fedi/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-24 06:06:24 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
forgejo/services/webhook/main_test.go

28 lines
632 B
Go
Raw Normal View History

Move webhook to a standalone package under modules (#8747) * Move webhook to a standalone package under modules * fix test * fix comments
2019-11-01 22:51:22 +00:00
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840) Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification. Fix #16132 Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
Move webhook to a standalone package under modules (#8747) * Move webhook to a standalone package under modules * fix test * fix comments
2019-11-01 22:51:22 +00:00
package webhook
import (
"testing"
Decouple unit test code from business code (#17623)
2021-11-12 14:36:47 +00:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926) _This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting some parts, see below_ ## Context In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication. The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a given token. For instance: - Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872) - TeamCity #18667 - Gitea instances #20267 - SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this is my actual personal need :) ## Proposed solution Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307). This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872. As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple `Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and `Basic` switches): ![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png) The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase justifying otherwise. ## Questions - What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind - ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new file, or is there a command for that?~~ - ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~ ## Done as well: - add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the `Authorization` logic there _Closes #19872_ Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 18:23:20 +00:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/hostmatcher"
Use queue instead of memory queue in webhook send service (#19390)
2022-04-25 18:03:01 +00:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
Add missing `X-Total-Count` and fix some related bugs (#17968) * Add missing `X-Total-Count` and fix some related bugs Adds `X-Total-Count` header to APIs that return a list but doesn't have it yet. Fixed bugs: * not returned after reporting error (https://github.com/qwerty287/gitea/blob/39eb82446c6fe5da3d79124e1f701f3795625b69/routers/api/v1/user/star.go#L70) * crash with index out of bounds, API issue/issueSubscriptions I also found various endpoints that return lists but do not apply/support pagination yet: ``` /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/reactions /repos/{owner}/{repo}/branch_protections /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents /repos/{owner}/{repo}/hooks/git /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issue_templates /repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/{id}/assets /repos/{owner}/{repo}/reviewers /repos/{owner}/{repo}/teams /user/emails /users/{username}/heatmap ``` If this is not expected, an new issue should be opened. Closes #13043 * fmt * Update routers/api/v1/repo/issue_subscription.go Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> * Use FindAndCount Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2021-12-15 05:39:34 +00:00
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948) Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/actions"
tests: improve actvititypub integration test code - Make use of `test.MockVariableValue` to override variables for the duration of the test. - Don't needlessly call `onGiteaRun`, its only needed when a HTTP server needs to be called by the code. - When `onGiteaRun` is used, make use of the passed parameters, such as the passed `*testing.T` variable and `*url.URL` (this also avoids needing to serve the routers in the test code again). - Use `(*url.URL).JoinPath` to craft new URLs. - Don't override `setting.AppURL` & `setting.Database.LogSQL` when its does not affect the test. - Add empty fixture files for `FederatedUser` & `FederationHost` so they are truncated and do not persist between tests.
2024-11-01 20:02:52 +00:00
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/forgefed"
Move webhook to a standalone package under modules (#8747) * Move webhook to a standalone package under modules * fix test * fix comments
2019-11-01 22:51:22 +00:00
)
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926) _This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting some parts, see below_ ## Context In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication. The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a given token. For instance: - Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872) - TeamCity #18667 - Gitea instances #20267 - SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this is my actual personal need :) ## Proposed solution Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307). This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872. As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple `Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and `Basic` switches): ![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png) The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase justifying otherwise. ## Questions - What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind - ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new file, or is there a command for that?~~ - ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~ ## Done as well: - add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the `Authorization` logic there _Closes #19872_ Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 18:23:20 +00:00
// for tests, allow only loopback IPs
setting.Webhook.AllowedHostList = hostmatcher.MatchBuiltinLoopback
Use a struct as test options (#19393) * Use a struct as test options * Fix name * Fix test
2022-04-14 13:58:21 +00:00
unittest.MainTest(m, &unittest.TestOptions{
Merge setting.InitXXX into one function with options (#24389) This PR will merge 3 Init functions on setting packages as 1 and introduce an options struct.
2023-05-04 03:55:35 +00:00
SetUp: func() error {
setting.LoadQueueSettings()
return Init()
},
Use a struct as test options (#19393) * Use a struct as test options * Fix name * Fix test
2022-04-14 13:58:21 +00:00
})
Move webhook to a standalone package under modules (#8747) * Move webhook to a standalone package under modules * fix test * fix comments
2019-11-01 22:51:22 +00:00
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink