fedi/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-01 21:11:12 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
forgejo/modules/actions/workflows_test.go

164 lines
6.4 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package actions
import (
"testing"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
webhook_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/webhook"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535) go-require lint is ignored for now Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
)
func TestDetectMatched(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc string
commit *git.Commit
triggeredEvent webhook_module.HookEventType
payload api.Payloader
yamlOn string
expected bool
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
}{
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventCreate(create) matches GithubEventCreate(create)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventCreate,
payload: nil,
yamlOn: "on: create",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventIssues(issues) `opened` action matches GithubEventIssues(issues)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventIssues,
payload: &api.IssuePayload{Action: api.HookIssueOpened},
yamlOn: "on: issues",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventIssueComment(issue_comment) `created` action matches GithubEventIssueComment(issue_comment)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventIssueComment,
payload: &api.IssueCommentPayload{Action: api.HookIssueCommentCreated},
yamlOn: "on:\n issue_comment:\n types: [created]",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
{
desc: "HookEventIssues(issues) `milestoned` action matches GithubEventIssues(issues)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventIssues,
payload: &api.IssuePayload{Action: api.HookIssueMilestoned},
yamlOn: "on: issues",
expected: true,
},
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequestSync(pull_request_sync) matches GithubEventPullRequest(pull_request)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequestSync,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueSynchronized},
yamlOn: "on: pull_request",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequest(pull_request) `label_updated` action doesn't match GithubEventPullRequest(pull_request) with no activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequest,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueLabelUpdated},
yamlOn: "on: pull_request",
expected: false,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
Fix activity type match in `matchPullRequestEvent` (#25746) Fix #25736 Caused by #24048 Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when `types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow only specifies filters but no `types` like this: ``` on: pull_request: branches: [main] ``` the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of `[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this case. Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-07 16:30:07 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequest(pull_request) `closed` action doesn't match GithubEventPullRequest(pull_request) with no activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequest,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueClosed},
yamlOn: "on: pull_request",
expected: false,
Fix activity type match in `matchPullRequestEvent` (#25746) Fix #25736 Caused by #24048 Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when `types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow only specifies filters but no `types` like this: ``` on: pull_request: branches: [main] ``` the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of `[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this case. Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-07 16:30:07 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequest(pull_request) `closed` action doesn't match GithubEventPullRequest(pull_request) with branches",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequest,
Fix activity type match in `matchPullRequestEvent` (#25746) Fix #25736 Caused by #24048 Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when `types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow only specifies filters but no `types` like this: ``` on: pull_request: branches: [main] ``` the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of `[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this case. Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-07 16:30:07 +00:00
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{
Action: api.HookIssueClosed,
PullRequest: &api.PullRequest{
Base: &api.PRBranchInfo{},
},
},
yamlOn: "on:\n pull_request:\n branches: [main]",
expected: false,
},
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequest(pull_request) `label_updated` action matches GithubEventPullRequest(pull_request) with `label` activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequest,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueLabelUpdated},
yamlOn: "on:\n pull_request:\n types: [labeled]",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequestReviewComment(pull_request_review_comment) matches GithubEventPullRequestReviewComment(pull_request_review_comment)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequestReviewComment,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueReviewed},
yamlOn: "on:\n pull_request_review_comment:\n types: [created]",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventPullRequestReviewRejected(pull_request_review_rejected) doesn't match GithubEventPullRequestReview(pull_request_review) with `dismissed` activity type (we don't support `dismissed` at present)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPullRequestReviewRejected,
payload: &api.PullRequestPayload{Action: api.HookIssueReviewed},
yamlOn: "on:\n pull_request_review:\n types: [dismissed]",
expected: false,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventRelease(release) `published` action matches GithubEventRelease(release) with `published` activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventRelease,
payload: &api.ReleasePayload{Action: api.HookReleasePublished},
yamlOn: "on:\n release:\n types: [published]",
expected: true,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventRelease(updated) `updated` action matches GithubEventRelease(edited) with `edited` activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventRelease,
payload: &api.ReleasePayload{Action: api.HookReleaseUpdated},
yamlOn: "on:\n release:\n types: [edited]",
expected: true,
},
{
desc: "HookEventPackage(package) `created` action doesn't match GithubEventRegistryPackage(registry_package) with `updated` activity type",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventPackage,
payload: &api.PackagePayload{Action: api.HookPackageCreated},
yamlOn: "on:\n registry_package:\n types: [updated]",
expected: false,
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
},
Support triggering workflows by wiki related events (#24119) This PR is to support triggering workflows by wiki related events like creating, editing or deleting wiki pages. In GitHub, this event is called [gollum](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#gollum)
2023-04-17 17:49:47 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventWiki(wiki) matches GithubEventGollum(gollum)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventWiki,
payload: nil,
yamlOn: "on: gollum",
expected: true,
Support triggering workflows by wiki related events (#24119) This PR is to support triggering workflows by wiki related events like creating, editing or deleting wiki pages. In GitHub, this event is called [gollum](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#gollum)
2023-04-17 17:49:47 +00:00
},
Fix schedule tasks bugs (#28691) Fix #28157 This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule. ## The Changes - Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to service layer - Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled or global disabled. - Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
2024-01-12 21:50:38 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventSchedule(schedule) matches GithubEventSchedule(schedule)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventSchedule,
payload: nil,
yamlOn: "on: schedule",
expected: true,
Fix schedule tasks bugs (#28691) Fix #28157 This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule. ## The Changes - Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to service layer - Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled or global disabled. - Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
2024-01-12 21:50:38 +00:00
},
Add support for workflow_dispatch (#3334) Closes #2797 I'm aware of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28163 exists, but since I had it laying around on my drive and collecting dust, I might as well open a PR for it if anyone wants the feature a bit sooner than waiting for upstream to release it or to be a forgejo "native" implementation. This PR Contains: - Support for the `workflow_dispatch` trigger - Inputs: boolean, string, number, choice Things still to be done: - [x] API Endpoint `/api/v1/<org>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<workflow id>/dispatches` - ~~Fixing some UI bugs I had no time figuring out, like why dropdown/choice inputs's menu's behave weirdly~~ Unrelated visual bug with dropdowns inside dropdowns - [x] Fix bug where opening the branch selection submits the form - [x] Limit on inputs to render/process Things not in this PR: - Inputs: environment (First need support for environments in forgejo) Things needed to test this: - A patch for https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner to actually consider the inputs inside the workflow. ~~One possible patch can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/Mai-Lapyst/runner/src/branch/support-workflow-inputs~~ [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199) ![image](/attachments/2db50c9e-898f-41cb-b698-43edeefd2573) ## Testing - Checkout PR - Setup new development runner with [this PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199) - Create a repo with a workflow (see below) - Go to the actions tab, select the workflow and see the notice as in the screenshot above - Use the button + dropdown to run the workflow - Try also running it via the api using the `` endpoint - ... - Profit! <details> <summary>Example workflow</summary> ```yaml on: workflow_dispatch: inputs: logLevel: description: 'Log Level' required: true default: 'warning' type: choice options: - info - warning - debug tags: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: false type: boolean boolean_default_true: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: true type: boolean default: true boolean_default_false: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: false type: boolean default: false number1_default: description: 'Number w. default' default: '100' type: number number2: description: 'Number w/o. default' type: number string1_default: description: 'String w. default' default: 'Hello world' type: string string2: description: 'String w/o. default' required: true type: string jobs: test: runs-on: docker steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: whoami - run: cat /etc/issue - run: uname -a - run: date - run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }} - run: echo ${{ inputs.tags }} - env: GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }} run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT" - run: echo "abc" ``` </details> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3334 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-06-28 05:17:11 +00:00
{
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
desc: "HookEventWorkflowDispatch(workflow_dispatch) matches GithubEventWorkflowDispatch(workflow_dispatch)",
triggeredEvent: webhook_module.HookEventWorkflowDispatch,
payload: nil,
yamlOn: "on: workflow_dispatch",
expected: true,
Add support for workflow_dispatch (#3334) Closes #2797 I'm aware of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28163 exists, but since I had it laying around on my drive and collecting dust, I might as well open a PR for it if anyone wants the feature a bit sooner than waiting for upstream to release it or to be a forgejo "native" implementation. This PR Contains: - Support for the `workflow_dispatch` trigger - Inputs: boolean, string, number, choice Things still to be done: - [x] API Endpoint `/api/v1/<org>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<workflow id>/dispatches` - ~~Fixing some UI bugs I had no time figuring out, like why dropdown/choice inputs's menu's behave weirdly~~ Unrelated visual bug with dropdowns inside dropdowns - [x] Fix bug where opening the branch selection submits the form - [x] Limit on inputs to render/process Things not in this PR: - Inputs: environment (First need support for environments in forgejo) Things needed to test this: - A patch for https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner to actually consider the inputs inside the workflow. ~~One possible patch can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/Mai-Lapyst/runner/src/branch/support-workflow-inputs~~ [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199) ![image](/attachments/2db50c9e-898f-41cb-b698-43edeefd2573) ## Testing - Checkout PR - Setup new development runner with [this PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199) - Create a repo with a workflow (see below) - Go to the actions tab, select the workflow and see the notice as in the screenshot above - Use the button + dropdown to run the workflow - Try also running it via the api using the `` endpoint - ... - Profit! <details> <summary>Example workflow</summary> ```yaml on: workflow_dispatch: inputs: logLevel: description: 'Log Level' required: true default: 'warning' type: choice options: - info - warning - debug tags: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: false type: boolean boolean_default_true: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: true type: boolean default: true boolean_default_false: description: 'Test scenario tags' required: false type: boolean default: false number1_default: description: 'Number w. default' default: '100' type: number number2: description: 'Number w/o. default' type: number string1_default: description: 'String w. default' default: 'Hello world' type: string string2: description: 'String w/o. default' required: true type: string jobs: test: runs-on: docker steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: whoami - run: cat /etc/issue - run: uname -a - run: date - run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }} - run: echo ${{ inputs.tags }} - env: GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }} run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT" - run: echo "abc" ``` </details> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3334 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-06-28 05:17:11 +00:00
},
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(tc.desc, func(t *testing.T) {
evts, err := GetEventsFromContent([]byte(tc.yamlOn))
Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535) go-require lint is ignored for now Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
require.NoError(t, err)
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
assert.Len(t, evts, 1)
test: add more workflow event coverage
2024-07-30 22:15:22 +00:00
assert.Equal(t, tc.expected, detectMatched(nil, tc.commit, tc.triggeredEvent, tc.payload, evts[0]))
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048) Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as `issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly because we don't check the activity types. For example, `pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a `pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use `pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to improve the match logic. - [x] [`issues` ](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues) - [x] [`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment) - [x] [`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request) - [x] [`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review) - [x] [`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment) - [x] [`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release) - [x] [`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 16:16:47 +00:00
})
}
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink