Pw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/last-run": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/last-run/-/last-run-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-U/VxvpX4N/rFvPzr3qG5EtLKEnNI0emvIQB3/ecEwv+8GHaUKbIB8vxv1Oai5FAF0d0r7LXHhLLe5K/yChm5GQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"default-resolution": "^2.0.0",
"es6-weak-map": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/lazy-cache": {
"version": "1.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lazy-cache/-/lazy-cache-1.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-RE2g0b5VGZsOCFOCgP7omTRYFqydmZkBwl5oNnQ1lDYC57uyO9KqNnNVxT7COSHTxrRCWVcAVOcbjk+tvh/rgQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lazystream": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lazystream/-/lazystream-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-b94GiNHQNy6JNTrt5w6zNyffMrNkXZb3KTkCZJb2V1xaEGCk093vkZ2jk3tpaeP33/OiXC+WvK9AxUebnf5nbw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "^2.0.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.6.3"
}
},
"node_modules/lcid": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lcid/-/lcid-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YiGkH6EnGrDGqLMITnGjXtGmNtjoXw9SVUzcaos8RBi7Ps0VBylkq+vOcY9QE5poLasPCR849ucFUkl0UzUyOw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"invert-kv": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lead": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lead/-/lead-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-IpSVCk9AYvLHo5ctcIXxOBpMWUe+4TKN3VPWAKUbJikkmsGp0VrSM8IttVc32D6J4WUsiPE6aEFRNmIoF/gdow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"flush-write-stream": "^1.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/less": {
"version": "3.13.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/less/-/less-3.13.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-SwA1aQXGUvp+P5XdZslUOhhLnClSLIjWvJhmd+Vgib5BFIr9lMNlQwmwUNOjXThF/A0x+MCYYPeWEfeWiLRnTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"copy-anything": "^2.0.1",
"tslib": "^1.10.0"
},
"bin": {
"lessc": "bin/lessc"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
},
"optionalDependencies": {
"errno": "^0.1.1",
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.2",
"image-size": "~0.5.0",
"make-dir": "^2.1.0",
"mime": "^1.4.1",
"native-request": "^1.0.5",
"source-map": "~0.6.0"
}
},
"node_modules/liftoff": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/liftoff/-/liftoff-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DlIPlJUkCV0Ips2zf2pJP0unEoT1kwYhiiPUGF3s/jtxTCjziNLoiVVh+jqWOWeFi6mmwQ5fNxvAUyPad4Dfog==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend": "^3.0.0",
"findup-sync": "^3.0.0",
"fined": "^1.0.1",
"flagged-respawn": "^1.0.0",
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4",
"object.map": "^1.0.0",
"rechoir": "^0.6.2",
"resolve": "^1.1.7"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.8"
}
},
"node_modules/liftoff/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/load-json-file": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/load-json-file/-/load-json-file-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cy7ZdNRXdablkXYNI049pthVeXFurRyb9+hA/dZzerZ0pGTx42z+y+ssxBaVV2l70t1muq5IdKhn4UtcoGUY9A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.2",
"parse-json": "^2.2.0",
"pify": "^2.0.0",
"pinkie-promise": "^2.0.0",
"strip-bom": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/load-json-file/node_modules/pify": {
"version": "2.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pify/-/pify-2.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-udgsAY+fTnvv7kI7aaxbqwWNb0AHiB0qBO89PZKPkoTmGOgdbrHDKD+0B2X4uTfJ/FT1R09r9gTsjUjNJotuog==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash": {
"version": "4.17.21",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash/-/lodash-4.17.21.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-v2kDEe57lecTulaDIuNTPy3Ry4gLGJ6Z1O3vE1krgXZNrsQ+LFTGHVxVjcXPs17LhbZVGedAJv8XZ1tvj5FvSg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._baseassign": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._baseassign/-/lodash._baseassign-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t3N26QR2IdSN+gqSy9Ds9pBu/J1EAFEshKlUHpJG3rvyJOYgcELIxcIeKKfZk7sjOz11cFfzJRsyFry/JyabJQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._basecopy": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.keys": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash._basecopy": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._basecopy/-/lodash._basecopy-3.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-rFR6Vpm4HeCK1WPGvjZSJ+7yik8d8PVUdCJx5rT2pogG4Ve/2ZS7kfmO5l5T2o5V2mqlNIfSF5MZlr1+xOoYQQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._basetostring": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._basetostring/-/lodash._basetostring-3.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-mTzAr1aNAv/i7W43vOR/uD/aJ4ngbtsRaCubp2BfZhlGU/eORUjg/7F6X0orNMdv33JOrdgGybtvMN/po3EWrA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._basevalues": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._basevalues/-/lodash._basevalues-3.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-H94wl5P13uEqlCg7OcNNhMQ8KvWSIyqXzOPusRgHC9DK3o54P6P3xtbXlVbRABG4q5gSmp7EDdJ0MSuW9HX6Mg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._bindcallback": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._bindcallback/-/lodash._bindcallback-3.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-2wlI0JRAGX8WEf4Gm1p/mv/SZ+jLijpj0jyaE/AXeuQphzCgD8ZQW4oSpoN8JAopujOFGU3KMuq7qfHBWlGpjQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._createassigner": {
"version": "3.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._createassigner/-/lodash._createassigner-3.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LziVL7IDnJjQeeV95Wvhw6G28Z8Q6da87LWKOPWmzBLv4u6FAT/x5v00pyGW0u38UoogNF2JnD3bGgZZDaNEBw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._bindcallback": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._isiterateecall": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.restparam": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash._getnative": {
"version": "3.9.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._getnative/-/lodash._getnative-3.9.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-RrL9VxMEPyDMHOd9uFbvMe8X55X16/cGM5IgOKgRElQZutpX89iS6vwl64duTV1/16w5JY7tuFNXqoekmh1EmA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._isiterateecall": {
"version": "3.0.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._isiterateecall/-/lodash._isiterateecall-3.0.9.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-De+ZbrMu6eThFti/CSzhRvTKMgQToLxbij58LMfM8JnYDNSOjkjTCIaa8ixglOeGh2nyPlakbt5bJWJ7gvpYlQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._isnative": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._isnative/-/lodash._isnative-2.4.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-BOlKGKNHhCHswGOWtmVb5zBygyxN7EmTuzVOSQI6QSoGhG+kvv71gICFS1TBpnqvT1n53txK8CDK3u5D2/GZxQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._objecttypes": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._objecttypes/-/lodash._objecttypes-2.4.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-XpqGh1e7hhkOzftBfWE7zt+Yn9mVHFkDhicVttvKLsoCMLVVL+xTQjfjB4X4vtznauxv0QZ5ZAeqjvat0dh62Q==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._reescape": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._reescape/-/lodash._reescape-3.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Sjlavm5y+FUVIF3vF3B75GyXrzsfYV8Dlv3L4mEpuB9leg8N6yf/7rU06iLPx9fY0Mv3khVp9p7Dx0mGV6V5OQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._reevaluate": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._reevaluate/-/lodash._reevaluate-3.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-OrPwdDc65iJiBeUe5n/LIjd7Viy99bKwDdk7Z5ljfZg0uFRFlfQaCy9tZ4YMAag9WAZmlVpe1iZrkIMMSMHD3w==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._reinterpolate": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._reinterpolate/-/lodash._reinterpolate-3.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-xYHt68QRoYGjeeM/XOE1uJtvXQAgvszfBhjV4yvsQH0u2i9I6cI6c6/eG4Hh3UAOVn0y/xAXwmTzEay49Q//HA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._root": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._root/-/lodash._root-3.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-O0pWuFSK6x4EXhM1dhZ8gchNtG7JMqBtrHdoUFUWXD7dJnNSUze1GuyQr5sOs0aCvgGeI3o/OJW8f4ca7FDxmQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash._shimkeys": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash._shimkeys/-/lodash._shimkeys-2.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lBrglYxLD/6KAJ8IEa5Lg+YHgNAL7FyKqXg4XOUI+Du/vtniLs1ZqS+yHNKPkK54waAgkdUnDOYaWf+rv4B+AA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._objecttypes": "~2.4.1"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.assign": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.assign/-/lodash.assign-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/VVxzgGBmbphasTg51FrztxQJ/VgAUpol6zmJuSVSGcNg4g7FA4z7rQV8Ovr9V3vFBNWZhvKWHfpAytjTVUfFA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._baseassign": "^3.0.0",
"lodash._createassigner": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.keys": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.clone": {
"version": "4.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.clone/-/lodash.clone-4.5.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-GhrVeweiTD6uTmmn5hV/lzgCQhccwReIVRLHp7LT4SopOjqEZ5BbX8b5WWEtAKasjmy8hR7ZPwsYlxRCku5odg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.defaults": {
"version": "3.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.defaults/-/lodash.defaults-3.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-X7135IXFQt5JDFnYxOVAzVz+kFvwDn3N8DJYf+nrz/mMWEuSu7+OL6rWqsk3+VR1T4TejFCSu5isBJOLSID2bg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash.assign": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.restparam": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.escape": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.escape/-/lodash.escape-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-n1PZMXgaaDWZDSvuNZ/8XOcYO2hOKDqZel5adtR30VKQAtoWs/5AOeFA0vPV8moiPzlqe7F4cP2tzpFewQyelQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._root": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.flatten": {
"version": "4.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.flatten/-/lodash.flatten-4.4.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-C5N2Z3DgnnKr0LOpv/hKCgKdb7ZZwafIrsesve6lmzvZIRZRGaZ/l6Q8+2W7NaT+ZwO3fFlSCzCzrDCFdJfZ4g==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.get": {
"version": "4.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.get/-/lodash.get-4.4.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-z+Uw/vLuy6gQe8cfaFWD7p0wVv8fJl3mbzXh33RS+0oW2wvUqiRXiQ69gLWSLpgB5/6sU+r6BlQR0MBILadqTQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.isarguments": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.isarguments/-/lodash.isarguments-3.1.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-chi4NHZlZqZD18a0imDHnZPrDeBbTtVN7GXMwuGdRH9qotxAjYs3aVLKc7zNOG9eddR5Ksd8rvFEBc9SsggPpg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.isarray": {
"version": "3.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.isarray/-/lodash.isarray-3.0.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-JwObCrNJuT0Nnbuecmqr5DgtuBppuCvGD9lxjFpAzwnVtdGoDQ1zig+5W8k5/6Gcn0gZ3936HDAlGd28i7sOGQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.isobject": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.isobject/-/lodash.isobject-2.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-sTebg2a1PoicYEZXD5PBdQcTlIJ6hUslrlWr7iV0O7n+i4596s2NQ9I5CaZ5FbXSfya/9WQsrYLANUJv9paYVA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._objecttypes": "~2.4.1"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.keys": {
"version": "3.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.keys/-/lodash.keys-3.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-CuBsapFjcubOGMn3VD+24HOAPxM79tH+V6ivJL3CHYjtrawauDJHUk//Yew9Hvc6e9rbCrURGk8z6PC+8WJBfQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._getnative": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.isarguments": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.isarray": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.merge": {
"version": "4.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.merge/-/lodash.merge-4.6.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-0KpjqXRVvrYyCsX1swR/XTK0va6VQkQM6MNo7PqW77ByjAhoARA8EfrP1N4+KlKj8YS0ZUCtRT/YUuhyYDujIQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.partialright": {
"version": "4.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.partialright/-/lodash.partialright-4.2.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-yebmPMQZH7i4El6SdJTW9rn8irWl8VTcsmiWqm/I4sY8/ZjbSo0Z512HL6soeAu3mh5rhx5uIIo6kYJOQXbCxw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.pick": {
"version": "4.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.pick/-/lodash.pick-4.4.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-hXt6Ul/5yWjfklSGvLQl8vM//l3FtyHZeuelpzK6mm99pNvN9yTDruNZPEJZD1oWrqo+izBmB7oUfWgcCX7s4Q==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.restparam": {
"version": "3.6.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.restparam/-/lodash.restparam-3.6.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-L4/arjjuq4noiUJpt3yS6KIKDtJwNe2fIYgMqyYYKoeIfV1iEqvPwhCx23o+R9dzouGihDAPN1dTIRWa7zk8tw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.set": {
"version": "4.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.set/-/lodash.set-4.3.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-4hNPN5jlm/N/HLMCO43v8BXKq9Z7QdAGc/VGrRD61w8gN9g/6jF9A4L1pbUgBLCffi0w9VsXfTOij5x8iTyFvg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/lodash.template": {
"version": "4.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.template/-/lodash.template-4.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-84vYFxIkmidUiFxidA/KjjH9pAycqW+h980j7Fuz5qxRtO9pgB7MDFTdys1N7A5mcucRiDyEq4fusljItR1T/A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._reinterpolate": "^3.0.0",
"lodash.templatesettings": "^4.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.templatesettings": {
"version": "4.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.templatesettings/-/lodash.templatesettings-4.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-stgLz+i3Aa9mZgnjr/O+v9ruKZsPsndy7qPZOchbqk2cnTU1ZaldKK+v7m54WoKIyxiuMZTKT2H81F8BeAc3ZQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lodash._reinterpolate": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lodash.uniq": {
"version": "4.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.uniq/-/lodash.uniq-4.5.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-xfBaXQd9ryd9dlSDvnvI0lvxfLJlYAZzXomUYzLKtUeOQvOP5piqAWuGtrhWeqaXK9hhoM/iyJc5AV+XfsX3HQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/longest": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/longest/-/longest-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-k+yt5n3l48JU4k8ftnKG6V7u32wyH2NfKzeMto9F/QRE0amxy/LayxwlvjjkZEIzqR+19IrtFO8p5kB9QaYUFg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/lru-cache": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "10.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lru-cache/-/lru-cache-10.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-CQl19J/g+Hbjbv4Y3mFNNXFEL/5t/KCg8POCuUqd4rMKjGG+j1ybER83hxV58zL+dFI1PTkt3GNFSHRt+d8qEQ==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"node": "14 || >=16.14"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/macos-release": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.5.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/macos-release/-/macos-release-2.5.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DXqXhEM7gW59OjZO8NIjBCz9AQ1BEMrfiOAl4AYByHCtVHRF4KoGNO8mqQeM8lRCtQe/UnJ4imO/d2HdkKsd+A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/make-dir": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/make-dir/-/make-dir-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LS9X+dc8KLxXCb8dni79fLIIUA5VyZoyjSMCwTluaXA0o27cCK0bhXkpgw+sTXVpPy/lSO57ilRixqk0vDmtRA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"dependencies": {
"pify": "^4.0.1",
"semver": "^5.6.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/make-dir/node_modules/pify": {
"version": "4.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pify/-/pify-4.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uB80kBFb/tfd68bVleG9T5GGsGPjJrLAUpR5PZIrhBnIaRTQRjqdJSsIKkOP6OAIFbj7GOrcudc5pNjZ+geV2g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/make-error": {
"version": "1.3.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/make-error/-/make-error-1.3.6.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-s8UhlNe7vPKomQhC1qFelMokr/Sc3AgNbso3n74mVPA5LTZwkB9NlXf4XPamLxJE8h0gh73rM94xvwRT2CVInw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/make-error-cause": {
"version": "1.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/make-error-cause/-/make-error-cause-1.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4TO2Y3HkBnis4c0dxhAgD/jprySYLACf7nwN6V0HAHDx59g12WlRpUmFy1bRHamjGUEEBrEvCq6SUpsEE2lhUg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"make-error": "^1.2.0"
}
},
"node_modules/make-iterator": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/make-iterator/-/make-iterator-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-pxiuXh0iVEq7VM7KMIhs5gxsfxCux2URptUQaXo4iZZJxBAzTPOLE2BumO5dbfVYq/hBJFBR/a1mFDmOx5AGmw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^6.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/make-iterator/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "6.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-6.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dcS1ul+9tmeD95T+x28/ehLgd9mENa3LsvDTtzm3vyBEO7RPptvAD+t44WVXaUjTBRcrpFeFlC8WCruUR456hw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/map-cache": {
"version": "0.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/map-cache/-/map-cache-0.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8y/eV9QQZCiyn1SprXSrCmqJN0yNRATe+PO8ztwqrvrbdRLA3eYJF0yaR0YayLWkMbsQSKWS9N2gPcGEc4UsZg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/map-stream": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/map-stream/-/map-stream-0.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-CkYQrPYZfWnu/DAmVCpTSX/xHpKZ80eKh2lAkyA6AJTef6bW+6JpbQZN5rofum7da+SyN1bi5ctTm+lTfcCW3g=="
},
"node_modules/map-visit": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/map-visit/-/map-visit-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4y7uGv8bd2WdM9vpQsiQNo41Ln1NvhvDRuVt0k2JZQ+ezN2uaQes7lZeZ+QQUHOLQAtDaBJ+7wCbi+ab/KFs+w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"object-visit": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/matchdep": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/matchdep/-/matchdep-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LFgVbaHIHMqCRuCZyfCtUOq9/Lnzhi7Z0KFUE2fhD54+JN2jLh3hC02RLkqauJ3U4soU6H1J3tfj/Byk7GoEjA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"findup-sync": "^2.0.0",
"micromatch": "^3.0.4",
"resolve": "^1.4.0",
"stack-trace": "0.0.10"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/matchdep/node_modules/findup-sync": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/findup-sync/-/findup-sync-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-vs+3unmJT45eczmcAZ6zMJtxN3l/QXeccaXQx5cu/MeJMhewVfoWZqibRkOxPnmoR59+Zy5hjabfQc6JLSah4g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"detect-file": "^1.0.0",
"is-glob": "^3.1.0",
"micromatch": "^3.0.4",
"resolve-dir": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/matchdep/node_modules/is-glob": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-glob/-/is-glob-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-UFpDDrPgM6qpnFNI+rh/p3bUaq9hKLZN8bMUWzxmcnZVS3omf4IPK+BrewlnWjO1WmUsMYuSjKh4UJuV4+Lqmw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-extglob": "^2.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/merge-stream": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/merge-stream/-/merge-stream-2.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-abv/qOcuPfk3URPfDzmZU1LKmuw8kT+0nIHvKrKgFrwifol/doWcdA4ZqsWQ8ENrFKkd67Mfpo/LovbIUsbt3w==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/micromatch": {
"version": "3.1.10",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/micromatch/-/micromatch-3.1.10.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-MWikgl9n9M3w+bpsY3He8L+w9eF9338xRl8IAO5viDizwSzziFEyUzo2xrrloB64ADbTf8uA8vRqqttDTOmccg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-diff": "^4.0.0",
"array-unique": "^0.3.2",
"braces": "^2.3.1",
"define-property": "^2.0.2",
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2",
"extglob": "^2.0.4",
"fragment-cache": "^0.2.1",
"kind-of": "^6.0.2",
"nanomatch": "^1.2.9",
"object.pick": "^1.3.0",
"regex-not": "^1.0.0",
"snapdragon": "^0.8.1",
"to-regex": "^3.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/micromatch/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/micromatch/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/micromatch/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/micromatch/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "6.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-6.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dcS1ul+9tmeD95T+x28/ehLgd9mENa3LsvDTtzm3vyBEO7RPptvAD+t44WVXaUjTBRcrpFeFlC8WCruUR456hw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/mime": {
"version": "1.6.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mime/-/mime-1.6.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-x0Vn8spI+wuJ1O6S7gnbaQg8Pxh4NNHb7KSINmEWKiPE4RKOplvijn+NkmYmmRgP68mc70j2EbeTFRsrswaQeg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true,
"bin": {
"mime": "cli.js"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/mimic-fn": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mimic-fn/-/mimic-fn-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jf84uxzwiuiIVKiOLpfYk7N46TSy8ubTonmneY9vrpHNAnp0QBt2BxWV9dO3/j+BoVAb+a5G6YDPW3M5HOdMWQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/minimatch": {
"version": "3.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimatch/-/minimatch-3.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-J7p63hRiAjw1NDEww1W7i37+ByIrOWO5XQQAzZ3VOcL0PNybwpfmV/N05zFAzwQ9USyEcX6t3UO+K5aqBQOIHw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"brace-expansion": "^1.1.7"
},
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/minimist": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.2.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimist/-/minimist-1.2.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2yyAR8qBkN3YuheJanUpWC5U3bb5osDywNB8RzDVlDwDHbocAJveqqj1u8+SVD7jkWT4yvsHCpWqqWqAxb0zCA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/minipass": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "7.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minipass/-/minipass-7.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qOOzS1cBTWYF4BH8fVePDBOO9iptMnGUEZwNc/cMWnTV2nVLZ7VoNWEPHkYczZA0pdoA7dl6e7FL659nX9S2aw==",
"license": "ISC",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.17"
}
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/mixin-deep": {
"version": "1.3.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mixin-deep/-/mixin-deep-1.3.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WRoDn//mXBiJ1H40rqa3vH0toePwSsGb45iInWlTySa+Uu4k3tYUSxa2v1KqAiLtvlrSzaExqS1gtk96A9zvEA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"for-in": "^1.0.2",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/mixin-deep/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/mixin-deep/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/mkdirp": {
"version": "0.5.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mkdirp/-/mkdirp-0.5.6.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FP+p8RB8OWpF3YZBCrP5gtADmtXApB5AMLn+vdyA+PyxCjrCs00mjyUozssO33cwDeT3wNGdLxJ5M//YqtHAJw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"minimist": "^1.2.6"
},
"bin": {
"mkdirp": "bin/cmd.js"
}
},
"node_modules/ms": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ms/-/ms-2.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Tpp60P6IUJDTuOq/5Z8cdskzJujfwqfOTkrwIwj7IRISpnkJnT6SyJ4PCPnGMoFjC9ddhal5KVIYtAt97ix05A==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/multipipe": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/multipipe/-/multipipe-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7ZxrUybYv9NonoXgwoOqtStIu18D1c3eFZj27hqgf5kBrBF8Q+tE8V0MW8dKM5QLkQPh1JhhbKgHLY9kifov4Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"duplexer2": "0.0.2"
}
},
"node_modules/mute-stdout": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mute-stdout/-/mute-stdout-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kDcwXR4PS7caBpuRYYBUz9iVixUk3anO3f5OYFiIPwK/20vCzKCHyKoulbiDY1S53zD2bxUpxN/IJ+TnXjfvxg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/mute-stream": {
"version": "0.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mute-stream/-/mute-stream-0.0.7.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-r65nCZhrbXXb6dXOACihYApHw2Q6pV0M3V0PSxd74N0+D8nzAdEAITq2oAjA1jVnKI+tGvEBUpqiMh0+rW6zDQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/nan": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "2.20.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nan/-/nan-2.20.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bk3gXBZDGILuuo/6sKtr0DQmSThYHLtNCdSdXk9YkxD/jK6X2vmCyyXBBxyqZ4XcnzTyYEAThfX3DCEnLf6igw==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/nanomatch": {
"version": "1.2.13",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nanomatch/-/nanomatch-1.2.13.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-fpoe2T0RbHwBTBUOftAfBPaDEi06ufaUai0mE6Yn1kacc3SnTErfb/h+X94VXzI64rKFHYImXSvdwGGCmwOqCA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-diff": "^4.0.0",
"array-unique": "^0.3.2",
"define-property": "^2.0.2",
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2",
"fragment-cache": "^0.2.1",
"is-windows": "^1.0.2",
"kind-of": "^6.0.2",
"object.pick": "^1.3.0",
"regex-not": "^1.0.0",
"snapdragon": "^0.8.1",
"to-regex": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/nanomatch/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/nanomatch/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/nanomatch/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/nanomatch/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "6.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-6.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dcS1ul+9tmeD95T+x28/ehLgd9mENa3LsvDTtzm3vyBEO7RPptvAD+t44WVXaUjTBRcrpFeFlC8WCruUR456hw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/native-request": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/native-request/-/native-request-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uZ5rQaeRn15XmpgE0xoPL8YWqcX90VtCFglYwAgkvKM5e8fog+vePLAhHxuuv/gRkrQxIeh5U3q9sMNUrENqWw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/next-tick": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/next-tick/-/next-tick-1.1.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-CXdUiJembsNjuToQvxayPZF9Vqht7hewsvy2sOWafLvi2awflj9mOC6bHIg50orX8IJvWKY9wYQ/zB2kogPslQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/nice-try": {
"version": "1.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nice-try/-/nice-try-1.0.5.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-1nh45deeb5olNY7eX82BkPO7SSxR5SSYJiPTrTdFUVYwAl8CKMA5N9PjTYkHiRjisVcxcQ1HXdLhx2qxxJzLNQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/node-fetch": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/node-fetch/-/node-fetch-2.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-c4FRfUm/dbcWZ7U+1Wq0AwCyFL+3nt2bEw05wfxSz+DWpWsitgmSgYmy2dQdWyKC1694ELPqMs/YzUSNozLt8A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"whatwg-url": "^5.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": "4.x || >=6.0.0"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"encoding": "^0.1.0"
},
"peerDependenciesMeta": {
"encoding": {
"optional": true
}
}
},
"node_modules/node-notifier": {
"version": "5.4.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/node-notifier/-/node-notifier-5.4.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tVbHs7DyTLtzOiN78izLA85zRqB9NvEXkAf014Vx3jtSvn/xBl6bR8ZYifj+dFcFrKI21huSQgJZ6ZtL3B4HfQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"growly": "^1.3.0",
"is-wsl": "^1.1.0",
"semver": "^5.5.0",
"shellwords": "^0.1.1",
"which": "^1.3.0"
}
},
"node_modules/node-releases": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.0.14",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/node-releases/-/node-releases-2.0.14.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-y10wOWt8yZpqXmOgRo77WaHEmhYQYGNA6y421PKsKYWEK8aW+cqAphborZDhqfyKrbZEN92CN1X2KbafY2s7Yw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/node.extend": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/node.extend/-/node.extend-2.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-xwADg/okH48PvBmRZyoX8i8GJaKuJ1CqlqotlZOhUio8egD1P5trJupHKBzcPjSF9ifK2gPcEICRBnkfPqQXZw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "(MIT OR GPL-2.0)",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"hasown": "^2.0.0",
"is": "^3.3.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.4.0"
}
},
"node_modules/nopt": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "7.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nopt/-/nopt-7.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-taM24ViiimT/XntxbPyJQzCG+p4EKOpgD3mxFwW38mGjVUrfERQOeY4EDHjdnptttfHuHQXFx+lTP08Q+mLa/w==",
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"abbrev": "^2.0.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"nopt": "bin/nopt.js"
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": "^14.17.0 || ^16.13.0 || >=18.0.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/normalize-package-data": {
"version": "2.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-package-data/-/normalize-package-data-2.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/5CMN3T0R4XTj4DcGaexo+roZSdSFW/0AOOTROrjxzCG1wrWXEsGbRKevjlIL+ZDE4sZlJr5ED4YW0yqmkK+eA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-2-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"hosted-git-info": "^2.1.4",
"resolve": "^1.10.0",
"semver": "2 || 3 || 4 || 5",
"validate-npm-package-license": "^3.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/normalize-path": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-path/-/normalize-path-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-6eZs5Ls3WtCisHWp9S2GUy8dqkpGi4BVSz3GaqiE6ezub0512ESztXUwUB6C6IKbQkY2Pnb/mD4WYojCRwcwLA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/normalize-range": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-range/-/normalize-range-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-bdok/XvKII3nUpklnV6P2hxtMNrCboOjAcyBuQnWEhO665FwrSNRxU+AqpsyvO6LgGYPspN+lu5CLtw4jPRKNA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/now-and-later": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/now-and-later/-/now-and-later-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-KGvQ0cB70AQfg107Xvs/Fbu+dGmZoTRJp2TaPwcwQm3/7PteUyN2BCgk8KBMPGBUXZdVwyWS8fDCGFygBm19UQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"once": "^1.3.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/npm-run-path": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/npm-run-path/-/npm-run-path-2.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lJxZYlT4DW/bRUtFh1MQIWqmLwQfAxnqWG4HhEdjMlkrJYnJn0Jrr2u3mgxqaWsdiBc76TYkTG/mhrnYTuzfHw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"path-key": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/num2fraction": {
"version": "1.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/num2fraction/-/num2fraction-1.2.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Y1wZESM7VUThYY+4W+X4ySH2maqcA+p7UR+w8VWNWVAd6lwuXXWz/w/Cz43J/dI2I+PS6wD5N+bJUF+gjWvIqg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/number-is-nan": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/number-is-nan/-/number-is-nan-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4jbtZXNAsfZbAHiiqjLPBiCl16dES1zI4Hpzzxw61Tk+loF+sBDBKx1ICKKKwIqQ7M0mFn1TmkN7euSncWgHiQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object-assign": {
"version": "4.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-assign/-/object-assign-4.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rJgTQnkUnH1sFw8yT6VSU3zD3sWmu6sZhIseY8VX+GRu3P6F7Fu+JNDoXfklElbLJSnc3FUQHVe4cU5hj+BcUg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object-copy": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-copy/-/object-copy-0.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-79LYn6VAb63zgtmAteVOWo9Vdj71ZVBy3Pbse+VqxDpEP83XuujMrGqHIwAXJ5I/aM0zU7dIyIAhifVTPrNItQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"copy-descriptor": "^0.1.0",
"define-property": "^0.2.5",
"kind-of": "^3.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object-copy/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "0.2.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-0.2.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Rr7ADjQZenceVOAKop6ALkkRAmH1A4Gx9hV/7ZujPUN2rkATqFO0JZLZInbAjpZYoJ1gUx8MRMQVkYemcbMSTA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object-copy/node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.1.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-0.1.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3grZTvObeN1xud4cRWl366OMXZTj0+HGyk4hvfpx4ZHt1Pb60ANSXqCK7pdOTeUQpRzECBSTphqvD7U+l22Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/object-copy/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-3.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NOW9QQXMoZGg/oqnVNoNTTIFEIid1627WCffUBJEdMxYApq7mNE7CpzucIPc+ZQg25Phej7IJSmX3hO+oblOtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object-keys": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-keys/-/object-keys-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NuAESUOUMrlIXOfHKzD6bpPu3tYt3xvjNdRIQ+FeT0lNb4K8WR70CaDxhuNguS2XG+GjkyMwOzsN5ZktImfhLA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
"node_modules/object-visit": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-visit/-/object-visit-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GBaMwwAVK9qbQN3Scdo0OyvgPW7l3lnaVMj84uTOZlswkX0KpF6fyDBJhtTthf7pymztoN36/KEr1DyhF96zEA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object.assign": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "4.1.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object.assign/-/object.assign-4.1.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-byy+U7gp+FVwmyzKPYhW2h5l3crpmGsxl7X2s8y43IgxvG4g3QZ6CffDtsNQy1WsmZpQbO+ybo0AlW7TY6DcBQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"call-bind": "^1.0.5",
"define-properties": "^1.2.1",
"has-symbols": "^1.0.3",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"object-keys": "^1.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/object.defaults": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object.defaults/-/object.defaults-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-c/K0mw/F11k4dEUBMW8naXUuBuhxRCfG7W+yFy8EcijU/rSmazOUd1XAEEe6bC0OuXY4HUKjTJv7xbxIMqdxrA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-each": "^1.0.1",
"array-slice": "^1.0.0",
"for-own": "^1.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object.map": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object.map/-/object.map-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3+mAJu2PLfnSVGHwIWubpOFLscJANBKuB/6A4CxBstc4aqwQY0FWcsppuy4jU5GSB95yES5JHSI+33AWuS4k6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"for-own": "^1.0.0",
"make-iterator": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object.pick": {
"version": "1.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object.pick/-/object.pick-1.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tqa/UMy/CCoYmj+H5qc07qvSL9dqcs/WZENZ1JbtWBlATP+iVOe778gE6MSijnyCnORzDuX6hU+LA4SZ09YjFQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/object.reduce": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object.reduce/-/object.reduce-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-naLhxxpUESbNkRqc35oQ2scZSJueHGQNUfMW/0U37IgN6tE2dgDWg3whf+NEliy3F/QysrO48XKUz/nGPe+AQw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"for-own": "^1.0.0",
"make-iterator": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/octokit-pagination-methods": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/octokit-pagination-methods/-/octokit-pagination-methods-1.1.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-fZ4qZdQ2nxJvtcasX7Ghl+WlWS/d9IgnBIwFZXVNNZUmzpno91SX5bc5vuxiuKoCtK78XxGGNuSCrDC7xYB3OQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/once": {
"version": "1.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/once/-/once-1.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-lNaJgI+2Q5URQBkccEKHTQOPaXdUxnZZElQTZY0MFUAuaEqe1E+Nyvgdz/aIyNi6Z9MzO5dv1H8n58/GELp3+w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"wrappy": "1"
}
},
"node_modules/onetime": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/onetime/-/onetime-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-oyyPpiMaKARvvcgip+JV+7zci5L8D1W9RZIz2l1o08AM3pfspitVWnPt3mzHcBPp12oYMTy0pqrFs/C+m3EwsQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"mimic-fn": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/ordered-read-streams": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ordered-read-streams/-/ordered-read-streams-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Z87aSjx3r5c0ZB7bcJqIgIRX5bxR7A4aSzvIbaxd0oTkWBCOoKfuGHiKj60CHVUgg1Phm5yMZzBdt8XqRs73Mw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "^2.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/os-homedir": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/os-homedir/-/os-homedir-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-B5JU3cabzk8c67mRRd3ECmROafjYMXbuzlwtqdM8IbS8ktlTix8aFGb2bAGKrSRIlnfKwovGUUr72JUPyOb6kQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/os-locale": {
"version": "1.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/os-locale/-/os-locale-1.4.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-PRT7ZORmwu2MEFt4/fv3Q+mEfN4zetKxufQrkShY2oGvUms9r8otu5HfdyIFHkYXjO7laNsoVGmM2MANfuTA8g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"lcid": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/os-name": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/os-name/-/os-name-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h8L+8aNjNcMpo/mAIBPn5PXCM16iyPGjHNWo6U1YO8sJTMHtEtyczI6QJnLoplswm6goopQkqc7OAnjhWcugVg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"macos-release": "^2.2.0",
"windows-release": "^3.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/os-tmpdir": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/os-tmpdir/-/os-tmpdir-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-D2FR03Vir7FIu45XBY20mTb+/ZSWB00sjU9jdQXt83gDrI4Ztz5Fs7/yy74g2N5SVQY4xY1qDr4rNddwYRVX0g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/p-finally": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/p-finally/-/p-finally-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LICb2p9CB7FS+0eR1oqWnHhp0FljGLZCWBE9aix0Uye9W8LTQPwMTYVGWQWIw9RdQiDg4+epXQODwIYJtSJaow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/p-map": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/p-map/-/p-map-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-r6zKACMNhjPJMTl8KcFH4li//gkrXWfbD6feV8l6doRHlzljFWGJ2AP6iKaCJXyZmAUMOPtvbW7EXkbWO/pLEA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"node_modules/package-json-from-dist": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/package-json-from-dist/-/package-json-from-dist-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dATvCeZN/8wQsGywez1mzHtTlP22H8OEfPrVMLNr4/eGa+ijtLn/6M5f0dY8UKNrC2O9UCU6SSoG3qRKnt7STw==",
"license": "BlueOak-1.0.0"
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/parse-filepath": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/parse-filepath/-/parse-filepath-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FwdRXKCohSVeXqwtYonZTXtbGJKrn+HNyWDYVcp5yuJlesTwNH4rsmRZ+GrKAPJ5bLpRxESMeS+Rl0VCHRvB2Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-absolute": "^1.0.0",
"map-cache": "^0.2.0",
"path-root": "^0.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8"
}
},
"node_modules/parse-import": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/parse-import/-/parse-import-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-c59vdx1LiQT+majNKMyfFLrNMAVS9U1bychTv3CEuxbKspgnVTrzLRtgtfCWyAmTuFAxQVSJFasVv8svJLksIg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-imports": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/parse-json": {
"version": "2.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/parse-json/-/parse-json-2.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QR/GGaKCkhwk1ePQNYDRKYZ3mwU9ypsKhB0XyFnLQdomyEqk3e8wpW3V5Jp88zbxK4n5ST1nqo+g9juTpownhQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"error-ex": "^1.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/parse-node-version": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/parse-node-version/-/parse-node-version-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3YHlOa/JgH6Mnpr05jP9eDG254US9ek25LyIxZlDItp2iJtwyaXQb57lBYLdT3MowkUFYEV2XXNAYIPlESvJlA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/parse-passwd": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/parse-passwd/-/parse-passwd-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1Y1A//QUXEZK7YKz+rD9WydcE1+EuPr6ZBgKecAB8tmoW6UFv0NREVJe1p+jRxtThkcbbKkfwIbWJe/IeE6m2Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/pascalcase": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pascalcase/-/pascalcase-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-XHXfu/yOQRy9vYOtUDVMN60OEJjW013GoObG1o+xwQTpB9eYJX/BjXMsdW13ZDPruFhYYn0AG22w0xgQMwl3Nw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/path-dirname": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-dirname/-/path-dirname-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ALzNPpyNq9AqXMBjeymIjFDAkAFH06mHJH/cSBHAgU0s4vfpBn6b2nf8tiRLvagKD8RbTpq2FKTBg7cl9l3c7Q==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/path-exists": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-exists/-/path-exists-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-yTltuKuhtNeFJKa1PiRzfLAU5182q1y4Eb4XCJ3PBqyzEDkAZRzBrKKBct682ls9reBVHf9udYLN5Nd+K1B9BQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"pinkie-promise": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/path-is-absolute": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-is-absolute/-/path-is-absolute-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-AVbw3UJ2e9bq64vSaS9Am0fje1Pa8pbGqTTsmXfaIiMpnr5DlDhfJOuLj9Sf95ZPVDAUerDfEk88MPmPe7UCQg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/path-is-inside": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-is-inside/-/path-is-inside-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-DUWJr3+ULp4zXmol/SZkFf3JGsS9/SIv+Y3Rt93/UjPpDpklB5f1er4O3POIbUuUJ3FXgqte2Q7SrU6zAqwk8w==",
"license": "(WTFPL OR MIT)"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/path-key": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-key/-/path-key-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-fEHGKCSmUSDPv4uoj8AlD+joPlq3peND+HRYyxFz4KPw4z926S/b8rIuFs2FYJg3BwsxJf6A9/3eIdLaYC+9Dw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/path-parse": {
"version": "1.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-parse/-/path-parse-1.0.7.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-LDJzPVEEEPR+y48z93A0Ed0yXb8pAByGWo/k5YYdYgpY2/2EsOsksJrq7lOHxryrVOn1ejG6oAp8ahvOIQD8sw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/path-root": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-root/-/path-root-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QLcPegTHF11axjfojBIoDygmS2E3Lf+8+jI6wOVmNVenrKSo3mFdSGiIgdSHenczw3wPtlVMQaFVwGmM7BJdtg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"path-root-regex": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/path-root-regex": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-root-regex/-/path-root-regex-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4GlJ6rZDhQZFE0DPVKh0e9jmZ5egZfxTkp7bcRDuPlJXbAwhxcl2dINPUAsjLdejqaLsCeg8axcLjIbvBjN4pQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/path-scurry": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "1.11.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-scurry/-/path-scurry-1.11.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Xa4Nw17FS9ApQFJ9umLiJS4orGjm7ZzwUrwamcGQuHSzDyth9boKDaycYdDcZDuqYATXw4HFXgaqWTctW/v1HA==",
"license": "BlueOak-1.0.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"lru-cache": "^10.2.0",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"minipass": "^5.0.0 || ^6.0.2 || ^7.0.0"
},
"engines": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"node": ">=16 || 14 >=14.18"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/path-type": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-type/-/path-type-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-S4eENJz1pkiQn9Znv33Q+deTOKmbl+jj1Fl+qiP/vYezj+S8x+J3Uo0ISrx/QoEvIlOaDWJhPaRd1flJ9HXZqg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.2",
"pify": "^2.0.0",
"pinkie-promise": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/path-type/node_modules/pify": {
"version": "2.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pify/-/pify-2.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-udgsAY+fTnvv7kI7aaxbqwWNb0AHiB0qBO89PZKPkoTmGOgdbrHDKD+0B2X4uTfJ/FT1R09r9gTsjUjNJotuog==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/picocolors": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/picocolors/-/picocolors-0.2.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-cMlDqaLEqfSaW8Z7N5Jw+lyIW869EzT73/F5lhtY9cLGoVxSXznfgfXMO0Z5K0o0Q2TkTXq+0KFsdnSe3jDViA==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/pify": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pify/-/pify-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3FsVNH1udSEX48gGX1xfvwTWfsYWj5U+8/uK15BGzIGrKoUpghX8hWZwa/OFnakBiiVNmBvemTJR5mcy7iPcg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/pinkie": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pinkie/-/pinkie-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-MnUuEycAemtSaeFSjXKW/aroV7akBbY+Sv+RkyqFjgAe73F+MR0TBWKBRDkmfWq/HiFmdavfZ1G7h4SPZXaCSg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/pinkie-promise": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pinkie-promise/-/pinkie-promise-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0Gni6D4UcLTbv9c57DfxDGdr41XfgUjqWZu492f0cIGr16zDU06BWP/RAEvOuo7CQ0CNjHaLlM59YJJFm3NWlw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"pinkie": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/plugin-error": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plugin-error/-/plugin-error-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L1zP0dk7vGweZME2i+EeakvUNqSrdiI3F91TwEoYiGrAfUXmVv6fJIq4g82PAXxNsWOp0J7ZqQy/3Szz0ajTxA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-colors": "^1.0.1",
"arr-diff": "^4.0.0",
"arr-union": "^3.1.0",
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/plugin-error/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/plugin-error/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/plugin-error/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/plur": {
"version": "3.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/plur/-/plur-3.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-t1Ax8KUvV3FFII8ltczPn2tJdjqbd1sIzu6t4JL7nQ3EyeL/lTrj5PWKb06ic5/6XYDr65rQ4uzQEGN70/6X5w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"irregular-plurals": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
}
},
"node_modules/posix-character-classes": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/posix-character-classes/-/posix-character-classes-0.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-xTgYBc3fuo7Yt7JbiuFxSYGToMoz8fLoE6TC9Wx1P/u+LfeThMOAqmuyECnlBaaJb+u1m9hHiXUEtwW4OzfUJg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/postcss": {
"version": "7.0.39",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/postcss/-/postcss-7.0.39.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-yioayjNbHn6z1/Bywyb2Y4s3yvDAeXGOyxqD+LnVOinq6Mdmd++SW2wUNVzavyyHxd6+DxzWGIuosg6P1Rj8uA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"picocolors": "^0.2.1",
"source-map": "^0.6.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6.0.0"
},
"funding": {
"type": "opencollective",
"url": "https://opencollective.com/postcss/"
}
},
"node_modules/postcss-value-parser": {
"version": "4.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/postcss-value-parser/-/postcss-value-parser-4.2.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-1NNCs6uurfkVbeXG4S8JFT9t19m45ICnif8zWLd5oPSZ50QnwMfK+H3jv408d4jw/7Bttv5axS5IiHoLaVNHeQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/pretty-hrtime": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pretty-hrtime/-/pretty-hrtime-1.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-66hKPCr+72mlfiSjlEB1+45IjXSqvVAIy6mocupoww4tBFE9R9IhwwUGoI4G++Tc9Aq+2rxOt0RFU6gPcrte0A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.8"
}
},
"node_modules/process-nextick-args": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/process-nextick-args/-/process-nextick-args-2.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-3ouUOpQhtgrbOa17J7+uxOTpITYWaGP7/AhoR3+A+/1e9skrzelGi/dXzEYyvbxubEF6Wn2ypscTKiKJFFn1ag==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/proto-list": {
"version": "1.2.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/proto-list/-/proto-list-1.2.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-vtK/94akxsTMhe0/cbfpR+syPuszcuwhqVjJq26CuNDgFGj682oRBXOP5MJpv2r7JtE8MsiepGIqvvOTBwn2vA==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/prr": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/prr/-/prr-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-yPw4Sng1gWghHQWj0B3ZggWUm4qVbPwPFcRG8KyxiU7J2OHFSoEHKS+EZ3fv5l1t9CyCiop6l/ZYeWbrgoQejw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/pump": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pump/-/pump-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ruPMNRkN3MHP1cWJc9OWr+T/xDP0jhXYCLfJcBuX54hhfIBnaQmAUMfDcG4DM5UMWByBbJY69QSphm3jtDKIkA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"end-of-stream": "^1.1.0",
"once": "^1.3.1"
}
},
"node_modules/pumpify": {
"version": "1.5.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/pumpify/-/pumpify-1.5.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-oClZI37HvuUJJxSKKrC17bZ9Cu0ZYhEAGPsPUy9KlMUmv9dKX2o77RUmq7f3XjIxbwyGwYzbzQ1L2Ks8sIradQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"duplexify": "^3.6.0",
"inherits": "^2.0.3",
"pump": "^2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/read-pkg": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/read-pkg/-/read-pkg-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7BGwRHqt4s/uVbuyoeejRn4YmFnYZiFl4AuaeXHlgZf3sONF0SOGlxs2Pw8g6hCKupo08RafIO5YXFNOKTfwsQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"load-json-file": "^1.0.0",
"normalize-package-data": "^2.3.2",
"path-type": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/read-pkg-up": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/read-pkg-up/-/read-pkg-up-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WD9MTlNtI55IwYUS27iHh9tK3YoIVhxis8yKhLpTqWtml739uXc9NWTpxoHkfZf3+DkCCsXox94/VWZniuZm6A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"find-up": "^1.0.0",
"read-pkg": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/readable-stream": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.3.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/readable-stream/-/readable-stream-2.3.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8p0AUk4XODgIewSi0l8Epjs+EVnWiK7NoDIEGU0HhE7+ZyY8D1IMY7odu5lRrFXGg71L15KG8QrPmum45RTtdA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"core-util-is": "~1.0.0",
"inherits": "~2.0.3",
"isarray": "~1.0.0",
"process-nextick-args": "~2.0.0",
"safe-buffer": "~5.1.1",
"string_decoder": "~1.1.1",
"util-deprecate": "~1.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/readdirp": {
"version": "2.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/readdirp/-/readdirp-2.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1JU/8q+VgFZyxwrJ+SVIOsh+KywWGpds3NTqikiKpDMZWScmAYyKIgqkO+ARvNWJfXeXR1zxz7aHF4u4CyH6vQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.11",
"micromatch": "^3.1.10",
"readable-stream": "^2.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/rechoir": {
"version": "0.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rechoir/-/rechoir-0.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HFM8rkZ+i3zrV+4LQjwQ0W+ez98pApMGM3HUrN04j3CqzPOzl9nmP15Y8YXNm8QHGv/eacOVEjqhmWpkRV0NAw==",
"dependencies": {
"resolve": "^1.1.6"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/regex-not": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/regex-not/-/regex-not-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-J6SDjUgDxQj5NusnOtdFxDwN/+HWykR8GELwctJ7mdqhcyy1xEc4SRFHUXvxTp661YaVKAjfRLZ9cCqS6tn32A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2",
"safe-regex": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/regex-not/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/regex-not/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/regex-not/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/remove-bom-buffer": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/remove-bom-buffer/-/remove-bom-buffer-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8v2rWhaakv18qcvNeli2mZ/TMTL2nEyAKRvzo1WtnZBl15SHyEhrCu2/xKlJyUFKHiHgfXIyuY6g2dObJJycXQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5",
"is-utf8": "^0.2.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/remove-bom-stream": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/remove-bom-stream/-/remove-bom-stream-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wigO8/O08XHb8YPzpDDT+QmRANfW6vLqxfaXm1YXhnFf3AkSLyjfG3GEFg4McZkmgL7KvCj5u2KczkvSP6NfHA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"remove-bom-buffer": "^3.0.0",
"safe-buffer": "^5.1.0",
"through2": "^2.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/remove-bom-stream/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/remove-trailing-separator": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/remove-trailing-separator/-/remove-trailing-separator-1.1.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-/hS+Y0u3aOfIETiaiirUFwDBDzmXPvO+jAfKTitUngIPzdKc6Z0LoFjM/CK5PL4C+eKwHohlHAb6H0VFfmmUsw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/repeat-element": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/repeat-element/-/repeat-element-1.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LFiNfRcSu7KK3evMyYOuCzv3L10TW7yC1G2/+StMjK8Y6Vqd2MG7r/Qjw4ghtuCOjFvlnms/iMmLqpvW/ES/WQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/repeat-string": {
"version": "1.6.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/repeat-string/-/repeat-string-1.6.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-PV0dzCYDNfRi1jCDbJzpW7jNNDRuCOG/jI5ctQcGKt/clZD+YcPS3yIlWuTJMmESC8aevCFmWJy5wjAFgNqN6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/replace-ext": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/replace-ext/-/replace-ext-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-yD5BHCe7quCgBph4rMQ+0KkIRKwWCrHDOX1p1Gp6HwjPM5kVoCdKGNhN7ydqqsX6lJEnQDKZ/tFMiEdQ1dvPEw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/replace-homedir": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/replace-homedir/-/replace-homedir-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-CHPV/GAglbIB1tnQgaiysb8H2yCy8WQ7lcEwQ/eT+kLj0QHV8LnJW0zpqpE7RSkrMSRoa+EBoag86clf7WAgSg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"homedir-polyfill": "^1.0.1",
"is-absolute": "^1.0.0",
"remove-trailing-separator": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/replacestream": {
"version": "4.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/replacestream/-/replacestream-4.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-AC0FiLS352pBBiZhd4VXB1Ab/lh0lEgpP+GGvZqbQh8a5cmXVoTe5EX/YeTFArnp4SRGTHh1qCHu9lGs1qG8sA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.3",
"object-assign": "^4.0.1",
"readable-stream": "^2.0.2"
}
},
"node_modules/require-dir": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/require-dir/-/require-dir-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LY85DTSu+heYgDqq/mK+7zFHWkttVNRXC9NKcKGyuGLdlsfbjEPrIEYdCVrx6hqnJb+xSu3Lzaoo8VnmOhhjNA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/require-directory": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/require-directory/-/require-directory-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-fGxEI7+wsG9xrvdjsrlmL22OMTTiHRwAMroiEeMgq8gzoLC/PQr7RsRDSTLUg/bZAZtF+TVIkHc6/4RIKrui+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/require-dot-file": {
"version": "0.4.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/require-dot-file/-/require-dot-file-0.4.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-pMe/T7+uFi2NMYsxuQtTh9n/UKD13HAHeDOk7KuP2pr7aKi5aMhvkbGD4IeoJKjy+3vdIUy8ggXYWzlZTL5FWA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/require-main-filename": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/require-main-filename/-/require-main-filename-1.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-IqSUtOVP4ksd1C/ej5zeEh/BIP2ajqpn8c5x+q99gvcIG/Qf0cud5raVnE/Dwd0ua9TXYDoDc0RE5hBSdz22Ug==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/resolve": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.22.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/resolve/-/resolve-1.22.8.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-oKWePCxqpd6FlLvGV1VU0x7bkPmmCNolxzjMf4NczoDnQcIWrAF+cPtZn5i6n+RfD2d9i0tzpKnG6Yk168yIyw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-core-module": "^2.13.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"path-parse": "^1.0.7",
"supports-preserve-symlinks-flag": "^1.0.0"
},
"bin": {
"resolve": "bin/resolve"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/resolve-dir": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/resolve-dir/-/resolve-dir-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-R7uiTjECzvOsWSfdM0QKFNBVFcK27aHOUwdvK53BcW8zqnGdYp0Fbj82cy54+2A4P2tFM22J5kRfe1R+lM/1yg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"expand-tilde": "^2.0.0",
"global-modules": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/resolve-options": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/resolve-options/-/resolve-options-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NYDgziiroVeDC29xq7bp/CacZERYsA9bXYd1ZmcJlF3BcrZv5pTb4NG7SjdyKDnXZ84aC4vo2u6sNKIA1LCu/A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"value-or-function": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/resolve-url": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/resolve-url/-/resolve-url-0.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZuF55hVUQaaczgOIwqWzkEcEidmlD/xl44x1UZnhOXcYuFN2S6+rcxpG+C1N3So0wvNI3DmJICUFfu2SxhBmvg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "https://github.com/lydell/resolve-url#deprecated",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/restore-cursor": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/restore-cursor/-/restore-cursor-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-6IzJLuGi4+R14vwagDHX+JrXmPVtPpn4mffDJ1UdR7/Edm87fl6yi8mMBIVvFtJaNTUvjughmW4hwLhRG7gC1Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"onetime": "^2.0.0",
"signal-exit": "^3.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/ret": {
"version": "0.1.15",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ret/-/ret-0.1.15.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-TTlYpa+OL+vMMNG24xSlQGEJ3B/RzEfUlLct7b5G/ytav+wPrplCpVMFuwzXbkecJrb6IYo1iFb0S9v37754mg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.12"
}
},
"node_modules/rework": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rework/-/rework-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-eEjL8FdkdsxApd0yWVZgBGzfCQiT8yqSc2H1p4jpZpQdtz7ohETiDMoje5PlM8I9WgkqkreVxFUKYOiJdVWDXw==",
"dependencies": {
"convert-source-map": "^0.3.3",
"css": "^2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-import": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rework-import/-/rework-import-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ufvoQX6cDhrqYc8ZXvJ+6FqimwyI4qn8cH1ypAiS9Mn41iVPN/9RGwRvscBtUEkHA09w8voTIakRJKslgWcTEQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"css": "^2.0.0",
"globby": "^2.0.0",
"parse-import": "^2.0.0",
"url-regex": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-import/node_modules/glob": {
"version": "5.0.15",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/glob/-/glob-5.0.15.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-c9IPMazfRITpmAAKi22dK1VKxGDX9ehhqfABDriL/lzO92xcUKEJPQHrVA/2YHSNFB4iFlykVmWvwo48nr3OxA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "Glob versions prior to v9 are no longer supported",
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inflight": "^1.0.4",
"inherits": "2",
"minimatch": "2 || 3",
"once": "^1.3.0",
"path-is-absolute": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-import/node_modules/globby": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/globby/-/globby-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-CqRID2dMaN4Zi9PANiQHhmKaGu7ZASehBLnaDogjR9L3L1EqAGFhflafT0IrSN/zm9xFk+KMTXZCN8pUYOiO/Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"array-union": "^1.0.1",
"async": "^1.2.1",
"glob": "^5.0.3",
"object-assign": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-import/node_modules/object-assign": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/object-assign/-/object-assign-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jHP15vXVGeVh1HuaA2wY6lxk+whK/x4KBG88VXeRma7CCun7iGD5qPc4eYykQ9sdQvg8jkwFKsSxHln2ybW3xQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-plugin-function": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rework-plugin-function/-/rework-plugin-function-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kyIphbC2Kuc3iFz1CSAQ5zmt4o/IHquhO+uG0kK0FQTjs4Z5eAxrqmrv3rZMR1KXa77SesaW9KwKyfbYoLMEqw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"rework-visit": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-plugin-url": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rework-plugin-url/-/rework-plugin-url-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-qlAhbJKfEK59jAPQppIn8bNXffW1INlaJZaXdX/ZLs/CzZSnn38Y0wESQ3tjOwRsDbPEUHN2XJ3ZgueDaaCC0A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"rework-plugin-function": "^1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rework-visit": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rework-visit/-/rework-visit-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-W6V2fix7nCLUYX1v6eGPrBOZlc03/faqzP4sUxMAJMBMOPYhfV/RyLegTufn5gJKaOITyi+gvf0LXDZ9NzkHnQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/rework/node_modules/convert-source-map": {
"version": "0.3.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/convert-source-map/-/convert-source-map-0.3.5.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-+4nRk0k3oEpwUB7/CalD7xE2z4VmtEnnq0GO2IPTkrooTrAhEsWvuLF5iWP1dXrwluki/azwXV1ve7gtYuPldg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/right-align": {
"version": "0.1.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/right-align/-/right-align-0.1.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-yqINtL/G7vs2v+dFIZmFUDbnVyFUJFKd6gK22Kgo6R4jfJGFtisKyncWDDULgjfqf4ASQuIQyjJ7XZ+3aWpsAg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"align-text": "^0.1.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rimraf": {
"version": "2.7.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.7.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-uWjbaKIK3T1OSVptzX7Nl6PvQ3qAGtKEtVRjRuazjfL3Bx5eI409VZSqgND+4UNnmzLVdPj9FqFJNPqBZFve4w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "Rimraf versions prior to v4 are no longer supported",
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"glob": "^7.1.3"
},
"bin": {
"rimraf": "bin.js"
}
},
"node_modules/rtlcss": {
"version": "2.6.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rtlcss/-/rtlcss-2.6.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-06LFAr+GAPo+BvaynsXRfoYTJvSaWRyOhURCQ7aeI1MKph9meM222F+Zkt3bDamyHHJuGi3VPtiRkpyswmQbGA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"@choojs/findup": "^0.2.1",
"chalk": "^2.4.2",
"mkdirp": "^0.5.1",
"postcss": "^6.0.23",
"strip-json-comments": "^2.0.0"
},
"bin": {
"rtlcss": "bin/rtlcss.js"
}
},
"node_modules/rtlcss/node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "3.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-3.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VT0ZI6kZRdTh8YyJw3SMbYm/u+NqfsAxEpWO0Pf9sq8/e94WxxOpPKx9FR1FlyCtOVDNOQ+8ntlqFxiRc+r5qA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-convert": "^1.9.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/rtlcss/node_modules/chalk": {
"version": "2.4.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/chalk/-/chalk-2.4.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Mti+f9lpJNcwF4tWV8/OrTTtF1gZi+f8FqlyAdouralcFWFQWF2+NgCHShjkCb+IFBLq9buZwE1xckQU4peSuQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^3.2.1",
"escape-string-regexp": "^1.0.5",
"supports-color": "^5.3.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/rtlcss/node_modules/postcss": {
"version": "6.0.23",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/postcss/-/postcss-6.0.23.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-soOk1h6J3VMTZtVeVpv15/Hpdl2cBLX3CAw4TAbkpTJiNPk9YP/zWcD1ND+xEtvyuuvKzbxliTOIyvkSeSJ6ag==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"chalk": "^2.4.1",
"source-map": "^0.6.1",
"supports-color": "^5.4.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rtlcss/node_modules/supports-color": {
"version": "5.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-color/-/supports-color-5.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-QjVjwdXIt408MIiAqCX4oUKsgU2EqAGzs2Ppkm4aQYbjm+ZEWEcW4SfFNTr4uMNZma0ey4f5lgLrkB0aX0QMow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"has-flag": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/run-async": {
"version": "2.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/run-async/-/run-async-2.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tvVnVv01b8c1RrA6Ep7JkStj85Guv/YrMcwqYQnwjsAS2cTmmPGBBjAjpCW7RrSodNSoE2/qg9O4bceNvUuDgQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.12.0"
}
},
"node_modules/rxjs": {
"version": "6.6.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/rxjs/-/rxjs-6.6.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-hTdwr+7yYNIT5n4AMYp85KA6yw2Va0FLa3Rguvbpa4W3I5xynaBZo41cM3XM+4Q6fRMj3sBYIR1VAmZMXYJvRQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"tslib": "^1.9.0"
},
"engines": {
"npm": ">=2.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/safe-buffer": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "5.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/safe-buffer/-/safe-buffer-5.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Gd2UZBJDkXlY7GbJxfsE8/nvKkUEU1G38c1siN6QP6a9PT9MmHB8GnpscSmMJSoF8LOIrt8ud/wPtojys4G6+g==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/safe-regex": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/safe-regex/-/safe-regex-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aJXcif4xnaNUzvUuC5gcb46oTS7zvg4jpMTnuqtrEPlR3vFr4pxtdTwaF1Qs3Enjn9HK+ZlwQui+a7z0SywIzg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ret": "~0.1.10"
}
},
"node_modules/safer-buffer": {
"version": "2.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/safer-buffer/-/safer-buffer-2.1.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-YZo3K82SD7Riyi0E1EQPojLz7kpepnSQI9IyPbHHg1XXXevb5dJI7tpyN2ADxGcQbHG7vcyRHk0cbwqcQriUtg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/semver": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "5.7.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/semver/-/semver-5.7.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cBznnQ9KjJqU67B52RMC65CMarK2600WFnbkcaiwWq3xy/5haFJlshgnpjovMVJ+Hff49d8GEn0b87C5pDQ10g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"bin": {
"semver": "bin/semver"
}
},
"node_modules/semver-greatest-satisfied-range": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/semver-greatest-satisfied-range/-/semver-greatest-satisfied-range-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Ny/iyOzSSa8M5ML46IAx3iXc6tfOsYU2R4AXi2UpHk60Zrgyq6eqPj/xiOfS0rRl/iiQ/rdJkVjw/5cdUyCntQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"sver-compat": "^1.5.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/set-blocking": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/set-blocking/-/set-blocking-2.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-KiKBS8AnWGEyLzofFfmvKwpdPzqiy16LvQfK3yv/fVH7Bj13/wl3JSR1J+rfgRE9q7xUJK4qvgS8raSOeLUehw==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/set-function-length": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "1.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/set-function-length/-/set-function-length-1.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-pgRc4hJ4/sNjWCSS9AmnS40x3bNMDTknHgL5UaMBTMyJnU90EgWh1Rz+MC9eFu4BuN/UwZjKQuY/1v3rM7HMfg==",
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"define-data-property": "^1.1.4",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"es-errors": "^1.3.0",
"function-bind": "^1.1.2",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"get-intrinsic": "^1.2.4",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"gopd": "^1.0.1",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"has-property-descriptors": "^1.0.2"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/set-value": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/set-value/-/set-value-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-JxHc1weCN68wRY0fhCoXpyK55m/XPHafOmK4UWD7m2CI14GMcFypt4w/0+NV5f/ZMby2F6S2wwA7fgynh9gWSw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"is-extendable": "^0.1.1",
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.3",
"split-string": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/set-value/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/shebang-command": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shebang-command/-/shebang-command-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-EV3L1+UQWGor21OmnvojK36mhg+TyIKDh3iFBKBohr5xeXIhNBcx8oWdgkTEEQ+BEFFYdLRuqMfd5L84N1V5Vg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"shebang-regex": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/shebang-regex": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shebang-regex/-/shebang-regex-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wpoSFAxys6b2a2wHZ1XpDSgD7N9iVjg29Ph9uV/uaP9Ex/KXlkTZTeddxDPSYQpgvzKLGJke2UU0AzoGCjNIvQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/shellwords": {
"version": "0.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shellwords/-/shellwords-0.1.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-vFwSUfQvqybiICwZY5+DAWIPLKsWO31Q91JSKl3UYv+K5c2QRPzn0qzec6QPu1Qc9eHYItiP3NdJqNVqetYAww==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/signal-exit": {
"version": "3.0.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/signal-exit/-/signal-exit-3.0.7.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-wnD2ZE+l+SPC/uoS0vXeE9L1+0wuaMqKlfz9AMUo38JsyLSBWSFcHR1Rri62LZc12vLr1gb3jl7iwQhgwpAbGQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/snapdragon": {
"version": "0.8.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/snapdragon/-/snapdragon-0.8.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FtyOnWN/wCHTVXOMwvSv26d+ko5vWlIDD6zoUJ7LW8vh+ZBC8QdljveRP+crNrtBwioEUWy/4dMtbBjA4ioNlg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"base": "^0.11.1",
"debug": "^2.2.0",
"define-property": "^0.2.5",
"extend-shallow": "^2.0.1",
"map-cache": "^0.2.2",
"source-map": "^0.5.6",
"source-map-resolve": "^0.5.0",
"use": "^3.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon-node": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/snapdragon-node/-/snapdragon-node-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-O27l4xaMYt/RSQ5TR3vpWCAB5Kb/czIcqUFOM/C4fYcLnbZUc1PkjTAMjof2pBWaSTwOUd6qUHcFGVGj7aIwnw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"define-property": "^1.0.0",
"isobject": "^3.0.0",
"snapdragon-util": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon-node/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cZTYKFWspt9jZsMscWo8sc/5lbPC9Q0N5nBLgb+Yd915iL3udB1uFgS3B8YCx66UVHq018DAVFoee7x+gxggeA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon-util": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/snapdragon-util/-/snapdragon-util-3.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mbKkMdQKsjX4BAL4bRYTj21edOf8cN7XHdYUJEe+Zn99hVEYcMvKPct1IqNe7+AZPirn8BCDOQBHQZknqmKlZQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^3.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon-util/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-3.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NOW9QQXMoZGg/oqnVNoNTTIFEIid1627WCffUBJEdMxYApq7mNE7CpzucIPc+ZQg25Phej7IJSmX3hO+oblOtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "0.2.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-0.2.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Rr7ADjQZenceVOAKop6ALkkRAmH1A4Gx9hV/7ZujPUN2rkATqFO0JZLZInbAjpZYoJ1gUx8MRMQVkYemcbMSTA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon/node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.1.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-0.1.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3grZTvObeN1xud4cRWl366OMXZTj0+HGyk4hvfpx4ZHt1Pb60ANSXqCK7pdOTeUQpRzECBSTphqvD7U+l22Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/snapdragon/node_modules/source-map": {
"version": "0.5.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map/-/source-map-0.5.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LbrmJOMUSdEVxIKvdcJzQC+nQhe8FUZQTXQy6+I75skNgn3OoQ0DZA8YnFa7gp8tqtL3KPf1kmo0R5DoApeSGQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/source-map": {
"version": "0.6.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map/-/source-map-0.6.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-UjgapumWlbMhkBgzT7Ykc5YXUT46F0iKu8SGXq0bcwP5dz/h0Plj6enJqjz1Zbq2l5WaqYnrVbwWOWMyF3F47g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/source-map-resolve": {
"version": "0.5.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map-resolve/-/source-map-resolve-0.5.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Htz+RnsXWk5+P2slx5Jh3Q66vhQj1Cllm0zvnaY98+NFx+Dv2CF/f5O/t8x+KaNdrdIAsruNzoh/KpialbqAnw==",
"deprecated": "See https://github.com/lydell/source-map-resolve#deprecated",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"atob": "^2.1.2",
"decode-uri-component": "^0.2.0",
"resolve-url": "^0.2.1",
"source-map-url": "^0.4.0",
"urix": "^0.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/source-map-url": {
"version": "0.4.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map-url/-/source-map-url-0.4.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cPiFOTLUKvJFIg4SKVScy4ilPPW6rFgMgfuZJPNoDuMs3nC1HbMUycBoJw77xFIp6z1UJQJOfx6C9GMH80DiTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "See https://github.com/lydell/source-map-url#deprecated",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/sparkles": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/sparkles/-/sparkles-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-dSO0DDYUahUt/0/pD/Is3VIm5TGJjludZ0HVymmhYF6eNA53PVLhnUk0znSYbH8IYBuJdCE+1luR22jNLMaQdw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/spdx-correct": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/spdx-correct/-/spdx-correct-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kN9dJbvnySHULIluDHy32WHRUu3Og7B9sbY7tsFLctQkIqnMh3hErYgdMjTYuqmcXX+lK5T1lnUt3G7zNswmZA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.0",
"spdx-license-ids": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/spdx-exceptions": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "2.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/spdx-exceptions/-/spdx-exceptions-2.5.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-PiU42r+xO4UbUS1buo3LPJkjlO7430Xn5SVAhdpzzsPHsjbYVflnnFdATgabnLude+Cqu25p6N+g2lw/PFsa4w==",
"license": "CC-BY-3.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/spdx-expression-parse": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/spdx-expression-parse/-/spdx-expression-parse-3.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cbqHunsQWnJNE6KhVSMsMeH5H/L9EpymbzqTQ3uLwNCLZ1Q481oWaofqH7nO6V07xlXwY6PhQdQ2IedWx/ZK4Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"spdx-exceptions": "^2.1.0",
"spdx-license-ids": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/spdx-license-ids": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "3.0.18",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/spdx-license-ids/-/spdx-license-ids-3.0.18.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-xxRs31BqRYHwiMzudOrpSiHtZ8i/GeionCBDSilhYRj+9gIcI8wCZTlXZKu9vZIVqViP3dcp9qE5G6AlIaD+TQ==",
"license": "CC0-1.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/split-string": {
"version": "3.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/split-string/-/split-string-3.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NzNVhJDYpwceVVii8/Hu6DKfD2G+NrQHlS/V/qgv763EYudVwEcMQNxd2lh+0VrUByXN/oJkl5grOhYWvQUYiw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/split-string/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/split-string/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/split-string/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/sprintf-js": {
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/sprintf-js/-/sprintf-js-1.0.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-D9cPgkvLlV3t3IzL0D0YLvGA9Ahk4PcvVwUbN0dSGr1aP0Nrt4AEnTUbuGvquEC0mA64Gqt1fzirlRs5ibXx8g==",
"license": "BSD-3-Clause"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/stack-trace": {
"version": "0.0.10",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stack-trace/-/stack-trace-0.0.10.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-KGzahc7puUKkzyMt+IqAep+TVNbKP+k2Lmwhub39m1AsTSkaDutx56aDCo+HLDzf/D26BIHTJWNiTG1KAJiQCg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": "*"
}
},
"node_modules/stat-mode": {
"version": "0.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stat-mode/-/stat-mode-0.2.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-o+7DC0OM5Jt3+gratXXqfXf62V/CBoqQbT7Kp7jCxTYW2PLOB2/ZSGIfm9T5/QZe1Vw1MCbu6DoB6JnhVtxcJw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/static-extend": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/static-extend/-/static-extend-0.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-72E9+uLc27Mt718pMHt9VMNiAL4LMsmDbBva8mxWUCkT07fSzEGMYUCk0XWY6lp0j6RBAG4cJ3mWuZv2OE3s0g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"define-property": "^0.2.5",
"object-copy": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/static-extend/node_modules/define-property": {
"version": "0.2.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/define-property/-/define-property-0.2.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Rr7ADjQZenceVOAKop6ALkkRAmH1A4Gx9hV/7ZujPUN2rkATqFO0JZLZInbAjpZYoJ1gUx8MRMQVkYemcbMSTA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-descriptor": "^0.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/static-extend/node_modules/is-descriptor": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "0.1.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-descriptor/-/is-descriptor-0.1.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C3grZTvObeN1xud4cRWl366OMXZTj0+HGyk4hvfpx4ZHt1Pb60ANSXqCK7pdOTeUQpRzECBSTphqvD7U+l22Eg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"is-accessor-descriptor": "^1.0.1",
"is-data-descriptor": "^1.0.1"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"engines": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node": ">= 0.4"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/stream-exhaust": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stream-exhaust/-/stream-exhaust-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-b/qaq/GlBK5xaq1yrK9/zFcyRSTNxmcZwFLGSTG0mXgZl/4Z6GgiyYOXOvY7N3eEvFRAG1bkDRz5EPGSvPYQlw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/stream-shift": {
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"version": "1.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stream-shift/-/stream-shift-1.0.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-76ORR0DO1o1hlKwTbi/DM3EXWGf3ZJYO8cXX5RJwnul2DEg2oyoZyjLNoQM8WsvZiFKCRfC1O0J7iCvie3RZmQ==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/string_decoder": {
"version": "1.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string_decoder/-/string_decoder-1.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-n/ShnvDi6FHbbVfviro+WojiFzv+s8MPMHBczVePfUpDJLwoLT0ht1l4YwBCbi8pJAveEEdnkHyPyTP/mzRfwg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"safe-buffer": "~5.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-nOqH59deCq9SRHlxq1Aw85Jnt4w6KvLKqWVik6oA9ZklXLNIOlqg4F2yrT1MVaTjAqvVwdfeZ7w7aCvJD7ugkw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^2.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^4.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/string-width-cjs": {
"name": "string-width",
"version": "4.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-4.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wKyQRQpjJ0sIp62ErSZdGsjMJWsap5oRNihHhu6G7JVO/9jIB6UyevL+tXuOqrng8j/cxKTWyWUwvSTriiZz/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"emoji-regex": "^8.0.0",
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^3.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^6.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/string-width-cjs/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "5.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-5.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-quJQXlTSUGL2LH9SUXo8VwsY4soanhgo6LNSm84E1LBcE8s3O0wpdiRzyR9z/ZZJMlMWv37qOOb9pdJlMUEKFQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/string-width-cjs/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zymm5+u+sCsSWyD9qNaejV3DFvhCKclKdizYaJUuHA83RLjb7nSuGnddCHGv0hk+KY7BMAlsWeK4Ueg6EV6XQg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/string-width-cjs/node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-6.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y38VPSHcqkFrCpFnQ9vuSXmquuv5oXOKpGeT6aGrr3o3Gc9AlVa6JBfUSOCnbxGGZF+/0ooI7KrPuUSztUdU5A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^5.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/string-width/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-3.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+O9Jct8wf++lXxxFc4hc8LsjaSq0HFzzL7cVsw8pRDIPdjKD2mT4ytDZlLuSBZ4cLKZFXIrMGO7DbQCtMJJMKw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/string-width/node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "4.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-4.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4XaJ2zQdCzROZDivEVIDPkcQn8LMFSa8kj8Gxb/Lnwzv9A8VctNZ+lfivC/sV3ivW8ElJTERXZoPBRrZKkNKow==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/stringify-object": {
"version": "3.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/stringify-object/-/stringify-object-3.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-rHqiFh1elqCQ9WPLIC8I0Q/g/wj5J1eMkyoiD6eoQApWHP0FtlK7rqnhmabL5VUY9JQCcqwwvlOaSuutekgyrw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-2-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-own-enumerable-property-symbols": "^3.0.0",
"is-obj": "^1.0.1",
"is-regexp": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-3.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VhumSSbBqDTP8p2ZLKj40UjBCV4+v8bUSEpUb4KjRgWk9pbqGF4REFj6KEagidb2f/M6AzC0EmFyDNGaw9OCzg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/strip-ansi-cjs": {
"name": "strip-ansi",
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-6.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y38VPSHcqkFrCpFnQ9vuSXmquuv5oXOKpGeT6aGrr3o3Gc9AlVa6JBfUSOCnbxGGZF+/0ooI7KrPuUSztUdU5A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^5.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-ansi-cjs/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "5.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-5.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-quJQXlTSUGL2LH9SUXo8VwsY4soanhgo6LNSm84E1LBcE8s3O0wpdiRzyR9z/ZZJMlMWv37qOOb9pdJlMUEKFQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/strip-bom": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-bom/-/strip-bom-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-kwrX1y7czp1E69n2ajbG65mIo9dqvJ+8aBQXOGVxqwvNbsXdFM6Lq37dLAY3mknUwru8CfcCbfOLL/gMo+fi3g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-utf8": "^0.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-bom-buf": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-bom-buf/-/strip-bom-buf-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1sUIL1jck0T1mhOLP2c696BIznzT525Lkub+n4jjMHjhjhoAQA6Ye659DxdlZBr0aLDMQoTxKIpnlqxgtwjsuQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-utf8": "^0.2.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-bom-stream": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-bom-stream/-/strip-bom-stream-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2di6sulSHfspbuEJHwwF6vzwijA4uaKsKYtviRQsJsOdxxb6yexiDcZFQ5oY10J50YxmCdHn/1sQmxDKbrGOVw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"first-chunk-stream": "^2.0.0",
"strip-bom-buf": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=4"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-eof": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-eof/-/strip-eof-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-7FCwGGmx8mD5xQd3RPUvnSpUXHM3BWuzjtpD4TXsfcZ9EL4azvVVUscFYwD9nx8Kh+uCBC00XBtAykoMHwTh8Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/strip-json-comments": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-json-comments/-/strip-json-comments-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-4gB8na07fecVVkOI6Rs4e7T6NOTki5EmL7TUduTs6bu3EdnSycntVJ4re8kgZA+wx9IueI2Y11bfbgwtzuE0KQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/supports-color": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-color/-/supports-color-2.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-KKNVtd6pCYgPIKU4cp2733HWYCpplQhddZLBUryaAHou723x+FRzQ5Df824Fj+IyyuiQTRoub4SnIFfIcrp70g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8.0"
}
},
"node_modules/supports-preserve-symlinks-flag": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-preserve-symlinks-flag/-/supports-preserve-symlinks-flag-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ot0WnXS9fgdkgIcePe6RHNk1WA8+muPa6cSjeR3V8K27q9BB1rTE3R1p7Hv0z1ZyAc8s6Vvv8DIyWf681MAt0w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.4"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
}
},
"node_modules/sver-compat": {
"version": "1.5.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/sver-compat/-/sver-compat-1.5.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aFTHfmjwizMNlNE6dsGmoAM4lHjL0CyiobWaFiXWSlD7cIxshW422Nb8KbXCmR6z+0ZEPY+daXJrDyh/vuwTyg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"es6-iterator": "^2.0.1",
"es6-symbol": "^3.1.1"
}
},
"node_modules/ternary-stream": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ternary-stream/-/ternary-stream-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-j6ei9hxSoyGlqTmoMjOm+QNvUKDOIY6bNl4Uh1lhBvl6yjPW2iLqxDUYyfDPZknQ4KdRziFl+ec99iT4l7g0cw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"duplexify": "^3.5.0",
"fork-stream": "^0.0.4",
"merge-stream": "^1.0.0",
"through2": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/ternary-stream/node_modules/merge-stream": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/merge-stream/-/merge-stream-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-e6RM36aegd4f+r8BZCcYXlO2P3H6xbUM6ktL2Xmf45GAOit9bI4z6/3VU7JwllVO1L7u0UDSg/EhzQ5lmMLolA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "^2.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/ternary-stream/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/textextensions": {
"version": "3.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/textextensions/-/textextensions-3.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mk82dS8eRABNbeVJrEiN5/UMSCliINAuz8mkUwH4SwslkNP//gbEzlWNS5au0z5Dpx40SQxzqZevZkn+WYJ9Dw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://bevry.me/fund"
}
},
"node_modules/through": {
"version": "2.3.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through/-/through-2.3.8.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-w89qg7PI8wAdvX60bMDP+bFoD5Dvhm9oLheFp5O4a2QF0cSBGsBX4qZmadPMvVqlLJBBci+WqGGOAPvcDeNSVg==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/through2": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-enaDQ4MUyP2W6ZyT6EsMzqBPZaM/avg8iuo+l2d3QCs0J+6RaqkHV/2/lOwDTueBHeJ/2LG9lrLW3d5rWPucuQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"inherits": "^2.0.4",
"readable-stream": "2 || 3"
}
},
"node_modules/through2-filter": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2-filter/-/through2-filter-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jaRjI2WxN3W1V8/FMZ9HKIBXixtiqs3SQSX4/YGIiP3gL6djW48VoZq9tDqeCWs3MT8YY5wb/zli8VW8snY1CA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"through2": "~2.0.0",
"xtend": "~4.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/through2-filter/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/tildify": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tildify/-/tildify-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y9q1GaV/BO65Z9Yf4NOGMuwt3SGdptkZBnaaKfTQakrDyCLiuO1Kc5wxW4xLdsjzunRtqtOdhekiUFmZbklwYQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"os-homedir": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/time-stamp": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/time-stamp/-/time-stamp-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-gLCeArryy2yNTRzTGKbZbloctj64jkZ57hj5zdraXue6aFgd6PmvVtEyiUU+hvU0v7q08oVv8r8ev0tRo6bvgw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/tmp": {
"version": "0.0.33",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tmp/-/tmp-0.0.33.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-jRCJlojKnZ3addtTOjdIqoRuPEKBvNXcGYqzO6zWZX8KfKEpnGY5jfggJQ3EjKuu8D4bJRr0y+cYJFmYbImXGw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"os-tmpdir": "~1.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.6.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-absolute-glob": {
"version": "2.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/to-absolute-glob/-/to-absolute-glob-2.0.2.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-rtwLUQEwT8ZeKQbyFJyomBRYXyE16U5VKuy0ftxLMK/PZb2fkOsg5r9kHdauuVDbsNdIBoC/HCthpidamQFXYA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-absolute": "^1.0.0",
"is-negated-glob": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-object-path": {
"version": "0.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/to-object-path/-/to-object-path-0.3.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-9mWHdnGRuh3onocaHzukyvCZhzvr6tiflAy/JRFXcJX0TjgfWA9pk9t8CMbzmBE4Jfw58pXbkngtBtqYxzNEyg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"kind-of": "^3.0.2"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-object-path/node_modules/kind-of": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/kind-of/-/kind-of-3.2.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-NOW9QQXMoZGg/oqnVNoNTTIFEIid1627WCffUBJEdMxYApq7mNE7CpzucIPc+ZQg25Phej7IJSmX3hO+oblOtQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-buffer": "^1.1.5"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-regex": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/to-regex/-/to-regex-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-FWtleNAtZ/Ki2qtqej2CXTOayOH9bHDQF+Q48VpWyDXjbYxA4Yz8iDB31zXOBUlOHHKidDbqGVrTUvQMPmBGBw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"define-property": "^2.0.2",
"extend-shallow": "^3.0.2",
"regex-not": "^1.0.2",
"safe-regex": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-regex-range": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/to-regex-range/-/to-regex-range-2.1.1.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-ZZWNfCjUokXXDGXFpZehJIkZqq91BcULFq/Pi7M5i4JnxXdhMKAK682z8bCW3o8Hj1wuuzoKcW3DfVzaP6VuNg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-number": "^3.0.0",
"repeat-string": "^1.6.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-regex/node_modules/extend-shallow": {
"version": "3.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/extend-shallow/-/extend-shallow-3.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-BwY5b5Ql4+qZoefgMj2NUmx+tehVTH/Kf4k1ZEtOHNFcm2wSxMRo992l6X3TIgni2eZVTZ85xMOjF31fwZAj6Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"assign-symbols": "^1.0.0",
"is-extendable": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-regex/node_modules/is-extendable": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-extendable/-/is-extendable-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-arnXMxT1hhoKo9k1LZdmlNyJdDDfy2v0fXjFlmok4+i8ul/6WlbVge9bhM74OpNPQPMGUToDtz+KXa1PneJxOA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"is-plain-object": "^2.0.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-regex/node_modules/is-plain-object": {
"version": "2.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-plain-object/-/is-plain-object-2.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-h5PpgXkWitc38BBMYawTYMWJHFZJVnBquFE57xFpjB8pJFiF6gZ+bU+WyI/yqXiFR5mdLsgYNaPe8uao6Uv9Og==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isobject": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/to-through": {
"version": "2.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/to-through/-/to-through-2.0.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-+QIz37Ly7acM4EMdw2PRN389OneM5+d844tirkGp4dPKzI5OE72V9OsbFp+CIYJDahZ41ZV05hNtcPAQUAm9/Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"through2": "^2.0.3"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/to-through/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/tr46": {
"version": "0.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tr46/-/tr46-0.0.3.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-N3WMsuqV66lT30CrXNbEjx4GEwlow3v6rr4mCcv6prnfwhS01rkgyFdjPNBYd9br7LpXV1+Emh01fHnq2Gdgrw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/tslib": {
"version": "1.14.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tslib/-/tslib-1.14.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Xni35NKzjgMrwevysHTCArtLDpPvye8zV/0E4EyYn43P7/7qvQwPh9BGkHewbMulVntbigmcT7rdX3BNo9wRJg==",
"license": "0BSD"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/type": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "2.7.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/type/-/type-2.7.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-8j+1QmAbPvLZow5Qpi6NCaN8FB60p/6x8/vfNqOk/hC+HuvFZhL4+WfekuhQLiqFZXOgQdrs3B+XxEmCc6b3FQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/typedarray": {
"version": "0.0.6",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/typedarray/-/typedarray-0.0.6.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-/aCDEGatGvZ2BIk+HmLf4ifCJFwvKFNb9/JeZPMulfgFracn9QFcAf5GO8B/mweUjSoblS5In0cWhqpfs/5PQA==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/uglify-js": {
"version": "2.8.29",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/uglify-js/-/uglify-js-2.8.29.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-qLq/4y2pjcU3vhlhseXGGJ7VbFO4pBANu0kwl8VCa9KEI0V8VfZIx2Fy3w01iSTA/pGwKZSmu/+I4etLNDdt5w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-2-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"source-map": "~0.5.1",
"yargs": "~3.10.0"
},
"bin": {
"uglifyjs": "bin/uglifyjs"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.8.0"
},
"optionalDependencies": {
"uglify-to-browserify": "~1.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/uglify-js/node_modules/camelcase": {
"version": "1.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/camelcase/-/camelcase-1.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wzLkDa4K/mzI1OSITC+DUyjgIl/ETNHE9QvYgy6J6Jvqyyz4C0Xfd+lQhb19sX2jMpZV4IssUn0VDVmglV+s4g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/uglify-js/node_modules/cliui": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cliui/-/cliui-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-GIOYRizG+TGoc7Wgc1LiOTLare95R3mzKgoln+Q/lE4ceiYH19gUpl0l0Ffq4lJDEf3FxujMe6IBfOCs7pfqNA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"center-align": "^0.1.1",
"right-align": "^0.1.1",
"wordwrap": "0.0.2"
}
},
"node_modules/uglify-js/node_modules/source-map": {
"version": "0.5.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map/-/source-map-0.5.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LbrmJOMUSdEVxIKvdcJzQC+nQhe8FUZQTXQy6+I75skNgn3OoQ0DZA8YnFa7gp8tqtL3KPf1kmo0R5DoApeSGQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/uglify-js/node_modules/yargs": {
"version": "3.10.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/yargs/-/yargs-3.10.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-QFzUah88GAGy9lyDKGBqZdkYApt63rCXYBGYnEP4xDJPXNqXXnBDACnbrXnViV6jRSqAePwrATi2i8mfYm4L1A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"camelcase": "^1.0.2",
"cliui": "^2.1.0",
"decamelize": "^1.0.0",
"window-size": "0.1.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/uglify-to-browserify": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/uglify-to-browserify/-/uglify-to-browserify-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-vb2s1lYx2xBtUgy+ta+b2J/GLVUR+wmpINwHePmPRhOsIVCG2wDzKJ0n14GslH1BifsqVzSOwQhRaCAsZ/nI4Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"optional": true
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/unc-path-regex": {
"version": "0.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/unc-path-regex/-/unc-path-regex-0.1.2.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-eXL4nmJT7oCpkZsHZUOJo8hcX3GbsiDOa0Qu9F646fi8dT3XuSVopVqAcEiVzSKKH7UoDti23wNX3qGFxcW5Qg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/undertaker": {
"version": "1.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/undertaker/-/undertaker-1.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/RXwi5m/Mu3H6IHQGww3GNt1PNXlbeCuclF2QYR14L/2CHPz3DFZkvB5hZ0N/QUkiXWCACML2jXViIQEQc2MLg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-flatten": "^1.0.1",
"arr-map": "^2.0.0",
"bach": "^1.0.0",
"collection-map": "^1.0.0",
"es6-weak-map": "^2.0.1",
"fast-levenshtein": "^1.0.0",
"last-run": "^1.1.0",
"object.defaults": "^1.0.0",
"object.reduce": "^1.0.0",
"undertaker-registry": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/undertaker-registry": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/undertaker-registry/-/undertaker-registry-1.0.1.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-UR1khWeAjugW3548EfQmL9Z7pGMlBgXteQpr1IZeZBtnkCJQJIJ1Scj0mb9wQaPvUZ9Q17XqW6TIaPchJkyfqw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/undici-types": {
"version": "5.26.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/undici-types/-/undici-types-5.26.5.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-JlCMO+ehdEIKqlFxk6IfVoAUVmgz7cU7zD/h9XZ0qzeosSHmUJVOzSQvvYSYWXkFXC+IfLKSIffhv0sVZup6pA==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/union-value": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/union-value/-/union-value-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-tJfXmxMeWYnczCVs7XAEvIV7ieppALdyepWMkHkwciRpZraG/xwT+s2JN8+pr1+8jCRf80FFzvr+MpQeeoF4Xg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"arr-union": "^3.1.0",
"get-value": "^2.0.6",
"is-extendable": "^0.1.1",
"set-value": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/unique-stream": {
"version": "2.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/unique-stream/-/unique-stream-2.3.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-2nY4TnBE70yoxHkDli7DMazpWiP7xMdCYqU2nBRO0UB+ZpEkGsSija7MvmvnZFUeC+mrgiUfcHSr3LmRFIg4+A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify": "^1.0.1",
"through2-filter": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/universal-user-agent": {
"version": "4.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/universal-user-agent/-/universal-user-agent-4.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LnST3ebHwVL2aNe4mejI9IQh2HfZ1RLo8Io2HugSif8ekzD1TlWpHpColOB/eh8JHMLkGH3Akqf040I+4ylNxg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"os-name": "^3.1.0"
}
},
"node_modules/unset-value": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/unset-value/-/unset-value-1.0.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-PcA2tsuGSF9cnySLHTLSh2qrQiJ70mn+r+Glzxv2TWZblxsxCC52BDlZoPCsz7STd9pN7EZetkWZBAvk4cgZdQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"has-value": "^0.3.1",
"isobject": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/unset-value/node_modules/has-value": {
"version": "0.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-value/-/has-value-0.3.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-gpG936j8/MzaeID5Yif+577c17TxaDmhuyVgSwtnL/q8UUTySg8Mecb+8Cf1otgLoD7DDH75axp86ER7LFsf3Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"get-value": "^2.0.3",
"has-values": "^0.1.4",
"isobject": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/unset-value/node_modules/has-value/node_modules/isobject": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/isobject/-/isobject-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-+OUdGJlgjOBZDfxnDjYYG6zp487z0JGNQq3cYQYg5f5hKR+syHMsaztzGeml/4kGG55CSpKSpWTY+jYGgsHLgA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isarray": "1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/unset-value/node_modules/has-values": {
"version": "0.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/has-values/-/has-values-0.1.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-J8S0cEdWuQbqD9//tlZxiMuMNmxB8PlEwvYwuxsTmR1G5RXUePEX/SJn7aD0GMLieuZYSwNH0cQuJGwnYunXRQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/upath": {
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/upath/-/upath-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-aZwGpamFO61g3OlfT7OQCHqhGnW43ieH9WZeP7QxN/G/jS4jfqUkZxoryvJgVPEcrl5NL/ggHsSmLMHuH64Lhg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=4",
"yarn": "*"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/update-browserslist-db": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-05 10:42:17 +00:00
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/update-browserslist-db/-/update-browserslist-db-1.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-EdRAaAyk2cUE1wOf2DkEhzxqOQvFOoRJFNS6NeyJ01Gp2beMRpBAINjM2iDXE3KCuKhwnvHIQCJm6ThL2Z+HzQ==",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"funding": [
{
"type": "opencollective",
"url": "https://opencollective.com/browserslist"
},
{
"type": "tidelift",
"url": "https://tidelift.com/funding/github/npm/browserslist"
},
{
"type": "github",
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ai"
}
],
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"escalade": "^3.1.2",
"picocolors": "^1.0.1"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"bin": {
"update-browserslist-db": "cli.js"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"browserslist": ">= 4.21.0"
}
},
"node_modules/update-browserslist-db/node_modules/picocolors": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "1.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/picocolors/-/picocolors-1.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-anP1Z8qwhkbmu7MFP5iTt+wQKXgwzf7zTyGlcdzabySa9vd0Xt392U0rVmz9poOaBj0uHJKyyo9/upk0HrEQew==",
"license": "ISC"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/urix": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/urix/-/urix-0.1.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Am1ousAhSLBeB9cG/7k7r2R0zj50uDRlZHPGbazid5s9rlF1F/QKYObEKSIunSjIOkJZqwRRLpvewjEkM7pSqg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"deprecated": "Please see https://github.com/lydell/urix#deprecated",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/url-regex": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/url-regex/-/url-regex-3.2.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-dQ9cJzMou5OKr6ZzfvwJkCq3rC72PNXhqz0v3EIhF4a3Np+ujr100AhUx2cKx5ei3iymoJpJrPB3sVSEMdqAeg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ip-regex": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/use": {
"version": "3.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/use/-/use-3.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-cwESVXlO3url9YWlFW/TA9cshCEhtu7IKJ/p5soJ/gGpj7vbvFrAY/eIioQ6Dw23KjZhYgiIo8HOs1nQ2vr/oQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/util-deprecate": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/util-deprecate/-/util-deprecate-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-EPD5q1uXyFxJpCrLnCc1nHnq3gOa6DZBocAIiI2TaSCA7VCJ1UJDMagCzIkXNsUYfD1daK//LTEQ8xiIbrHtcw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/v8flags": {
"version": "3.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/v8flags/-/v8flags-3.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-mH8etigqMfiGWdeXpaaqGfs6BndypxusHHcv2qSHyZkGEznCd/qAXCWWRzeowtL54147cktFOC4P5y+kl8d8Jg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"homedir-polyfill": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/validate-npm-package-license": {
"version": "3.0.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/validate-npm-package-license/-/validate-npm-package-license-3.0.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-DpKm2Ui/xN7/HQKCtpZxoRWBhZ9Z0kqtygG8XCgNQ8ZlDnxuQmWhj566j8fN4Cu3/JmbhsDo7fcAJq4s9h27Ew==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"spdx-correct": "^3.0.0",
"spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/value-or-function": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/value-or-function/-/value-or-function-3.0.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-jdBB2FrWvQC/pnPtIqcLsMaQgjhdb6B7tk1MMyTKapox+tQZbdRP4uLxu/JY0t7fbfDCUMnuelzEYv5GsxHhdg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl": {
"version": "2.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vinyl/-/vinyl-2.2.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LII3bXRFBZLlezoG5FfZVcXflZgWP/4dCwKtxd5ky9+LOtM4CS3bIRQsmR1KMnMW07jpE8fqR2lcxPZ+8sJIcw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"clone": "^2.1.1",
"clone-buffer": "^1.0.0",
"clone-stats": "^1.0.0",
"cloneable-readable": "^1.0.0",
"remove-trailing-separator": "^1.0.1",
"replace-ext": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-fs": {
"version": "3.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vinyl-fs/-/vinyl-fs-3.0.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-vIu34EkyNyJxmP0jscNzWBSygh7VWhqun6RmqVfXePrOwi9lhvRs//dOaGOTRUQr4tx7/zd26Tk5WeSVZitgng==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"fs-mkdirp-stream": "^1.0.0",
"glob-stream": "^6.1.0",
"graceful-fs": "^4.0.0",
"is-valid-glob": "^1.0.0",
"lazystream": "^1.0.0",
"lead": "^1.0.0",
"object.assign": "^4.0.4",
"pumpify": "^1.3.5",
"readable-stream": "^2.3.3",
"remove-bom-buffer": "^3.0.0",
"remove-bom-stream": "^1.2.0",
"resolve-options": "^1.1.0",
"through2": "^2.0.0",
"to-through": "^2.0.0",
"value-or-function": "^3.0.0",
"vinyl": "^2.0.0",
"vinyl-sourcemap": "^1.1.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-fs/node_modules/through2": {
"version": "2.0.5",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through2/-/through2-2.0.5.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-/mrRod8xqpA+IHSLyGCQ2s8SPHiCDEeQJSep1jqLYeEUClOFG2Qsh+4FU6G9VeqpZnGW/Su8LQGc4YKni5rYSQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"readable-stream": "~2.3.6",
"xtend": "~4.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-sourcemap": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vinyl-sourcemap/-/vinyl-sourcemap-1.1.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-NiibMgt6VJGJmyw7vtzhctDcfKch4e4n9TBeoWlirb7FMg9/1Ov9k+A5ZRAtywBpRPiyECvQRQllYM8dECegVA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"append-buffer": "^1.0.2",
"convert-source-map": "^1.5.0",
"graceful-fs": "^4.1.6",
"normalize-path": "^2.1.1",
"now-and-later": "^2.0.0",
"remove-bom-buffer": "^3.0.0",
"vinyl": "^2.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.10"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-sourcemap/node_modules/normalize-path": {
"version": "2.1.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-path/-/normalize-path-2.1.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-3pKJwH184Xo/lnH6oyP1q2pMd7HcypqqmRs91/6/i2CGtWwIKGCkOOMTm/zXbgTEWHw1uNpNi/igc3ePOYHb6w==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"remove-trailing-separator": "^1.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-sourcemaps-apply": {
"version": "0.2.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/vinyl-sourcemaps-apply/-/vinyl-sourcemaps-apply-0.2.1.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-+oDh3KYZBoZC8hfocrbrxbLUeaYtQK7J5WU5Br9VqWqmCll3tFJqKp97GC9GmMsVIL0qnx2DgEDVxdo5EZ5sSw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"source-map": "^0.5.1"
}
},
"node_modules/vinyl-sourcemaps-apply/node_modules/source-map": {
"version": "0.5.7",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map/-/source-map-0.5.7.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LbrmJOMUSdEVxIKvdcJzQC+nQhe8FUZQTXQy6+I75skNgn3OoQ0DZA8YnFa7gp8tqtL3KPf1kmo0R5DoApeSGQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/webidl-conversions": {
"version": "3.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/webidl-conversions/-/webidl-conversions-3.0.1.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-2JAn3z8AR6rjK8Sm8orRC0h/bcl/DqL7tRPdGZ4I1CjdF+EaMLmYxBHyXuKL849eucPFhvBoxMsflfOb8kxaeQ==",
"license": "BSD-2-Clause"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/whatwg-url": {
"version": "5.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/whatwg-url/-/whatwg-url-5.0.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-saE57nupxk6v3HY35+jzBwYa0rKSy0XR8JSxZPwgLr7ys0IBzhGviA1/TUGJLmSVqs8pb9AnvICXEuOHLprYTw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"tr46": "~0.0.3",
"webidl-conversions": "^3.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/when": {
"version": "3.7.8",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/when/-/when-3.7.8.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-5cZ7mecD3eYcMiCH4wtRPA5iFJZ50BJYDfckI5RRpQiktMiYTcn0ccLTZOvcbBume+1304fQztxeNzNS9Gvrnw==",
"license": "MIT"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/which": {
"version": "1.3.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/which/-/which-1.3.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-HxJdYWq1MTIQbJ3nw0cqssHoTNU267KlrDuGZ1WYlxDStUtKUhOaJmh112/TZmHxxUfuJqPXSOm7tDyas0OSIQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "ISC",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"isexe": "^2.0.0"
},
"bin": {
"which": "bin/which"
}
},
"node_modules/which-module": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/which-module/-/which-module-1.0.0.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-F6+WgncZi/mJDrammbTuHe1q0R5hOXv/mBaiNA2TCNT/LTHusX0V+CJnj9XT8ki5ln2UZyyddDgHfCzyrOH7MQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/window-size": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/window-size/-/window-size-0.1.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-1pTPQDKTdd61ozlKGNCjhNRd+KPmgLSGa3mZTHoOliaGcESD8G1PXhh7c1fgiPjVbNVfgy2Faw4BI8/m0cC8Mg==",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.8.0"
}
},
"node_modules/windows-release": {
"version": "3.3.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/windows-release/-/windows-release-3.3.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-OSOGH1QYiW5yVor9TtmXKQvt2vjQqbYS+DqmsZw+r7xDwLXEeT3JGW0ZppFmHx4diyXmxt238KFR3N9jzevBRg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"execa": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=6"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
}
},
"node_modules/wordwrap": {
"version": "0.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wordwrap/-/wordwrap-0.0.2.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-xSBsCeh+g+dinoBv3GAOWM4LcVVO68wLXRanibtBSdUvkGWQRGeE9P7IwU9EmDDi4jA6L44lz15CGMwdw9N5+Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT/X11",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.4.0"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wrap-ansi/-/wrap-ansi-2.1.0.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-vAaEaDM946gbNpH5pLVNR+vX2ht6n0Bt3GXwVB1AuAqZosOvHNF3P7wDnh8KLkSqgUh0uh77le7Owgoz+Z9XBw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"string-width": "^1.0.1",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs": {
"name": "wrap-ansi",
"version": "7.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wrap-ansi/-/wrap-ansi-7.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-YVGIj2kamLSTxw6NsZjoBxfSwsn0ycdesmc4p+Q21c5zPuZ1pl+NfxVdxPtdHvmNVOQ6XSYG4AUtyt/Fi7D16Q==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-styles": "^4.0.0",
"string-width": "^4.1.0",
"strip-ansi": "^6.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=10"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/wrap-ansi?sponsor=1"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/ansi-regex": {
"version": "5.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-5.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-quJQXlTSUGL2LH9SUXo8VwsY4soanhgo6LNSm84E1LBcE8s3O0wpdiRzyR9z/ZZJMlMWv37qOOb9pdJlMUEKFQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/ansi-styles": {
"version": "4.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-styles/-/ansi-styles-4.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zbB9rCJAT1rbjiVDb2hqKFHNYLxgtk8NURxZ3IZwD3F6NtxbXZQCnnSi1Lkx+IDohdPlFp222wVALIheZJQSEg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-convert": "^2.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
},
"funding": {
"url": "https://github.com/chalk/ansi-styles?sponsor=1"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/color-convert": {
"version": "2.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/color-convert/-/color-convert-2.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-RRECPsj7iu/xb5oKYcsFHSppFNnsj/52OVTRKb4zP5onXwVF3zVmmToNcOfGC+CRDpfK/U584fMg38ZHCaElKQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"color-name": "~1.1.4"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=7.0.0"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/color-name": {
"version": "1.1.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/color-name/-/color-name-1.1.4.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-dOy+3AuW3a2wNbZHIuMZpTcgjGuLU/uBL/ubcZF9OXbDo8ff4O8yVp5Bf0efS8uEoYo5q4Fx7dY9OgQGXgAsQA==",
"license": "MIT"
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "3.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-3.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-zymm5+u+sCsSWyD9qNaejV3DFvhCKclKdizYaJUuHA83RLjb7nSuGnddCHGv0hk+KY7BMAlsWeK4Ueg6EV6XQg==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "4.2.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-4.2.3.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wKyQRQpjJ0sIp62ErSZdGsjMJWsap5oRNihHhu6G7JVO/9jIB6UyevL+tXuOqrng8j/cxKTWyWUwvSTriiZz/g==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"emoji-regex": "^8.0.0",
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^3.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^6.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi-cjs/node_modules/strip-ansi": {
"version": "6.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/strip-ansi/-/strip-ansi-6.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-Y38VPSHcqkFrCpFnQ9vuSXmquuv5oXOKpGeT6aGrr3o3Gc9AlVa6JBfUSOCnbxGGZF+/0ooI7KrPuUSztUdU5A==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"ansi-regex": "^5.0.1"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
}
},
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"node_modules/wrap-ansi/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1pqUqRjkhPJ9miNq9SwMfdvi6lBJcd6eFxvfaivQhaH3SgisfiuudvFntdKOmxuee/77l+FPjKrQjWvmPjWrRw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"number-is-nan": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/wrap-ansi/node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0XsVpQLnVCXHJfyEs8tC0zpTVIr5PKKsQtkT29IwupnPTjtPmQ3xT/4yCREF9hYkV/3M3kzcUTSAZT6a6h81tw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"code-point-at": "^1.0.0",
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^1.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/wrappy": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wrappy/-/wrappy-1.0.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-l4Sp/DRseor9wL6EvV2+TuQn63dMkPjZ/sp9XkghTEbV9KlPS1xUsZ3u7/IQO4wxtcFB4bgpQPRcR3QCvezPcQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/wrench-sui": {
"version": "0.0.3",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/wrench-sui/-/wrench-sui-0.0.3.tgz",
Regenerate fomantic lockfile and build it with our browserslist (#29560) 1. Make fomantic build use [our browserslist](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/e3524c63d6d42865ea8288af89b372544d35474b/package.json#L99). I found no other way than to sed-replace into it's js, the normal browserlist config files do not work. The effect of this change is the removal of some uneeded CSS vendor prefixes. 2. Regenerate `web_src/fomantic/package-lock.json`, this might shut up some security scanners. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> (cherry picked from commit da3b7f5039158faae4b617ca878061f8a4f3e489)
2024-03-04 20:24:12 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-Y6qzMpcMG9akKnIdUsKzEF/Ht0KQJBP8ETkZj3FcGe93NC71e940WZUP1y+j+hc8Ecx9TyX0GvAWC4yymA88yA==",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.1.97"
}
},
"node_modules/xtend": {
"version": "4.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/xtend/-/xtend-4.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-LKYU1iAXJXUgAXn9URjiu+MWhyUXHsvfp7mcuYm9dSUKK0/CjtrUwFAxD82/mCWbtLsGjFIad0wIsod4zrTAEQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.4"
}
},
"node_modules/y18n": {
"version": "3.2.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/y18n/-/y18n-3.2.2.tgz",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"integrity": "sha512-uGZHXkHnhF0XeeAPgnKfPv1bgKAYyVvmNL1xlKsPYZPaIHxGti2hHqvOCQv71XMsLxu1QjergkqogUnms5D3YQ==",
"license": "ISC"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
},
"node_modules/yamljs": {
"version": "0.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/yamljs/-/yamljs-0.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-C/FsVVhht4iPQYXOInoxUM/1ELSf9EsgKH34FofQOp6hwCPrW4vG4w5++TED3xRUo8gD7l0P1J1dLlDYzODsTQ==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"argparse": "^1.0.7",
"glob": "^7.0.5"
},
"bin": {
"json2yaml": "bin/json2yaml",
"yaml2json": "bin/yaml2json"
}
},
"node_modules/yargs": {
"version": "7.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/yargs/-/yargs-7.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ZEjj/dQYQy0Zx0lgLMLR8QuaqTihnxirir7EwUHp1Axq4e3+k8jXU5K0VLbNvedv1f4EWtBonDIZm0NUr+jCcA==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"camelcase": "^3.0.0",
"cliui": "^3.2.0",
"decamelize": "^1.1.1",
"get-caller-file": "^1.0.1",
"os-locale": "^1.4.0",
"read-pkg-up": "^1.0.1",
"require-directory": "^2.1.1",
"require-main-filename": "^1.0.1",
"set-blocking": "^2.0.0",
"string-width": "^1.0.2",
"which-module": "^1.0.0",
"y18n": "^3.2.1",
"yargs-parser": "^5.0.1"
}
},
"node_modules/yargs-parser": {
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"version": "5.0.1",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/yargs-parser/-/yargs-parser-5.0.1.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-wpav5XYiddjXxirPoCTUPbqM0PXvJ9hiBMvuJgInvo4/lAOTZzUprArw17q2O1P2+GHhbBr18/iQwjL5Z9BqfA==",
"license": "ISC",
"dependencies": {
"camelcase": "^3.0.0",
"object.assign": "^4.1.0"
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
}
},
"node_modules/yargs/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-fullwidth-code-point/-/is-fullwidth-code-point-1.0.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-1pqUqRjkhPJ9miNq9SwMfdvi6lBJcd6eFxvfaivQhaH3SgisfiuudvFntdKOmxuee/77l+FPjKrQjWvmPjWrRw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"number-is-nan": "^1.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
},
"node_modules/yargs/node_modules/string-width": {
"version": "1.0.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-1.0.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-0XsVpQLnVCXHJfyEs8tC0zpTVIr5PKKsQtkT29IwupnPTjtPmQ3xT/4yCREF9hYkV/3M3kzcUTSAZT6a6h81tw==",
Lock file maintenance
2024-07-01 00:03:45 +00:00
"license": "MIT",
Revert overflow: overlay (revert #21850) (#25231) It causes not only one issue like #25221 (the footer width was also affected by that change and was fixed some time ago) The problem of "overflow: overlay" (#21850) is: * It's not widely supported and is non-standard https://caniuse.com/css-overflow-overlay * It's not widely tested in Gitea (some standard layout like `ui container + ui grid` may break it). * The benefit seems smaller than the problems it brings. So, I think it is good to revert it. ---- Let's leave enough time for testing and reviewing. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-13 19:17:14 +00:00
"dependencies": {
"code-point-at": "^1.0.0",
"is-fullwidth-code-point": "^1.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "^3.0.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=0.10.0"
}
}
}
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink